References
- Bhatt, Abhinav. 2005. The First Sale of Software. Singapore Law Gazette.
- Bigos, Oren. 2005. “Jurisdiction over Cross-Border Wrongs on the Internet.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54: 585–620.
- Braun, Nora. 2003. “The Interface Between the Protection of Technological Measures and the Exercise of Exceptions to Copyright and Related Rights: Comparing the Situation in the United States and the European Community.” European Intellectual Property Review 25: 496–503.
- Cornish, William. 2004. Intellectual Property: Omnipresent, Distracting, Irrelevant? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hazucha, Branislav, Hsiao-Chien Liu, and Toshihide Watabe. 2013. “Copyright, Protection Measures and Their Acceptance by Consumers.” In Governing Innovation and Expression: New Regimes, Strategies and Techniques, edited by Katja Weckström, 271–302. Turku: University of Turku Press.
- Hinze, Gwen. 1997. “Seven Lessons from a Comparison of the Technological Protection Measure Provisions.” Accessed 7 January 2021. https://www.eff.org/pages/seven-lessons-comparison-technological-protection-measure-provisions.
- LaFrance, Mary. 2013. “Wag the Dog: Using Incidental Intellectual Property Rights to Block Parallel Imports.” Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 20: 45.
- Marks, Dean, and Bruce Turnbull. 1999. “Technical Protection Measures: The Intersection of Technology, Law and Commercial Licenses.” Accessed 7 January 2021. https://cryptome.org/wipo-imp99-3.htm
- Mazziotti, Giuseppe. 2016. “Is Geo-blocking a Real Cause for Concern in Europe?” European Intellectual Property Review 38 (6): 365–376.
- Ministry of Law. 2016. Public Consultation Paper on Proposed Changes to Singapore’s Copyright Regime (August) (‘Public Consultation Paper’), Annex B, 52.
- Mirandah. 2008. “Parallel Imports Permitted on Patented Products in Singapore.” 20 December. Accessed 7 January 2021. http://www.mirandah.com/pressroom/item/82-parallel-imports-permitted-on-patented-products-in-singapore.
- Parliament of Australia, House of Representatives Committees. 2006. Review of Technological Protection Measures Exceptions. Accessed 7 January 2021. https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=/laca/protection/chapter2.htm.
- Raval, Melchor I. 2012. “Game Over for Mod Chips? The Aftermath of Sony v. Stevens and the Australian-US Free Trade Agreement.” European Intellectual Property Review 34 (2): 95–107.
- Rychlicki, Tomasz. 2007. “An Opinion on Legal Regulations on Reverse Engineering and Technological Protections Measures.” Computer and Telecommunications Law Review 13: 94–99.
- Saw, Cheng Lim, and Warren B. Chik. 2015. “Whither the Future of Internet Streaming and Time-Shifting? Revisiting the Rights of Reproduction and Communication to the Public in Copyright Law after Aereo.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 23: 63.
- Sheinblatt, Julie S. 1998. “The WIPO Copyright Treaty.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 13: 535.
- Straits Times. 2016. “VPN Technology Being Reviewed as Part of Proposed Changes to Copyright Law.” The Straits Times (Singapore, 23 August). Accessed 7 January 2021. http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/vpn-technology-being-reviewed-under-new-proposed-changes-to-copyright-lawhttps://cryptome.org/wipo-imp99-3.htm.
- US Copyright Office. 2017. “Section 1201 of Title 17: A Report of the Register of Copyrights.” (US Copyright Office, June). Accessed 7 January 2021. https://www.copyright.gov/policy/1201/section-1201-full-report.pdf.
- Von Lohmann, Fred. 2010. “Unintended Consequences: Twelve Years under the DMCA.” February. Accessed 7 January 2021. eff.org/files/eff-unintended-consequences-12-years.pdf.
Treaties
- ‘WIPO Copyright Treaty’ (WIPO, 20 December 1996)
Cases
- Case C-128/11 UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp. [2013] Bus. L.R. 911
- Highway Video Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor [2001] 3 SLR(R) 830
- Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment v Stevens (2002) 200 ALR 55
- Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment v Stevens (2003) 132 FCR 31
- PP v Teoh Ai Nee [1995] 2 SLR 69
- Television Broadcasts Ltd v Golden Line Video [1989] 1 MLJ 201
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Eric Corley 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir 2001)