Should we prepare students for active learning classrooms? An unresolved question and two provocations

References

• Auster, E. R., & Wylie, K. K. (2006). Creating active learning in the classroom: A systematic approach. Journal of Management Education, 30(2), 333–353.
   Google Scholar
• Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Bending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R., Corbett, A. T., Roll, I., Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., Cocea, M., & Mathews, M. (2013). Modeling and studying gaming the system with educational data mining. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 97–115). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R., Corbett, A., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2008a). Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interactions, 18, 287–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R., Walonoski, J., Heffernan, N., Roll, I., Corbett, A., & Koedinger, K. (2008b). Why students engage in ‘gaming the system’ behaviour in interactive learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(2), 185–224.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning—A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbott, D. S., Morse, J. J., Deardorff, D. L., Allain, R. J., Bonham, S. W., Dancy, M. H., & Risley, J. S. (2007). The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project. In Redish, E. & Cooney, P. (Eds), Reviews in PER, volume 1: Research-based reforms of university physics (pp. 1–42). College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, A. (2017). Monitoring implementation of active learning classrooms at Lethbridge College, 2014-2015. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. Washington, DC: The George Washington University/ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No 1.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal of Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. C. (2012). Space and consequences: The impact of different formal learning spaces on instructor and student behaviour. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. C., & Solheim, C. A. (2014). Pedagogy matters, too: The impact of adapting teaching approaches to formal learning environments on student learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 137, 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. (2000). Editorial. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caygill, H. (2018). Introduction. In The withholding power: An essay on political theology by M. Cacciari. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, V. (2015). ‘There is no single right answer’: The potential for active learning classrooms to facilitate open-minded thinking. Collected Essays in Learning and Teaching, 8, 171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, V. (2018). Please stop blabbing: A prescription for verbal diarrhea. Collected Essays in Learning and Teaching, 11, 88–95.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, V., Leger, A., & Riel, A. (2016). Standing to preach, moving to teach: What TAs learned from teaching in flexible and less-flexible spaces. Collected Essays in Learning and Teaching, 9, 187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, P. H. P., & Cheng, S. H. (2016). Effects of active learning classrooms on student learning: A two-year empirical investigation on student perceptions and academic performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(2), 269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocea, M., Hershkovitz, A., & Baker, R. (2009). The impact of off-task and gaming behaviors on learning: Immediate or aggregate. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, B. Du Boulay, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education—Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling (pp. 507–514). Brighton, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Re(in)forming the conversations: Student position, power, and voice in teacher education. The Radical Teacher, 64, 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: ‘student voice’ in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotner, S., Loper, S., Walker, J. D., & Brooks, D. C. (2013). ‘It’s not you, it’s the room’—Are the high-tech, active learning classrooms worth it? Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(6), 82–88.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, J. (2014). What have we been writing about? Patterns and trends in the scholarship of teaching and learning in political science. Journal of Political Science Education, 10(1), 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Fanghanel, J., Pritchard, J., Potter, G., & Wisker, G. (2016). Defining and Supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): A sector-wide study. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Fluckiger, J., Vigil, Y. T., Pasco, R., & Danielson, K. (2010). Formative feedback: Involving students as partners in assessment to enhance learning. College Teaching, 58(4), 136–140.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410–8415.
   Google Scholar
• Granito, V. J., & Santana, M. E. (2016). Psychology of learning spaces: Impact on teaching and learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Griswold, E. N. (2015). Lifeguard final exam—Encouraging the use of active learning. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 16(2), 133–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, P., Arnott-Hill, E., & Allbritton, D. (2010). Squeezing out gaming behavior in a dialog-based ITS. In V. Aleven, J. Kay, & J. Mostow (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 6094, pp. 204–213). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshaw, R. G., Edwards, P. M., & Bagley, E. J. (2011). Use of swivel desks and aisle space to promote interaction in mid-sized college classrooms. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Y., Lomas, L., & MacGregor, J. (2003). Students’ perception of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hinde, R. J., & Kovac, J. (2001). Student active learning methods in physical chemistry. Journal of Chemistry Education, 78(1), 93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, K., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. E. (2013). On Potentiality: Giorgio Agamben and educational potentiality. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. E. (2014). The fundamental ontology of study. Educational Theory, 64(2), 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. E. (2018). Inoperative learning: A radical rewriting of educational potentialities. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, J. A. (2015). Matching instructors and spaces of learning: The impact of space on behavioural, affective, and cognitive learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 4(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D. A., Steer, D. N., & Owens, K. D. (2003). Assessment and active learning strategies for introductory geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(2), 205–216.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 159–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, H. I. (1996). Preparing students to participate in an active learning environment. Advances in Physiology Education, 15(1), 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, H. I., & Michael, J. A. (1993). Promoting active learning in the life science classroom: Defining the issues. Annals of the NYAS, 701(1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mooring, S. R., Mitchell, C. E., & Burrows, N. L. (2016). Evaluation of a flipped, large-enrollment organic chemistry course on student attitude and achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 93, 1972–1983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muldner, K., Buleson, W., Van de Sande, B., & VanLehn, K. (2011). An analysis of students’ gaming behaviors in an intelligent tutoring system: Predictors and impacts. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interactions, 21, 99–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. P. A. (2017). Using active-learning pedagogy to develop essay-writing skills in introductory political theory tutorials. Journal of Political Science Education, 13(3), 346–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. P. A. (2018). ‘Blending’ docent learning: Using Google forms quizzes to increase efficiency in interpreter education at Fort Henry. Journal of Museum Education, 43(1), 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. P. A. (2019). Active learning as destituent potential: Agambenian philosophy of education and moderate steps towards the coming politics. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00131857.2019.1594778.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. P. A., & Rose, D. (2019). Curator’s curiosities: Active learning as interpretive pedagogy. Journal of Museum Education, 44(1), 81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oros, A. L. (2007). Let’s debate: Active learning encourages student participation and critical thinking. Journal of Political Science Education, 7, 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. S. (2017). Reforming the environment: The influence of the roundtable classroom design on interactive learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Pekdogan, S., & Kanak, M. (2016). A qualitative research on active learning practices in pre-school education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(9), 232–239.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, A., & Riel, A. (2017, June). ‘I lived it here’: New instructors crossing a teaching and learning threshold in active learning classrooms. Paper presented at the Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Annual Conference, Halifax, NS.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, A., Riel, A., & Leger, A. B. (2018). Between knowing and learning: New instructors’ experiences in active learning classrooms. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: Classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rudduck, J., & Fielding, M. (2006). Student voice and the perils of popularity. Educational Review, 58(2), 219–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B. (2013). Crowdsourcing: Using student-driven learning using web 2.0 technologies in an introduction to globalization. Journal of Political Science Education, 9, 362–365.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, L. B. (2016). The influence of active learning classrooms and pedagogy on perceptions of engagement and learning at South Texas College (EdD diss). Lamar University.
   Google Scholar
• Sasley, B. E. (2010). Teaching students to fail: Simulations as tools of exploration. International Studies Perspectives, 11, 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotltzfus, J. R., & Libarkin, J. (2016). Does the room matter? Active learning in traditional and enhanced lecture spaces. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tight, M. (2018). Tracking the scholarship of teaching and learning. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2(1), 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Van Horne, S., Murniati, C., Gaffney, J. D. H., & Jesse, M. (2012). Promoting active learning in technology-infused TILE classrooms at the University of Iowa. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D. L., Kessler, D. A., Kalla, S., Kam, C. M., & Ueki, K. (1996). Active learning exercises are more motivating than quizzes for underachieving college students. Psychological Reports, 78, 131–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. F. (2011). Learning space spotlight—Informal learning space: Noel studio for academic creativity—Crabbe Library, Eastern Kentucky University. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(1), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Winkelmes, M. A., Bernacki, M., Butler, J., Zochowski, M., Golanics, J., & Weavil, K. H. (2016). A teaching intervention that increases underserved college students’ success. Peer Review, 18(1/2), 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Yuretich, R. F., Khan, S. A., Leckie, R. M., & Clement, J. J. (2001). Active-learning methods to improve student performance and scientific interest in a large introductory oceanography course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(2), 111–119.
   Google Scholar