669
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring the relationship between supplementary schools and ‘cohesive communities’

Pages 1135-1151 | Received 06 Jul 2012, Accepted 14 Oct 2012, Published online: 13 Nov 2012

References

  • Abdelrazak, M. 2001. Towards more effective supplementary and mother tongue schools (in England). London: Resource Unit for Supplementary and Mother Tongue Schools.
  • Adonis, Andrew. 2006. Reception speech, supplementary schools. Paper presented at the Supplementary Schools Forum. http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/speeches/media/documents/supplementary.doc (accessed September 29, 2011)
  • Berkeley, Rob 2008. Right to divide?: Faith schools and community cohesion. London: Runnymede Trust.
  • Cantle, Ted 2001. Community cohesion: A report of the independent review team. London: Home Office. http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/independentreviewteam.pdf (accessed May 16, 2012)
  • Commission on Integration and Cohesion (CIC) 2007. Our shared futures. West Yorkshire: Crown Copyright.
  • Conway, David 2009. Disunited Kingdom: How the government's community cohesion agenda undermines British identity and nationhood. London: Civitas.
  • Department for Children Schools and Families (DCSF) 2007. New Arrivals excellence programme guidance primary and secondary national strategies. Nottingham: DCSF.
  • Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) 2009. The economic case for cohesion. London: CLG.
  • Faas, D. 2011. A civic rebalancing of British multiculturalism? An analysis of geography, history and citizenship education curricula. Educational Review, 63, no. 2: 143–58. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2010.527924
  • Flint, John, and David Robinson, eds. 2008. Community cohesion in crisis??. Bristol: Polity Press.
  • Francis, B., L. Archer, and A. Mau 2010. Parents’ and teachers’ constructions of the purposes of Chinese complementary schooling: ‘Culture’, identity and power. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 13, no. 1: 101–17. doi: 10.1080/13613320903550089
  • Hall, K. A., and K. Ozerk, M. Zulfiqar, J. E.C. Tan 2002. ‘This is our school’: Provision, purpose and pedagogy of supplementary schooling in Leeds and Oslo. British Educational Research Journal, 28, no. 3: 399–418. doi: 10.1080/01411920220137467
  • Hetherington, M., P. Benefield, A. Lines, C. Paterson, J. Ries, and M. Shuayb. 2007. Community cohesion for children, young people and their families: A rapid review of policy, practice and research in local authorities. LGAR Report 1/07, NFER
  • Home Office 2005. Community cohesion: Seven steps – a practitioners toolkit. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
  • Issa, Tozun, and Kimberley Allen, Alistair Ross 2008. Young people's educational attainment in London's Turkish, Turkish Kurdish and Cypriot Communities: A report for the Mayor's Office. London: Mayors Office.
  • Issa, Tozun, and Claudette Williams 2009. Realising potential: Complementary schools in the UK. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
  • Kalra, V. S., and N. Kapoor 2009. Interrogating segregation, integration and the community cohesion agenda. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35, no. 9: 1397–415. doi: 10.1080/13691830903125893
  • Kifano, S. 1996. Afrocentric education in supplementary schools: Paradigm and practice at the Mary McLeod Bethune Institute. Journal of Negro Education, 65, no. 2: 209–18. doi: 10.2307/2967314
  • Local Government Association (LGA) 2002a. Guidance on community cohesion. London: LGA.
  • Local Government Association (LGA) 2002b. Draft guidance on community cohesion. London: LGA.
  • Local Government Association (LGA) 2004. Community cohesion – an action guide: Guidance for local authorities. London: LGA.
  • Martin, P., A. Creese, and A. Bhatt 2003. Complementary schools and their communities in Leicester. Leicester: University of Leicester.
  • Mason, A. 2010. Integration, cohesion and national identity: Theoretical reflection on recent British policy. British Journal of Political Science, 40, no. 4: 857–74. doi: 10.1017/S0007123410000104
  • Maylor, U. 2010. Notions of diversity, British identities and citizenship belonging. Race Ethnicity and Education, 13, no. 2: 233–52. doi: 10.1080/13613321003726884
  • Maylor, U., Glass, K., Issa, T., Kuyok, K., Minty, S., Rose, A., Ross, A., et al. 2010. The impact of supplementary schools on pupils’ attainment: An investigation into what factors contribute to educational improvements. Research Report 210. Nottingham: Department for Children Schools and Families (DCSF)
  • Maylor, U., A. Rose, S. Minty, A. Ross, T. Issa and A. K. Kuyok 2011. Exploring the impact of supplementary schools on black and minority ethnic pupils’ mainstream attainment. British Educational Research Journal, iFirst, , 1–19. doi: 10.1080/01411926.2011.614689
  • McGhee, D. 2003. Moving to ‘our’ common ground – a critical examination of community cohesion discourse in 21st century Britain. The Sociological Review, 51, no. 3: 376–404. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00426
  • Morris, A., M. McDaid, and H. Potter 2011. Promoting community cohesion in England. School Leadership and Management, 31, no. 3: 281–96. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2010.545382
  • National Resource Centre for Supplementary Schools (NRC) 2010. Evaluation of the National Resource Centre for Supplementary Education (NRC) 2007–10. London: ContiuYou.
  • Ofsted. 2008. Schools and inspections: Information and guidance for inspectors of maintained schools, independent schools and teacher education. http://www.sharedfutures.org/resources/Schools%20and%20Inspection%2005.pdf (accessed September 29, 2011)
  • Ofsted 2009. Inspecting maintained schools’ duty to promote community cohesion: Guidance for inspectors. London: Ofsted.
  • Ofsted 2011. The draft framework for school inspections. London: Ofsted.
  • Parker-Jenkins, M., and M. Glenn 2011. Levels of community cohesion: Theorizing the UK agenda and the implications for policy and practice in schools. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 13, no. 1: 1–12.
  • Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone.
  • Putnam, Robert D. 2002. Community-based social capital and educational performance. In Making good citizens: Education and civil society, ed. Diane Ravitch, and Joseph Viteritti, 58–95. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Reay, D. and H. S. Mirza 1997. Uncovering genealogies of the margins: Black supplementary schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18, no. 4: 477–99. doi: 10.1080/0142569970180401
  • Resnick, D. 1997. Understanding unusual minority school settings: Hollywood and Hebrew School. Education & Society, 15, no. 2: 49–61. doi: 10.7459/es/15.2.06
  • Robinson, David 2008. Community cohesion and the politics of communitarianism. In Community cohesion in crisis?: New dimensions of diversity and difference, ed. John Flint, and David Robinson, 15–33. Bristol: Polity Press.
  • Rochdale Safer Communities Partnership. 2011. Safer communities partnership draft community cohesion strategy for 2011–2014. Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council. http://www.rochdale.gov.uk/council_and_democracy/consultations/current_consultation_-_service/community_cohesion_stratey.aspx (accessed March 13, 2012)
  • Rutter, J. 1998. Refugee supplementary schools. Language Issues, 10, no. 1: 7–11.
  • Sanders, Z. 1979. Latvian education in the United States: Antecedents and development of supplementary schools. Journal of Ethnic Studies, 7, no. 1: 31–42.
  • Savage, M. 2008. Histories, belongings, communities. International Journal of Social Research Methodologies, 11, no. 2: 151–62. doi: 10.1080/13645570801940863
  • The Schools Network. Community cohesion. https://www.ssatrust.org.uk/community/communitycohesion/Pages/default.aspx (accessed March 14, 2012)
  • Tomlinson, Sally 1984. Home and school in multicultural Britain. London: Batsford.
  • Worley, C. 2005. ‘It's not about race, it's about the community’: New labour and ‘community cohesion’. Critical Social Policy, 25, no. 4: 483–96. doi: 10.1177/0261018305057026
  • Zhou, M., and S. Kim 2006. Community forces, social capital and educational achievement: The case of supplementary education in the Chinese and Korean immigrant communities. Harvard Educational Review, 76, no. 1: 1–29.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.