Towards an Australian regional university professional development typology: a qualitative exploration of the academic voice

References

• Boud, D., & Brew, A. (2013). Reconceptualising academic work as professional practice: Implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.671771
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, G. (2017). Developing an instrument for self-evaluation of teaching and learning competencies: A review of faculty professional development and the changing higher education landscape in Singapore. Education Research and Perspectives (Online), 44, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.220159
   Google Scholar
• Coaldrake, P. (2019, September). What’s in a name? Review of the higher education provider category standards (final report). Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.dese.gov.au/higher-education-reviews-and-consultations/resources/final-report-review-higher-education-provider-category-standards
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Hong, E., Moss, T., & Williamson, A. (2021). Developing new faculty voice and agency through trustful, overlapping, faculty-faculty and student-faculty conversations. International Journal for Academic Development, 26(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1947296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, K., & van der Laan, L. (2021). Towards a typology of learning and teaching professional development practice uptake by university academics in Australia. Professional Development in Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1973068
   Google Scholar
• Kálmán, O., Tynjälä, P., & Skaniakos, T. (2019). Patterns of university teachers’ approaches to teaching, professional development and perceived departmental cultures. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(5), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1586667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibowitz, B. (2014). Reflections on academic development: What is in a name? International Journal for Academic Development, 19(4), 357–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2014.969978
   Google Scholar
• Lisewski, B. (2020). Teaching and learning regimes: An educational developer’s perspective within a university’s top-down education policy and its practice architectures. International Journal for Academic Development, 26(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1831505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, D., & Green, D. A. (2022). Credibility in educational development: Trustworthiness, expertise, and identification. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(3), 804–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1871325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. (2012). The implications of interview type and structure in mixed-method designs. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 193–205). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & Cakitaki, B. (2016). Mapping Australian higher education 2016. Grattan Institute. https://grattan.edu.au/report/mapping-australian-higher-education-2016/
   Google Scholar
• O’Meara, K. A. (2011). Faculty civic engagement: New training, assumptions, and markets needed for the engaged American scholar. In J. Saltmarsh & M. Hartley (Eds.), “To Serve a Larger Purpose”: Engagement for Democracy and the Transformation of Higher Education (pp. 177–198). Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sugrue, C., Englund, T., Solbrekke, T. D., & Fossland, T. (2018). Trends in the practices of academic developers: Trajectories of higher education? Studies in Higher Education (Dorchester-On-Thames), 43(12), 2336–2353. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1326026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. A. (2018). Holistic academic development: Is it time to think more broadly about the academic development project? International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1524571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and Learning Regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436022000020742
   Google Scholar
• Unluer, S. (2012). Being an insider researcher while conducting case study research. The Qualitative Report, 17(29), 1–14. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss29/2
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, K. (2017). Research concepts. In K. Williamson & G. Johanson (Eds.), Research methods: Information, systems, and contexts (pp. 3–21). Elsevier Ltd.
   Google Scholar