Re-thinking Global Governance as Fuzzy: Multi-Scalar Boundaries of Responsibility in the Arctic

References

• Acharya, A. 2004. “How Ideas spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58 (02): 239–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. 2011. “Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (1): 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00637.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R. 2014. “Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms and Order in International Society.” International Organisation 68 (1): 143–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, E. 2007. “The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO's Post—Cold War Transformation.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (2): 195–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108089241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agence France-Presse. 2021. “Norway Court Rules Two Windfarms Harming Sami Reindeer Herders.” The Guardian: 11 October.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, M. 2007. “‘Globalization Theory’: Yesterday’s Fad or More Lively than Ever?” International Political Sociology 1 (2): 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2007.00011.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, M., H. Brunkhorst, I. Neumann, S. Stetter, 2023. “The Social Evolution of World Politics.” Bielefeld, Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, M., B. Buzan, M. Zürn, 2013. “Introduction: differentiation theory and international relations.” In Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory, edited by M. Albert, B. Buzan, and M. Zürn, 1–24. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, M., O. Kessler, and S. Stetter. 2008. “On Order and Conflict: International Relations and the ‘'Communicative Turn'’.” Review of International Studies 34 (S1): 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210508007791
   Google Scholar
• Albert, M., and S. Knecht. 2022. “A Responsibility to Freeze? The Arctic as a complex object of responsibility.” In The Routledge Handbook on Responsibility in International Relations, edited by H. Hansen-Magnusson and A. Vetterlein, 369–379. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. 2006. “Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholder Democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (4): 467–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106069321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badescu, C. G., and T. G. Weiss. 2010. “Misrepresenting R2P and Advancing Norms: An Alternative Spiral?” International Studies Perspectives 11 (4): 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkin, J. S. 2023. International Organization. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, J., S. Smith, and P. Owens. 2019. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, edited by J. Baylis Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, M. M. 2015. “How China Sees the Arctic: Reading Between Extraregional and Intraregional Narratives.” Geopolitics 20 (3): 645–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1017757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, F. 2011. “Reclaiming the Vision Thing: Constructivists as Students of the Future.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (3): 647–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00669.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkman, P. A., L. Kullerud, A. Pope, A. N. Vylegzhanin, and O. R. Young. 2017. “The Arctic Science Agreement propels science diplomacy.” Science 358 (6363): 596–598. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berling, T. V., U. P. Gad, K. L. Petersen, O. Wæver, 2022. Translations of security: a framework for the study of unwanted futures. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., and T. Risse. 2021. Effective Governance Under Anarchy: Institutions, Legitimacy, and Social Trust in Areas of Limited Statehood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brosig, M. 2021. Africa in a Changing Global Order: Marginal but Meaningful? Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
   Google Scholar
• Bueger, C., and F. Gadinger. 2014. International Practice Theory: New Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., W. C. Clark, F. Alcock, N. M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D. H. Guston, J. Jäger, and R. B. Mitchell. 2003. “Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 100 (14): 8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2018. “Planetary Crises and the Difficulty of Being Modern.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 46 (3): 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829818771277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, A. 2017. “The Big Role of Coastal Communities and Small-Scale Fishers in Ocean Conservation.” In Conservation for the Anthropocene Ocean, edited by P. S. Levin, and M. R. Poe, 447–461. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J. 1997. Routes: travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Czempiel, E.-O. 1992. “Governance and Democratization.” In Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, edited by J. N. Rosenau and E.-O. Czempiel, 250–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dannevig, H., et al. 2020. “Culturally Sensitive Boundary Work: A Framework for Linking Knowledge to Climate Action.” Environmental Science & Policy 112: 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depledge, D., and K. Dodds. 2017. “Bazaar Governance: Situating the Arctic Circle.” In Governing Arctic Change, edited by K. Keil and S. Knecht, 141–160. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Santo, E. M., E. Mendenhall, E. Nyman, R. Tiller, 2020. “Stuck in the middle with you (and not much time left): The third intergovernmental conference on biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction.” Marine Policy 117: 103957. 103910.101016j.marpol.102020.103957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, K. 2010. “Flag planting and finger pointing: the Law of the Sea, the Arctic and the political geographies of the outer continental shelf.” Political Geography 29 (2): 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, K. 2018. “Global Arctic.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 33 (2): 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1332488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, K., and M. Nuttall. 2019. The Arctic: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, R. 2014. “What Does Collaborative Event Ethnography Tell Us About Global Environmental Governance?” Global Environmental Politics 14 (3): 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, S. 2022. “Changing Paradigms of Territory and Boundary Studies in Political Geography.” International Studies 59 (3): 252–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208817221118786
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierke, K. M. 2002. “Links Across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 46 (3): 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, C. 2023. “Wild Polar Bear Conservation: A Case of Successful Arctic Science Diplomacy?” Marine Policy 155: 105783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholiagha, S., H. Hansen-Magnusson, M. Hofius, 2021. “Meaning-in-use: Zum Verhältnis von Normativität und Normalität in der Normenforschung.” In Kritische Normenforschung in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Neue Wege und metatheoretische Perspektiven, edited by S. Engelkamp, K. Glaab, and A. Graf, 223–252. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, A., K. Glaab, S. Engelkamp, 2021. “Normen und andere Vehikel: Wie untersuchbar gemacht wird, was sich der Beobachtung entzieht.” In Kritische Normenforschung in den Internationalen Beziehungen, edited by S. Engelkamp, K. Glaab, and A. Graf, 69–92. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. 1980. “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes.” World Politics 32 (3): 357–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. 1992. “Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46 (1): 187–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830000148X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1998. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S. 2018. “Foucault’s End of History: The Temporality of Governmentality and its End in the Anthropocene.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 46 (3): 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829818774892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen-Magnusson, H. 2019. “The Web of Responsibility in and for the Arctic.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (2): 132–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1573805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen-Magnusson, H. 2020. International Relations as Politics among People - Hermeneutic Encounters and Global Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen-Magnusson, H., and C. Gehrke. 2023. “Navigating towards justice and sustainability? Syncretic encounters and stakeholder-sourced solutions in Arctic cruise Tourism Governance.” The Polar Journal 13 (2): 216–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2023.2251225
   Google Scholar
• Hansen-Magnusson, H., C. Gehrke, E. Conde, and C. Wood-Donnelly, eds. forthcoming. “The web of Arctic governance fora? More than just the council.” In The Routledge Handbook of Arctic Governance. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen-Magnusson, H., and A. Vetterlein. 2022. “Responsibility in International Relations Theory and Practice: Introducing the Handbook.” In The Routledge Handbook on Responsibility in International Relations, edited by H. Hansen-Magnusson and A. Vetterlein, 1–28. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. 1997. “Democracy and Globalization.” Global Governance 3: 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00303003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofius, M. 2016. “Community at the Border or the Boundaries of Community? The Case of EU Field Diplomats.” Review of International Studies 42 (5): 939–967. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210516000085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzscheiter, A., S. Gholiagha, and A. Liese. 2022. “Advocacy Coalition Constellations and Norm Collisions: Insights from International Drug Control, Human Trafficking, and Child Labour.” Global Society 36 (1): 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2021.1885352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornidge, A.-K. 2011. “‘Creative industries’: Economic programme and boundary concept.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 42 (2): 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002246341100004X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53 (2): 379–408. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. 2020. International Organizations: Politics, Law, Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. 2007. On Global Order - Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. T., and D. H. Nexon. 1999. “Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 291–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. T., and D. H. Nexon. 2013. “International Theory in a Post-Paradigmatic Era: From Substantive Wagers to Scientific Ontologies.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E. C. H. 2004. Negotiating the Arctic: The Construction of an International Region. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, O. 2009. “Toward a Sociology of the International? International Relations between Anarchy and World Society.” International Political Sociology 3 (1): 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00065.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, F. 2014. The Status of Law in World Society. Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krisch, N. 2017. “Liquid Authority in Global Governance.” International Theory 9 (2): 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971916000269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2023. “Between an Archipelago and An Ice Floe: The Know-Where of Arctic Governance Expertise.” Polar Record 59 (e10): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. F., and A. Wiener. 2017. “A constitutionalising Global Order: An Introduction.” In Handbook on Global Constitutionalism, edited by A. F. Lang, and A. Wiener, 1–20. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A., K. Lindberg, B. E. Mørk, D. Nicolini, E. Raviola, and L. Walter. 2019. “Boundary Work among Groups, Occupations, and Organizations: From Cartography to Process.” Academy of Management Annals 13 (2): 704–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantis, J. S., and C. Wunderlich. 2022. “Reevaluating Constructivist Norm Theory: A Three-Dimensional Norms Research Program.” International Studies Review 24 (1). https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 1994. Organizing modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Laya, A. G. 2023. “The Search for a New International Order in a Fractured World.” Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development 23: 154–163.
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, A. 2009. “Grand Narratives and International Relations.” Global change, peace & security 21 (1): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781150802659234
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, A. R. 1991. “Out in the Cold: Canada's Experimental Inuit Relocation to Grise Fiord and Resolute Bay.” Polar Record 27 (163): 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400013048
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, H., and N. Wright. 2021. “How Much Unity Do You Need? Systemic Contestation in EU Foreign and Security Cooperation.” European Security 30 (3): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1947800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medby, I. A. 2017. “Preface - ‘Arcticness and Change’.” In Arcticness: Power and Voice from the North, edited by I. Kelman, v–vii. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mittelman, J. H. 2011. Contesting Global Order: Development, Global Governance, and Globalization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. 2012. At Home with the Diplomats: Inside a European Foreign Ministry. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. 2001. “Boundaries, Borders, and Barriers: Changing Geographic Perspectives on Territorial Lines.” In Identities Borders Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory, edited by M. Albert, D. Jacobson, and Y. Lapid, 137–151. Minneapolis London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, O. 2009. “Applied Ethics: Naturalism, Normativity and Public Policy.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3): 219–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orange, R. 2020. “Indigenous Reindeer Herders win Hunting Rights Battle in Sweden.” The Guardian, 23 January.
   Google Scholar
• Orchard, P., and A. Wiener. 2023. “Norms and Norm Contestation.” In Routledge Handbook on Foreign Policy Analysis Methods, edited by P. A. Mello, and F. Ostermann, 51–66. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Østhagen, A., and A. Raspotnik. 2018. “Crab! How a Dispute Over Snow Crab Became a Diplomatic Headache between Norway and the EU.” Marine Policy 98: 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, S., J. Petts, and H. Bulkeley. 2006. “Boundary Work: Knowledge, Policy, and the Urban Environment.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24 (5): 633–643. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0606j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, A. 1967. “Speech at the UN General Assembly, 1515th Meeting (1 November 1967).” New York. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/pardo_ga1967.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. 2018. International Organisations and Global Problems: Theories and Explanations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V., and J.-P. Thérien. 2023. Global policymaking: the patchwork of global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. L. 1991. “Arts of the Contact Zone.” Profession 15 (1): 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Rahbek-Clemmensen, J., and G. Thomasen. 2020. “How has Arctic Coastal State Cooperation Affected the Arctic Council?” Marine Policy 122: 104239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantanen, M., A. Y. Karpechko, A. Lipponen, K. Nordling, O. Hyvärinen, K. Ruosteenoja, T. Vihma, and A. Laaksonen. 2022. “The Arctic has Warmed Nearly Four Times Faster than the Globe Since 1979.” Communications Earth & Environment 3 (1): 168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00498-3
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, M. 2014. Border Work: Spatial Lives of the State in Rural Central Asia. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., S. Ropp, K. Sikkink, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., and E. Paglia. 2016. “Science as national belonging: The construction of Svalbard as a Norwegian space.” Social Studies of Science 46 (6): 894–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716639153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N. 1992a. “Governance, Order, and Change in World Politics.” In Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, edited by J. N. Rosenau, and E.-O. Czempiel, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N. 1992b. “Citizenship in a Changing Global Order.” In Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, edited by J. N. Rosenau, and E.-O. Czempiel, 272–294. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggie, J. G. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” International Organization 36 (2): 379–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger, C. 1986. Ordering the Oceans. The Making of the Law of the Sea. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Saramago, A. 2022. “Post-Eurocentric Grand Narratives in Critical International Theory.” European journal of international relations 28 (1): 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661211058797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 2014. “When the Global Inhabits the National: Fuzzy Interactions.” In New Constitutionalism & World Order, edited by S. Gill, and A. C. Cutler, 115–125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 2007. “Reflections on Multilevel Legitimacy.” EUSA Review 20 (3): 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. 2019. “Defining, Explaining and, Then, Exploiting the Elusive Concept of ‘Governance’.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 12 (4): 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-018-0236-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholte, J. A. 2000. “Global Civil Society.” In The Political Economy of Globalization, edited by N. Woods, 173–201. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shadian, J. M. 2010. “From States to Polities: Reconceptualizing Sovereignty through Inuit Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 16 (3): 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109346887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, F. 2013. “Rethinking Regions and Regionalism.” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 14 (2): 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Speyer, J., and N. Stockmann. 2023. “How a Conversation Between EU Studies and Critical-Constructivist IR Norm Research Illuminates a Union in Crisis: A Research Note.” Journal of Common Market Studies 62 (3): 902–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., P. J. Crutzen, and J. R. McNeill. 2007. “The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?” AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36 (8): 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinveg, B. 2021. “The Role of Conferences Within Arctic Governance.” Polar Geography 44 (1): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2020.1798540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinveg, B. 2023. Arctic Governance through Conferencing. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stetter, S. 2014. “World Politics and Conflict Systems: The Communication of a “No” and its Effects.” Horyzonty Polityki 5 (12): 43–67.
   Google Scholar
• Stimmer, A., and L. Wisken. 2019. “The Dynamics of Dissent: When Actions are Louder than Words.” International Affairs 95 (3): 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suganami, H. 1999. “Agents, Structures, Narratives.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y. 2023. The International Law of the Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Langenhove, L., and M. C. Macovei. 2009. “Regional formations and global governance.” In World-Regional Social Policy and Global Governance: New Research and Policy Agendas in Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America, edited by B. Deacon, M. C. Macovei, L. Van Langenhove, and N. Yeates, 9–26. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Vetterlein, A. 2018. “Responsibility is more than Accountability: From Regulatory Towards Negotiated Governance.” Contemporary Politics 24 (5): 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2018.1452106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Foerster, H. 2003. Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Watt-Cloutier, S. 2018. The Right to be Cold. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P., J. B. Bavelas, D. D. Jackson, 1967. Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, T. G. 2013. Global Governance: What? Why? Whither? Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, T. G., and R. Wilkinson, eds. 2018. International Organization and Global Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weldes, J. 1998. “Bureaucratic Politics: A Critical Constructivist Assessment.” Mershon International Studies Review 42 (2): 216–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/254413
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 1997. “Making Sense of the New Geography of Citizenship: Fragmented Citizenship in the European Union.” Theory and Society 26 (4): 529–560. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006809913519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2004. “Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 10 (2): 189–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104042934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2009. “Enacting Meaning-in-Use. Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations.” Review of International Studies 35 (1): 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2018. Constitution and Contestation of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willke, H. 2013. “Complex Governance and Europe’s Model of Subsidiarity.” In Engaging with the World: Agency, Institutions, Historical Formations, edited by M. S. Archer, and A. Maccarini, 198–215. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson Rowe, E. 2018. Arctic Governance: Power in Cross-border Relations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winston, C. 2023. “International Norms as Emergent Properties of Complex Adaptive Systems.” International Studies Quarterly 67 (3). https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqad063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Donnelly, C., and J. Ohlsson. 2023. Arctic Justice: Environment, Society and Governance. Bristol: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 2011. Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zacher, M. W. 1992. “The Decaying Pillars of the Westphalian Temple: Implications for International Order and Governance.” In Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, edited by J. N. Rosenau, and E.-O. Czempiel, 58–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, A. 2019. “‘Rise of the Rest’: As Hype and Reality.” International Relations 33 (2): 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819840793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, L. 2016. “Same Same or Different? Norm Diffusion Between Resistance, Compliance, and Localization in Post-conflict States.” International studies perspectives 17 (1): 98–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, L. 2017. Global Norms with a Local Face: Rule-Of-Law Promotion and Norm-Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance - Authority, Legitimacy & Contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M., Martin Binder, and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt 2012. “International Authority and Its Politicization.” International Theory 4 (1): 69–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971912000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar