Rediscovering artificial intelligence and law: an inadequate jurisprudence?

References

• Amselek, Paul, and Neil MacCormick. 1989. Controversies about Law’s Ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, Kevin. 1990. Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, Kevin. 2006. “Case Based Reasoning.” In Information Technology and Lawyers: Advanced Technology in the Legal Domain, from Challenges to Daily Routine, edited by A. R. Lodder and A. Oskamp, 23–60. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bench-Capon, Trevor, and Henry Prakken. 2006. “Argumentation.” In Information Technology and Lawyers: Advanced Technology in the Legal Domain, from Challenges to Daily Routine, edited by A. R. Lodder and A. Oskamp, 61–80. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamins, Richard, Pompeu Casanovas, Joost Breuker, and Aldo Gangemi, eds. 2005. Law and the Semantic Web: Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information Retrieval, and Applications. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bex, Floris, Susan van den Braak, Herre van Oostendorp, Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij and Gerard Vreeswijk. 2007. “Sense-Making Software for Crime Investigation: How to Combine Stories and Arguments?” Law Probability and Risk 2007 (6): 145–168. doi: 10.1093/lpr/mgm007
   Google Scholar
• Breuker, Joost. 2013. “A Cognitive Science Perspective on Knowledge Acquisition.” International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 71 (2): 177–183
   Google Scholar
• Breuker, Joost, and Rinke Hoekstra. 2004. “Epistemology and Ontology in Core Ontologies: FOLaw and LRI-Core, Two Core Ontologies for Law.” Accessed February 23, 2016. http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-118/paper2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Breuker, Joost, and Rinke Hoekstra. 2011. “A Cognitive Science Perspective on Legal Ontologies.” In Approaches to Legal Ontologies, edited by Giovanni Sartor, Pompeu Casanovas, Mariangela Biasiotti, and Meritxell Fernández-Barrera, 69–81. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carneiro, Davide, Paulo Novais, Francisco Andrade, Johan Zeleznikow, and Jose Neves. 2014. “Online Dispute Resolution: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective.” Artificial Intelligence Review 41: 211–240. doi: 10.1007/s10462-011-9305-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro, Davide, Paulo Novais, and Jose Neves, eds. 2014. Conflict Resolution and its Context: From an Analysis of Behavioral Patterns to Efficient Decision Making. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Casanovas, Pompeu, Nuria Casellas, and Joan-Josep Vallbé. 2011. “Empirically Grounded Developments of Legal Ontologies: A Socio-legal Perspective.” In Approaches to Legal Ontologies, edited by Giovanni Sartor, Pompeu Casanovas, Mariangela Biasiotti, and Meritxell Fernández-Barrera, 52–81. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, David. 2015. “Legal Geography I: Constitutivities, Complexities, and Contingencies.” Progress in Human Geography 39 (1): 96–102. doi: 10.1177/0309132514527035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Ronald. 1997. “In Praise of Theory.” Arizona State Law Journal 29: 353–376.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, Eric. 2004. “An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning: Using xtalk to Model the Alien Tort Claims Act and Torture Victim Protection Act.” Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 11 (1): 2–40.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, Ian. 1965. “The Mystery of Go.” New Scientist, January 21. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://www.chilton-computing.org.uk/acl/literature/reports/p019.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Leith, Philip. 1984. “Logic, Formal Models and Legal Reasoning.” Jurimetrics Journal 24 (4): 334–356.
   Google Scholar
• Leith, Philip. 1987. “The Emperor’s New Expert System.” The Modern Law Review 50 (1): 128–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1987.tb02568.x
   Google Scholar
• Leith, Philip. 2010. “The Rise and Fall of the Legal Expert System.” In A History of Legal Informatics, edited by Abdul Paliwala, 179–203.
   Google Scholar
• Lodder, Arno, and Anja Oskamp, eds. 2006. Information Technology and Lawyers: Advanced Technology in the Legal Domain, from Challenges to Daily Routine. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meeran, Richard. 2011. “Tort Litigation Against Multinational Corporations for Violation of Human Rights: An Overview of the Position Outside the United States.” City University of Hong Kong Law Review 2011 (3): 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, Cade. 2016. “In a Huge Breakthrough, Google’s AI Beats a Top Player in the Game of Go.” Wired Business, January 27. Accessed February 23, 2016. http://www.wired.com/2016/01/in-a-huge-breakthrough-googles-ai-beats-a-top-player-at-the-game-of-go/.
   Google Scholar
• Needle, Justin. 2000. “The Automatic Linking of Legal Citations.” The Journal of Information, Law and Technology 2000 (3). Accessed August 21, 2016. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/needle/.
   Google Scholar
• Oskamp, Anja, and Arno Lodder. 2006. “Introduction: Law, Information Technology, and Artificial Intelligence.” In Information Technology and Lawyers: Advanced Technology in the Legal Domain, from Challenges to Daily Routine, edited by Lodder, Arno, and Anja Oskamp, 1–22. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Paliwala, Abdul. 1997. “Artificial Blue and Deep Intelligence.” In Legal Knowledge Based Systems: Jurix ’97, edited by Anja Oskamp, R.V. De Mulder, C. van Noortwijk, K. Ashley, T. Gordon and C.A.F.M. Grutters, 101–106. Nijmegen: Foundation for Legal Knowledge Based Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Paliwala, Abdul. 2001. “An Intellectual Celebration: A Review of the Jurix Legal Knowledge Based Systems Scholarship.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 8: 317–335. doi: 10.1023/A:1011242531937
   Google Scholar
• Sartor, Giovanni, Pompeu Casanovas, Mariangela Biasiotti, and Meritxell Fernández-Barrera, eds. 2011. Approaches to Legal Ontologies. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey, Noel. 2011. “Automating Warfare: Lessons Learnt from the Drones.” Journal of Law, Information and Science 2011 (21): 140–154.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein Cass. 2001. “On Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning.” Chicago Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No 18.
   Google Scholar
• Twining, William. 2007. “Argumentation, Stories and Generalizations: A Comment.” Law, Probability and Risk 6: 169–185. doi: 10.1093/lpr/mgm008
   Google Scholar
• Twining, William, and David Miers. 2010. How to Do Things with Rules. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar