Electing to speak: professional dialogue in the context of Fellowship of the Higher Education Academy

References

• Appleby, Y., & Pilkington, R. (2014). Developing critical professional practice in education. Leicester: National institute of Adult Continuing Education.
   Google Scholar
• Asghar, M., & Pilkington, R. (2017). The relational value of professional dialogue for academics pursuing HEA fellowship. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(2), 135–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Maidenhead: OU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, S. (2014). Not a means to an end but a genuinely rewarding process’ – A personal response to ‘UKPSF: A vehicle for development or hierarchical ladder? Educational Developments, 15(2), 19–20. Retrieved from http://www.seda.ac.uk/resources/files/publications_187_Ed%20Devs%2015.2%20 FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. (2011). Progress and challenges to the recognition and reward of the scholarship of teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crafton, L., & Kaiser, E. (2011). The language of collaboration: Dialogue and identity in teacher professional development. Improving Schools, 14(2), 104–116.
   Google Scholar
• Creanor, L. (2014). Raising the profile: An institutional case study of embedding scholarship and innovation through distributive leadership. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(6), 573–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, S. (2014). Challenging professional learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing. (1997). Higher Education in the learning society. Retrieved February 28, 2019, from http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/dearing1997/dearing1997.html
   Google Scholar
• Devonshire, P., & Brailsford, I. (2012). Defining pedagogical standards and benchmarks for teaching performance in law schools: Contrasting models in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Law Teacher, 46(1), 50–64.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Groves, C. (2015). Creating spaces for critical transformative dialogues: Legitimising discussion groups as professional practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(12), 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ellinor, L., & Gerard, G. (1998). Dialogue: Rediscover the transforming power of conversation. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L., & Stevenson, J. (2017). Teaching excellence in higher education: Critical perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(4), 391–395. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1304632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbert, P., & Semler, M. (2016). Faculty development in teaching and learning: The UK framework and current debates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 581–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Education Academy. (2011). The UK Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education. Retrieved February 28, 2019, from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/downloads/ukpsf_2011_english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, M., Westwood, J., & Campbell, F. (2012). Oral versus written assessments: A test of student performance and attitudes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrivee, B. (2008). Development of a tool to assess teachers’ level of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 341–360.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, W. (2014). Shifting academic careers: Implications for enhancing professionalism in teaching and supporting learning. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Neville, M. G. (2015). Opening the flood gates of curiosity: How dialogue can increase the flow of relational space. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 38(2), 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Peat, J. (2015). Getting down to the nitty-gritty: The trials and tribulations of an institutional professional recognition scheme. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 19(3), 92–95.
   Google Scholar
• Penlington, C. (2008). Dialogue as a catalyst for teacher change: A conceptual analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1304–1316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilkington, R. (2014). Professional dialogues: Exploring an alternative means of assessing the professional learning of experienced HE academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), 251–263.
   Google Scholar
• Pilkington, R. (2016). Annual review of HEA accredited CPD schemes 2014-15. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/downloads/annual_cpd_review_report_2014-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks – Exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547–559. doi:10.1080/03075070802597200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjorgen, E., Ragnemalm, E. L., Tingstrom, P., Uhlin, L., & Abrandt Dahlgren, L. (2012). Academic reflections on the use of portfolio documentation of pedagogical skills. A pilot study. The Quality of Higher Education, 9, 98–119.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, A., & Garside, D. (2017). (Co)meta-reflection as a method for the professional development of academic middle leaders in higher education. Management in Education, 31(3), 111–117.
   Google Scholar
• van der Sluis, H., Burden, P., & Huet, I. (2017). Retrospection and reflection: The emerging influence of an institutional professional recognition scheme on professional development and academic practice in a UK university. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(2), 126–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vloet, K., Jacobs, G., & Veuglers, W. (2013). Dialogic learning in teachers professional identities in Ligorio. In M. Cesar (Ed.), Interplays between dialogic learning and dialogical self (pp. 419–457). Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M., & Su, F. (2017). What makes an excellent lecturer? Academics’ perspectives on the discourse of “teaching excellence” in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(4), 451–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar