References
- Allen, Anita L. 1999. “Coercing Privacy.” William & Mary Law Review 40: 723.
- APEC. 2005. APEC Privacy Framework. https://www.apec.org/publications/2005/12/apec-privacy-framework.
- Balkin, Jack M. 2015. “Information Fiduciaries and the First Amendment.” U.C. Davis Law Review 1183.
- Bhandari, Vrinda, Amba Kak, Smriti Parsheera, and Faiza Rahman. 2017. Social Science Open Access Repository. Accessed May 30, 2023. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54766-2.
- Bhatia, Gautam. n.d. The Supreme Court’s Right to Privacy Judgment IV: Privacy, Informational Self-Determination, and the Idea of Consent, Idea of Consent, Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy. Accessed May 30, 2023. https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/2017/08/30/the-supreme-courts-right-to-privacy-judgment-iv-privacy-informational-self-determination-and-the-idea-of-consent/.
- Brownsword, Roger. 2006. Contract Law: Themes for the Twenty-First Century. OUP.
- Burman, Anirudh. 2020. Carnegie India. March 09. https://carnegieindia.org/2020/03/09/will-india-s-proposed-data-protection-law-protect-privacy-and-promote-growth-pub-81217last.
- Cate, Fred H. 2012. Technology|Academics|Policy Notice and Consent in a World of Big Data. November 26. Accessed May 30, 2023. https://www.techpolicy.com/NoticeConsent-inWorldBigData.aspx.
- Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2012/C 326/02). 2012. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX%3A12012P%2FTXT.
- Council Regulation (EU) 2016/679 General Data Protection Regulation. 2016. April 27. https://gdpr.eu/tag/gdpr/.
- Economic Times. 2018. The Economic Times. December 21. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/10-central-agencies-can-now-snoop-on-any-computer-they-want/articleshow/67188875.cms?from=mdr.
- Euronews. 2021. Dutch Data Protection Authority fines TikTok € 750,000 over privacy flaw. July 22. https://www.euronews.com/next/2021/07/22/dutch-data-protection-authority-fines-tiktok-750-000-over-privacy-flaw.
- Gindin, Susan E. 2009. “Nobody Reads Your Privacy Policy or Online Contract? Lessons Learned and Questions Raised by the FTC’s Action Against Sears.” Northwest Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 8: 1.
- GoI. 2017. “White Paper of the Committee of Experts on a Data Protection Framework for India.” Accessed May 30, 2023.” http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/rep_privacy.pdf.
- GoI. 2018a. “A Free and Fair Digital Economy, Protecting Privacy, Empowering Indians.” Accessed January 2024. https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Data_Protection_Committee_Report.pdf.
- GoI. 2018b. The Personal Data Protection Bill. https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Personal_Data_Protection_Bill,2018.pdf.
- GoI. 2019. The Personal Dara Protection Bill. http://164.100.47.4/BillsTexts/LSBillTexts/Asintroduced/373_2019_LS_Eng.pdf.
- GoI. 2021. The Joint Parliamentary Committee on Personal Data Protection Bil. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1emcAB8HjE2oCC_DI6zR5YPnPQ5iwwwCT/view?ref=static.internetfreedom.in.
- GoI. 2022. Digital Personal Data Protection Bill. https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/The%20Digital%20Personal%20Data%20Potection%20Bill%2C%202022_0.pdf.
- GoI. 2023. Digital Personal Data Protection Act.
- GoI. n.d. The Indian Contract Act, 1872. https://lddashboard.legislative.gov.in/actsofparliamentfromtheyear/indian-contract-act-1872.
- Gupta, Indranath, and Parth Naithani. 2023. “What is Left of Consent When it is Deemed Consent: A Data Protection Experiment in India.” Journal of Data Protection & Privacy 6 (1): 71–83.
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. v. Union of India. 2017. 10 SCC 1 (The Supreme Court of India, September 28).
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India. 2019. 1 SCC 1 (The Supreme Court of India).
- Kharak Singh v. State of U.P. 1963. AIR 1963 SC 1295 (The Supreme Court).
- Matthan, Rahul. 2017a. Takshashila Institution, Beyond Consent - A New Paradigm for Data Protection. July. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/618a55c4cb03246776b68559/t/62a6beb7e9a41c52669d188b/1655094971332/TDD-Beyond-Consent-Data-Protection-RM-2017-03.pdf.
- Matthan, Rahul. 2017b. Takshashila Institution, Beyond Consent - A New Paradigm for Data Protection. July. Accessed May 30, 2023. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/618a55c4cb03246776b68559/t/62a6beb7e9a41c52669d188b/1655094971332/TDD-Beyond-Consent-Data-Protection-RM-2017-03.pdf.
- M.P. Sharma and Ors. V. Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi and Ors. 1950. SCR 1077 (The Supreme Court of India).
- Omotubora, Adekemi, and Subhajit Basu. 2020. “Next Generation Privacy.” Information & Communication Technology Law, 151–173.
- PRS Legislative Research. n.d. The DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill 2019. https://www.prsindia.org/sites/default/files/bill_files/DNA%20Technology%20Bill%2C%202018%20as%20passed%20by%20LS.pdflast.
- R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu. 1994. 6 SCC 632 (The Supreme Court of India).
- Schwartz, Paul M. 2000. “Internet Privacy and the State.” Connecticut Law Review.
- SG. 2012. Personal Data Protection Act. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/PDPA2012.
- Sinha, Amber, and Scott Mason. 2016. A Critique of Consent in Information Privacy. January 11. https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/a-critique-of-consent-in-information-privacy.
- Solove, Daniel. 2013. “Privacy Self Management and the Consent Dilemma.” Harvard Law Review 126: 1894–1900.
- Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration. 2009. 9 SCC 1 (The Supreme Court of India).
- Sur, Aihik, and Deepsekhar Choudhury. 2022. Money Control. August 03. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/complicated-data-protection-bill-would-have-hurt-startups-rajeev-chandrasekhar-8947571.html.
- Tene, Omer, and Jules Polonetsky. 2013. “Big Data for All: Privacy and User Control in the Age of Analytics.” Northwest Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 11: 239.
- UIDAI. n.d. Unique Identification Authority of India. Accessed January 20, 2024. https://uidai.gov.in/aadhaar_dashboard/.