Fit for purpose: traditional assessment is failing undergraduates with learning difficulties. Might eAssessment help?

References

• Arnold, K., and M. Pistilli. 2012. Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. New York: ACM
   Google Scholar
• Baum, D., M. Yorke, and M. Coffey. 2004. “What is happening when we assess, and how can we use our understanding of this to improve assessment?”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (4): 451–77. doi: 10.1080/02602930310001689037
   Google Scholar
• BDA. 2011. Dyslexia and SpLD in adults. Bracknell: British Dyslexia Association.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, C., O'Doherty, M., and L. Shannon. 2011. “Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning?”. Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 671–87. doi: 10.1080/03075071003731135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the theory of formative assessment”. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability 21 (1): 5–31. doi: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, A., and S. McGinty. 2013. “Feedback-dialogues: Exploring the student perspective”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (4): 466–76. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.649244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D.. 2007. “Reframing assessment as if learning were important”. In Rethinking assessment in higher education, edited by D. Boud, N. Falchikov, 14–25. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Associates. 2010. Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G.. 2010. “The validity of examination essays in higher education: Issues and responses”. Higher Education Quarterly 64 (3): 276–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00460.x
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J., and J. Iles. 2006. “An assessment of anxiety levels in dyslexic students in higher education”. British Journal of Educational Psychology 76 (3): 651–62. doi: 10.1348/000709905X66233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conole, G., and M. Dyke. 2004. “What are the affordances of information and communication technologies?”. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology 12 (2): 113–24. doi: 10.1080/0968776042000216183
   Google Scholar
• Cotterill, S., P. Bradley, and G. Hammond. 2006. “ePortfolios: Supporting assessment in complex educational environments”. In Innovative assessment in higher education, edited by C. Bryan, K. Clegg, 191–99. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Course Signals. 2012. Information technology at Purdue. http://itap.purdue.edu (accessed July 30, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, M.. 2010. Dyslexia, dyspraxia and dyscalculia: A toolkit for nursing staff. London: Royal College of Nursing.
   Google Scholar
• DDP. 2011. Diagnostic digital portfolio, Alverno College. http://www.alverno.edu/academics/ouruniquecurriculum/diagnosticdigitalportfolio/ (accessed July 30, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Ellucian. 2012. Ellucian course signals. http://www.ellucian.com/signals/ (accessed July 30, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R. 2012. The state of learning analytics in 2012: A review and future challenges. Technical Report KMI-12–0, Knowledge Media Institute. Milton Keynes, UK, The Open University
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, S., and C. Yapp, eds. 2005. Personalizing learning in the 21st century. Stafford: Network Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, J.. 2010. “Classroom walls that talk: Using online course activity data of successful students to raise self-awareness of underperforming peers”. The Internet and Higher Education 14 (2): 89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon-Leary, P., and J. Smailes. 2004. “Students with dyslexia: Research projects at Northumbria University”. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning 6 (2): 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gikandi, J., D. Morrow, and N. Davis. 2011. “Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature”. Computers & Education 57 (4): 2333–51. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjikakou, K., and D. Hartas. 2008. “Higher education provision for students with disabilities in Cyprus”. Higher Education 55 (1): 103–19. doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9070-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, E., J. Milne, A. Ramsay, and D. Morrison. 2009. “Recommendations for the use of e-tools for improvements around assignment marking quality”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (4): 469–79. doi: 10.1080/02602930802071122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HESA. 2011. 2009/10 students by disability. Online table. http://www.hesa.ac.uk/index.php/content/view/1897/239/ (accessed July 30, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• HESA. 2012. Widening participation of students in receipt of DSA (table T7). http://www.hesa.ac.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2062&Itemid=141 (accessed December 1, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Hockings, C. 2010. Inclusive learning and teaching in higher education: A synthesis of research. EvidenceNet. York: Higher Education Academy
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, P., and M. Pang. 2012. “Effective formative e-assessment of student learning: A study on a statistics course”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (2): 215–25. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.523818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, C., and E. Morgan. 2007. Managing dyslexia at University: A resource for students, academic and support staff. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• JISC. 2004. Effective practice with e-learning, e-learning and pedagogy JISC development group. Bristol: Joint Information Systems Committee
   Google Scholar
• JISC. 2008. Effective Practice with e-Portfolios: Supporting 21st century learning. Bristol: Joint Information Systems Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T., D. Laham, and D. Foltz. 2003. “Automatic essay assessment”. Assessment in Education 10 (3): 295–308. doi: 10.1080/0969594032000148154
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, A., and K. Hogan. 2000. “The use and abuse of models of disability”. Disability and Society 15 (1): 157–65. doi: 10.1080/09687590025829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, P., and G. Siemens. 2011. “Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education”. Educause Review 46 (5): 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• LTMS. 2011. ePortfolios. Learning technologies for medical sciences, Newcastle University. http://www.eportfolios.ac.uk (accessed July 30, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Maclellan, E.. 2004. “How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education?”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (3): 311–21. doi: 10.1080/0260293042000188267
   Google Scholar
• Madriaga, M., K. Hanson, C. Heaton, H. Kay, S. Newitt, and A. Walker. 2010. “Confronting similar challenges? Disabled and non-disabled students’ learning and assessment experiences”. Studies in Higher Education 35 (6): 647–58. doi: 10.1080/03075070903222633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, H., and K. Bridger. 2010. Developing and embedding inclusive policy and practice in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, T., D. Morrison, H. Mellar, P. Bullen, and M. Oliver, eds. 2009. Transforming higher education through technology-enhanced learning. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Mentkowski, M.. 2006. “Accessible and adaptable elements of Alverno student assessment-as-learning”. In Innovative assessment in higher education, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 48–63. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Disability Practitioners. 2012. Accessible ICTs and personalised learning for students with disabilities. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• NSS. 2012. National student survey. http://www.thestudentsurvey.com (accessed July 30, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D.. 2009. “Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (3): 335–52. doi: 10.1080/02602930802255139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. Decade ends with record student numbers. Education today, UNESCO, Paris
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, P.. 1999. “Pilot study to investigate the performance of dyslexic students in written assessments”. Innovations in Education and Training International 36 (2): 155–60. doi: 10.1080/1355800990360208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., J. Carroll, O'Donovan, B., and C. Rust. 2008. “Assessment standards: A manifesto for change”. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching 2, no. 3, http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/article/assessment_standards_a_manifesto_for_change (accessed July 30, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., J. Carroll, O'Donovan, B., and C. Rust. 2011. “If I was going there I wouldn't start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (4): 479–92. doi: 10.1080/02602930903512883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QAA. 2010. Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education: Section 3: Disabled students. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Riddell, S., T. Tinklin, and A. Wilson. 2004. Disabled students and multiple policy innovations in Higher Education Project R000239069. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council
   Google Scholar
• Sambell, K., L. McDowell, and C. Montgomery. 2013. Assessment for learning in higher education. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P.. 2005. “Universities and the knowledge economy”. Minerva 43 (3): 297–309. doi: 10.1007/s11024-005-6510-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T.. 2006. “The social model of disability”. In The disability studies reader, edited by J. Davis, Chapter 16, 214–21. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, K.. 2009. “e is for exploration: Assessing hard-to-measure learning outcomes”. British Journal of Educational Technology 40 (2): 386–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00927.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. 2011. Learning and knowledge analytics. http://www.learninganalytics.net (accessed July 30, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• SNAPP. 2011. About SNAPP, University of Wollongong. http://research.uow.edu.au/learningnetworks/%20seeing/snapp/index.html (accessed July 30, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Stefani, L., R. Mason, and C. Pegler. 2007. The educational potential of e-portfolios: Supporting personal development and reflective learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Summer, J., and F. Catarro. 2003. “Assessment of handwriting speed and factors influencing written output of university students in examinations”. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 50: 148–57. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1630.2003.00310.x
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M.. 2002. “Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (6): 501–10. doi: 10.1080/0260293022000020273
   Google Scholar
• The Work Foundation. 2011. A plan for growth in the knowledge economy, a knowledge economy programme paper. London: The Work Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V.. 2005. Taking student retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of college. Washington, DC: The Pell Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H., and J. Pryor. 2001. “Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory”. British Educational Research Journal 27 (5): 615–31. doi: 10.1080/01411920120095780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Hull. 2008a. Making your teaching more inclusive: Guidance notes. Hull, UK: University of Hull.
   Google Scholar
• University of Hull. 2008b. University guidelines and procedures for making reasonable adjustments to examination and assessment arrangements for disabled students or students with health difficulties. Hull, UK: University of Hull.
   Google Scholar
• University of Hull. 2008c. Guidelines for marking the work of students whose disability affects their ability to produce written English. Hull, UK: University of Hull.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Schaaf, M., L. Baartman, and F. Prins. 2012. “Exploring the role of assessment criteria during teachers’ collaborative judgement processes of students’ portfolios”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (7): 847–60. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.576312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterfield, J., and B. West. 2007. “Towards making assessments inclusive in higher education”. SKILL Journal 89: 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P.. 2007. “Valid Knowledge: The economy and the academy”. Higher Education 54 (4): 511–23. doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9051-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P.. 2008. “Assessing context based learning: Not only rigorous but also relevant”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (4): 395–408. doi: 10.1080/02602930701562890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorke, M.. 2011. “Summative assessment: dealing with the ‘measurement fallacy’”. Studies in Higher Education 36 (3): 251–73. doi: 10.1080/03075070903545082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar