“Outrageous” Diplomacy: Investigating the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Twitter

References

• Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2014. “Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society.” International Organization 68 (1): 143–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Kristin Anabel Eggeling. 2022. “Blended Diplomacy: The Entanglement and Contestation of Digital Technologies in Everyday Diplomatic Practice.” European Journal of International Relations 28 (3): 640–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661221107837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Ayşe Zarakol. 2021. “Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of its Discontents.” International Organization 75 (2): 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, Colin R. 2021. “Hegemony, Morality, and Power: A Gramscian Theoretical Framework for Public Diplomacy.” In The Frontiers of Public Diplomacy. Hegemony, Morality, and Power in the International Sphere, edited by Colin R. Alexander, 9–24. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Yochai, Robert Faris, and Hal Roberts. 2018. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, Jeffrey M., and Sara Sobieraj. 2014. The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjola, Corneliu, Jennifer Cassidy, and Ilan Manor. 2019. “Public Diplomacy in the Digital Age.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 14 (1–2): 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14011032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjola, Corneliu, and Ilan Manor. 2018. “Revisiting Putnam’s Two-level Game Theory in the Digital Age: Domestic Digital Diplomacy and The Iran Nuclear Deal.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 31 (1): 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1476836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjola, Corneliu, and Ilan Manor. 2022. “The Rise of Hybrid Diplomacy: From Digital Adaptation to Digital Adoption.” International Affairs 98 (2): 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjola, Corneliu, and James Pamment, eds. 2019. Countering Online Propaganda and Extremism: The Dark Side of Digital Diplomacy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Penelope, and Steven Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Brüggemann, Michael, and Paul D’Angelo. 2018. “Defragmenting News Framing Research: Reconciling Generic and Issue-specific Frames.” In Doing News Framing Analysis II, edited by Paul D'Angelo, 90–111. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, Paul. 1990. “Politeness, Politics and Diplomacy.” Discourse and Society 1 (2): 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926590001002005.
   Google Scholar
• Cornut, Jérémie. 2015. “To Be a Diplomat Abroad: Diplomatic Practice at Embassies.” Cooperation and Conflict 50 (3): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715574912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornut, Jérémie, Susan Gail Harris Rimmer, and Ivy Choi. 2022. “The Liquidification of International Politics and Trump’s (Un) diplomacy on Twitter.” International Politics 59 (2): 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00309-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cover, Rob. 2015. Digital Identities: Creating and Communicating the Online Self. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danziger, Roni, and Mia Schreiber. 2021. “Digital diplomacy: Face management in MFA Twitter accounts.” Policy and Internet 13: 586–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.269.
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, Claes H., Joechen Peter, and Holli A. Semetko. 2001. “Framing Politics at the Launch of the Euro: A Cross-national Comparative Study of Frames in the News.” Political Communication 18 (2): 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncombe, Constance. 2017. “Twitter and Transformative Diplomacy: Social Media and Iran-US Relations.” International Affairs 93 (3): 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faizullaev, Alisher. 2017. “Symbolic Insult in Diplomacy. A Subtle Game of Diplomatic Slap.” Diplomacy and Foreign Politics 2 (4): 1–116. https://brill.com/view/journals/rpdf/2/4/article-p1_1.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Bruce. 1990. “Perspectives on Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Christian. 2021. Social Media: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, Tarleton. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1971. Interaction Ritual. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Golovchenko, Yevgeniy. 2020. “Measuring the Scope of Pro-Kremlin Disinformation on Twitter.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00659-9.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2008. “Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem.” International Organization 62 (4): 689–716. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818308080247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Ian. 2010. “The Transformation of Diplomacy: Mysteries, Insurgencies and Public Relations.” International Affairs 86 (1): 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00878.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Todd H. 2015. Emotional Diplomacy. Official Emotion on the International Stage. Ithaca and London. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, Stephen. 2022. Projecting Russia in a Mediatized World: Recursive Nationhood. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Susan T. 2019. “A Turning IR Landscape in a Shifting Media Ecology: The State of IR Literature on New Media.” International Studies Review 21 (3): 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiriya, Ilya. 2021. “From ‘Troll Factories’ to ‘Littering the Information Space’: Control Strategies over the Russian Internet.” Media and Communication 9 (4): 16–26. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korostelina, Karina V. 2014. Political Insults. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, Merje. 2015. “Symbolic Power in Diplomatic Practice: Matters of Style in Brussels.” Cooperation and Conflict 50 (3): 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715574914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne, Richard. 1992. “The Regulation of Diplomatic Practice: The Beginnings to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961.” Review of International Studies 18 (1): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118716.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Tobias, and Michael Habegger. 2021. “Diplomat or Troll? The Case Against Digital Diplomacy.” In Digital Diplomacy and International Organisations, edited by Corneliu Bjola and Ruben Zaiotti. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, Clare, Laura Cram, Robin L. Hill, and Adrian Favero. 2020. “For Whom the Bell Trolls: Shifting Troll Behaviour in the Twitter Brexit Debate.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (5): 1148–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovink, Geert. 2013. Zero Comments: Blogging and Critical Internet Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, Deborah. 2015. Digital Sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, Maria. 2012. “The Challenge of Liminality for International Relations Theory.” Review of International Studies 38 (2): 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manor, Ilan. 2015. “Framing Adversaries: Digital Diplomacy and Moral Delegitimization.” Paper presented at the 9th Pan-European Conference on International Relations, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Manor, Ilan. 2019. The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Manor, Ilan. 2021. “When Diplomats Go MAD: How the Crisis Framing of Ministries of Foreign Affairs Results in Mutually Assured Delegitimization.” Journal of Public Diplomacy 1 (2): 75–116. https://doi.org/10.23045/jpd.2021.1.2.075.
   Google Scholar
• Manor, Ilan, and Rhys Crilley. 2018. “Visually Framing the Gaza War of 2014: The Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Twitter.” Media, War & Conflict 11 (4): 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635218780564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Peter. 2021. China’s Civilian Army: The Making of Wolf Warrior Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massa, Alessandra. 2022. “Pop Wars. Popular Culture, Online Platforms, and the Representation of International Issues: The IDF Case.” Mediascapes Journal 19 (1): 128–141.
   Google Scholar
• Massa, Alessandra, and Giuseppe Anzera. 2023. “The Platformization of Military Communication: The Digital Strategy of the Israel Defense Forces on Twitter.” Media, War & Conflict 16 (3): 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352221101257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miskimmon, Alistair, Ben O’Loughlin, and Laura Roselle. 2014. Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mor, Ben D. 2009. “Accounts and Impression Management in Public Diplomacy: Israeli Justification of Force During The 2006 Lebanon War.” Global Change, Peace & Security 21 (2): 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781150902872125.
   Google Scholar
• Morini, Marco. 2020. Lessons from Trump’s Political Communication: How to Dominate the Media Environment. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, Sarah. 2016. “Russian Media in the Digital Age: Propaganda Rewired.” Russian Politics 1 (4): 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1163/2451-8921-00104004.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Zizi. 2004. “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society 6 (2): 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. New Haven: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, Vincent, and Jérémie Cornut. 2015. “Practice Theory and the Study of Diplomacy: A Research Agenda.” Cooperation and Conflict 50 (3): 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836715574913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games.” International Organization 42 (3): 427–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, Yaqing. 2020. “Diplomacy as Relational Practice.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (1–2): 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-15101092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogstad, Adrian. 2022. “Stigma Dynamics: Russia and the Crisis of Liberal Ordering.” Global Studies Quarterly 2 (3): ksac027. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac027.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Elise, and Stephane J. Baele. 2021. “‘Filthy Lapdogs,’ ‘Jerks,’ and ‘Hitler’: Making Sense of Insults in International Relations.” International Studies Review 23 (3): 532–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelili, Bahar. 2012. “Liminal Identities and Processes of Domestication and Subversion in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 38 (2): 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanovich, Sergey. 2018. “Russia: The Origin of Digital Disinformation.” In Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media, edited by Samuel C. Woolley and Philip N. Howard, 21–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semetko, Holli A., and Patti M. Valkenburg. 2000. “Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News.” Journal of Communication 50 (2): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sending, Ole Jacob, Vincent Pouliot, and Iver B. Neumann. 2011. “The Future of Diplomacy: Changing Practices, Evolving Relationships.” International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 66 (3): 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070201106600301.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, Saif, and Q. Elyse Huang. 2019. “Friend, Ally, or Rival? Twitter Diplomacy as ‘Technosocial’ Performance of National Identity.” International Journal of Communication 13:5100–5118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, Paul. 2009. Diplomatic Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiraev, Eric B., Jennifer Keohane, Martijn Icks, and Sergei A. Samoilenko. 2021. Character Assassination and Reputation Management: Theory and Applications. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Šimunjak, Maja, and Alessandro Caliandro. 2019. “Twiplomacy in the Age of Donald Trump: Is the Diplomatic Code Changing?” The Information Society 35 (1): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1542646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spykman, Nicholas J. 1942. America’s Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Storr, Will. 2018. Selfie: How the West Became Self-obsessed. London: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Szostek, Joanna. 2020. “What Happens to Public Diplomacy During Information War? Critical Reflections on the Conceptual Framing of International Communication.” International Journal of Communication 14:2728–2748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, Lisa. 2019. “Interpersonal Approaches to Relationship Building: Diplomat as a Human Agent of Public Diplomacy.” Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 15 (2): 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-018-0101-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, José, Thomas Poell, and Martijn De Waal. 2018. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rythoven, Eric. 2022. “Backstage Mockery: Impoliteness and Asymmetry on the World Stage.” Global Studies Quarterly 2 (4): ksac064. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac064.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of it: the Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2): 391–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wight, Martin. 1977. Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wight, Martin, and Herbert Butterfield, eds. 1966. Diplomatic Investigations. Essays in the Theory of International Politics. London: Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Zittrain, Jonathan L. 2014. “Reflections on Internet Culture.” Journal of Visual Culture 13 (3): 388–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914544540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar