References
- Baldwin, Robert, Martin Cave, and Martin Lodge. 2012. Understanding Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Balkin, J. 2009. “ The Future of Free Expression in a Digital Age. Faculty Scholarship Series 223.” Accessed March 6, 2020. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/223.
- Black, J. 2001. “Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a 'Post-Regulatory World'.” Current Legal Problems 54: 103–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/54.1.103
- Celeste, Edoardo. 2018. “ Terms of Service and Bills of Rights: New Mechanisms of Constitutionalisation in the Social Media Environment?” Accessed March 6, 2020. https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/hPnFfyVuHNnMKdxtixm6/full.
- Ferraz, Otávio Leite. 2009. “ The Right to Health in the Courts of Brazil: Worsening Health Inequities?” The Health and Human Rights Journal 11, no. 2. Accessed March 6, 2020. https://www.hhrjournal.org/2013/08/the-right-to-health-in-the-courts-of-brazil-worsening-health-inequities.
- Flew, Terry, Fiona Martin, and Nicolas Suzor. 2019. “Internet Regulation as Media Policy: Rethinking the Question of Digital Communication Platform Governance.” Journal of Digital Media and Policy 10 (1): 33–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp.10.1.33_1
- Frosio, Giancarlo. 2018. “Why Keep a Dog and Bark Yourself? From Intermediary Liability to Responsibility.” Oxford International Journal of Law and Technology 26 (1): 1–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eax021
- Gasser, Urs, and Wolfgang Schulz. 2015. “ Governance of Online Intermediaries: Observations from a Series of National Case Studies.” Berkman Center Research, Publication 5.
- Gorwa, Robert, Reuben Binns, and Christian Katzenbach. 2020. “Algorithmic Content Moderation: Technical and Political Challenges in the Automation of Platform Governance.” Big Data & Society. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945.
- Gregorio, Giovanni di. 2019. “Democratising Content Moderation: A Constitutional Framework., Computer Law & Security Review.” The International Journal of Technology Law and Practice. Accessed March 6, 2020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/computer-law-and-security-review/special-issue/10L87CSMG55.
- Grimmelmann, James. 2015. “The Virtues of Moderation.” Yale Journal of Law and Technology 17: 42–109.
- Heldt, Amélie. 2019. “ Reading Between the Lines and Numbers: An Analysis of the First NetzDG Reports.” Internet Policy Review 8.
- Hirschl, Ran. 2008. “The Judicialisation of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts.” Annual Review of Political Science 93, doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006. 183906.
- Hofmann, Jeanette, Christian Katzenbach, and Kirsten Gollatz. 2016. “Between Coordination and Regulation: Finding the Governance in Internet Governance.” New Media & Society 19 (9): 1406–1423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816639975
- Keller, Daphne. 2015. “ Empirical Evidence of ‘Over-Removal’ by Internet Companies under Intermediary Liability Laws. The Center for Internet and Society.” Accessed March 6, 2020. http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2015/10/empirical-evidence-over-removal-internet-companies-under-intermediary-liability-laws.
- Keller, Clara Iglesias. 2019a. Regulação Nacional de Serviços na Internet: Exceção, Legitimidade e o Papel do Estado [National Regulation of Internet Based Services: Exception, Legitimacy and the Role of States]. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris.
- Keller, Daphne. 2019b. Who Do You Sue? State and Platform Hybrid Power over Online Speech. Aegis Series Paper No. 1902. Accessed March 6, 2020. https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/who-do-you-sue-state-and-platform-hybrid-power-over-online-speech_0.pdf.
- Klonick, Kate. 2018. “ The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech. Harvard Law Review 131.” Accessed March 6, 2020. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2937985.
- Kuczerawy, Aleksandra. 2019. “ General Monitoring Obligations: A New Cornerstone of Internet Regulation in the EU?” SSRN. Accessed March 6, 2020. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3449170.
- Laidlaw, Emily, and Hilary Young. 2017. “ Internet Intermediary Liability in Defamation: Proposals for Statutory Reform.” Law Commission of Ontario. Accessed June 22nd, 2020. http://www.lco-cdo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/DIA-Commissioned-Paper-Laidlaw-and-Young.pdf.
- Langvardt, Kyle. 2018. “Regulating Online Content Moderation.” The Georgetown Law Journal 106: 1353–1388.
- Lecher, Colin. 2019. “ YouTube Took Down an ‘Unprecedented Volume’ of Videos after New Zealand Shooting – The Platform Disabled Functions to Stop the Video. The Verge. Accessed March 6, 2020. https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/18/18270814/youtube-new-zealand-shooting-videos-moderation.
- Lemos, Ronaldo, and Carlos Affonso de Souza. 2015. “ A Bill of Rights for the Brazilian Internet (‘Marco Civil’) – A Multistakeholder Policymaking Case”, in Gasser, U and W. Schulz. Governance of Online Intermediaries: Observations from a Series of National Case Studies. Berkman Center Research Publication 5.
- Machado, Jónathas. 2002. Liberdade de Expressão. Dimensões Constitucionais da Esfera Pública no Sistema Social [Freedom of Expression. Constitutional Dimensions of the Public Sphere in the Social System]. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora.
- Mancuso, Rodolfo de Camargo. 2015. Acesso à Justiça – Condicionantes Legítimas e Ilegítimas [Access to Justice - Legitimate and Illegitimate Conditions]. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais.
- Manila Principles on Intermediary Liability. “ Best Practices Guidelines for Limiting Intermediary Liability for Content to Promote Freedom of Expression and Innovation,” v. 1.0. 2015. Accessed March 6, 2020. https://www.eff.org/files/2015/10/31 /manila_principles_1.0.pdf.
- Mendel, Toby. 2010. “ Restricting Freedom of Expression: Standards and Principles. Centre for Law and Democracy.” Accessed March 6, 2020. http://www.law-democracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/10.03.Paper-on-Restrictions-on-FOE.pdf.
- Moncau, Luís Fernando Marrey, and Diego Werneck Arguelhes. 2020. Marco Civil da Internet and Digital Constitutionalism. The Oxford Handbook of Intermediary Liability Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Murray, Andrew. 2019. “ Rethinking Regulation for the Digital Environment. LSE Policy Briefing Series, Policy Briefing 41.” Accessed June 25, 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3462792.
- Omer, Corey. 2014. “Intermediary Liability for Harmful Speech: Lessons from Abroad.” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 28: 288–324.
- Pereira, Jane Reis Gonçalves. 2015. “ Direitos Sociais, Estado de Direito e Desigualdade: Reflexões Sobre as Críticas à Judicialização dos Direitos Prestacionais [Social Rights, Rule of Law and Inequality: Reflections on Criticisms of the Judicialization of Provincial Rights].” Quastio Iuris 8, no. 3.
- Pereira, Jane Reis Gonçalves. 2016. “ O judiciário como impulsionador dos direitos fundamentais: entre fraquezas e possibilidades [The judiciary as a driver of fundamental rights: between weaknesses and possibilities].” Revista da Faculdade de Direito RFD-UERJ, n. 29.
- Porfirio, Fernando. 2006. “ Justiça confirma veto ao vídeo de Cicarelli na Internet [Justice confirms veto to Cicarelli’s video on the Internet].” Consultor Jurídico. Accessed March 6, 2020. https://www.conjur.com.br/2006-set-28/justica_confirma_veto_video_cicarelli_internet.
- Prado, Mariana Motta. 2013. “The Debatable Role of Courts in Brazil’s Health Care System: Does Litigation Harm or Help?” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 124, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12009.
- Roberts, Sarah T. 2019. Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Age of Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Rue, Frank de La. 2013. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. Human Rights Council, United Nations. Accessed March 6, 2020. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A.HRC.23.40_EN.pdf.
- Schmidt, Viviane A. 2012. Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks Online.
- Schreiber, Anderson. 2018. “ Marco Civil da Internet: Avanço ou Retrocesso? A Responsabilidade Civil por Dano derivado do Conteúdo Gerado por Terceiro [Civil Framework of the Internet: Advance or Backward? Responsibility Damage arising from Third Party Content].” Accessed March 6, 2020. http://sdls.com.br/assets/files/2018/06/artigo-marco-civil-internet.pdf.
- Schulz, Wolfgang. 2019. “Roles and Responsibilities of Information Intermediaries: Fighting Misinformation as a Test Case for a Humans Rights-Respecting Governance of Social Media Platforms.” Aegis Series Paper No. 1904. Accessed March 6, 2020. https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/schulz_webreadypdf.pdf.
- Síthigh, Daithí Mac. 2019. “ The Road to Responsibilities: New Attitudes Towards Internet Intermediaries.” Information & Communications Technology Law 1.
- Souza, Carlos Affonso and Ronaldo Lemos. 2016. Marco Civil da Internet – Construção e Aplicação [Marco Civil da Internet – Construction and Application] 16. Juiz De Fora: Edit Associated Publisher.
- Souza, Carlos Affonso, Fabro Steibel, and Ronado Lemos. 2017. “ Notes on the Creation and Impacts of Brazil’s Internet Bill of Rights.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 73.
- Superior Court of Justice (STJ). Provedores, redes sociais e conteúdos ofensivos: o papel do STJ na definição de responsabilidades. [Providers, social networks and offensive content: the role of STJ in the definition of liability]. Accessed on June 06, 2019. http://www.stj.jus.br/sites/STJ/default/pt_BR/Comunicação/noticias/Not%C3%ADcias/Provedores,-redes-sociais-e-conteúdos-ofensivos:-o-papel-do-STJ-na-definição-de-responsabilidades/.
- Suzor, Nicolas. 2019. Lawless. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Teffé, Chiara Antonia Spadaccini. 2015. A Responsabilidade Civil do Provedor de Aplicações de Internet Pelos Danos Decorrentes do Conteúdo Gerado por Terceiros, de Acordo com o Marco Civil da Internet [The Liability of the Internet Applications Provider for Damage Resulting from Content Generated by Third Parties, in accordance with the Civil Framework of the Internet]. Revista Fórum De Direito Civil – RFDC 1. Accessed March 6, 2020. https://www.editoraforum.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/A-responsabilidade-civil-do-provedor-de-aplicacoes-de-internet.pdf.
- Zingales, Nicolo. 2015. “ The Brazilian Approach to Internet Intermediary Liability: Blueprint for a Global Regime?” Internet Policy Review 4, 4.