Good global citizen? ASEAN’s image building in the United Nations

References

• Acharya, A. 2014. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ba, A. D. 2009. (Re)negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cremona, M., D. Kleimann, J. Larik, R. Lee, and P. Vennesson. 2015. ASEAN’s External Agreements: Law, Practice and the Quest for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denoon, D. B. H., ed. 2017. China, the United States and the Future of Southeast Asia. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fehrmann, T. J. 2014. Die Effektivität interregionaler Kooperation: Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der interregionalen Handlungsfähigkeit von Regionalorganisationen am Beispiel von ASEAN, EU und MERCOSUR. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Gaupp, P. 1983. Staaten als Rollenträger: Die Rollentheorie als Analyse-Instrument von Außenpolitik und internationalen Beziehungen. Frauenfeld: Verlag Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, J. 2002. Asia Meets Europe: Inter-regionalism and the Asia-Europe Meeting. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, J. M. 1996. “State Interests and Institutional Rule Trajectories: A Neorealist Interpretation of the Maastricht Treaty and the European Economic and Monetary Union.” In Realism: Restatement and Renewal, edited by B. Frankel, 261–301. London: Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Haacke, J. 2003. ASEAN’s Diplomatic and Security Culture: Origin, Development and Prospects. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
   Google Scholar
• Hänggi, H., R. Roloff, and J. Rüland, eds. 2006. Interregionalism and International Relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harnisch, S. 2011. “Role Theory: Operationalization of Key Concepts.” In Role Theory in International Relations, edited by S. Harnisch, C. Frank, and H. W. Maull, 7–15. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, K. J. 1970. “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy.” International Studies Quarterly 14 (3): 233–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, M. F. 2017. “Role Conflict and the Limits of State Identity: the Case of Indonesia in Democracy Promotion.” The Pacific Review 30 (3): 385–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsumata, H. 2009. “ASEAN and Human Rights: Resisting Western Pressure or Emulating the West.” Pacific Review 22 (5): 619–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirste, K., and H. W. Maull. 1996. “Zivilmacht und Rollentheorie.” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 3 (2): 283–312.
   Google Scholar
• Kuik, -C.-C. 2016. “How Do Weaker States Hedge? Unpacking ASEAN States’ Alignment Behaviour Towards China.” Journal of Contemporary China 25 (100): 500–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legro, J. W. 2000. “The Transformation of Policy Ideas.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 419–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limaye, S. P. 2007. “United States-ASEAN Relations on ASEAN’s Fortieth Anniversay: A Glass Half Full.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 29 (3): 447–464.
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2002. “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maull, H. W. 1990. “Germany and Japan. The New Civilian Powers.” Foreign Affairs 69 (5): 91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narine, S. 2002. Explaining ASEAN. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Nguitragool, P. 2010. Environmental Cooperation in Southeast Asia: ASEAN’s Regime for Transboundary Haze Pollution. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nguitragool, P., and J. Rüland. 2015. ASEAN as an Actor in International Fora: Reality, Potential and Constraints. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. 1988. “Soft Power.” Foreign Policy 80: 153–171.
   Google Scholar
• Rüland, J. 2000. “ASEAN and the Asian Crisis: Theoretical and Practical Consequences for Southeast Asian Regionalism.” The Pacific Review 13 (3): 421–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüland, J. 2010. “Balancers, Multilateral Utilities or Identity Builders? International Relations and the Study of Interregionalism.” Journal of European Public Policy 17 (8): 1268–1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüland, J. 2014. “Constructing Regionalism Domestically: Local Actors and Foreign Policymaking in Newly Democratized Indonesia.” Foreign Policy Analysis 1 (2): 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüland, J. 2017. “Democratizing Foreign-Policy Making in Indonesia and the Democratization of ASEAN: A Role Theory Analysis.” Trans: Trans –regional and –national Studies of Southeast Asia 5 (1): 49–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüland, J. 2018. The Indonesian Way. ASEAN, Europeanization and Foreign Policy Debates in a New Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Severino, R. C. 2006. Southeast Asia in Search of an ASEAN Community: Insights from the Former ASEAN Secretary-General. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, I. 2013. Southeast Asia and the Rise of China: the Search for Security. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thiess, C. G., and M. Breuning. 2012. “Integrating Foreign Policy Analysis and International Relations through Role Theory.” Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (1): 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar