How facilitated multi-source feedback constructs new conversations about teaching: a positioning theory study

References

• Barrineau, S., Schnaas, U., Engström, A., & Härlin, F. (2016). Breaking ground and building bridges: A critical reflection on student-faculty partnerships in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1120735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M., & Cooper, P. (2013). Peer observation of teaching in university departments: A framework for implementation. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.633753
   Google Scholar
• Berk, R. A. (2009). Using the 360° multisource feedback model to evaluate teaching and professionalism. Medical Teacher, 31(12), 1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590802572775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken, D. W., & Rose, D. S. (2011). When does 360-degree feedback create behavior change? And how would we know it when it does? Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9218-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2020). Longitudinal perspectives on students’ experiences of feedback: A need for teacher–student partnerships. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1684455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, M. K., Henriksen, J., Thomsen, K. R., Lund, O., & Mørcke, A. M. (2017). Positioning health professional identity: On-campus training and work-based learning. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 7(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-01-2017-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.805694
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Respecting voices: How the co-creation of teaching and learning can support academic staff, underrepresented students, and equitable practices. Higher Education, 79, 885–901. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00445-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, S. (2017). What contemporary work are student ratings actually doing in higher education? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H., James, C., Prestholdt, T., Peterson, V., Salomone, S., & Anctil, E. (2020). Development of a formative peer observation protocol for STEM faculty reflection. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1645091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., Wakeling, J., & Bowie, P. (2014). Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 14(76), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-76
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Ed.). (2003). The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & van Lagenhove, L. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In L. van Langehove (Ed.), Position theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R., Meyer, L., Rawstorne, P., Razee, H., Chitkara, U., Mears, S., & Balasooriya, C. (2020). Evaluating and enhancing quality in higher education teaching practice: A meta- review. Studies in Higher Education. Published online 29 Feb 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1730315
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, H. A. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1304016.https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, A., Yarris, L. M., & Sargeant, J. (2015). Feedback: Cultivating a positive culture. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 7(2), 262–264. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-15-00103.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kreitzer, R. J., & Sweet-Cushman, J. (2021). Evaluating student evaluations of teaching: A review of measurement and equity bias in SETs and recommendations for ethical reform. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1–12. Published online 09 Feb 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09400-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mackillop, L., Parker-Swift, J., & Crossley, J. (2011). Getting the questions right: Non-compound questions are more reliable than compound questions on matched multi-source feedback instruments. Medical Education, 45(8), 843–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03996.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Stensaker, B. (2014). From quality assurance to quality practices: An investigation of strong microcultures in teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mårtensson, K., & Roxå, T. (2015). Academic development in a world of informal learning about teaching and student learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(2), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1029736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, A. M., & Garavan, T. N. (2001). 360 degree feedback processes: Performance improvement and employee career development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590110380614
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, I. M., Pedersen, K., Stentoft, D., & Christensen, M. K. (2020). Faciliteret Multi-Source Feedback som pædagogisk kompetenceudvikling – Et dansk casestudie [Facilitated multi-source feedback as educational development – A Danish case study]. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 15 (28), 124–148. https://tidsskrift.dk/dut/article/view/115654
   Google Scholar
• Pelger, S., & Larsson, M. (2018). Advancement towards the scholarship of teaching and learning through the writing of teaching portfolios. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1435417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks: Exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2015). Microcultures and informal learning: A heuristic guiding analysis of conditions for informal learning in local higher education workplaces. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1029929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saedon, H., Salleh, S., Balakrishnan, A., Imray, C. H., & Saedon, M. (2012). The role of feedback in improving the effectiveness of workplace based assessments: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 12(25), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sargeant, J., Lockyer, J., Mann, K., Holmboe, E., Silver, I., Armson, H., Driessen, E., MacLeod, T., Yen, W., Ross, K., & Power, M. (2015). Facilitated reflective performance feedback: Developing an evidence-and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Academic Medicine, 90(12), 1698–1706. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2003). Clarifying different types of portfolio use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(6), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293032000130252
   Google Scholar
• Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, K. E., & Trigwell, K. R. (2018). The role of informal conversations in developing university teaching? Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1536–1547. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1265498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, N. D. (2015). Reconceptualisation of approaches to teaching evaluation in higher education. Issues in Educational Research, 25(1), 50–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. (2008). Cultures and change in higher education. Theories and practices. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, G. C., Austin, A. E., Greenhoot, A. F., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2020). Establishing a better approach for evaluating teaching: The TEval project. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 52(3), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2020.1745575
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L., Hassell, A., Whitehouse, A., Bullock, A., & Wall, D. (2006). A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design. Medical Teacher, 28(7), e185–e191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590600834286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yiend, J., Weller, S., & Kinchin, I. (2014). Peer observation of teaching: The interaction between peer review and developmental models of practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(4), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2012.726967
   Google Scholar