Creating the Framework for Inclusive Teaching Excellence

References

• Banks, B. M., & Cicciarelli, K. (2019). Microaggressive classroom climate and diminished cognitive functioning. Journal of Multicultural Education, 13(3), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-05-2019-0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Barkley, E. F., & Major, C. H. (2020). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bensimon, E. M. (2016, August 26). The next equity challenge? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/08/26/work-faculty-members-classroom-next-equity-challenge-essay
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, J. A., & Watson, C. E. (2017). Teaching naked techniques: Leveraging research on learning to improve the effectiveness of teaching. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(5), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2017.1366809
   Google Scholar
• Branche, J., Mullinex, J., & Cohn, E. R. (2007). Diversity across the curriculum: A guide for faculty in higher education. Anker Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, S. (2013). Websites, publications, and videos. In S. Burgstahler (Ed.), Universal design in higher education: Promising practices. DO-IT, University of Washington. www.uw.edu/doit/UDHE-promising-practices/resources.html
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, R., Morin, C., Sweet, C., & Blythe, H. (2017). The role of faculty development in teaching and learning through high-impact educational practices. The Journal of Faculty Development, 31(1), 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, S. R. (2016). The spark of learning: Energizing the college classroom with the science of emotion. West Virginia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chavez, A. F., & Longerbeam, S. D. (2016). Teaching across cultural strengths: A guide to balancing integrated and individuated cultural frameworks in college teaching. Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L. (2003). Effects of teaching clarity and nonverbal immediacy on student learning, receiver apprehension, and affect. Communication Education, 52(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302471
   Google Scholar
• Chick, N. (2018, September 20). Community engaged learning: The signature pedagogy of Rollins College. ROLLINSpire: News & Inspiration from the Endeavour Foundation Center for Faculty Development. https://blogs.rollins.edu/endeavor/2018/09/20/community-engaged-learning-the-signature-pedagogy-of-rollins-college/
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. (2012). The importance of self-regulation for college student learning. College Student Journal, 46(4), 892–902.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2017). Where student engagement meets faculty development: How student-faculty pedagogical partnership fosters a sense of belonging. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(2), 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Costino, K. (2018). Equity-minded faculty development: An intersectional identity-conscious community of practice model for faculty learning. Metropolitan Universities, 29(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.18060/22170
   Google Scholar
• Curry, K. A., Mwavita, M., Holter, A., & Harris, E. (2016). Getting assessment right at the classroom level: Using formative assessment for decision making. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9226-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darvin, J. (2018). Becoming a more culturally responsive teacher by identifying and reducing microaggressions in classrooms and school communities. Journal for Multicultural Education, 12(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-03-2017-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don, G., Garvey, C., & Sadeghpour, M. (2009). Theory and practice: Signature pedagogies in music theory and performance. In R. Gurung, N. Chick, & A. Haynie (Eds.), Exploring signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind (pp. 81–98). Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, K., Kwong, T., Chan, S.-W., Lam, T.-F., & Downing, W.-K. (2008). Problem-based learning and the development of metacognition. Higher Education, 57(5), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9165-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7275/jg4h-rb87
   Google Scholar
• du Toit, E. (2012). Constructive feedback as a learning tool to enhance students’ self-regulation and performance in higher education. Perspectives in Education, 30(2), 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. (2019). Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Finley, A., & McNair, T. (2013). Assessing underserved students’ engagement in high impact practices. Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://www.aacu.org/publication/assessing-underserved-students-engagement-in-high-impact-practices
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, M. A., Zelaya, D. G., & Madsen, J. W. (2021). Rethinking the course syllabus: Considerations for promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion. Teaching of Psychology, 48(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320959979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, J., & Turk, J. (2017). The data-enabled executive: Using analytics for student success and sustainability. American Council on Education. https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/The-Data-Enabled-Executive.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Revisiting instructor misbehaviors: A revised typology and development of a measure. Communication Education, 64(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.978798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurung, R. A. R., Chick, N. L., & Haynie, A. (2009). Exploring signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Hassel, H., & Nelson, N. (2012). A signature feminist pedagogy: Correction and transformation in women’s studies. In N. Chick, A. Haynie, & R. Gurung (Eds.), Exploring more signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind (pp. 143–156). Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, L., & Anderson, C. (2018). Connecting universal design for learning with culturally responsive teaching. Education and Urban Society, 51(9), 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124518785012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemenčič, M., & Chirikov, I. (2015). How do we know how students experience higher education? On the use of student surveys. In A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, & P. Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area (pp. 361–379). Springer, Cham Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://www.aacu.org/publication/high-impact-educational-practices-what-they-are-who-has-access-to-them-and-why-they-matter
   Google Scholar
• Landi, M. (2008). Start talking: A handbook for engaging difficult dialogue in higher education. University of Alaska and Alaska Pacific University. https://www.uaa.alaska.edu/academics/institutional-effectiveness/departments/center-for-advancing-faculty-excellence/difficult-dialogues/_documents/Start_Talking.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ogunyemi, D., Clare, C., Astudillo, Y. M., Marseille, M., Manu, E., & Kim, S. (2020). Microaggressions in the learning environment: A systematic review. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhem, J. (2013). Using reflection and metacognition to improve student learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. (2016). The syllabus: A tool that shapes students’ academic experiences. Appendix of the Syllabus review guide. Center for Urban Education, Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Shilbi, D., & West, R. (2018). Cognitive load theory and its application in the classroom. Impact: Journal of the Chartered College of Teaching, 2. https://impact.chartered.college/article/shibli-cognitive-load-theory-classroom/
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Dedalus, 134(3), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolarek, B. B., & Hora, M. T. (2016). Examining how faculty reflect on instructional data: A call for critical awareness and institutional support (WCER Working Paper No. 2016-4). Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison. http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingpapers/
   Google Scholar
• Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Y. H. (2012). A study on metacognition of college teachers. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 8(1), 80.
   Google Scholar
• Yosso, T. J. (2014). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. In L. Parker & D. Gillborn (Eds.), Critical race theory in education (pp. 181–204). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Youatt, J., & Wilcox, K. A. (2008). Intentional and integrated learning in a new cognitive age: A signature pedagogy for undergraduate education in the twenty-first century. Peer Review, 10(4), 24–28.
   Google Scholar