Academic thriving and online course design: a conceptual model

References

• Adesope, O. O. (2010). The cognitive effects of verbal redundancy and animated concept maps on learning [Doctoral dissertation]. Simon Fraser University, Summit Institutional Repository. http://summit.sfu.ca/item/9947
   Google Scholar
• Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
   Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R., Jr., & Jones, K. D., II. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baik, C., Larcombe, W., & Brooker, A. (2019). How universities can enhance student mental wellbeing: The student perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(4), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1576596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D. J., & Zuvela, D. (2013). Feedforward strategies in the first-year experience of online and distributed learning environments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannert, M., & Reimann, P. (2012). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science, 40(1), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9167-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2013). Improving participation and learning with gamification. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (pp. 10–17). https://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583010
   Google Scholar
• Boboc, M. (2018). Connecting communication to curriculum and pedagogy in online environments. In Online course management: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Critical explorations (pp. 1501–1525). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5472-1.ch079
   Google Scholar
• Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Buntins, K., Kerres, M., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2020). Facilitating student engagement in higher education through educational technology: A narrative systematic review in the field of education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(2), 315–368. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L. R., Rust, D. Z., Fox-Horton, J., & Johnson, A. D. (2017). ePortfolios and interdisciplinary adult degree programs. International Journal of ePortfolio, 7(2), 129–138.
   Google Scholar
• Butnaru, G. I., Haller, A. P., Dragolea, L. L., Anichiti, A., & Tacu Hârșan, G. D. (2021). Students’ wellbeing during transition from onsite to online education: Are there risks arising from social isolation? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 9665. Article 9665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butz, N. T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2016). A mixed methods study of graduate students’ self-determined motivation in synchronous hybrid learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 years of the community of inquiry framework. TechTrends, 64(4), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Demmans, C. (2020, July 10-13). CSCLRec: Personalized recommendation of forum posts to support socio-collaborative learning [Paper presentation]. Thirteenth International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2020), Toronto, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, J., Mundy, M. E., Hunt, I., Coxon, A., Dyer, K. R., & McKenzie, S. (2021). An evaluation of an online brief mindfulness-based intervention in higher education: A pilot conducted at an Australian university and a British university. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 752060. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752060
   Google Scholar
• Correia, A. P., Liu, C., & Xu, F. (2020). Evaluating videoconferencing systems for the quality of the educational experience. Distance Education, 41(4), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, J. M. (2015). Mechanizing people and pedagogy: Establishing social presence in the online classroom. Online Learning, 19(3), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., Alstad, Z., & Banerjee, M. (2020). Comparing synchronous and asynchronous online discussions for students with disabilities: The impact of social presence. Computers & Education, 150, Article 103842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2010). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daradoumis, T., Marquès Puig, J. M., Arguedas, M., & Calvet Liñan, L. (2021). A distributed systems laboratory that helps students accomplish their assignments through self-regulation of behavior. Educational Technology Research & Development, 69(2), 1077–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09975-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrico, C. M., Tharp, J. L., & Schreiner, L. A. (2015). Called to make a difference: The experiences of students who thrive on faith-based campuses. Christian Higher Education, 14(5), 298–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2015.1079750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschaine, M. E., & Whale, D. E. (2017). Increasing student engagement in online educational leadership courses. Journal of Educators Online, 14(1), Article EJ1133612. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ej1133612
   Google Scholar
• Du, J., Fan, X., Xu, J., Wang, C., Sun, L., & Liu, F. (2019). Predictors for students’ self-efficacy in online collaborative groupwork. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 767–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9631-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyment, J., Stone, C., & Milthorpe, N. (2020). Beyond busy work: Rethinking the measurement of online student engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1440–1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1732879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Koehler, A. A. (2018). Facilitation strategies and problem space coverage: Comparing face-to-face and online case-based discussions . Educational Technology Research & Development, 66(3), 639–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9563-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanshawe, M., Delaney, N., & Powell, A. (2020). Utilizing instantaneous feedback to promote self-regulated learning in online higher education courses: The case for digital badges. In Technology-enhanced formative assessment practices in higher education (pp. 41–59). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0426-0.ch003
   Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., Stull, A. T., Kuhlmann, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Instructor presence in video lectures: The role of dynamic drawings, eye contact, and instructor visibility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1162–1171. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. M., & Baird, D. E. (2020). Humanizing user experience design strategies with NEW technologies: AR, VR, MR, ZOOM, ALLY and AI to support student engagement and retention in higher education. In International perspectives on the role of technology in humanizing higher education (pp. 105–129). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120200000033007
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
   Google Scholar
• Gašević, D., Adesope, O., Joksimović, S., & Kovanović, V. (2015). Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, D. (2021). Implementing a coaching model for the development of online teachers. International Journal for Academic Development, 26(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1822847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazier, R. A. (2016). Building rapport to improve retention and success in online classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2016.1155994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabinger, S. (2010). A framework for supporting postsecondary learners with psychiatric disabilities in online environments. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 8(2), 101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Greener, S. (2020). Student wellbeing in the learning zone. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(7), 806–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1832718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway, K. L. (2014). An application of the seven principles of good practice to online courses. Research in Higher Education Journal, 22, 1–12. https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/131676.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hegeman, J. S. (2015). Using instructor-generated video lectures in online mathematics courses improves student learning. Online Learning, 19(3), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiman, T., & Shemesh, D. O. (2012). Students with LD in higher education: Use and contribution of assistive technology and website courses and their correlation to students’ hope and well-being. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(4), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410392047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel, B., Kiehlbaugh, K., & Blowers, P. (2020). Scalable and practical interventions faculty can deploy to increase retention: A faculty cookbook for increasing student success. Education for Chemical Engineers, 33, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, G., Sutherlin, A., Akpanudo, U., James, L., & Chen, M. (2014). The effect of structured divergent prompts on knowledge construction. Online Learning Journal, 18(2), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i2.410
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik, M. K., & Agrawal, D. (2021). Influence of technology readiness in adoption of e-learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(2), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2020-0216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, R., Olfman, L., Ryan, T., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). Leveraging a personalized system to improve self-directed learning in online educational environments. Computers & Education, 70, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitsantas, A. (2013). Fostering college students’ self-regulated learning with learning technologies. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 235–252.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. H. (2012). Are they listening better? Supporting EFL college students’ DVD video comprehension with advance organizers in a multimedia English course. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 9(4), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v9i4.7298
   Google Scholar
• Li, M. Z., & Edwards, S. H. (2020, June 22-26). Integrating role-playing gamification into programming activities to increase student engagement [Paper presentation]. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–34847
   Google Scholar
• Lubbe, W., ten Ham-Baloyi, W., & Smit, K. (2020). The integrative literature review as a research method: A demonstration review of research on neurodevelopmental supportive care in preterm infants. Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 26(6), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2020.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Magjuka, R. J., & Liu, X. (2018). A case study of online MBA courses: Online facilitation, case-based learning, and virtual team. In Business education and ethics: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 662–687). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3153-1.ch035
   Google Scholar
• Malan, M. (2020). Engaging students in a fully online accounting degree: An action research study. Accounting Education, 29(4), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1787855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, K., Pouska, B., Moraes, M. C., & Folkestad, J. E. (2019). Visual-form learning analytics: A tool for critical reflection and feedback. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(3), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.589989
   Google Scholar
• McNicholl, A., Desmond, D., & Gallagher, P. (2020). Assistive technologies, educational engagement and psychosocial outcomes among students with disabilities in higher education. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1854874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngoyi, L., & Malapile, L. S. (2018). Social presence and student engagement in online learning. In Student engagement and participation: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1228–1237). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2584-4.ch061
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. (2018). Highly nontraditonal student persistence in online degree programs-exploring curriculum and instruction: Case study [Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED591674
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, D. M., Pfeiffer, H. M., Fleming, R., Ports, K. A., Pedrick, L. E., Barnack-Tavlaris, J. L., Jirovec, D. L., Helion, A. M., & Swain, R. A. (2013). “U-Pace” Instruction: Improving student success by integrating content mastery and amplified assistance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 17(1), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v17i1.307
   Google Scholar
• Rivenburg, C. R. (2015). Instructional design strategies and their effect on self-directed learning in online learning [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/openview/27ca9206cb1f894d0548c7e7e34477e5/
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. E., & Wizer, D. R. (2016). Universal design for learning and the quality matters guidelines for the design and implementation of online learning events. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Roddy, C., Amiet, D. L., Chung, J., Holt, C., Shaw, L., McKenzie, S., Garivaldis, F., Lodge, J. M., & Mundy, M. E. (2017). Applying best practice online learning, teaching, and support to intensive online environments: An integrative review. Frontiers in Education, 2, Article 59. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00059
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, F. A., & Rafferty, J. A. (2013). Instructional design interventions for supporting self-regulated learning: Enhancing academic outcomes in postsecondary e-learning environments. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 590–601.
   Google Scholar
• Rusli, M., & Negara, I. K. R. Y. (2017). The effect of animation in multimedia computer-based learning and learning style to the learning results. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salar, R., Arici, F., Caliklar, S., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). A model for augmented reality immersion experiences of university students studying in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09810-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiner, L. A. (2010). Thriving in the classroom. About Campus, 15(3), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.20022
   Google Scholar
• Schreiner, L. A. (2018). Applying principles of positive psychology to student success and well-being: Enabling all students to thrive. In D. S. Dunn (Ed.), Positive psychology: Established and emerging issues (pp. 197–219). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315106304-12
   Google Scholar
• Schreiner, L. A., & Louis, M. C. (2011). The engaged learning index: Implications for faculty development. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. 22(1), 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, L. A., Temple, P., & Marshall, D. (2015). UDL in online college coursework: Insights of infusion and educator preparedness. Online Learning, 19(5), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i5.623
   Google Scholar
• Selvi, A. F. (2019). Qualitative content analysis. In The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 440–452). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367824471-37
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, L. A., & Sharp, J. H. (2016). Enhancing student success in online learning experiences through the use of self-regulation strategies. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 27(2), 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Simionescu, D. C. (2020). The impact of emotional design on the effectiveness of instructional materials [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses & Dissertations Center. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/6
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C., & Springer, M. (2019). Interactivity, connectedness and ‘teacher-presence’: Engaging and retaining students online. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59(2), 146–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stull, A. T., Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2020). The case for embodied instruction: The instructor as a source of attentional and social cues in video lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(7), 1441–1453. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C. Y., Yu, S. J., & Chao, C. H. (2019). Effects of intelligent feedback on online learners’ engagement and cognitive load: The case of research ethics education. Educational Psychology, 39(10), 1293–1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1527291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwannawut, N. (2013). Accessibility evaluation of online learning management system for persons with visual impairment [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED564823
   Google Scholar
• Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2014). The role of feedback and social presence in an online peer coaching program for student teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2019). Effect of a metacognitive scaffolding on self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement in e-learning environments. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vayre, E., & Vonthron, A. M. (2017). Psychological engagement of students in distance and online learning: Effects of self-efficacy and psychosocial processes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116656849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitton, N. (2012). The place of game-based learning in an age of austerity. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(2), 249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, P. P., Gonzalez DeHass, A. R., Powers, J. R., & Musgrove, A. (2021). The role of authentic teaching cases and mastery approach goals in online pre-service teachers’ self-regulated learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 69(2), 1003–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09972-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Taylor, J., & Cao, L. (2016). The 3 x 2 achievement goal model in predicting online student test anxiety and help-seeking. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 31(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar