6,455
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Educational Development Interview: a guided conversation supporting professional learning about teaching practice in higher education

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 224-236 | Received 01 Aug 2020, Accepted 10 Mar 2021, Published online: 01 Jun 2021

References

  • Amundsen, C., & Wilson, M. (2012). Are we asking the right questions? A conceptual review of the educational development literature in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 90–126. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312438409
  • Beach, A. L., Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., & Rivard, J. K. (2016). Faculty development in the age of evidence: Current practices, future imperatives. Stylus.
  • Bray, J. N., Lee, J., Smith, L. L., & Yorks, L. (2000). Collaborative inquiry in practice: Action, reflection, and meaning making. Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
  • Clegg, S., & Stevenson, J. (2013). The interview reconsidered: Context, genre, reflexivity and interpretation in sociological approaches to interviews in higher education research. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.750277
  • Cox, B. E., McIntosh, K. L., Reason, R. D., & Terenzini, P. T. (2011). A culture of teaching: Policy, perception, and practice in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 808–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9223-6
  • Currie, G. (2017). Conscious connections: Phenomenology and decoding the disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 150(3), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20236
  • Easton, L., Lexier, R., Lindstrom, G., & Yeo, M. (2019). Uncovering the complicit: The decoding interview as a decolonising practice. In L. Quinn (Ed.), Reimagining curriculum: Spaces for disruption (pp. 149–170). African Sun Media.
  • Ermine, W. (2007). Ethical Space of engagement. Indigenous Law Journal, 6(1), 193–203. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ilj6&div=12&id=&page=
  • Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). Chapter 27: The interview – From neutral stance to political involvement. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 695–727). Sage Publications.
  • Hibbert, P. (2012). Approaching reflexivity through reflection: Issues for critical management education. Journal of Management Education, 37(6), 803–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912467757
  • Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2011). Animating interview narratives. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Issues of theory, method and practice (3rd ed., pp. 149–167). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • King, T. (2003). The truth about stories: A native narrative. CBC Massey Lectures. House of Anansi Press.
  • Kreber, C. (2004). An analysis of two models of reflection and their implications for educational development. International Journal of Academic Development, 9(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144042000296044
  • Lessing, D. (2007). Nobel lecture. NobelPrize.org. Nobel Media AB. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/2007/lessing/25434-doris-lessing-nobel-lecture-2007/
  • Lieberman, D. (2011). Chapter 3 nurturing institutional change: Collaboration and leadership between upper-level administrators and faculty developers. In C. M. Schroeder (Ed.), Coming in from the margins: Faculty development’s emerging organizational development role in institutional change (pp. 60–73).Stylus.
  • Macpherson, A. (2007). Faculty learning communities: The heart of the transformative learning organization. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 1(2), 1–16.
  • Mårtensson, K., & Roxå, T. (2016). Working with networks, microcultures and communities. In D. Baume & C. Popovic (Eds.), Advancing practice in academic development. Chapter 11, (pp. 174–187). Routledge.
  • McPherson, M., Budge, K., & Lemon, N. (2015). New practices in doing academic development: Twitter as an informal learning space. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1029485
  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
  • Middendorf, J., Mickutė, J., Saunders, T., Najar, J., Clark-Huckstep, A. E., & Pace, D., & with Keith Eberly and Nicole McGrath. (2015). What’s feeling got to do with it? Decoding emotional bottlenecks in the history classroom. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 14(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214552655
  • Middendorf, J., & Pace, D. (2004). Decoding the disciplines: A model for helping students learning disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 98(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.142
  • Miller-Young, J., & Boman, J. (2017). Uncovering ways of thinking, practicing, and being through decoding across the disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 150(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20235
  • Miller-Young, J., Dean, Y., Rathburn, M., Pettit, J., Underwood, M., Gleeson, J., Lexier, R., Calvert, V., & Clayton, P. (2015). Decoding ourselves: An Inquiry into faculty learning about reciprocity in service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 22(1), 32–47. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1137414 
  • Miller-Young, J., Yeo, M., Manarin, K., Carey, M., & Zimmer, J. (2016). SoTL2: Inquiring into the impact of inquiry. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 146(146), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20187
  • Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing context and narrative. Harvard University Press.
  • Mooney, J. A. (2019). Podcasting as faculty development medium and method: The story of a podcast series showcasing teaching excellence in higher education. Transformative Dialogues, 12(2), 1–18. https://www.tcrecord.org/books/Content.asp?ContentId=22137 
  • Mooney, J. A., & Da Rosa dos Santos, L. (2017). Book Review of: Beach, A.L., Sorcinelli, M.D., Austin, A.E., & Rivard, J.K. (2016). Faculty Development in the Age of Evidence: Current Practices, Future Imperatives. Stylus Publishing: Sterling, VA. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education. Columbia University. www.tcrecord.org
  • Pace, D. (2017). The decoding the disciplines paradigm: Seven steps to increased student learning. Indiana University Press.
  • Phillips, L. G., & Bunda, T. (2018). Research through, with and as story. Routledge.
  • Poole, G., & Simmons, N. (2013). Contributions of the scholarship of teaching and learning to quality enhancement in Canada. In R. Land & G. Gordon (Eds.), Enhancing quality in higher education: International perspectives (pp. 118–128). Routledge.
  • Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 8(3), 238–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091111162070
  • Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks: Exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597200
  • Shadiow, L. (2013). What our stories teach us: A guide to critical reflection for college faculty. Jossey-Bass.
  • Swan, E. (2008). Let’s not get too personal: Critical reflection, reflexivity, and the confessional turn. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(5), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590810877102
  • Yeo, M. (2017). Decoding the disciplines as a hermeneutic practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 150(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20237
  • Yeo, M., Lafave, M., Westbrook, K., McAllister, J., Valdez, D., & Eubank, B. (2017). Impact of decoding work within a professional program. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 150(7), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20240