520
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Exploring the variation of educational developers’ teaching-related perceptions in higher education

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 20 May 2022, Accepted 19 Nov 2023, Published online: 18 Feb 2024

References

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Information Age Publishing, Incorporated.
  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Calkins, S., & Seidler, A. (2011). Faculty perceptions of relevance in teaching and learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 215–225.
  • Cao, Y., Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Toom, A. (2018). Teacher educators’ approaches to teaching and the nexus with self-efficacy and burnout: Examples from two teachers’ universities in China. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1450954
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
  • Debowski, S. (2014). From agents of change to partners in arms: The emerging academic developer role. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.862621
  • DiNapoli, R., Fry, H., Frenay, M., Verhesschen, P., & Verburgh, A. (2010). Academic development and educational developers: Perspectives from different European higher education contexts. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440903529851
  • Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.
  • Englund, C., Olofsson, A., & Price, L. (2018). The influence of sociocultural and structural contexts in academic change and development in higher education. Higher Education, 76(6), 1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0254-1
  • Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual base of study strategies inventories in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0
  • Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Felten, P., Kalish, A., Pingree, A., & Plank, K. M. (2007). Toward a scholarship of teaching and learning in educational development. To Improve the Academy, 25(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2007.tb00476.x
  • Fraser, K. (2001). Australasian academic developers’ conceptions of the profession. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440110033706
  • Fraser, K., Gosling, D., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2010). Conceptualizing evolving models of educational development. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2010(122), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.397
  • Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.751691
  • Green, D. A., & Little, D. (2016). Family portrait: A profile of educational developers around the world. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1046875
  • Hoessler, C., Britnell, J., & Stockley, D. (2010). Assessing the impact of educational development through the lens of the scholarship of teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2010(122), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.400
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Isaacs, G. (1997). Developing the developers: Some ethical dilemmas in changing times. The International Journal for Academic Development, 2(2), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144970020202
  • Kálmán, O., Tynjälä, P., & Skaniakos, T. (2020). Patterns of university teachers’ approaches to teaching, professional development and perceived departmental cultures. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(5), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1586667
  • Kaye, L. K., & Brewer, G. (2013). Teacher and student-focused approaches: Influence of learning approach and self-efficacy in a psychology postgraduate sample. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 12(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2013.12.1.12
  • Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943877
  • Mårtensson, K., & Roxå, T. (2021). Academic developers developing: Aspects of an expanding lifeworld. International Journal for Academic Development, 26(4), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1950725
  • Mori, Y., Harland, T., & Wald, N. (2021). Academic developers’ professional identity: A thematic review of the literature. International Journal for Academic Development, 27(4), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.2015690
  • Murtonen, M., & Vilppu, H. (2020). Change in university pedagogical culture – the impact of increased pedagogical training on first teaching experiences. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.20
  • Myllykoski-Laine, S., Postareff, L., Murtonen, M., & Vilppu, H. (2022). Building a framework of a supportive pedagogical culture for teaching and pedagogical development in higher education. Higher Education, 85(4), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00873-1
  • Parpala, A., & Postareff, L. (2021). Supporting high-quality teaching in higher education through the HowUTeach self-reflection tool. Ammattikasvatuksen aikakauskirja, 23(4), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.54329/akakk.113327
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
  • Postareff, L., Katajavuori, N., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Trigwell, K. (2008). Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794809
  • Postareff, L., Lahdenperä, J., Hailikari, T., & Parpala, A. (2023). The dimensions of approaches to teaching in higher education: A new analysis of teaching profiles. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01104-x
  • Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers’ descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.008
  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01224.x
  • Roxå, T., Mårtensson, K., & Alveteg, M. (2010). Understanding and influencing teaching and learning cultures at university – a network approach. Higher Education, 62(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9368-9
  • Schiefele, U., Streblow, L., & Retelsdorf, J. (2013). Dimensions of teacher interest and their relations to occupational well-being and instructional practices. Journal for Educational Research Online, 5, 7–37. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:8018
  • Sorcinelli, M. D., & Austin, A. E. (2010). Educational developers: The multiple structures and influences that support our work. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2010(122), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.395
  • Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching: A model. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943600445628
  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Ginns, P. (2005). Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised approaches to teaching inventory. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284730
  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383761
  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003548313194
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
  • Turner, K., & Thielkin, M. (2019). How teachers find meaning in their work and effects on their pedagogical practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(9), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2019v44n9.5
  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
  • Vreekamp, M., Gulikers, J. T. M., Runhaar, P. R., & Den Brok, P. J. (2023). A systematic review to explore how characteristics of pedagogical development programmes in higher education are related to teacher development outcomes. International Journal for Academic Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2023.2233471
  • Wheeler, L. B., & Bach, D. (2021). Understanding the impact of educational development interventions on classroom instruction and student success. International Journal for Academic Development, 26(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1777555