Identifying Canadian teacher candidates' needs for training in the use of inclusive classroom assessment

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. 2011. “Formative Assessment: A Critical Review.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 18 (1): 5–25. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M., K. Breuer, E. Cascallar, F. Dochy, Y. Dori, J. Ridgway, R. Wiesemes, and G. Nickmans. 2006. “A Learning Integrated Assessment System.” Educational Research Review 1 (1): 61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2006.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998a. “Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment.” Phi Delta Kappan 80 (2): 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998b. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice 5 (1): 7–74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. J., and D. Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 5–31. doi: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, S. E., and M. L. Thurlow. 2004. “Five of the Most Frequently Allowed Testing Accommodations in State Policy: Synthesis of Research.” Remedial and Special Education 25 (3): 141–152. doi: 10.1177/07419325040250030201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgers, N., D. Sikkel, and J. Hox. 2004. “Response Effects in Surveys on Children and Adolescents: The Effect of Number of Response Options, Negative Wording, and Neutral Mid-Point.” Quality and Quantity 38 (1): 17–33. doi: 10.1023/B:QUQU.0000013236.29205.a6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindley, G. 2001. “Outcomes-based Assessment in Practice: Some Examples and Emerging Insights.” Language Testing 18 (4): 393–407. doi: 10.1177/026553220101800405
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L. 2004. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: Implications for Policy and Professional Development.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 11 (3): 301–318. doi: 10.1080/0969594042000304609
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., L. R. Harris, and J. Harnett. 2012. “Teacher Beliefs About Feedback Within an Assessment for Learning Environment: Endorsement of Improved Learning over Student Well-Being.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (7): 968–978. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. 2012. Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, L., D. Eignor, Y. Sawaki, J. Steinberg, and F. Cline. 2010. “Using Factor Analysis to Investigate Accommodations Used by Students with Disabilities on an English-language Arts Assessment.” Applied Measurement in Education. Special Issue: Testing Students with Disabilities 23 (2): 187–208. doi: 10.1080/08957341003673831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., T. Chavez, and C. Cao. 2013. “Establishing a Foundation for Valid Teacher Judgment on Student Learning: The Role of Pre-Service Assessment Education.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 20 (1): 107–126. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2012.668870
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., and D. A. Klinger. 2010. “Assessment Literacy Development: Identifying Gaps in Teacher Candidates’ Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 17 (4): 419–438. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2010.516643
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. 2003. Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L., and S. Katz. 2006. Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind. Winnipeg: Western Northern Canadian Protocol.
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds, A., and G. Edmunds. 2014. Special Education in CANADA. 2nd ed. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., B. C. McKevitt, and R. J. Kettler. 2002. “Testing Accommodations Research and Decision Making: The Case of "Good" Scores being Highly Valued but Difficult to Achieve for all Students.” Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 35 (3): 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., D. Fuchs, S. B. Eaton, C. Hamlett, E. Binkley, and R. Crouch. 2000. “Using Objective Data Sources to Enhance Teacher Judgments about Test Accommodations.” Exceptional Children 67 (1): 67–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., D. Fuchs, S. B. Eaton, C. L. Hamlett, and K. M. Karns. 2000. “Supplemental Teacher Judgments of Mathematics Test Accommodations with Objective Data Sources.” School Psychology Review 29 (1): 65–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., and M. James. 1997. “Assessment and Learning: Differences and Relationships between Formative and Summative Assessment.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 4 (3): 365–379. doi: 10.1080/0969594970040304
   Google Scholar
• Helwig, R., and G. Tindal. 2003. “An Experimental Analysis of Accommodation Decisions on Large-Scale Mathematics Tests.” Exceptional Children 69 (2): 211–225. doi: 10.1177/001440290306900206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, J. R., S. S. Lazarus, and M. L. Thurlow. 2011. Professional Development to Improve Accommodations Decisions – A Review of the Literature (Synthesis Report 84). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, R. R., G. C. Fekken, and D. N. Jackson. 1985. “Structured Personality Test Item Characteristics and Validity.” Journal of Research in Personality 19 (4): 386–394. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90007-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, P. M., C. DiStefano, and R. W. Motl. 2003. “Wording Effects in Self-Esteem Scales: Methodological Artifact or Response Style?.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 10 (3): 435–455. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1): 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, N. L. 2014. Inclusion of Exceptional Learners in Canadian Schools: A Practical Handbook for Teachers. 4th ed. Toronto: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., and B. Monroe. 2004. “Simplified Language as an Accommodation on Math Tests.” Assessment for Effective Intervention 29 (3): 35–45. doi: 10.1177/073724770402900303
   Google Scholar
• Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., J. Alonzo, J. Braun-Monegan, and G. Tindal. 2007. “Recommendations for Accommodations: Implications of (In)Consistency.” Remedial and Special Education 28 (4): 194–206. doi: 10.1177/07419325070280040101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, P. 1999. The Handbook of Psychological Testing. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., and A. DeNisi. 1996. “The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory.” Psychological Bulletin 119 (2): 254–284. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, P.-W., and Q. Wu. 2007. “Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Practical Considerations.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices 26 (3): 33–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00099.x
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowski, L. J., B. J. Lovett, and C. L. Rogers. 2008. “Extended Time as a Testing Accommodation for Students with Reading Disabilities: Does a Rising Tide Lift all Ships?.” Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 26 (4): 315–324. doi: 10.1177/0734282908315757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locker, D., A. Jokovic, and P. Allison. 2007. “Direction of Wording and Responses to Items in Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaires for Children and their Parents.” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 35 (4): 255–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00320.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., M. W. Browne, and H. M. Sugawara. 1996. “Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling.” Psychological Methods 1 (2): 130–149. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., and M. J. Drummond. 2006. “How Teachers Engage with Assessment for Learning: Lessons from the Classroom.” Research Papers in Education 21 (2): 133–149. doi: 10.1080/02671520600615638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., and B. O. Muthén. 2012. Mplus User's Guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2004. “Keeping Score for All: The Effects of Inclusion and Accommodation Policies on Large-Scale Educational Assessments.” Committee on Participation of English Language Learners and Students with Disabilities in NAEP and Other Large-Scale Assessments. Judith A. Koenig and Lyle F. Bachman, Editors. Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. 1991. “Measurement and Control of Response Bias.” In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, edited by J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, and L. S. Wrightsman, 17–59. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitoniak, M. J., and J. M. Royer. 2001. “Testing Accommodations for Examinees with Disabilities: A Review of Psychometric, Legal, and Social Policy Issues.” Review of Educational Research 71 (1): 53–104. doi: 10.3102/00346543071001053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. 2009. “Assessment Literacy for Teachers: Faddish or Fundamental?.” Theory into Practice 48 (1): 4–11. doi: 10.1080/00405840802577536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. 2011. “Assessment Literacy Overlooked: A Teacher Educator's Confession.” The Teacher Educator 46 (4): 265–273. doi: 10.1080/08878730.2011.605048
   Google Scholar
• Principles for fair Student Assessment Practices for Education in Canada. 1993. Edmonton, AB: Joint Advisory Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Remesal, A. 2011. “Primary and Secondary Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: A Qualitative Study.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (2): 472–482. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., A. Nora, F. K. Stage, E. A. Barlow, and J. King. 2006. “Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review.” The Journal of Educational Research 99 (6): 323–338. doi: 10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segers, M., and H. Tillema. 2011. “How do Dutch Secondary Teachers and Students Conceive the Purpose of Assessment?.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.008
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S. G., S. E. Scarpati, and S. Li. 2005. “Test Accommodations for Students with Disabilities: An Analysis of the Interaction Hypothesis.” Review of Educational Research 75 (4): 457–490. doi: 10.3102/00346543075004457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. 2006. “Assessment for Learning: A Key to Student Motivation and Learning.” Phi Delta Kappa Edge 2 (2): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, A., and C. Leung. 2000. “Teacher Assessment and Psychometric Theory: A Case of Paradigm Crossing?.” Language Testing 17 (2): 163–184. doi: 10.1177/026553220001700204
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M., L. Christensen, and K. E. Lail. 2008. An Analysis of Accommodations Issues from the Standards and Assessments Peer Review (Technical Report 51). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Tindal, G., D. Lee, and L. Ketterlin-Geller. 2008. The Reliability of Teacher Decision-Making in Recommending Accommodation for Large-Scale Tests (Technical Report 08–01). Eugene, OR: Behavioral Research and Teaching, University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. 2007. “Assessment as Learning? How the use of Explicit Learning Objectives, Assessment Criteria and Feedback in Post-Secondary Education and Training can Come to Dominate Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 14 (3): 281–294. doi: 10.1080/09695940701591867
   Google Scholar
• Volante, L. 2010. “Assessment of, for, and as Learning within Schools: Implications for Transforming Classroom Practice.” Action in Teacher Education 31 (4): 66–75. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2010.10463536
   Google Scholar
• Volante, L., and X. Fazio. 2007. “Exploring Teacher Candidates’ Assessment Literacy: Implications for Teacher Education Reform and Professional Development.” Canadian Journal of Education 30 (3): 749–770. doi: 10.2307/20466661
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., G. H. Beckett, and L. Brown. 2006. “Controversies of Standardized Assessment in School Accountability Reform: A Critical Synthesis of Multidisciplinary Research Evidence.” Applied Measurement in Education 19 (4): 305–328. doi: 10.1207/s15324818ame1904_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijters, B., M. Geuens, and N. Schillewaert. 2009. “The Proximity Effect: The Role of Inter-Item Distance on Reverse-Item Bias.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 26 (1): 2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2011. “What is Assessment for Learning?.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., C. Lee, C. Harrison, and P. Black. 2004. “Teachers Developing Assessment for Learning: Impact on Student Achievement.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 11 (1): 49–65. doi: 10.1080/0969594042000208994
   Google Scholar