Technology-facilitated coercive control: response, redress, risk, and reform

References

• Academic Literature
   Google Scholar
• Ajder, H., G. Patrini, F. Cavalli, and L. Cullen. 2019. “The State of Deepfakes: Landscape, Threats, and Impact.” DeepTrace Technologies. https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/10/08/deepfake_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Australian House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs. 2021. Inquiry Into Family, Domestic and Sexual Violence: Final Report. Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS). 2021. Defining and Responding to Coercive Control: Policy Brief. Sydney: ANROWS.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, J., A. Flynn, and N. Henry. 2021. The Emerald International Handbook of Technology-Facilitated Violence and Abuse. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, C., and S. Walklate. 2021. “Gender, Risk Assessment and Coercive Control: Contradictions in Terms?” The British Journal of Criminology 61 (4): 887–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, H. 2017. “Revenge Porn and Mental Health: A Qualitative Analysis of the Mental Health Effects of Revenge Porn on Female Survivors.” Feminist Criminology 12 (1): 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116654565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belknap, J. 2021. The Invisible Woman: Gender, Crime, and Justice. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. 2016. “Why it’s so Hard to Prosecute Cases of Coercive or Controlling Behaviour.” The Conversation, October 31, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A., K. Lumsden, and L. Hadlington. 2019. “Why Don’t You Block Them?’ Police Officers’ Constructions of the Ideal Victim When Responding to Reports of Interpersonal Cybercrime.” In Online Othering: Exploring Digital Violence and Discrimination on the Web, edited by K. Harmer, and E. Lumsden, 355–378. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, N. 2018. “Thermostats, Locks and Lights: Digital Tools of Domestic Abuse.” New York Times, June 23, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Boxall, H., and A. Morgan. 2021. Experiences of Coercive Control among Australian Women. Statistical Bulletin 30. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Buzawa, E. S., C. G. Buzawa, and E. D. Stark. 2017. Responding to Domestic Violence: The Integration of Criminal Justice and Human Services. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, L., and S. Wright. 2020. Technology and Domestic Abuse. London: UK Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., and T. Gillespie. 2016. “What is a Flag for? Social Media Reporting Tools and the Vocabulary of Complaint.” New Media & Society 18 (3): 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobash, R. E., and R. Dobash. 1979. Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. 2018. “Legal Systems Abuse and Coercive Control.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 18 (1): 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817728380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H., and K. Chapple. 2019. National Domestic and Family Violence Bench Book. https://dfvbenchbook.aija.org.au/contents.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H., and R. Fitzgerald. 2018. “The Domestic Violence Protection Order System as Entry to the Criminal Justice System for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People.” International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 7 (3): 41–57. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v7i3.499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H., B. Harris, and M. Dragiewicz. 2019. “Technology-facilitated Domestic and Family Violence: Women’s Experiences.” The British Journal of Criminology 59 (3): 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, C., A. Morgan, S. Hulme, M. Manning, and G. Wong. 2018. “Protection Orders for Domestic Violence: A Systematic Review.” Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice 5 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dragiewicz, M., J. Burgess, A. Matamoros-Fernández, M. Salter, N. P. Suzor, D. Woodlock, and B. Harris. 2018. “Technology Facilitated Coercive Control: Domestic Violence and the Competing Roles of Digital Media Platforms.” Feminist Media Studies 18 (4): 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragiewicz, M., D. Woodlock, M. Salter, and B. Harris. 2022. “What’s Mum’s Password?” Australian Mothers’ Perceptions of Children’s Involvement in Technology-Facilitated Coercive Control.” Journal of Family Violence 37: 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00283-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, S. 2021. Women, Not Politicians, Are Targeted Most Often by Deepfake Videos. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, M. A., L. Goodman, and R. J. Schmidt. 2005. “Development and Validation of a Coercive Control Measure for Intimate Partner Violence.” Final Technical Report for National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. COSMOS Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Fitz-Gibbon, K., and S. Walklate. 2018. Gender, Crime and Criminal Justice. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freed, D., J. Palmer, D. Minchala, K. Levy, T. Ristenpart, and N. Dell. 2018. “A Stalker’s Paradise”: How Intimate Partner Abusers Exploit Technology. CHI 2018. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.11453173574.3174241.
   Google Scholar
• Gieseke, A. P. 2020. “The New Weapon of Choice”: Law’s Current Inability to Properly Address Deepfake Pornography.” Vanderbilt Law Review 73 (5): 1479–1515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, M. 2020. “How Domestic Abusers Have Exploited Technology During the Pandemic.” Time, December 31, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Goodmark, L. 2018. Decriminalising Domestic Violence: A Balanced Approach to Intimate Partner Violence. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodmark, L. 2021. “Reimagining VAWA: Why Criminalization is a Failed Policy and What a non-Carceral VAWA Could Look Like.” Violence Against Women 27 (1): 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220949686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosse, C., and J. Burkell. 2020. “Politics and Porn: How News Media Characterizes Problems Presented by Deepfakes.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 37 (5): 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2020.1832697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, T., D. Chung, and M. Peters. 2009. The Use of Information and Communication Technologies to Coerce and Control in Domestic Violence and Following Separation. Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, C. 2009. “The Paradox of Progress: Translating Evan Stark’s Coercive Control Into Legal Doctrine for Abused Women.” Violence Against Women 15 (12): 1458–1476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209347091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, B., and D. Woodlock. 2019. “Digital Coercive Control: Insights from two Landmark Domestic Violence Studies.” The British Journal of Criminology 59 (3): 530–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, N., and A. Powell. 2015. “Embodied Harms: Gender, Shame and Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence.” Violence Against Women 21 (6): 758–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215576581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. 2019. See What you Made me do: Power, Control and Domestic Abuse. Melbourne: Black Inc Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kaspiew, R., B. Horsfall, L. Qu, J. M. Nicholson, C. Humphreys, K. Diemer, C. D. Nguyen, et al. 2017. Domestic and Family Violence and Parenting: Mixed Method Insights Into Impact and Support Needs: Final Report. Sydney: ANROWS.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. 1987. “The Continuum of Sexual Violence.” In Women, Violence and Social Control, edited by J. Holmes, and M. Maynards, 46–60. Houndmills: Macmillan Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. 1988. Surviving Sexual Violence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Killean, R. 2021. “A Leap Forward’? Critiquing the Criminalization of Domestic Abuse in Northern Ireland.” Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 71 (4): 595–617. https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v71i4.918.
   Google Scholar
• Lever, K., and J. Eckstein. 2021. “I Never Did Those Things They Said!” Image, Coercive Control, and Intrusion from Former Partners’ Technology-Mediated Abuse.” Iowa Journal of Communication 52 (1): 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Mantle, G., and M. Hermans. 2020. “Criminalising Coercive Control is Not the Answer: An Abolitionist Critique.” Honi Soit, October 22, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Maras, M.-H. 2015. “Internet of Things: Security and Privacy Implications.” International Data Privacy Law 5 (2): 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipv004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maras, M.-H., and A. Alexandrou. 2019. “Determining Authenticity of Video Evidence in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and in the Wake of Deepfake Videos.” The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 23 (3): 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712718807226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matias, J. N., A. Johnson, W. E. Boesel, B. Keegan, J. Friedman, and C. DeTar. 2015. “Reporting, Reviewing, and Responding to Harassment on Twitter.” Women, Action, and the Media. May 13, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mcglynn, C., E. Rackley, and R. Houghton. 2017. “Beyond ‘Revenge Porn’: The Continuum of Image-Based Sexual Abuse.” Feminist Legal Studies 25: 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGorrery P., J. Hill, H. Foster, M. McMahon, and A. Daniel. 2020. “Coercive Control is a Form of Intimate Terrorism and Must be Criminalised.” The Guardian, October 6, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, M., and P. McGorrery. 2016. “Criminalising Emotional Abuse, Intimidation and Economic Abuse in the Context of Family Violence: The Tasmanian Experience.” University of Tasmania Law Review 35 (2): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, M., and P. McGorrery. 2020. Criminalising Coercive Control: Family Violence and the Criminal law. Singapore: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Messing, J., M. Bagwell-Gray, M. L. Brown, A. Kappas, and A. Durfee. 2020. “Intersections of Stalking and Technology-Based Abuse: Emerging Definitions, Conceptualization, and Measurement.” Journal of Family Violence 35 (7): 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00114-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. E., and C. Raghavan. 2021. “The Impact of Coercive Control on Use of Specific Sexual Coercion Tactics.” Violence Against Women 27 (2): 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219884127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancarrow, H., K. Thomas, V. Ringland, and T. Modini. 2020. Accurately Identifying the “Person Most in Need of Protection” in Domestic and Family Violence law: Research Report 23. Sydney: ANROWS.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C., A. Molnar, J. Dalek, J. Knockel, M. Kenyon, B. Haselton, C. Khoo, et al. 2019. The Predator in Your Pocket: A Multidisciplinary Assessment of the Stalkerware Application Industry. Toronto: Citizen Lab. June 12, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• PenzeyMoog, E., and D. C. Slakoff. 2021. “As Technology Evolves, so Does Domestic Violence: Modern-Day Tech Abuse and Possible Solutions.” In The Emerald International Handbook of Technology-Facilitated Violence and Abuse, edited by J. Bailey, A. Flynn, and N. Henry, 643–662. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A., and N. Henry. 2017. Sexual Violence in a Digital Age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A., and N. Henry. 2018. “Policing Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence Against Adult Victims: Police and Service Sector Perspectives.” Policing and Society 28 (3): 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2016.1154964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A., N. Henry, and A. Flynn. 2018. “Image-based Sexual Abuse.” In Handbook of Critical Criminology, edited by W. DeKeseredy, and M. Dragiewicz, 305–3015. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quilter, J. 2020. “Evaluating Criminalisation as a Strategy in Relation to Non-Physical Family Violence.” In Criminalising Coercive Control: Family Violence and the Criminal law, edited by M. McMahon, and P. McGorrery, 111–131. Singapore: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, A. 2020. “How Your Smart Home Devices Can be Turned Against You.” BBC News, May 11, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Schechter, S. 1982. Women and Male Violence: The Visions and Struggles of the Battered Women’s Movement. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shoalcast Community Legal Centre. 2020. Submission to the NSW Parliamentary Inquiry on Coercive Control (Submission 136).
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C. 1989. Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S.G., X. Zhang, K.C. Basile, M.T. Merrick, J. Wang, M.-J. Kresnow, and J.Chen. 2018. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2015 Data Brief – Updated Release. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E. 2007. Coercive Control: The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E. 2020. “The ‘Coercive Control Framework’: Making Law Work for Women.” In Criminalising Coercive Control: Family Violence and the Criminal law, edited by M. McMahon, and P. McGorrery, 33–49. Singapore: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E., and M. Hester. 2019. “Coercive Control: Update and Review.” Violence Against Women 25 (1): 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218816191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State of Queensland. 2015. Not Now Not Ever: Putting an End to Domestic and Family Violence in Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrant, S., J. Tolmie, and G. Giudice. 2019. Transforming Legal Understandings of Intimate Partner Violence. Research Report 03/2019. Sydney: ANROWS.
   Google Scholar
• Tolmie, J. 2018. “Coercive Control: To Criminalize or not to Criminalize?” Criminology & Criminal Justice 18 (1): 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817746712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson, D. 2020. “Coercive Control and Intimate Partner Homicide.” In Criminalising Coercive Control: Family Violence and the Criminal law, edited by M. McMahon, and P. McGorrery, 73–92. Singapore: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Home Office. 2015. Statutory Guidance Framework on Controlling or Coercive Behaviour in an Intimate or Family Relationship. London: UK Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Vera-Grey, F., and L. Kelly. 2020. “Contested Gendered Space: Public Sexual Harassment and Women’s Safety Work.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 44 (4): 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2020.1732435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walklate, S., and K. Fitz-Gibbon. 2019. “The Criminalisation of Coercive Control: The Power of law?” International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 8 (4): 94–108. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v8i4.1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walklate, S., and K. Fitz-Gibbon. 2021. “Why Criminalise Coercive Control? The Complicity of the Criminal Law in Punishing Women Through Furthering the Power of the State.” International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 10 (4): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walklate, S., K. Fitz-Gibbon, and J. McCulloch. 2018. “Is More law the Answer? Seeking Justice for Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Through the Reform of Legal Categories.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 18 (1): 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817728561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangmann, J. 2020. “Coercive Control as the Context for Intimate Partner Violence: The Challenge for the Legal System.” In Criminalising Coercive Control: Family Violence and the Criminal law, edited by M. McMahon, and P. McGorrery, 219–242. Singapore: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Woodlock, D. 2015. ReCharge: Women’s Technology Safety, Legal Resources, Research & Training. Women’s Legal Services NSW, Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria and WESNET Collingwood.
   Google Scholar
• Woodlock, D. 2017. “The Abuse of Technology in Domestic Violence and Stalking.” Violence Against Women 23 (5): 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216646277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodlock, D., M. McKenzie, D. Western, and B. Harris. 2020. “Technology as a Weapon in Domestic Violence: Responding to Digital Coercive Control.” Australian Social Work 73 (3): 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2019.1607510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley, E. 2021. “Technology-Facilitated Domestic Abuse in Political Economy: A New Theoretical Framework.” Violence Against Women 27 (10): 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220947172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zauner, J. 2021. “The Continuum of Symbolic Violence: How Sexting Education Neglects Image-Based-Abuse Sexual Abuse, Dismisses Perpetrators’ Responsibility, and Violates Rights to Sexual Autonomy.” Journal of Gender-Based Violence 5 (3): 483–498.
   Google Scholar
• Case Law
   Google Scholar
• Attorney-General (Tas) v CL [2018] TASFC 6
   Google Scholar
• Buturugă v. Romania (App No. 56867/15) [2020] ECHR
   Google Scholar
• Harrison v. Moore [2018] TASSC 53
   Google Scholar
• International Legal Materials
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe, 2001. “Convention on Cybercrime.” European Treaty Series 185.
   Google Scholar
• Legislation
   Google Scholar
• Crimes Act 1958 [Vic]
   Google Scholar
• Crimes Amendment (Apprehended Violence) Act 2006 [NSW]
   Google Scholar
• Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Code (Stalking) Amendment Act of 1999 [Qld]
   Google Scholar
• Domestic Abuse Act 2018 [Scotland]
   Google Scholar
• Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012 [Qld]
   Google Scholar
• Domestic Violence Act 2018 [Ireland]
   Google Scholar
• Family Code [California]
   Google Scholar
• Family Court Act [NY]
   Google Scholar
• Family Violence Act 2004 [Tas]
   Google Scholar
• Family Violence Protection Act 2008 [VIC]
   Google Scholar
• Hawaii Revised Statutes [Hawaii]
   Google Scholar
• Serious Crime Act 2015 [England and Wales]
   Google Scholar
• Victims of Crime Assistance Act 1976 [Tas]
   Google Scholar
• Bills and Decrees
   Google Scholar
• Crimes (Stalking) Bill (Victoria) (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Decree on the promulgation of the Law amending and supplementing Law no. 217/2003 for the prevention and combating of domestic violence (2020) (Romania).
   Google Scholar
• Senate Bill No. 1141 (California) (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Senate Bill No. 1091 (Connecticut) (2021).
   Google Scholar
• South Australia Criminal Law Consolidation (Coercive Control) Amendment Bill (105) (2020). Parliament of South Australia).
   Google Scholar
• House Bill No. 2425 (Hawaii) (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Bill 207 (Ontario). 2020.
   Google Scholar