Legal decision support systems in Cuba: some background and notes for future projects

References

• Al-Abdulkarim, L., K. Atkinson, and T. Bench-Capon. 2016a. “A Methodology for Designing Systems to Reason with Legal Cases Using Abstract Dialectical Frameworks.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (1): 1–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9178-1.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Abdulkarim, L., K. M. Atkinson, and T. Bench-Capon. 2016b. “Statement Types in Legal Argument.” In Proceedings of JURIX 2016. IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Abdulkarim, L., K. Atkinson, T. Bench-Capon, S. Whittle, R. Williams, and C. Wolfenden. 2019. “Noise Induced Hearing Loss: Building an Application Using the ANGELIC Methodology.” Argument and Computation 10 (1): 5–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/AAC-181005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aletras, N., D. Tsarapatsanis, D. Preoţiuc-Pietro, and V. Lampos. 2016. “Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing Perspective.” PeerJ Computer Science 2016 (10): e93. doi:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93.
   Google Scholar
• Aleven, V. 1997. “Teaching Case-Based Argumentation through an Example and Models.” University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Alpaydin, E. 2020. Introduction to Machine Learning. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amoroso, Y. 1994. “Proyecto Menjur: Una Alternativa Válida Para El Perfeccionamiento Del Ordenamiento Jurídico Cubano.” Informática y Derecho: Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Informático 1994 (5): 815–824.
   Google Scholar
• Amoroso, Y. 2018. “La Administración Pública En La Encrucijada Del Big Data.” La Habana.
   Google Scholar
• Amoroso, Y. 2019. “Pasado, Presente y Futuro de La Informática Jurídica.” In El Derecho de Las TIC En Iberoamérica, edited by Marcelo Bauzá, 71–102. Montevideo, Uruguay: La Ley.
   Google Scholar
• Amoroso, Y., and M. Sassi. 2000. Recopilación y Apuntes Para Una Historiografía Constitucional Cubana: Un Análisis Lexicográfico. Pisa: ILC-CNR, S.T.A.R.
   Google Scholar
• Asamblea Nacional del Poder Popular. 2019. Constitución de La República de Cuba. La Habana, Cuba.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, K. D. 2011. “The Case-Based Reasoning Approach: Ontologies for Analogical Legal Argument.” In Approaches to Legal Ontologies. Law, Governance and Technology Series, Vol 1, 99–115. Springer, Dordrecht. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0120-5_6.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, K. D. 2017. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316761380.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, K., T. Bench-Capon, and D. Bollegala. 2020. “Explanation in AI and Law: Past, Present and Future.” Artificial Intelligence 289 (December): 103387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bench-Capon, T. 2020. “The Need for Good Old Fashioned Ai and Law.” In International Trends in Legal Informatics: A Festschrift for Erich Schweighofer, edited by C. Hötzendorfer, W. Tschohl, and F. Kummer, 23–36. Bern: Weblaw.
   Google Scholar
• Bench-Capon, T., M. Araszkiewicz, K. Ashley, K. Atkinson, F. Bex, F. Borges, D. Bourcier, et al. 2012. “A History of AI and Law in 50 Papers: 25 Years of the International Conference on AI and Law.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (3): 215–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9131-x.
   Google Scholar
• Bench-Capon, T., and K. Atkinson. 2017. “Dimensions and Values for Legal CBR.” In Proceedings of JURIX 2017, 27–32. https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3013630/1/atkinson_crc.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bench-Capon, T., and K. Atkinson. 2018. “Lessons from Implementing Factors with Magnitude.” In Proceedings of JURIX 2018, 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bench-Capon, T., and F. P. Coenen. 1992. “Isomorphism and Legal Knowledge Based Systems.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1): 65–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118479.
   Google Scholar
• Bing, J. 2010. “Let There Be Lite: A Brief History of Legal Information Retrieval.” European Journal of Law and Technology 1 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, I., and D. López. 2015. “Big Data y Fair Play En El Tratamiento de Datos Personales.” Red Iberoamericana de Protección de Datos. 2015. http://www.redipd.org/noticias_todas/2015/tribuna/news/07_09_2015-ides-idphp.php.
   Google Scholar
• Blaquier, M. 2006. “OnProc: Una Ontología Para El Proceso Jurídico.” In Congreso Internacional INFO 2006. La Habana, Cuba: IIDICT.
   Google Scholar
• Blaquier, M. 2015. “La Similaridad de Términos En El Lenguaje Jurídico. Similaridad Semántica y Correspondencia de Nombres.” In X Conferencia Internacional de Derecho e Informática de La Habana. La Habana.
   Google Scholar
• Blaquier, M., R. Alonso, E. Infante, A. Quintero, E. Rodríguez, and Y. Viera. 2003. “La Modelación Computacional de Los Procesos Jurídicos: Una Herramienta de Análisis.” In 2da Conferencia Iberoamericana En Sistemas, Cibernética e Informática. Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Branting, L. Karl. 2017. “Data-Centric and Logic-Based Models for Automated Legal Problem Solving.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (1): 5–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9193-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branting, L. K., C. Pfeifer, B. Brown, L. Ferro, J. Aberdeen, B. Weiss, M. Pfaff, and B. Liao. 2020. “Scalable and Explainable Legal Prediction.” Artificial Intelligence and Law, June, 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09273-1.
   Google Scholar
• Bruninghaus, S., and K. D. Ashley. 2003. “Predicting Outcomes of Case Based Legal Arguments.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 233–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1047788.1047838.
   Google Scholar
• Casanovas, P., G. Sartor, M. Biasiotti, and M. Fernández-Barrera. 2011. “Introduction: Theory and Methodology in Legal Ontology Engineering: Experiences and Future Directions.” In Approaches to Legal Ontologies, Law, Governance and Technology Series, Vol 1, 1–14. Springer, Dordrecht. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0120-5_1.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, P., J. Clinton, R. Kerber, T. Khabaza, T. Reinartz, C. Shearer, and R. Wirth. 2000. “CRISP-DM 1.0 Step-by-Step Data Mining Guide”.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., S. Mao, and Y. Liu. 2014. “Big Data: A Survey.” Mobile Networks and Applications 19 (2): 171–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-013-0489-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, J. E. 2017. “PL/R - R Procedural Language for PostgreSQL”.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, J. 2019. Introduction to Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fayyad, U., et al. 2001. “Knowledge Discovery In Databases: An Overview.” In Relational Data Mining, edited by S. Džeroski, 28–47. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, E., M. A. Hall, and I. H. Witten. 2016. The WEKA Workbench. Online Appendix for “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques”. 4th ed. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Galindo, F. 2019. “La Informática En Los Ámbitos Jurídicos Universitarios.” In El Derecho de Las TIC En Iberoamérica, edited by Marcelo Bauzá, 171–202. Montevideo, Uruguay: La Ley.
   Google Scholar
• García, Y. 2016. “Método Para La Desambiguación Sintáctica de Textos de La Legislación Cubana.” Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas. https://repositorio.uci.cu/handle/123456789/7998.
   Google Scholar
• González, I., and J. Rivera. 2017. “Informatización de La Impartición de Justicia, Tribunales Populares Cubanos.” In 8va. Conferencia Científica Internacional de La Universidad de Holguín. Holguín.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, G., A. Mowbray, and P. Chung. 2018. “Building Sustainable Free Legal Advisory Systems: Experiences from the History of AI & Law.” Computer Law and Security Review 34 (2): 314–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevara, B. 2014. “Modelo de Gestión Del Conocimiento Jurídico Basado En La Ejecución de Una Arquitectura de Software.” Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas.
   Google Scholar
• Heredia, L. 2018. “Actualización de Los Sistemas Informáticos En La Organización Nacional de Bufetes Colectivos.” In XVI Convención y Feria Internacional INFORMÁTICA 2018. La Habana.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, B. D., and Y. Otero. 2015. “Mercado de Datos Para Los Departamentos de Procesos Penales y Gestión de Cuadros y Personal de Apoyo de La Fiscalía General de La República de Cuba.” Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas.
   Google Scholar
• Horty, J. 2019. “Reasoning with Dimensions and Magnitudes.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 27 (3): 309–345. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85076643759&partnerID=40&md5=c95e7e3713f59cabb360888616df91a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. A., and T. Rostain. 2020. “Tool for Surveillance or Spotlight on Inequality? Big Data and the Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 16: 453–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-061020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, R. 2004. “The Data Warehouse Lifecycle Toolkit.” New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lamorú, D. 2015. “Minería de Datos Aplicada a Expedientes Ordinarios Contractuales de La Sala de Lo Económico Del Tribunal Provincial de La Habana.” Universidad Tecnológica de La Habana José Antonio Hecheverría.
   Google Scholar
• Leith, P. 2016. “The Rise and Fall of the Legal Expert System.” International Review of Law, Computers and Technology 30 (3): 94–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2016.1232465.
   Google Scholar
• Leone, V., L. Di Caro, and S. Villata. 2020. “Taking Stock of Legal Ontologies: A Feature-Based Comparative Analysis.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (2): 207–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09252-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., G. Zhang, L. Yu, and T. Meng. 2019. “Research and Design on Cognitive Computing Framework for Predicting Judicial Decisions.” Journal of Signal Processing Systems 91 (10): 1159–1167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-018-1429-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loevinger, L. 1949. “Jurimetrics-The Next Step Forward.” Minnesota Law Review 33 (5): 455–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, L., R.M. Rodriguez, and F. Herrera. 2015. The 2-Tuple Linguistic Model: Computing with Words in Decision Making. Cham: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24714-4.
   Google Scholar
• McCarty, L. T. 1977. “Reflections on ‘Taxman’: An Experiment in Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning.” Harvard Law Review 90 (5): 837–893. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1340132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, L. T. 2018. “Finding the Right Balance in Artificial Intelligence and Law.” In Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence, edited by Woodrow Barfield, and Ugo Pagallo, 55–87. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439055.00013.
   Google Scholar
• Medvedeva, M., M. Vols, and M. Wieling. 2020. “Using Machine Learning to Predict Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (2): 237–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09255-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parellada, Y. 2014. “Mercados de Datos Para Los Departamentos Verificación Fiscal, Quejas Peticiones y Denuncias, Dictámenes y Revisiones de Causas Penales de La Fiscalía General de La República.” Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Z. 1995. “Rough Sets.” Journal of Information and Computer Sciences 11 (5): 341–356.
   Google Scholar
• Pentaho Corporation. 2012. “Pentaho.” Powerful Analytics Made Easy. 2012. http://www.pentaho.com/explore/pentaho-data-integration/.
   Google Scholar
• Picchi, E. 1997. DBT 3 - Data Base Testuale: Guida All’uso. Roma: Lexis Proggeti Editoriali.
   Google Scholar
• Placencia, P. J., and C. R. Rodríguez. 2016. “Componente Para La Construcción de Resúmenes Lingüísticos a Partir de Los Datos de Los Procesos Penales de La Fiscalía General de La República.” Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas. https://repositorio.uci.cu/handle/123456789/7715.
   Google Scholar
• Prakken, H., and G. Sartor. 1996. “A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3): 331–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118496.
   Google Scholar
• Pupo, J. C., C. Jiménez, A. Torres, Y. Figueroa, A. Parra, H. Fuentes, M. E. Delgado, and M. Álvarez. 2016. “Sistema de Gestión Fiscal: Informatización y Desarrollo.” In XIV Congreso Internacional de Información, INFO 2016. La Habana.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Alujas, Á. 2020. “El Estado Del Estado Abierto En América Latina: Avances, Alcances y Perspectivas.” Estado Abierto. Revista Sobre El Estado, La Administración Y Las Políticas Públicas 4 (1): 13–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rigoni, A. 2018. “Representing Dimensions Within the Reason Model of Precedent.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (1): 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9216-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissland, E. L., and K. D. Ashley. 1987. “A Case-Based System for Trade Secrets Law.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 60–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/41735.41743.
   Google Scholar
• Rissland, E. L., and D. B. Skalak. 1991. “CABARET: Rule Interpretation in a Hybrid Architecture.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34 (6): 839–887. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(91)90013-W.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, Y., and L. Solis. 2014. “Mercados de Datos Para Los Departamentos Civil y Familia, Administrativo y Atención a La Población de La Fiscalía General de La República.” Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, C. R., D. S. Zuev, and E. Cleger. 2019. “Model of Decision Support System for Legal Activities in Cuba: First Ideas [In Russian].” Scientific Notes 17 (1): 610–616.
   Google Scholar
• Sardiñas, O., and A. Benavides. 2013. “Mercado de Datos Económico Del Sistema de Información Estadístico Judicial Para Los Tribunales Populares.” Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas.
   Google Scholar
• Sassi, M., and Y. Amoroso. 2000. “Literatura, Derecho y Lingüistica Computacional: Recuento de Las Colaboraciones Italia-Cuba.” Pisa.
   Google Scholar
• Schlobohm, D. A., and D. A. Waterman. 1987. “Explanation for an Expert System That Performs Estate Pianning.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 18–27. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/41735.41738.
   Google Scholar
• Sergot, M. J., F. Sadri, R. A. Kowalski, F. Kriwaczek, P. Hammond, and H. T. Cory. 1986. “The British Nationality Act as a Logic Program.” Communications of the ACM 29 (5): 370–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/5689.5920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, D., A. Vold, K. Madan, and F. Schilder. 2021. “Multi-Label Legal Document Classification: A Deep Learning-Based Approach with Label-Attention and Domain-Specific Pre-Training.” Information Systems, January, 101718. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2021.101718.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, K. 2013. “Propuesta de Un Sistema de Alerta Temprana Para El Sistema de Informatización de La Gestión de Las Fiscalías.” Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas.
   Google Scholar
• Sulea, O. M., M. Zampieri, Mi Vela, and J. van Genabith. 2017. “Predicting the Law Area and Decisions of French Supreme Court Cases.” https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.01681v1.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, R. E. 2017. Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thammaboosadee, S., S. Kiattisin, S. Darakorn, and B. Watanapa. 2017. “Sentence Identification System Based on Criminal Law Ontology.” International Review of Law, Computers and Technology 31 (1): 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2017.1304615.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Anu, and Sivanesan Sangeetha. 2021. “Semi-Supervised, Knowledge-Integrated Pattern Learning Approach for Fact Extraction from Judicial Text.” Expert Systems 38 (3): e12656. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torra, V. 2010. “Hesitant Fuzzy Sets.” International Journal of Intelligent Systems 25 (6): 529–539. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, A. 2005. “Types and Roles of Legal Ontologies.” In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 65–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_5.
   Google Scholar
• Varona, D., Y. Lizama-Mue, and J. L. Suárez. 2020. “Machine Learning’s Limitations in Avoiding Automation of Bias.” AI and Society. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00996-y.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. F., A. Oskamp, J. A. Schrickx, G. J. Van Opdorp, and P. H. van den Berg. 1991. “PROLEXS: Creating Law and Order in a Heterogeneous Domain.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 35 (1): 35–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(07)80007-1.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J. 2020. “Legal Technology: The Great Disruption?” University of Melbourne Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series 897. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3664476.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang, A. 2021. “Reconciling Legal and Technical Approaches to Algorithmic Bias.” Tennessee Law Review 88 (3): 1–75.
   Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R. 1982. “A New Approach to the Summarization of Data.” Information Sciences 28: 69–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R. 2021. “An Introduction to Linguistic Summaries.” In Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 394:151–62. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54341-9_13.
   Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R., and R. L. Yager. 2016. “Using Linguistic Summaries and Concepts for Understanding Large Data.” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 56: 273–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, J. S. 2019. “Crime Data Warehousing and Crime Pattern Discovery.” In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Data Science, E-Learning and Information Systems (DATA ’19), 1–6. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3368691.3368731.
   Google Scholar
• Zamora, K. 2013. “Mercado de Datos Para El Subsistema Protección de Los Derechos Ciudadanos (PDC) Del Sistema de Informatización de La Gestión de Las Fiscalías.” Universidad de Ciencias Informáticas.
   Google Scholar