On nurturing the emergent SoTL researcher: responding to challenges and opportunities

References

• Amundsen, C., & D’Amico, L. (2019). Using Theory of Change to evaluate socially-situated, inquiry-based academic professional development. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge, B. L. (2001). Fostering the scholarship of teaching and learning: Communities of practice. In D. Lieberman & C. Wehlburg (Eds.), To improve the academy (pp. 3–16). Anker.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge, B. L. (Ed). (2004). Campus progress: Supporting the scholarship of teaching and learning. American Association for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.121
   Google Scholar
• Hubball, H., Clarke, A., & Poole, G. (2010). Ten-year reflections on mentoring SoTL research in a research-intensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601441003737758
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P. (2000). Introduction: Approaching the scholarship of teaching and learning. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 1–10). The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P., Huber, M., & Ciccone, A. (2011). Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Reconsidered: Institutional Integration and Impact. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kolomitro, K., Laverty, C., & Stockley, D. (2018). Sparking SoTL: Triggers and stories from one institution. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornhaber, R., Cross, M., Betihavas, V., & Bridgman, H. (2016). The benefits and challenges of academic writing retreats: An integrative review. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1210–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1144572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheux-Pelletier, G., Marsh, H., & Frake-Mistak, M. (2019). The benefits of writing retreats revisited. In N. Simmons & A. Singh (Eds.), Critical collaborative communities: Academic writing partnerships, groups, and retreats. Critical issues in the future of learning and teaching series (17) (pp. 92–105). Brill-Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marquis, E., Holmes, T., Apostolou, K., Centea, D., Cockcroft, R., Knorr, K., Maclachlan, J. C., Monteiro, S. D., & Karamanis, T. (2017). SoTL research fellows: Collaborative pathfinding through uncertain terrain. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.3.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill, I., & Brockbank, A. (2004). The action learning handbook. Routledge and Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, K. (2006). Attitudinal and structural factors contributing to challenges in the work of the scholarship of teaching and learning. New Directions for Institutional Research, 129(129), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.170
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. (2007). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Openo, J., Laverty, C., Kolomitro, K., Borin, P., Goff, L., Stranach, M., & Gomaa, N. (2017). Bridging the divide: Leveraging the scholarship of teaching and learning for quality enhancement. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 8(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.2.6.CrossRefGoogleScholar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, G., & Simmons, N. (2013). The contributions of the scholarship of teaching and learning to quality enhancement in Canada. In G. Gordon & R. Land (Eds.), Enhancing quality in higher education: International perspectives (pp. 118–128). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, M. K., & Kustra, E. (2011). The relationship between scholarly teaching and SoTL: Models, distinctions, and clarifications. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 5(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050123
   Google Scholar
• Riddel, J. (2016) The scholarship of teaching and learning: What works and why, University Affairs April 6.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1998). Course anatomy: The dissection and analysis of knowledge Through teaching. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to advance practice and improve student learning (pp. American Association for Higher Education). Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, N., & Marquis, E. (2017). Defining the scholarship of teaching and learning. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Kloet, M., Frake-Mistak, M., McGinn, M. K., Caldecott, M., Aspenlieder, E. D., Beres, J. L., Fukuzawa, S., Cassidy, A., & Gill, A. (2017). Conditions for contingent instructors engaged in the scholarship of teaching and learning. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.2.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuetherick, B., Yu, S., & Greer, J. (2016). Exploring the SoTL landscape at the university of Saskatchewan. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2016(146), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20188
   Google Scholar