Strategic responses of regional economic organizations to the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative: the cases of ASEAN, EAEU, and EU

References

• Acharya, A., and Johnston, A.I., eds. 2007. Crafting Cooperation. Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. 2016. “Regionalism Beyond EU-Centrism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism, edited by T. A. Börzel and T. Risse, 109–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, E., and P. Greve. 2009. “When Security Community Meets Balance of Power: Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance.” Review of International Studies 35 (1): 59–84. doi:10.1017/S0260210509008432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agostinis, G., and K. Parthenay. 2021. “Exploring the Determinants of Regional Health Governance Modes in the Global South: A Comparative Analysis of Central and South America.” Review of International Studies X: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Aoyama, R. 2016. “‘One Belt, One Road’: China’s New Global Strategy.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 5 (2): 3–22. doi:10.1080/24761028.2016.11869094.
   Google Scholar
• Aung, K. H. 2020. “The Political Economy of China-Myanmar Bilateral Relations Under the Framework of Belt and Road Initiative.” Journal of Governance and Public Policy 7 (2): 88–103. doi:10.18196/jgpp.72125.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, R., and F. A. Stengel. 2014. “Foreign Policy Analysis, Globalisation and Non-State Actors: State-Centric After All?” Journal of International Relations and Development 17 (4): 489–521. doi:10.1057/jird.2013.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besch, S., I. Bond, and L. Schuette. 2020. “Europe, the US and China: A Love-Hate Triangle?” Centre for European Reform Policy Brief, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, J.-M. 2021. “Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Blues: Powering BRI Research Back on Track to Avoid Choppy Seas.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 26 (1): 235–255. doi:10.1007/s11366-020-09717-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T., and T. Risse, eds. 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busygina, I., and M. Filippov. 2020. “Russia, Post-Soviet Integration, and the EAEU: The Balance Between Domination and Cooperation.” Problems of Post-Communism 68 (6): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, M., L. Cuyvers, D. Fu, and W. Viviers. 2021. “Identifying Export Opportunities for China in the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ Group of Countries: A Decision Support Model Approach.” Journal of International Trade Law and Policy 20 (2): 101–126. doi:10.1108/JITLP-11-2020-0061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisse, J., and M. Matsushita. 2018. “China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative: Mapping the World Trade Normative and Strategic Implications.” Journal of World Trade 52 (1): 163–186. doi:10.54648/TRAD2018008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, C. A., and K. J. Twitchett, eds. 1970. “Part One: International Organisations as Actors.” In The New International Actors. The United Nations and the European Economic Union. London: Macmillan St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuyvers, L. 2019. “The “ASEAN Way” and Asean’s Development Gap with Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam: A Critical View.” Asia Pacific Business Review 25 (5): 683–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuyvers, L., L. Chen, and P. De Lombaerde. 2019. “50 Years of Regional Integration in ASEAN.” Asia Pacific Business Review 25 (5): 609–618. doi:10.1080/13602381.2019.1652975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadush, U. 2019. “The State of China-European Union Economic Relations.” Bruegel Working Paper (09).
   Google Scholar
• Damro C., S. Gstöhl and S. Schunz, edited by. 2017. The European Union’s Evolving External Engagement: Towards New Sectoral Diplomacies? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Lombaerde, P., F. Söderbaum, L. Van Langenhove, and F. Baert. 2010. “The Problem of Comparison in Comparative Regionalism.” Review of International Studies 36 (3): 731–753. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diesen, G., and A. Lukin. 2021. The Return of Eurasia. Continuity and Change. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Drieskens, E. 2017. “Golden or Gilded Jubilee? A Research Agenda for Actorness.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (10): 1534–1546. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1225784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duina, F. 2006. The Social Construction of Free Trade. The European Union, NAFTA and MERCOSUR. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. “Report on the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Third Countries.” Commission Staff Working Document. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/march/tradoc_156634.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. “Global Gateway : Up to €300 Billion for the European Union’s Strategy to Boost Sustainable Links Around the World.” Press release Accessed 1 December, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_6433
   Google Scholar
• Feraru, A. 2016. “ASEAN Decision-Making Process: Before and After the ASEAN Charter.” Asian Development Policy Review 4 (1): 26–41. doi:10.18488/journal.107/2016.4.1/107.1.26.41.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes Kazakhstan. 2019. “‘55 Zavodov V Kazahstane’: Forbes.Kz Ob’Yasnyayet O Chem Idet Rech (‘55 Entreprises in Kazakhstan’: Forbes.Kz Explains What It is About). Accessed 5 September. https://forbes.kz/process/economy/55_kitayskih_zavoda_forbeskz_obyyasnyaet_pochemu_v_kazahstane_etih_predpriyatiy_ne_poyavitsya/
   Google Scholar
• Gabuev, A. 2016. “Friends with Benefits? Russian–Chinese Relations After the Ukraine Crisis.” Carnegie, Moscow Center, June. 50 p. https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/resources/docs/Carnegie%20Moscow-Friends%20with%20Benefits.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gaens, B. 2019. “The EU-Asia Connectivity Strategy and Its Impact on Asia-Europe Relations.” In Trade and Economic Connectivity in the Age of Uncertainty, edited by C. Echle and M. Sarmah, 19–27. Singapore: KAS.
   Google Scholar
• Garbuzarova, E. G. 2019. “Cooperation Between the Eurasian Economic Union and the Silk Road Economic Belt: Benefits, Risks, Achievements.” Post-Soviet Issues 6 (1): 8–15. doi:10.24975/2313-8920-2019-6-1-8-15.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, G. 2019. “The EU-China Partnership: Balancing Between Divergence and Convergence.” Asia Europe Journal 17 (3): 281–294. doi:10.1007/s10308-019-00554-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genna, G. M., and P. De Lombaerde. 2010. “The Small N Methodological Challenges of Analyzing Regional Integration.” Journal of European Integration 32 (6): 583–595. doi:10.1080/07036337.2010.518717.
   Google Scholar
• Giucci, R., and A. Mdinaradze. 2017. The Eurasian Economic Union. Analysis from a trade policy perspective. Berlin: Berlin Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Gyi, M. M. 2019. “‘The Belt and Road Initiative’ (BRI) and Its Implication on Myanmar.” Mandalay University of Foreign Languages Research Journal 10 (1): 106-113.
   Google Scholar
• Har, W. M., S. Y. Lee, C. H. Lim, A. L. Tan, and C. T. Tan. 2019. “Impact of Belt and Road and Reversed Globalization to Malaysia-China Economic Relationship.” International Journal of Business Management and Economic Review 2 (3): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, V. M. 2005. “Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations.” Foreign Policy Analysis 1 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. 2017. “Central Asia’s Silk Road Rivalries.” Europe and Central Asia Report, no-245, 31 p. https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/245-central-asias-silk-road-rivalries_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jetin, B. 2018. “‘One Belt-One Road Initiative’ and ASEAN Connectivity: Synergy Issues and Potentialities.” In China’s Global Rebalancing and the New Silk Road, edited by B. R. Deepak, 139–150. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., and M. L. Smith. 2007. “Making Process, Not Progress: ASEAN and the Evolving East Asian Regional Order.” International Security 32 (1): 148–184. doi:10.1162/isec.2007.32.1.148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupille, J., and J. A. Caporaso. 1998. “States, Agency, and Rules: The European Union in Global Environmental Politics.” The European Union in the World Community 17: 157–182.
   Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, J. 2003. “Foreign Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century: Back to Comparison, Forward to Identity and Ideas.” International Studies Review 5 (2): 156–202. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.5020012.
   Google Scholar
• Kassenova, N. 2017. “China’s Silk Road and Kazakhstan’s Bright Path: Linking Dreams of Prosperity.” Asia Policy 24 (1): 110–116. doi:10.1353/asp.2017.0028.
   Google Scholar
• Kheyfets, B. 2020. Kakim Marshrutom Poydet Rossiya Po Odnomu Neprostomu Kitayskomu Puti? (Which Route Will Russia Take Along One Not so Simple Chinese Road?). Moscow: Institute of Economics of Russian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, V. S. 2019. “Asean‘s External Relations – a Comparative Study.” In Proceedings of International Conference on Navigating the Idea of Indo-Pacific: Indian and South East Asian Perspectives, Madurai, 402–418. Shanlax Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Loc, N. T. P. 2020. “The OBOR Initiative and Asean’s Infrastructure Construction: Impact and Challenges.” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) 25 (7): 6-17. Series 8.
   Google Scholar
• Maass, A. S. 2020. “The Actorness of the Eu’s State-Building in Ukraine-Before and After Crimea.” Geopolitics 25 (2): 387–406. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1559149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makocki, M. 2016. “The EU Level: ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative Slowly Coming to Terms with the EU Rules-Based Approach.” In Europe and China’s New Silk Roads, edited by . F. P. Van der Putten, M. Huotari, J. Seaman, A. Ekman and M. Otero-Iglesias, 67–71. Berlin: ETNC.
   Google Scholar
• Maliszewska, M. 2019. “The Belt and Road Initiative: Economic, Poverty, and Environmental Impacts.” World Bank Group Policy Research Working Paper 8814.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, L. M. 2018. “Governing Regional Connectivity in Southeast Asia–the Role of the ASEAN Secretariat and Asean’s External Partners.” University of Freiburg Occasional Papers (42).
   Google Scholar
• Müller, L. M. 2019. “Connecting Southeast Asia—progress Under the Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity.” ASEAN Briefs 6 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Müller, L. M. 2021. “Challenges to ASEAN Centrality and Hedging in Connectivity Governance—regional and National Pressure Points.” The Pacific Review 34 (5): 747–777. doi:10.1080/09512748.2020.1757741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na-Xi, L., H. Meng-Fang, and L. Shan-Bing. 2019. “How the Belt and Road Initiative Can Help Strengthen the Role of the SCO and Deepen China’s Cooperation with Russia and the Countries of Central Asia.” India Quarterly 75 (1): 56–68. doi:10.1177/0974928418821484.
   Google Scholar
• Nguitragool, P., and J. Rüland. 2015. ASEAN as an Actor in International Fora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, A., and C. Bretherthon. 2013. “Introduction: EU External Policy at the Crossroads.” YLL International Relations 27 (3): 261–275. doi:10.1177/0047117813497306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosov, M. 2020. “Rossiya V Kontekste Kitayskogo Proyekta ‘Odin Poyas-Odin Put’. Statya Pervaya (Russia in the Context of Chinese Project ‘One Belt-One Road’).” Sovremennaya Yevropa (Contemporary Europe) 5: 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Picciau, S. 2016. “The ‘One Belt One Road’ Strategy Between Opportunities and Fears: A New Stage in EU-China Relations?” IndraStra Global 14: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ping, F. 2018. “‘16+ 1’ Challenge or Opportunity of EU.” Polish Journal of Political Science 4 (2): 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Rhinard, M., and G. Sjöstedt. 2019. “The EU as a Global Actor: A New Conceptualisation Four Decades After ‘Actorness’.” U-Paper (6).
   Google Scholar
• Saravanamuttu, J., and D. G. X. Han. 2016. “Malaysia-China Relations: A New Turn?” RSIS Commentary 274.
   Google Scholar
• Sbragia, A. 2008. “Comparative Regionalism: What Might It Be?” Journal of Common Market Studies 46: 29–49. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00809.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakhanova, G., and J. Garlick. 2020. “The Belt and Road Initiative and the Eurasian Economic Union: Exploring the ‘Greater Eurasian Partnership’.” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 49 (1): 33–57. doi:10.1177/1868102620911666.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, G. 1977. The External Role of the European Community. Westmead: Saxon House.
   Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, F. 2008. “Consolidating Comparative Regionalism: From Euro-Centrism to Global Comparison”. In GARNET Annual Conference, 17–19. Bordeaux: Sciences Po Bordeaux.
   Google Scholar
• Soong, J. J. 2016. “The Political Economy of Development Between China and the ASEAN States: Opportunity and Challenge.” The Chinese Economy 49 (6): 395–399. doi:10.1080/10971475.2016.1207972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soong, J. J. 2018. “China’s One Belt and One Road Initiative Meets ASEAN Economic Community: Propelling and Deepening Regional Economic Integration?” The Chinese Economy 51 (4): 291–297. doi:10.1080/10971475.2018.1457335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Putten, F. P., M. Huotari, J. Seaman, A. Ekman, and M. Otero-Iglesias. 2016. “The Role of OBOR in Europe-China Relations.” In In Europe and China’s New Silk Roads, edited by F. P. Van der Putten, M. Huotari, J. Seaman, A. Ekman and M. Otero-Iglesias, 3–11. sl: European Think-tank Network on China (ETNC).
   Google Scholar
• Van Langenhove, L., and D. Marchesi. 2008. “The Lisbon Treaty and the Emergence of Third Generation Regional Integration.” European Journal of Law Reform 4: 477–496.
   Google Scholar
• Vinokurov E., and A. Libman. 2021. One Eurasia or Many? Regional Interconnections and Connectivity Projects in the Eurasian Continent. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Central Asia Program.
   Google Scholar
• Vinokurov, E. 2017. “Eurasian Economic Union: Current State and Preliminary Results.” Russian Journal of Economics 3 (1): 54–70. doi:10.1016/j.ruje.2017.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler, J., and C. Bretherton. 2006. “The European Union as a Protagonist to the United States on Climate Change.” International Studies Perspectives 7 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., J. Ruet, and X. Richet. 2017. One Belt One Road and the Reconfiguration of China-EU Relations. Paris: CEPN.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, N. 2019. “Exploring the Significance of the Connectivity Between China and ASEAN Under the One Belt One Road Initiative.” In 2019 International Conference on Emerging Researches in Management, Business, Finance and Economics, Shanghai, Francis Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M. 2019. “Emerging Costs of China’s Belt and Road Strategy for Transboundary Water in South and Southeast Asia.” International Journal of Energy and Water Resources 3 (2): 81–92. doi:10.1007/s42108-019-00017-9.
   Google Scholar
• Witkowska, J. 2020. “The European Union’s Screening Framework for Foreign Direct Investment: Consequences for External Relations.” Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe 23 (1): 19–36. doi:10.18778/1508-2008.23.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, J. U. 2012. “The EU an Actor Sui Generis? A Comparison of EU and ASEAN Actorness.” Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (4): 653–669. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02237.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar