Enabling connections in postgraduate supervision for an applied eLearning professional development programme

References

• Altekruse, M. K., & Brew, L. (2000). Using the web for distance learning. In J. W. Bloom, & G. R. Walz (Eds.), Cybercounseling and cyberlearning: Strategies and resources for the millennium (pp. 129–141). Alexandria: American Counseling Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: It’s place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 98–118.
   Google Scholar
• Boitshwarelo, B. (2011). Proposing an integrated research framework for connectivism: Utilising theoretical synergies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 161–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brew, A., & Peseta, T. (2004). Changing postgraduate supervision practice: A programme to encourage learning through reflection and feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate, 4, Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=550
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, D., Pearson, M., Saha, L. J., & Spear, R. H. (1994). Establishing effective PhD supervision. Canberra: AGPS.
   Google Scholar
• de Beer, M., & Mason, R. B. (2009). Using a blended approach to facilitate postgraduate supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O., Samara, A., & Westrheim, K. (2006). Multivoiced supervision of Master’s students: A case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 299–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emilsson, U. M., & Johnsson, E. (2007). Supervision of supervisors: on developing supervision in postgraduate education. Higher Education Research and Development, 26, 163–179.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, A., & Martens, E. (2008). Transforming supervisors? A critique of post-liberal approaches to research supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 279–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, J., & Ryland, K. (2009). Building research supervision and training. Interim Report, University of Technology, Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council Project. Retrieved January 12, 2012, from http://www.first.edu.au/public/ALTC/ALTC_building_research_capacity_interviews_analysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hedberg, J., & Corrent-Agostinho, S. (2000). Creating a postgraduate virtual community: Assessment drives learning. Education Media International, 37, 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J., Gaffney, R., & Jones, E. (2011). Social network sites and student–lecturer communication: An academic voice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 35, 201–219.
   Google Scholar
• Kandlbinder, P. (1998). Transforming post-graduate supervision. In Conference proceedings HERDSA, Auckland, Newzealand. Retrieved from http://www2.auckland.ac.nz/cpd//HERDSA/HTML/TchLearn/kandlb.HTM
   Google Scholar
• Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/523/1103
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Green, B. (2009). Supervision as metaphor. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 615–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2005). The development of research supervision: ‘Turning the light on a private space’. International Journal for Academic Development, 10, 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., & Goozée, J. (2007). Challenging the dual assumption of the ‘always/already’ autonomous student and effective supervisor. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J., & Reason, P. (1993). Adult learning in collaborative action research: Reflections on the supervision process. Special Issue of Studies in Adult Education, 2–18.
   Google Scholar
• McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: a critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, E. B. (2007). Negotiating academicity: Postgraduate research supervision as category boundary work. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 475–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, A. (2011). Dialogue and connectivism: A new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning. In George Siemens & Gráinne Conole (Eds.), International review of open and distance learning, Special Edition: Connectivism: Design and delivery of social networked learning, 12, 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Samara, A. (2006). Group supervision in graduate education: A process of supervision skill development and text improvement. Higher Education Research and Development, 25, 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Retrieved February 10, 2012, from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sussex, R. (2011). Technological options in supervising remote research students. Higher Education, 55, 121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, J. H. (2010). Team supervision of the doctorate: managing roles, relationships and contradictions. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 335–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., Robinson, G., & Shacham, M. (2007). Postgraduate research success: Communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 44, 301–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J., & Griffiths, F. (2010). Reflective practice at a distance: Using technology in counseling supervision. Reflective practice, 11, 693–703.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T. (2003). Postgraduate research students: People in context? British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 31, 209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeatman, A. (1995). Making supervisory relationships accountable: Graduate student logs. Australian Universities Review, 2, 9–11.
   Google Scholar