References
- ARTICLE 19. 2013. “Internet Intermediary: Dilemma of Liability.” Accessed November 8, 2016. https://www.article19.org/data/files/Intermediaries_ENGLISH.pdf.
- ARTICLE 19. 2015. “Delfi v. Estonia Case Comment: Why Strasbourg Undermines Freedom of Expression.” October 1. Accessed November 8, 2016. https://www.article19.org/join-the-debate.php/221/view/.
- ARTICLE 19. 2016. “Policy Brief: The Right to be Forgotten.” March 29. Accessed November 10, 2016. https://www.article19.org/resources.php/resource/38318/en/policy-brief:-the-right-to-be-forgotten.
- Banks, David. 2013. “Online Comments: Why Websites Should Be Worried by Court Ruling.” The Guardian, October 11. Accessed November 8, 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/media/media-blog/2013/oct/11/online-comments-websites-court-ruling-estonian.
- Bedell, Zoe. 2016. “Google to France: ‘Forget You’ – An Update on the Right to Be Forgotten’”. Lawfare, May 25. Accessed November 11. https://www.lawfareblog.com/google-france-forget-you-–-update-right-be-forgotten.
- Belén Rodriguez v. Google (Federal Supreme Court of Argentina, 2014).
- Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedoms. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; Manuel Castells.
- Bethlehem, Daniel. 2014. “The End of Geography: The Changing Nature of the International System and the Challenge to International Law.” The European Journal of International Law 25 (1): 9–24. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chu003
- Botero, Catalina. 2016. “2015 Jurisprudence in Latin America.” Presentation for the Justice for Freedom of Expression Conference, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression, April 4–5. https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/GFOE-Presentation-Catalina-Botero-.pdf.
- California Legislative Information. 2013. “Senate Bill No. 568”: Chapter 336. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB568.
- Callamard, Agnes. 2012. Keynote Speech. ASEM, “Human Rights and Information and Communication Technology.” Proceedings of the 12th Informal Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) Seminar on Human Rights, Asia-Europe Foundation. June 27–29. http://www.asef.org/images/stories/publications/documents/ASEF-12th_HR_Seminar_Publication.pdf.
- Committee to Protect Journalists. 2008. Prison Census: Online and in Jail. Accessed November 10, 2016. https://www.cpj.org/reports/2008/12/cpjs-2008-prison-census-online-and-in-jail.php.
- Décision de la Présidente n°2015-047 mise en demeure publique de la société GOOGLE INC. (CNIL, 21 May 2015). Accessed November 10, 2016. http://www.cnil.fr/fileadmin/documents/approfondir/deliberations/Bureau/D2015-047_MED_GOOGLE_INC.pdf.
- Delfi v. Estonia, Application No. 64569/09 (European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber, 2015).
- Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data.
- Drake, W. J., V. G. Cerf, and W. Kleinwächter. 2016. “Internet Fragmentation: An Overview.” World Economic Forum Future of the Internet Initiative White Paper. World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland.
- Elliott, Stuart. 1997. “Clinton Adviser Urges Self-Regulation in Cyberspace.” The New York Times, November 4, 1997. Accessed February 22, 2017. https://partners.nytimes.com/library/cyber/week/110497magaziner.html.
- Entremedios. 2014. “Internet Service Providers Liability in Argentina: Rodriguez vs. Google.” December18. Accessed November 11, 2016. http://entremedios.org/2014/12/18/internet-service-providers-liability-in-argentina-rodriguez-vs-google/.
- Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc., BCCA 265 (Court of Appeals of British Columbia, 2015).
- Eugene Volokh, and Falk, Donald. 2012. “First Amendment Protection for Search Engine Search results.” White Paper commissioned by Google, April 20.
- Field v. Google, 412 F Supp 2d 1106 (District Court of Nevada, 2006).
- Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norms Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917. doi: 10.1162/002081898550789
- Freedom House. Freedom of the Net. 2012. A Global Assessment of Internet and Digital Media. New York: Freedom House, September 24, 2012.
- Ghatnekar, Seema. 2012. “Injury by Algorithm: A Look into Google's Liability for Defamatory Autocompleted Search Suggestions.” Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 33 (2): 171–204.
- Google. 2016. “European Privacy Requests for Search Removals”. Transparency report. Accessed November 6, 2016. https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/europeprivacy/?hl=en.
- Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González, C-131/12 (European Court of Justice, Grand Chamber, 2014) http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document_print.jsf?doclang=EN&text=&pageIndex=0&part=1&mode=DOC&docid=152065&occ=first&dir=&cid=667631.
- Goyal, Monica. 2014. “Freedom of Speech Gives Baidu Right to Censorship, Judge Rules.” Itbusiness.ca, April 15. Accessed November 11. http://www.itbusiness.ca/blog/freedom-of-speech-gives-baidu-right-to-censorship-judge-rules/48052.
- Graziani v. Diario El Mercurio (Supreme Court of Chile, Case N°: Rol. 22.243-2015).
- INAI (Federal Institute of Access to and Protection of Information). 2015. “Resolution of January 27, 2015. Google México, S de R.L. de C.V. Case File PPD. 0094/14. http://inicio.ifai.org.mx/pdf/resoluciones/2014/PPD94.pdf.
- Jian Zhang et al. v. Baidu.com Inc., Civ. 3388 (United States District Court, Southern District of New York, 2014).
- Judgment T-277 (Constitutional Court of Columbia, 2015). Accessed November 10, 2016. http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2015/t-277-15.htm.
- Karapapa Stavroulaand and Boghi, Maurizio. 2015. “Search Engine Liability for Autocomplete Suggestions: Personality, Privacy and the Power of the Algorithm.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 23 (3): 261–289. http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/3/261.full#xref-fn-34-1 doi: 10.1093/ijlit/eav009
- de La Chapelle, Bertrand, and Paul. Fehlinger. 2016. “Jurisdiction on the Internet, From Legal Arms Race to Transnational Cooperation.” Global Commission on Internet Governance, Paper Series No. 28. https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/gcig_no28_web.pdf.
- Le Monde. 2010. “Droit à l'oubli’ sur Internet : une charte signée sans Google ni Facebook”. November 13. http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2010/10/13/droit-a-l-oubli-sur-internet-une-charte-signee-sans-google-ni-facebook_1425667_651865.html.
- Le Petit Juriste. 2011. “Internet et le droit à l’oubli numérique.” February 23. http://www.lepetitjuriste.fr/divers/internet-et-le-droit-a-loubli-numerique.
- Lessig, Lawrence. 1996. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
- Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
- Lessig, Lawrence. 2006. Code version 2.0. Ohio: OCLC.
- Ligue contre le racisme et l'antisémitisme et Union des étudiants juifs de France (Licra) c. Yahoo! Inc. et Société Yahoo! France (Tribunal de Grande Instance, Paris, 2000).
- Magyar Tartalomszolgáltatók Egyesülete (“MTE”) and Index.hu Zrt v. Hungary, Application No. 22947/13 (European Court of Human Rights, 2016).
- Mueller, Milton. 2011. Networks and States, the Global Politics of Internet Governance. London: MIT Press.
- de Nardis, Laura. 2014. The Global War for Internet Governance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Parker v. Google Inc, 412 F Supp 2d 1106 (DC Nev, 2006).
- Perfect 10 v. Google, 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007).
- Rees, Marc. 2014. “Exclusif: la justice condamne Google pour avoir ignoré le droit à l'oubli.” Nextinpact, September 22. Accessed November 11, 2016. http://www.nextinpact.com/news/90020-exclusif-justice-condamne-google-pour-avoir-ignore-droit-a-oubli.htm.
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue, May 2011, A/HRC/17/27.
- Search King Inc. v. Google Technology Inc., Case No. Civ-02-1457-M (United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, 2003).
- Senate Bill 568, entitled “Privacy Rights for California Minors in the Digital World.” State of California, adopted in 2013, effective January 1, 2015. Accessed February 22, 2017. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB568.
- St. Louis Martin v. Google Inc., Case No. 14-539972 (Superior Court of the State of California, 2014).
- Tao, Quian. 2011. “The Knowledge Standard for the Internet Intermediary Liability in China.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 20 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1093/ijlit/ear014
- Wu, Tim. 1997. “Cyberspace Sovereignty? The Internet and the International System.” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 10 (3) 647–666.
- Wu, Tim. 2010. The Master Switch. New York: Knopf.
- Wu, Tim. 2012. “Free Speech for Computers”. The Guardian, June 19. Accessed November 11, 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/20/opinion/free-speech-for-computers.html.