Adding a scholarly analysis of teaching and learning to SoTL: the development of the hands-on Utrecht Roadmap for SoTL

References

• Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at University. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop-Clark, C., & Dietz-Uhler, B. (2012). Engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning. A guide to the process, and how to develop a project from start to finish. Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities for the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A., & Ginns, P. (2008). The relationship between engagement in the scholarship of teaching and learning and students’ course experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Comerford Boyes, L., Edmunds, S., Galloway, R., Lawson, D., & Keyle, J. (2011). Getting started in pedagogic research within the STEM disciplines. STEM Education Centre. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-eps/college/stem/getting-started-in-stem-pedagogic-optimised.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chick, N. L. (2014). ‘Methodologically Sound’ under the ‘Big Tent’: An ongoing conversation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080201
   Google Scholar
• Chick, N. L. (Ed.). (2018). SoTL in action. Illuminating critical moments of practice. Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29(3), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar, J. M., Bennett, C. D., & Fischer, M. A. (2018). The scholarship of teaching and learning. A guide for scientists, engineers, and mathematicians. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, R., Hattie, J., & Bowles, T. (2018). Exploring the experiences of teachers undertaking Educational Design Research (EDR) as a form of teacher professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1500389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elon University. (2022). Center for engaged learning. Retrieved July, 2022, from https://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/studying-engaged-learning/sotl-vs-scholarly-teaching/
   Google Scholar
• Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. http://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5176/1/Healey%20Flint%20and%20Harrington%20%282014%29%20Engagement%20through%20partnership%20-%20students%20as%20partners%20in%20learning%20and%20teaching%20in%20HE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P. (2000). Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. Carnegie Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, F., Wijsman, L., & Meijerman, I. (2021). The Utrecht Roadmap for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (UR-SoTL). https://www.uu.nl/en/education/centre-for-academic-teaching/utrecht-roadmap-for-scholarship-of-teaching-and-learning-ur-sotl
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan, M. (2018). The SoTL literature review. Exloring new territory. In N. L. Chick (Ed.), SoTL in action. Illuminating critical moments of practice (pp. 23–31). Stylis Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Meyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, K. (2013). The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meijerman, I. (2019). Supporting teachers in doing SoTL: Development and effect of an interdisciplinary course at Utrecht University. EuroSoTL. https://www.ehu.eus/documents/8301386/10560621/Actas-EuroSoTL-Conference-2019.pdf/1a7d5867-e222-4aab-6f92-a7948f1fbd67
   Google Scholar
• Meijerman, I., Kirschner, F., & Prins, F. (2023). Experiences with supporting teachers with scholarship of teaching and learning at a research intensive university: Lessons learned. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 11. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Young, J., & Yeo, M. (2015). Conceptualizing and communicating SOTL: A framework for the field. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 3(2), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.3.2.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, G. (2018). Using intuition, anecdote, and observation. Rich sources of SoTL projects. In N. L. Chick (Ed.), SoTL in action. Illuminating critical moments of practice (pp. 7–14). Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, S. L., & Myatt, P. M. (2014). Getting started in the scholarship of teaching and learning: A “how to” guide for science academics. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderbilt University. (2022). Center for Teaching. Retrieved July, 2022, from https://my.vanderbilt.edu/sotl/
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J., & Donche, V. (2017). A learning patterns perspective on student learning in higher education: State of the art and moving forward. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9414-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. M. (2015). Doing research to improve teaching and learning. A guide for college and university faculty (1st ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar