Reflecting on institutional support for SoTL engagement: developing a conceptual framework

References

• Bexley, E., James, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2011). The Australian academic profession in transition: Addressing the challenge of reconceptualising academic work and regenerating the academic workforce. Centre for the Study of Higher Education. Melbourne: Commissioned report for the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Retrieved from https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/1490923/The_Academic_Profession_in_Transition_Sept2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Brew, A. (2013). Reconceptualising academic work as professional practice: Implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. (2011). Progress and challenges in the recognition and reward of the scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 25–38.10.1080/07294360.2011.536970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers, F. J., & Herman, N. (2010). Impact of an educational development programme on teaching practice of academics at a research-intensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(3), 253–267.10.1080/1360144X.2010.497698
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (2003). Educational connoisseurship and educational criticism. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 153–166). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4
   Google Scholar
• Fanghanel, J., Pritchard, J., Potter, J., & Wisker, G. (2016). Defining and supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): A sector-wide study. York: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/defining-and-supporting-scholarship-teaching-and-learning-sotl-sector-wide-study
   Google Scholar
• Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 121–125.10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, K., Gosling, D., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2010). Conceptualising the evolving models of education development. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 122, 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Haigh, N., & Jiao, X. (2009). The status of scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) in New Zealand universities: Three institutional case studies. Final report: Ministry of Education and Ako Aotearoa. Retrieved from https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-4/the-scholarship-of-teaching–learning–a-practical-introduction-and-critique.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. (2014). Building a culture of pedagogical enquiry: Institutional support strategies for developing the scholarship of teaching and learning. Advances in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1). Retrieved from https://tlc.unisim.edu.sg/research/AdvSoTL/pdf/doug_hamliltion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M. (2014). Strategies to support staff/faculty engagement in pedagogic research (PedR) & scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). Retrieved October 28, 2015, from https://www.mickhealey.co.uk/?wpdmdl=1312
   Google Scholar
• Hubball, H., Clarke, A., & Poole, G. (2010). Ten-year reflections on mentoring SoTL research in a research-intensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 117–129.10.1080/13601441003737758
   Google Scholar
• Kerssens-van Drongelen, I. (2001). The iterative theory?building process: Rationale, principles and evaluation. Management Decision, 39(7), 503–512.10.1108/EUM0000000005799
   Google Scholar
• Ling, L., & Ling, P. (Eds.). (2016). Methods and paradigms in education research. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Stensaker, B. (2014). From quality assurance to quality practices: An investigation of strong microcultures in teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 534–545. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.709493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, D., Hill, I., Holland, J., & Willis, D. (2012). Impact of teaching development programmes in higher education. York: HEA (Higher Education Academy) Research Series. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/hea_impact_teaching_development_prog.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peseta, T., Brew, A., McShane, K., & Barrie, S. (2007). Encouraging the scholarship of learning and teaching in an institutional context. In A. Brew & J. Sachs (Eds.), Transforming a university: Scholarship of teaching and learning in action (pp. 223–231). Sydney: University of Sydney Press.
   Google Scholar
• Probert, B. (2014). Becoming a university teacher: The role of the PhD: Discussion paper. Sydney: Australian Commonwealth Government, Office of Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from https://www.olt.gov.au/resource-becoming-university-teacher-role-phd-2014
   Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks – Exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547–559. doi:10.1080/03075070802597200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniforth, D., & Harland, T. (2008). A family of strangers: The fragmented nature of academic development. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(6), 669–678. doi:10.1080/13562510802452392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardi, I., & Quin, R. (2011). Promotion and the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 39–49.10.1080/07294360.2011.536971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster-Wright, A. (2010). Authentic professional learning. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-3947-7
   Google Scholar