Social network perspectives reveal strength of academic developers as weak ties

References

• Barabási, A. L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books Group.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. London: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895.10.1126/science.1165821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, S. D., Pelaez, N. J., Rudd, J. A., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. (2011). Investigation of science faculty with education specialties within the largest university system in the United States. Cell Biology Education, 10(1), 25–42.10.1187/cbe.10-08-0106
   Google Scholar
• Carew, A. L., Lefoe, G., Bell, M., & Armour, L. (2008). Elastic practice in academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 13(1), 51–66.10.1080/13601440701860250
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. San Francisco, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Feick, L. F., & Price, L. L. (1987). The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 83–97.10.2307/1251146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, K., & Ling, P. (2014). How academic is academic development? International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 226–241.10.1080/1360144X.2013.837827
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 4–14.10.1080/1360144X.2013.751691
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.10.1086/ajs.1973.78.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, N. (2005). Everyday conversation as a context for professional learning and development. International Journal for Academic Development, 10(1), 3–16.10.1080/13601440500099969
   Google Scholar
• Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., … Tilghman, S. M. (2004). Education: Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521–522.10.1126/science.1096022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, S. T., & Lester, P. B. (2009). A multilevel approach to building and leading learning organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 34–48.10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984. doi:10.1002/tea.20439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubball, H., Clarke, A., & Poole, G. (2010). Ten-year reflections on mentoring SoTL research in a research-intensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 117–129.10.1080/13601441003737758
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Lefoe, G., Harvey, M., & Ryland, K. (2012). Distributed leadership: A collaborative framework for academics, executives and professionals in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(1), 67–78.10.1080/1360080X.2012.642334
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., & Ginns, K. (2012). Evaluating teaching and learning: A practical handbook for colleges, universities and the scholarship of teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Stensaker, B. (2014). From quality assurance to quality practices: An investigation of strong microcultures in teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 534–545.10.1080/03075079.2012.709493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2(1), 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pataraia, N., Falconer, I., Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Fincher, S. (2014). ‘Who do you talk to about your teaching?’: Networking activities among university teachers. Frontline Learning Research, 2(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, M. K., & Kustra, E. D. H. (2011). The relationship between scholarly teaching and SoTL: Models, distinctions, and clarifications. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Probert, B. (2013). Discussion paper 1: Teaching-focused academic appointments in Australian universities: Recognition, specialisation, or stratification? Canberra: Australian Government and the Office for Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-teaching-focused-academic-appointments
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, S. L., & Myatt, P. M. (2014). Getting started in the scholarship of teaching and learning: A ‘how to’ guide for science academics. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(1), 6–14.10.1002/bmb.20748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks – Exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547–559.10.1080/03075070802597200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., Mårtensson, K., & Alveteg, M. (2011). Understanding and influencing teaching and learning cultures at university: A network approach. Higher Education, 62(1), 99–111.10.1007/s10734-010-9368-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., Rifkin, W., Johnson, E., Tzioumis, V., & Hill, M. (2013). Fostering institutional and cultural change through the Australian network of university science educators– ‘SaMnet’. Canberra: Australian Government and the Office for Learning and Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Southwell, D., Gannaway, D., Orrell, J., Chalmers, D., & Abraham, C. (2010). Strategies for effective dissemination of the outcomes of teaching and learning projects. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 55–67.10.1080/13600800903440550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, K. E. (2012). The nature of academics’ informal conversation about teaching (Thesis). University of Sydney. Retrieved from http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/9166/1/ke-thomson-2013-thesis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(3), 221–240.10.1080/0729436022000020742
   Google Scholar
• van Schalkwyk, S., Cilliers, F., Adendorff, H., Cattell, K., & Herman, N. (2013). Journeys of growth towards the professional learning of academics: Understanding the role of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(2), 139–151.10.1080/1360144X.2012.673490
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Structural analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, D., Robbie, D., Kokonis, S., & Miceli, L. (2013). Collaborative scholarship as a means of improving both university teaching practice and research capability. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), 237–250.10.1080/1360144X.2012.718993
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods: Applied social research methods (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar