Reimagining the place of students in academic development

References

• Abbot, S., & Gravett, E. O. (2018). Querying the P(hD)ath to educational development in higher education. In C. Bossu & N. Brown (Eds.), Professional and support staff in higher education (pp. 389–403). Singapore: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, A., Sorcinelli, M., Austin, A., & Rivard, J. (2016). Faculty development in the age of evidence. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Birgbauer, E. (2016). Student assisted course design. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 15(1), E3–E5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birmingham Digital Student Project. (2018). Birmingham digital student. Retrieved from https://www.birminghamdigitalstudent.co.uk
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2016). Cultivating student-staff partnerships through research and practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Peck, C. (2018). Expanding the landscape: Developing knowledgeability through communities of practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(3), 232–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P. (2013). Representation and student engagement in higher education: A reflection on the views and experiences of course representatives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(1), 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Chng, H., & Looker, P. (2013). On the margins of SoTL discourse. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (2009). Forms of knowing and academic development practice. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 403–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Education. 2017. The future of undergraduate education. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts & Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.amacad.org/content/Research/researchproject.aspx?i=21999
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2008). “What you get is looking in a mirror, only better”: Inviting students to reflect (on) college teaching. Reflective Practice, 9(4), 473–483.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Englund, C., & Price, L. (2018). Facilitating agency: The change laboratory as an intervention for collaborative sustainable development in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(3), 192–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 123–141.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Harland, T., & Staniforth, D. (2008). A family of strangers: The fragmented nature of academic development. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(6), 669–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T., & Hutching, P. (2005). The advancement of learning: Building the teaching commons. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hurney, C., Harris, N., Bates Prins, S., & Kruck, S. (2014). The impact of a learner-centered, mid-semester course evaluation of students. Journal of Faculty Development, 28(3), 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P. (2000). Introduction. Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Leibowitz, B. (2014). Reflections on academic development: What’s in a name? International Journal for Academic Development, 19(4), 357–360.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson, S., & Eisenberg, D. (2018). Mental health and academic attitudes and expectations in university populations: Results from the healthy minds study. Journal of Mental Health, 27(3), 205–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubicz-Nawrocka, T., & Bunting, K. (2018). Student perceptions of teaching excellence: An analysis of student-led teaching award nomination data. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–18. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1461620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan, S., Felten, P., Caulkins, J., & Artze-Vega, I. (2017). Fostering evidence-informed teaching in crucial classes. New Directions for Higher Education, 180, 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Meizlish, D., Wright, M., Howard, J., & Kaplan, M. (2018). Measuring the impact of a new faculty program using institutional data. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(2), 72–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., … Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). doi:10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
   Google Scholar
• Mihans, R. J., Long, D. T., & Felten, P. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2). doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020216
   Google Scholar
• Millis, B. (2004). A versatile interactive focus group protocol for qualitative assessments. To Improve the Academy, 22(1), 125–141.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K., & Martin, J. (2018). Gender bias in student evaluations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(3), 648–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, N. (2016). Dealing with diversity in higher education: Awareness-raising and a linguistic perspective on teachers’ intercultural competence. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(3), 166–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasser-Abu Alhija, F. (2017). Guest editor introduction to the special issue “Contemporary evaluation of teaching: Challenges and promises”. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Union of Students. (2015). A manifesto for partnership. Retrieved from https://www.nusconnect.org.uk/resources/a-manifesto-for-partnership
   Google Scholar
• Neary, M. (2010). Student as producer: A pedagogy for the avant-garde? Learning Exchange, 1(1). Retrieved from http://studentasproducer.lincoln.ac.uk/files/2014/03/15-72-1-pb-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peseta, T., Hicks, M., Holmes, T., Manathunga, C., Sutherland, K., & Wilcox, S. (2005). The challenging academic development (CAD) collective. International Journal for Academic Development, 10(1), 59–61.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency. (2018). UK Quality Code for Higher Education, Part B: Assuring and Enhancing Academic Quality, Chapter 5B: Student Engagement. Retrieved from https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/chapter-b5_-student-engagement.pdf?sfvrsn=cd01f781_8
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (2008). The future of higher education teaching and the student experience. London: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• Reimann, N. (2018). Learning about assessment: The impact of two courses for higher education staff. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(2), 86–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2015). Microcultures and informal learning: A heuristic guiding analysis of conditions for informal learning in local higher education workplaces. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(2), 193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2017). Agency and structure in academic development practices. International Journal for Academic Development, 22(2), 95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawir, E. (2011). Academic staff response to international students and internationalising the curriculum: The impact of disciplinary differences. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(1), 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Shay, S. (2012). Educational development as a field: Are we there yet? Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 311–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, D. L. (2001). College teachers and student consultants: Collaborating about teaching and learning. In J. E. Miller, J. E. Groccia, & M. S. Miller (Eds.), Student-assisted teaching: A guide to faculty-student teamwork (pp. 179–183). Bolton, MA: Anker.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. (2018). Early career academics in New Zealand: Challenges and prospects in comparative perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. (2013). Policy statement on higher education. (Digital ISBN 978 0 7504 9538 7). Cardiff, Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Werder, C., & Otis, M. (eds). (2010). Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Wijaya Mulya, T. (2019). Contesting the neoliberalisation of higher education through student–Faculty partnership. International Journal for Academic Development, 24(1), 86–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar