Algorithmic Warfare: Taking Stock of a Research Programme

References

• Afina, Yasmin. 2022. “Intelligence is Dead: Long Live Artificial Intelligence”. Chatham House. July 14. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2022/07/intelligence-dead-long-live-artificial-intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, Jürgen, and Frank Sauer. 2017. “Autonomous Weapon Systems and Strategic Stability.” Survival 59 (5): 117–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1375263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwardt, Christian, and Niklas Schörnig. 2021. “A Necessary Step Back? Recovering the Security Perspective in the Debate on Lethal Autonomy.” Zeitschrift Für Friedens- Und Konfliktforschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42597-021-00067-z.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, Louise. 2009. “Algorithmic War: Everyday Geographies of the War on Terror.” Antipode 41 (1): 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00655.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoore, Louise, and Rita Raley. 2017. “Securing with Algorithms: Knowledge, Decision, Sovereignty.” Security Dialogue 48 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010616680753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoroso, Daniele, and Guglielmo Tamburrini. 2021. “In Search of the ‘Human Element’: International Debates on Regulating Autonomous Weapons Systems.” The International Spectator 56 (1): 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2020.1864995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Kenneth, Daniel Reisner, and Matthew Waxman. 2014. “Adapting the Law of Armed Conflict to Autonomous Weapon Systems.” International Law Studies 90:386–411.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Kenneth, and Matthew C. Waxman. 2013. “Law and Ethics for Autonomous Weapon Systems: Why a Ban Won’t Work and How the Laws of War Can.” In The Hoover Institution Jean Perkins Task Force on National Security & Law Essay Series. Stanford University. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2250126.
   Google Scholar
• Arkin, Ronald. 2018. “Lethal Autonomous Systems and the Plight of the Non-Combatant.” AISB Quarterly 137:317–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51466-6_15.
   Google Scholar
• Asaro, Peter. 2012. “On Banning Autonomous Weapon Systems: Human Rights, Automation, and the Dehumanization of Lethal Decision-Making.” International Review of the Red Cross 94 (886): 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaro, Peter. 2016. “Jus Nascendi. Robotic Weapons and the Martens Clause.” In Robot Law, edited by Michael A. Froomkin, Ryan Calo, and Ian Kerr, 367–386. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Asaro, Peter. 2019a. “Algorithms of Violence: Critical Social Perspectives on Autonomous Weapons.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 86 (2): 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2019.0026
   Google Scholar
• Asaro, Peter. 2019b. “What is an ‘Artificial Intelligence Arms Race’ Anyway?” I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 15 (1–2): 45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Asaro, Peter. 2020. “Autonomous Weapons and the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.” In Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, edited by Matthew S. Liao, 212–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bareis, Jascha, and Christian Katzenbach. 2022. “Talking AI Into being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and their Performative Politics.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 47 (5): 855–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211030007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellanova, Rocco, Kristina Irion, Katja Lindskov Jacobsen, Francesco Ragazzi, Rune Saugmann, and Lucy Suchman. 2021. “Toward a Critique of Algorithmic Violence.” International Political Sociology 15 (1): 121–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Medford, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuta, Nehal, Susanne Beck, Robin Geiss, Hin-Yan Liu, and Claus Kress. 2016. Autonomous Weapons Systems: Law, Ethics, Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biegon, Rubrick, Vladimir Rauta, and Tom F. A. Watts. 2021. “Remote Warfare – Buzzword or Buzzkill?” Defence Studies 21 (4): 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2021.1994396.
   Google Scholar
• Biegon, Rubrick, and Tom F. A. Watts. 2022. “Remote Warfare and the Retooling of American Primacy.” Geopolitics 27 (3): 948–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1850442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbacher, Dieter. 2016. “Are Autonomous Weapons Systems a Threat to Human Dignity?” In Autonomous Weapons Systems: Law, Ethics, Policy, edited by Nehal Bhuta, Susanne Beck, Robin Geiss, Hin-Yan Liu, and Claus Kress, 105–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bo, Marta, Laura Bruun, and Vincent Boulanin. 2022. Retaining Human Responsibility in the Development and Use of Autonomous Weapon Systems: On Accountability for Violations of International Humanitarian Law Involving AWS. Stockholm: SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Bode, Ingvild, and Hendrik Huelss. 2018. “Autonomous Weapons Systems and Changing Norms in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 44 (3): 393–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, Ingvild, and Hendrik Huelss. 2021. “The Future of Remote Warfare? Artificial Intelligence, Weapons Systems, and Human Control.” In Remote Warfare. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Alasdair McKay, Abigail Watson, and Megan Karlshøj-Pedersen, 218–233. Bristol: E-International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, Ingvild, and Hendrik Huelss. 2022. Autonomous Weapon Systems and International Norms. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, Ingvild, Hendrik Huelss, Anna Nadibaidze, Guangyu Qiao-Franco, and Tom F.A. Watts. 2023. “Prospects for the Global Governance of Autonomous Weapons: Comparing Chinese, Russian, and US Practices.” Ethics and Information Technology 25 (1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09678-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, Ingvild, and Tom F.A. Watts. 2021. Meaning-Less Human Control: Lessons from Air Defence Systems for Lethal Autonomous Weapons. Oxford: Drone Wars UK & Center for War Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, Ingvild, and Tom Watts. 2023. ‘Loitering Munitions and Unpredictability: Autonomy in Weapon Systems and Challenges to Human Control’. Odense: SDU Center for War Studies, Royal Holloway Centre for International Security.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanin, Vincent. 2016. Mapping the Innovation Ecosystem Driving the Advance of Autonomy in Weapon Systems. Stockholm: SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Boulanin, Vincent, Lora Saalman, Petr Topychkanov, Fei Su, and Moa Peldan Carlsson. 2020. Artificial Intelligence, Strategic Stability and Nuclear Risk. Stockholm: SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Boulanin, Vincent, and Maaike Verbruggen. 2017. Mapping the Development of Autonomy in Weapons Systems. Stockholm: SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Boutin, B. 2023. “State Responsibility in Relation to Military Applications of Artificial Intelligence.” Leiden Journal of International Law 36 (1): 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156522000607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, Maya. 2017. Defending the Boundary: Constraints and Requirements on the Use of Autonomous Weapon Systems Under International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law. Geneva: The Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Ben, and Taylor Miller. 2017. Machine Learning for Policymakers: What it is and why it Matters. Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center of Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry. 2010. “America in Space: The International Relations of Star Trek and Battlestar Galactica.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39 (1): 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810371016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Charli. 2016. “Rethinking the Political / -Science- / Fiction Nexus: Global Policy Making and the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (1): 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592715003229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrozza, Ilaria, Nicholas Marsh, and Gregory M. Reichberg. 2022. Dual-Use AI Technology in China, the US and the EU. Oslo: PRIO (Peace Research Institute Oslo).
   Google Scholar
• Cave, Stephen, and Kanta Dihal. 2019. “Hopes and Fears for Intelligent Machines in Fiction and Reality.” Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (2): 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0020-9.
   Google Scholar
• Cave, Stephen, and Kanta Dihal, eds. 2023. Imagining AI: How the World Sees Intelligent Machines. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cave, Stephen, Kanta Dihal, and Sarah Dillon. 2020. “Introduction: Imagining AI.” In AI Narratives: A History of Imaginative Thinking about Intelligent Machines, edited by Stephen Cave, Kanta Dihal, and Sarah Dillon, 1–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, Katherine. 2020. Unmanning: How Humans, Machines, and Media Perform Drone Warfare. War Culture. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng Hong, Makoto, and Choon Kuen Hui. 2019. “Towards a Digital Government: Reflections on Automated Decision-Making and the Principles of Administrative Justice.” Singapore Academy of Law Journal 31 (2): 875–906.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, Christopher. 2018. “Ethics, Drones, and Killer Robots.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory, edited by Chris Brown and Robyn Eckersley, 247–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crootof, Rebecca. 2015. “The Killer Robots are Here: Legal and Policy Implications.” Cardozo Law Review 36 (5): 1837–1916.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, M. L. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Warfare.” In Artificial Intelligence and International Affairs: Disruption Anticipated, edited by Chatham House, 7–18. London: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). 2018. “AI Next Campaign.” https://www.darpa.mil/work-with-us/ai-next-campaign.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin, Simon, and Christopher Markou. 2020. Is Law Computable? Critical Perspectives on Law and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, Carlo, and Daniel Lambach. 2022. ““(K)ein ‘AI Arms Race’? Technologieführerschaft im Verhältnis der Großmächte.” Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik 15 (2-3): 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12399-022-00915-7.
   Google Scholar
• Dignum, Virginia. 2019. Responsible Artificial Intelligence. How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, Bonnie. 2018. “Heed the Call: A Moral and Legal Imperative to Ban Killer Robots.” Human Rights Watch. August 21. https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/08/21/heed-call/moral-and-legal-imperative-ban-killer-robots.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, Daniel W. 2019. “Technological Change and International Relations.” International Relations 33 (2): 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819834629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elish, Madeleine Clare. 2019. “Moral Crumple Zones: Cautionary Tales in Human-Robot Interaction.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 5:40–60. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2019.260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrant, James, and Christopher M. Ford. 2017. “Autonomous Weapons and Weapon Reviews: The UK Second International Weapon Review Forum.” International Law Studies 93:390–422.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, Ed. 2017. What Algorithms Want: Imagination in the Age of Computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, Denise. 2016. “Future Arms, Technologies, and International Law: Preventive Security Governance.” European Journal of International Security 1 (1): 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2015.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, Denise. 2018. “Lethal Artificial Intelligence and Change: The Future of International Peace and Security.” International Studies Review 20 (2): 334–341. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, Denise. Forthcoming. Common Good Governance in the Age of Military Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gebru, Timnit. 2023. “Don’t Fall for the AI Hype.” Tech Won’t Save Us Podcast with Paris Marx. January 19. https://techwontsave.us/episode/151_dont_fall_for_the_ai_hype_w_timnit_gebru.
   Google Scholar
• Geist, Edward Moore. 2016. “It’s Already Too Late to Stop the AI Arms Race – We Must Manage It Instead.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 72 (5): 318–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2016.1216672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Amandeep Singh. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence and International Security: The Long View.” Ethics & International Affairs 33 (02): 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679419000145.
   Google Scholar
• Graae, Andreas Immanuel, and Kathrin Maurer. 2021. Drone Imaginaries: The Power of Remote Vision. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grayson, Kyle, Matt Davies, and Simon Philpott. 2009. “Pop Goes IR? Researching the Popular Culture—World Politics Continuum.” Politics 29 (3): 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2009.01351.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, Daniel N. 2015. “Autonomous Weapons and the Problem of State Accountability.” Chicago Journal of International Law 15 (2): 652–687.
   Google Scholar
• Hamon, Ronan, Henrik Junklewitz, and Jose Ignacio Sanchez Martin. 2020. Robustness and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Haner, Justin, and Denise Garcia. 2019. “The Artificial Intelligence Arms Race: Trends and World Leaders in Autonomous Weapons Development.” Global Policy 10 (3): 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, Kevin Jon. forthcoming. “The Concept of ‘The Human’ in the Critique of Autonomous Weapons.” Harvard National Security Journal. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4342529
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, Isabella. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence in Fiction: Between Narratives and Metaphors.” AI & SOCIETY 38 (1): 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01299-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyns, Christof. 2016a. “Autonomous Weapons Systems: Living a Dignified Life and Dying a Dignified Death.” In Autonomous Weapons Systems: Law, Ethics, Policy, edited by Nehal Bhuta, Susanne Beck, Robin Geiss, Hin-Yan Liu, and Claus Kress, 3–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyns, Christof. 2016b. “Human Rights and the Use of Autonomous Weapons Systems (AWS) During Domestic Law Enforcement.” Human Rights Quarterly 38 (2): 350–378. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2016.0034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoijtink, Marijn. 2022. “‘Prototype Warfare’: Innovation, Optimisation, and the Experimental Way of Warfare.” European Journal of International Security 7 (3): 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2022.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoijtink, Marijn, and Anneroos Planqué-van Hardeveld. 2022. “Machine Learning and the Platformization of the Military: A Study of Google’s Machine Learning Platform TensorFlow.” International Political Sociology 16 (2): 2. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoijtink, Marijn, and Matthias Leese. 2019. Technology and Agency in International Relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holland Michel, Arthur. 2020. The Black Box, Unlocked. Predictability and Understandability in Military AI. Geneva: UNIDIR (The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research).
   Google Scholar
• Holland Michel, Arthur. 2021. Known Unkowns: Data Issues and Military Autonomous Systems. Geneva: UNIDIR (The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research).
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael C. 2016. “Public Opinion and the Politics of the Killer Robots Debate.” Research & Politics 3 (1): 205316801562718. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015627183.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael C. 2019. “When Speed Kills: Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems, Deterrence and Stability.” Journal of Strategic Studies 42 (6): 764–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2019.1621174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huelss, Hendrik. 2020. “Norms are What Machines Make of Them: Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Normative Implications of Human-Machine Relations.” International Political Sociology 14 (2): 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olz023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichim, Oana. 2021. “Engineering Legal Expertise: The Politics of Lost Meanings.” Presented at the ESIL interest group on international Law and technology, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross). 2018. “Ethics and Autonomous Weapon Systems: An Ethical Basis for Human Control?” https://www.icrc.org/en/document/ethics-and-autonomous-weapon-systems-ethical-basis-human-control.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross). 2021. “ICRC Position on Autonomous Weapon Systems.” https://www.icrc.org/en/document/icrc-position-autonomous-weapon-systems.
   Google Scholar
• IPRAW (International Panel on the Regulation of Autonomous Weapons). 2018. Focus on Ethical Implications for a Regulation of LAWS. ‘Focus on’ Report No.4. Berlin: IPRAW.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2015. “Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity.” In Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, and Sang-Hyun Kim, 1–33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Benjamin M., Christopher Whyte, and Scott Cuomo. 2020. “Algorithms at War: The Promise, Peril, and Limits of Artificial Intelligence.” International Studies Review 22 (3): 526–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, James. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence & Future Warfare: Implications for International Security.” Defense & Security Analysis 35 (2): 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2019.1600800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, James. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence, Drone Swarming and Escalation Risks in Future Warfare.” The RUSI Journal 165 (2): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2020.1752026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Deborah G., and Mario Verdicchio. 2017. “AI Anxiety.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68 (9): 2267–2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiersey, Nicholas J., and Iver B. Neumann. 2013. Battlestar Galactica and International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer, Felicitas, Kees van Overveld, and Martin Peterson. 2011. “Is there an Ethics of Algorithms?” Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3): 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9233-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieg, Andreas, and Jean-Marc Rickli. 2019. Surrogate Warfare: The Transformation of War in the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, Armin. 2009. “Automating War: The Need for Regulation.” Contemporary Security Policy 30 (1): 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260902760397.
   Google Scholar
• Kunz, Martina, and Séan Ó hÉigeartaigh. 2021. “Artificial Intelligence and Robotization.” In Oxford Handbook on the International Law of Global Security, edited by Robin Geiss and Nils Melzer, 624–641. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, Helin M. 2017. “War, Weapons and Watchdogs: An Assessment of the Legality of New Weapons Under International Human Rights Law.” Cambridge International Law Journal 6 (1): 62–74. https://doi.org/10.4337/cilj.2017.01.04.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, Matthijs. 2019. “How Viable Is International Arms Control for Military Artificial Intelligence? Three Lessons from Nuclear Weapons.” Contemporary Security Policy 40 (3): 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1576464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, Matthijs. 2021. “Rebooting International Law? AI and the Sources, Vectors, and Consequences of the Displacement of the International Legal Order.” Presented at the ESIL interest group in international Law and Technology, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, Adrian. 2015. Cutting Code: Software and Sociality. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Margulies, Peter. 2019. “The Other Side of Autonomous Weapons: Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance IHL Compliance.” In The Impact of Emerging Technologies on the Law of Armed Conflict, edited by Ronald T. P. Alcala and Eric Talbot Jensen, 147–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, Daniel R. 2021. “Imposing Evenness, Preventing Combination: Charting the International Dynamics of Socio-Technical Imaginaries of Innovation in American Foreign Policy.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 34 (2): 296–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2021.1877617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, Forrest E., Benjamin Boudreaux, Andrew J. Lohn, Mark Ashby, Christian Curriden, Kelly Klima, and Derek Grossman. 2020. Military Applications of Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Concerns in an Uncertain World. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Mutschler, Max. 2023. “Liquid or Solid Warfare? Autocratic States, Non-State Armed Groups and the Socio-Spatial Dimension of Warfare in Yemen.” Geopolitics, https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2023.2165915.
   Google Scholar
• Nadibaidze, Anna. 2022. “Great Power Identity in Russia’s Position on Autonomous Weapons Systems.” Contemporary Security Policy 43 (3): 407–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2075665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natale, Simone, and Andrea Ballatore. 2020. “Imagining the Thinking Machine: Technological Myths and the Rise of Artificial Intelligence.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies 26 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517715164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, Kenneth. 2021. I, Warbot: The Dawn of Artificially Intelligent Conflict. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• REAIM Call for Action. 2023. “Government of the Netherlands.” February 16. https://www.government.nl/documents/publications/2023/02/16/reaim-2023-call-to-action.
   Google Scholar
• Renic, N. C. 2020. Asymmetric Killing: Risk Avoidance, Just War, and the Warrior Ethos. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roff, Heather M. 2019. “The Frame Problem: The AI ‘Arms Race’ Isn’t One.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75 (3): 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2019.1604836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosert, Elvira, and Frank Sauer. 2019. “Prohibiting Autonomous Weapons: Put Human Dignity First.” Global Policy 10 (3): 370–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosert, Elvira, and Frank Sauer. 2021. “How (Not) to Stop the Killer Robots: A Comparative Analysis of Humanitarian Disarmament Campaign Strategies.” Contemporary Security Policy 42 (1): 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1771508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, Ash. 2023. “AI-Enabled Remote Warfare: Sustaining the Western Warfare Paradigm?” International Politics 60 (4): 818–833. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00337-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russian Federation. 2021. “To Understanding the Characteristics of the LAWS Relevant to the Aims and Objectives of the Convention.” Presented at the Group of Governmental Experts on Emerging Technologies in the Area of LAWS, Geneva. September 27. https://documents.unoda.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/To-understanding-the-characteristics-of-the-LAWS-.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Laura, and Giulia Bocca. 2023. “Minding the Gap(s): Public Perceptions of AI and Socio-Technical Imaginaries.” AI & SOCIETY 38 (2): 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01422-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharre, Paul. 2018. Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, Paul. 2021. “Debunking the AI Arms Race Theory.” Texas National Security Review 4 (3). https://tnsr.org/2021/06/debunking-the-ai-arms-race-theory/.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, Paul, and Michael C. Horowitz. 2015. An Introduction to Autonomy in Weapon Systems. Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security.
   Google Scholar
• Schippers, Birgit. 2020. “Autonomous Weapons Systems and Ethics in International Relations.” In The Routledge Handbook to Rethinking Ethics in International Relations, edited by Birgit Schippers, 312–325. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schlag, Gabi, and Anna Geis. 2017. “Visualizing Violence: Aesthetics and Ethics in International Politics.” Global Discourse 7 (2–3): 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1359995.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, Elke. 2019. Death Machines: The Ethics of Violent Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharikov, Pavel. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence, Cyberattack, and Nuclear Weapons—A Dangerous Combination.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 74 (6): 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2018.1533185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey, Noel. 2010. “Saying ‘No!’ To Lethal Autonomous Targeting.” Journal of Military Ethics 9 (4): 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2010.537903.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey, Amanda. 2019. “Autonomous Weapons Systems, Killer Robots and Human Dignity.” Ethics and Information Technology 21 (2): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9494-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokova, Elena. 2020. “Disruptive Technologies and Nuclear Weapons.” New Perspectives 28 (3): 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X20934975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, Robert. 2009. “Predators or Plowshares? Arms Control of Robotic Weapons.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 28 (1): 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2009.931862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbruner, John D. 1978. “National Security and the Concept of Strategic Stability.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 22 (3): 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277802200303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimmer, Anette. 2019. “Star Wars or Strategic Defense Initiative: What’s in a Name?” Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (4): 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy. 2016. “Situational Awareness and Adherence to the Principle of Distinction as a Necessary Condition for Lawful Autonomy.” CCW Informal Meeting of Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons, Geneva, 12 April 2016, Panel ‘Towards a Working Definition of LAWS’: Autonomy. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/86141/1/CCW_Autonomy_Suchman.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy. 2020. “Algorithmic Warfare and the Reinvention of Accuracy.” Critical Studies on Security 8 (2): 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2020.1760587.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy. 2022. “Imaginaries of Omniscience: Automating Intelligence in the US Department of Defense.” Social Studies of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221104938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurnher, Jeffrey S. 2013. “The Law That Applies to Autonomous Weapon Systems.” ASIL Insights 17 (4). https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/17/issue/4/law-applies-autonomous-weapon-systems#:~:text=Customary%20law%20requires%20this%20legal,a%20party%20to%20the%20Protocol.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Emily. 2022. “Artifice and Intelligence”. Tech Policy Press. March 17. https://techpolicy.press/artifice-and-intelligence/.
   Google Scholar
• United States. 2018. “Humanitarian Benefits of Emerging Technologies in the Area of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems.” Working Paper CCW/GGE.1/2018/WP.4. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/ccw/2018/gge/documents/GGE.1-WP4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNSC (United Nations Security Council). 2021. “Final Report of the Panel of Experts on Libya Established Pursuant to Security Council Resolution 1973 (2011).” https://undocs.org/S/2021/229.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, James Igoe. 2015. “Political Accountability and Autonomous Weapons.” Research & Politics, 205316801560674. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015606749.
   Google Scholar
• Wasser, Merrill. 2020. “Public Opinion is a Key to America’s Global AI Leadership.” War on the Rocks. March 4. https://warontherocks.com/2020/03/public-opinion-is-a-key-to-united-states-global-ai-leadership/.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, Tom, and Ingvild Bode. 2023. “Machine Guardians: The Terminator, AI Narratives, and US Regulatory Discourse on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems.” Cooperation & Conflict. https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367231198155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Jutta. 2021. “Artificial Intelligence and the Socio-Technical Imaginary: On Skynet, Self-Healing Swarms and Slaughterbots.” In Drone Imaginaries: The Power of Remote Vision, edited by Andreas Immanuel Graae and Kathrin Maurer, 167–179. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, Meredith. 2021. “The Steep Cost of Capture.” Interactions 28 (6): 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488666.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, Lauren. 2017. “Embodying Algorithmic War: Gender, Race, and the Posthuman in Drone Warfare.” Security Dialogue 48 (1): 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010616657947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfield, Alan F. T. 2012. Robotics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, Austin. 2020. “Charting Great Power Progress Toward a Lethal Autonomous Weapon System Demonstration Point.” Defence Studies 20 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2019.1698956.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, Austin. 2021. The Disruptive Impact of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems Diffusion: Modern Melians and the Dawn of Robotic Warriors. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Kevin L., and Charli Carpenter. 2018. “Does Science Fiction Affect Political Fact? Yes and No: A Survey Experiment on ‘Killer Robots’.” International Studies Quarterly 62 (3): 562–576. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar