Exploring dimensions of change: the case of MOOC conceptions

References

• Åkerlind, G. S. (2012). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(1), 115–127.10.1080/07294360.2011.642845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamber, V., Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Knight, P. (2009). Enhancing learning and teaching in Higher education: Theory, cases, practices. Maidenhead: Open University Press/SRHE.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, J. A., & Walsh, E. (2000). Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breslow, L. (2016). MOOC research: Some of what we know and avenues for the future. In E. De Corte, L. Engwall, & U. Teichler (Eds.), From books to MOOCs? Emerging models of learning and teaching in higher education (pp. 57–67). London: Portland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, R. (2006). Agency and change: Rethinking change agency in organizations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, L. O., & Fallsberg, M. (1991). Phenomenography as a qualitative approach in social pharmacy research. Journal of social and administrative pharmacy: JSAP, 8(4), 150–156.
   Google Scholar
• Debowski, S. (2014). From agents of change to partners in arms: The emerging academic developer role. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(1), 50–56.10.1080/1360144X.2013.862621
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 4–14.10.1080/1360144X.2013.751691
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, S. T., & Lester, P. B. (2009). A multilevel approach to building and leading learning organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 34–48.10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, M. (2005, July 3–6). Academic developers as change agents: Caught in the middle. In A. Brew & C. Asmar (Eds.), Higher education in a changing world. Proceedings of the 28th HERDSA Annual Conference (pp. 175–182). Sydney: HERDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. Full report. Center for Benefit- Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, NY. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED547237.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, J., & Holmström, I. (2007). Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: Does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ work. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2(1), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography – Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200.10.1007/BF00132516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pong, W. Y. (2005). On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 335–348.10.1080/07294360500284706
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, C., & Bolander Laksov, K. (2014). Laying bare educational crosstalk: A study of discursive repertoires in the wake of educational reform. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(2), 139–149.10.1080/1360144X.2012.716760
   Google Scholar
• McLean, A. J., Bond, C. H., & Nicholson, H. D. (2015). An anatomy of feedback: A phenomenographic investigation of undergraduate students’ conceptions of feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40(5), 921–932.10.1080/03075079.2013.855718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. B., & Stensaker, I. G. (2006). Developing capacity for change. Journal of Change Management, 6(2), 217–231.10.1080/14697010600693731
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M. (2000). Using phenomenographic research methodology in the context of research in teaching and learning. In J. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 34–46). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Bamber, V., & Trowler, P. (2009). Making practical sense of enhancing learning, teaching, assessment and curriculum. In V. Bamber, P. Trowler, M. Saunders, & P. Knight (Eds.), Enhancing learning and teaching in Higher education: Theory, cases, practices. Maidenhead: Open University Press/SRHE.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2015). The role of MOOCs in the future of education. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and open education around the world ( Foreword, p. xii). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stenfors-Hayes, T., Hult, H., & Dahlgren, M. A. (2013). A phenomenographic approach to research in medical education. Medical Education, 47(3), 261–270.10.1111/medu.2013.47.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. (2008). Cultures and change in higher education: Theories and practices. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-36511-7
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(3), 221–240.10.1080/0729436022000020742
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., Fanghanel, J., & Wareham, T. (2005). Freeing the chi of change: The Higher Education Academy and enhancing teaching and learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(4), 427–444.10.1080/03075070500160111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., Hopkinson, P., & Comerford Boyes, L. (2013). Institutional change towards a sustainability agenda: How far can theory assist? Tertiary Education and Management, 19(3), 267–279.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, R., Dahlgren, L. O., Tomson, G., Diwan, V. K., & Beermann, B. (1997). Changing primary care doctors’ conceptions – A qualitative approach to evaluating an intervention. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2(3), 221–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education, a white paper. JISC Centre for Education Technology & Interoperability Standards (CETIS). Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667
   Google Scholar