Why teachers find it difficult to include students with EBD in mainstream classes

References

• Assarson, I. 2007. Talet om en skola för alla: Pedagogers meningskonstruktion i ett politiskt uppdrag. Diss. Malmö: Lärarutbildningen, Malmö högskola.
   Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E., and B. Norwich. 2002. “Teachers’ Attitudes towards Integration/Inclusion: A Review of the Literature.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 17 (2): 129–147. doi: 10.1080/08856250210129056
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, A., S. J. Pijl, and A. Minnaert. 2011. “Regular Primary Schoolteachers’ Attitudes towards Inclusive Education: A Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 15 (3): 331–353. doi: 10.1080/13603110903030089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, R., and C. Nilholm. 2004. “Demokrati och inkludering – en begreppsdiskussion.” Utbildning och Demokrati 13 (2): 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., A. Dyson, and A. Millward. 1998. Theorising Special Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connolley, S., and R. S. Hausstätter. 2009. “Tocqueville on Democracy and Inclusive Education: A More Ardent and Enduring Love of Equality than of Liberty.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 24 (3): 231–243. doi: 10.1080/08856250903016714
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A., and A. Millward. 2000. Schools and Special Needs. Issues of Innovation and Inclusion. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Enslin, P., and N. Hedge. 2010. “Inclusion and Diversity.” In The Sage Handbook of Philosophy of Education, edited by R. Bailey, R. Barrow, D. Carr, and C. MacCarthy, 385–401. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Erten, O., and R. S. Savage. 2012. “Moving Forward in Inclusive Education Research.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 16 (2): 221–233. doi: 10.1080/13603111003777496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidlund, U. in review. “Teachers’ Understanding of Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties (EBD) in Sweden. What Is the Problem?” Pedagogisk Psykologiskt Tidskrift.
   Google Scholar
• Gidlund, U., and L. Boström. 2017. “What is Inclusive Didactics? Teachers’ Understanding of Inclusive Didactics for Students with EBD in Swedish Mainstream Schools.” International Education Studies 10 (5): 87–99. doi: 10.5539/ies.v10n5p87
   Google Scholar
• Göransson, K., C. Nilholm, and K. Karlsson. 2011. “Inclusive Education in Sweden? A Critical Analysis.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 15 (5): 541–555. doi: 10.1080/13603110903165141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, P. 1998. Pedagogiskt dilemma: Specialundervisning. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Hedegaard Hansen, J. 2012. “Limits to Inclusion.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 16 (1): 89–98. doi: 10.1080/13603111003671632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimdahl Mattson, E., and A. Malmgren Hansen. 2009. “Inclusive and Exclusive Education in Sweden: Principals’ Opinions and Experiences.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 24 (4): 465–472. doi: 10.1080/08856250903223112
   Google Scholar
• Heimdahl Mattson, E., and L. Roll-Pettersson. 2007. “Segregated Groups or Inclusive Education? An Interview Study with Students Experiencing Failure in Reading and Writing.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 51 (3): 239–252. doi: 10.1080/00313830701356109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermerén, G. 2011. God forskningssed [Good research]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet. http://www.cm.se/webbshop_vr/pdfer/2011_01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Naraian, S., D. L. Ferguson, and N. Thomas. 2012. “Transforming for Inclusive Practice: Professional Development to Support the Inclusion of Students Labelled as Emotionally Disturbed.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 16 (7): 721–740. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2010.509817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilholm, C. 2006. “Special Education, Inclusion and Democracy.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 21 (4): 431–445. doi: 10.1080/08856250600957905
   Google Scholar
• Nilholm, C., and B. Alm. 2010. “An Inclusive Classroom? A Case Study of Inclusiveness, Teacher Strategies, and Children’s Experiences.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 25 (3): 239–252. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2010.492933
   Google Scholar
• Nilholm, C., L. Almqvist, K. Göransson, and G. Lindqvist. 2013. “Is It Possible to get Away from Disability-based Classifications in Education? An Empirical Investigation of the Swedish System.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 15 (4): 379–391. doi: 10.1080/15017419.2012.735201
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2010:800. Skollag [The Swedish Educational Act]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2011a. Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011 [The Swedish National Curriculum]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. 2011b. Särskilt stöd i grundskolan. En sammanställning av senare års forskning och utvärdering. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. 2010. Barn som utmanar: Barn med ADHD och andra beteendeproblem. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2010/2010-3-6.
   Google Scholar
• Takala, M., R. H. Haussttätter, A. Ahl, and G. Head. 2012. “Inclusion Seen by Student Teachers in Special Education: Differences among Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish Students.” European Journal of Teacher Education 35 (3): 305–325. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2011.654333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., and A. Loxley. 2001. Deconstructing Special Education and Constructing Inclusion. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1994. The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, J., and S. Stokes. 2003. “Is Education Ready for the Inclusion of Pupils With Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties: A Rights Perspective?” Educational Review 55 (1): 65–75. doi: 10.1080/00131910303252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winther Jørgensen, M., and L. Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar