Japan’s educational practices for mathematically gifted students

References

• Aikenhead, G. S. 2006. Science Education for Everyday Life: Evidence-Based Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alberta Education. 2010. Making a Difference: Meeting Diverse Learning Needs with Differentiated Curriculum. Edmonton: Alberta Education.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., and S. Jack. 2008. “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers.” The Qualitative Report 13 (4): 544–559. Accessed October 30, 2017. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/2.
   Google Scholar
• Benavot, A. 2015. Achievements and Challenges. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Bicknell, B. 2008. “Gifted Students and the Role of Competitions.” APEX: The New Zealand Journal of Gifted Education 17 (1), Accessed February 4, 2016. www.giftedchildren.org.nz/apex. doi: 10.21307/apex-2012-002
   Google Scholar
• Bicknell, B., and T. Riley. 2012. “The Role of Competitions in a Mathematics Programme.” APEX: The New Zealand Journal of Gifted Education 17 (1), Accessed February 4, 2016. www.giftedchildren.org.nz/apex. doi: 10.21307/apex-2012-002
   Google Scholar
• Bisland, A. 2001. “Mentoring: An Educational Alternative for Gifted Students.” Gifted Child Today 24 (4): 22–64. doi:10.4219/gct-2001-550.
   Google Scholar
• Bonotto, C., and L. D. Santo. 2015. “On the Relationship Between Problem Posing, Problem-Solving, and Creativity in the Primary School.” Mathematical Problem Posing, 103–123. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_5.
   Google Scholar
• Brandl, M. 2011. “High Attaining Versus (Highly) Gifted Pupils in Mathematics: A Theoretical Concept and an Empirical Survey.” In Proceedings of CERME 7, edited by M. Pytlak, E. Swoboda, and T. Rowland, 1044–1055. Poland: Univ. of Rzeszów.
   Google Scholar
• Brandl, M., and C. Barthel. 2012. “A Comparative Profile of High Attaining and Gifted Students in Mathematics.” ICME12 Preproceedings, 1429–1438.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. W., J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, D. Siegle, W. Zang, and C.-H. Chen. 2005. “Assumptions Underlying the Identification of Gifted and Talented Students.” Gifted Child Quarterly 49 (1): 68–79. doi: 10.1177/001698620504900107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, M. T., A. Adams, P. Sindelar, N. Waldron, and S. Vanhover. 2006. “Learning from Collaboration: The Role of Teacher Qualities.” Exceptional Children 72 (2): 169–185. doi: 10.1177/001440290607200203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, D. 2012. Educating Gifted Students in the Regular Classroom: Efficacy, Attitudes, and Differentiation of Instruction. Electronic Theses & Dissertations. Accessed February 4, 2016. http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1826&context=etd Paper 822.
   Google Scholar
• CCEA (Council of Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment). 2006. Gifted and Talented Children in (and Out) of the Classroom (Rep.). Belfast: CCEA.
   Google Scholar
• Chin Lin, G. H. 2013. Interviews vs. Thick Descriptions: A Comparison and Contract Study for Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologies. National Formosa University of Science and Technology. http://works.bepress.com/gracehuichinlin/4/.
   Google Scholar
• Clavel, T. 2014, June 1. “56 Schools Across Japan Aim to Nurture ‘Super Global’ Leaders. The Japan Times. Accessed 1 December 2015. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/tag/super-global-high-schools/.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. 2005. “Academic Strategies That Work for Gifted Students with Learning Disabilities.” Teaching Exceptional Children 38 (1): 28–32. doi: 10.1177/004005990503800105
   Google Scholar
• Conway, P. F., and F. C. Sloane. 2006. International Trends in Post-Primary Mathematics Education: Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Assessment. Dublin: NCCA.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, E. 1999. “A Reflection: The Japanese Approach to Gifted and Talented Students.” Gifted Child Today 22 (2): 18–21. doi: 10.1177/107621759902200206
   Google Scholar
• Cruzes, D. S., T. Dybå, P. Runeson, and M. Höst. 2014. “Case Studies Synthesis: A Thematic, Cross-Case, and Narrative Synthesis Worked Example.” Empirical Software Engineering 20 (6): 1634–1665. doi:10.1007/s10664-014-9326-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A. 2006. Gifted Children and Gifted Education: A Handbook for Teachers and Parents. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. S., S. B. Rimm, and D. Siegle. 2011. Education of the Gifted and Talented. 6th ed. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Diezman, C. M., and J. J. Watters. 2002. 25th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 219–226. Auckland. Accessed February 4, 2016. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/1506/1/1506.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar, J. D. 2012. Case Study Research for Business. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. 1992. “On the Differentiated Nature of Giftedness.” Keynote address at guiding the gifted national conference: proceedings of the guiding the gifted conference, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. 2003. “Transforming Gifted Into Talents: The DMGT as a Development Theory.” In Handbook of Gifted Education. 3rd ed., edited by N. Colangelo and G. Davis, 60–74. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F., and L. Nadeau. 1991. Opinions about the Gifted and Their Education. Unpublished Instrument.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. 1983. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. 1999. Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gogovska, V. 2006. “Problem-Solving Strategy – Challenge for Gifted Students.” Conference on creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students, Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M., D. Pool, M. Rearden, R. Carlstrom, S. Smith, and J. Speaks. 2009. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Gifted and Talented Education (GT). Montana: Office of Public Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Han, K. S., and C. Marvin. 2000. “A Five Year Follow-Up Study of the Nebraska Project.” Roeper Review 23 (1): 25–33. doi: 10.1080/02783190009554058
   Google Scholar
• Horne, J., and M. F. Shaughnessy. 2013. “The Response to Intervention Program and Gifted Students: How Can it Facilitate and Expedite Educational Excellence for Gifted Students in the Regular Education Setting?” International Journal of Academic Research IJAR 5 (3): 319–324. doi:10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-3/b.48.
   Google Scholar
• Ibata-Arens, K. C. 2012. “Race to the Future: Innovations in Gifted and Enrichment Education in Asia, and Implications for the United States.” Administrative Sciences 2 (4): 1–25. doi: 10.3390/admsci2010001
   Google Scholar
• Isoda, M. 2007. Japanese Lesson Study in Mathematics: Its Impact, Diversity and Potential for Educational Improvement. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Kadroon, T., and M. Inprasitha. 2013. “Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers with Lesson Study and Open Approach: The Process for Changing Teachers’ Values About Teaching Mathematics.” Psychoanalytic Psychology 04 (02): 101–105. doi:10.4236/psych.2013.42014.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. N. 2013. “Special Schools and Differentiated Curriculum: The Issues.” Gifted Child Today 36 (3): 201–204. doi:10.1177/1076217513487186.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, A. 2009. “Teaching the Mathematically Gifted: An Attempt at a Historical Analysis.” In Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students., edited by R. Leikin, A. Berman, and B. Koichu, 11–29. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kesan, C., D. Kaya, and S. Guvercin. 2010. “The Effect of Problem Posing Approach to the Gifted Student’s Mathematical Abilities.” International Online Journal for Educational Sciences 2 (3): 677–687.
   Google Scholar
• Koshy, V., P. Ernest, and R. Casey. 2009. “Mathematically Gifted and Talented Learners: Theory and Practice.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 40 (2): 213–228. doi:10.1080/00207390802566907.
   Google Scholar
• Krutetskii, V. A. 1976. The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F., and L. C. Sorensen. 2014. Returns to Teacher Experience: Student Achievement and Motivation in Middle School. Washington, DC: National Center for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, American Institutes for Research. http://www.caldercenter.org/sites/default/files/WP-112_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R. 2010. “Teaching the Mathematically Gifted.” Gifted Education International 27 (2): 161–175. doi:10.1177/026142941002700206.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R. 2011. “The Education of Mathematically Gifted Students: Some Complexities and Questions.” The Mathematics Enthusiast 8 (1): 166–188. Article 9.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., and M. Lev. 2012. “Mathematical Creativity in Generally Gifted and Mathematically Excelling Adolescents: What Makes the Difference?” Mathematics Education 45 (2): 183–197. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0460-8.
   Google Scholar
• Lodico, M. G., D. T. Spaulding, and K. Voegtle. 2010. Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lonsdale, M., and M. Anderson. 2012. “Preparing 21st Century Learners: The Case for School-community Collaborations.” Accessed December 5, 2017. https://research.acer.edu.au/policy_analysis_misc/16.
   Google Scholar
• Louie, J., A. Brodesky, J. Brett, L. M. Yang, and Y. Tan. 2008. Math Education Practices for Students with Disabilities and Other Struggling Learners: Case Studies of Six Schools in Two Northeast and Islands Region States. Washington, DC: USA, Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast and Islands. Accessed February 4, 2016. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, N. 2007. “Giftedness in the Culture of Japan.” In Conception of Giftedness: Socio-Cultural Perspectives, edited by S. N. Phillipson and M. McCann, 349–376. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
   Google Scholar
• May, T. 2011. Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mcclain, M., and S. Pfeiffer. 2012. “Identification of Gifted Students in the United States Today: A Look at State Definitions, Policies, and Practices.” Journal of Applied School Psychology 28 (1): 59–88. doi:10.1080/15377903.2012.643757.
   Google Scholar
• MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology). 2011. The 4th Science and Technology Basic Plan (FY2011-FY2015). Accessed February 4, 2016. http://www.mext.go.jp/component/english/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2012/02/22/1316511_01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology). 2015. Nationwide Academic Ability Survey. Accessed January 30, 2017. http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/gakuryoku-chousa/zenkoku/1344101.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Mogensen, A. 2011. “The Proficiency Challenge: An Action Research Program on Teaching of Gifted Math Students in Grades 1–9.” The Mathematics Enthusiast 8 (1): 11. Accessed January 17, 2017. http://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol8/iss1/11.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V., M. O. Martin, P. Foy, and A. Arora. 2012. TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics [Adobe Digital Edition]. Accessed January 24, 2017. http://timssand pirls.bc.edu/timss 2011/downloads/T11_IR_Mathematics_FullBook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nevo, B. 2004. Report of the Committee for Promotion of Education of the Gifted in Israel (Published Online). Accessed November 5, 2007. http://www.education.gov.il/gifted/download/doch_kidum_mechonanim.doc.
   Google Scholar
• Ninomiya, H., and P. Pusri. 2015. “The Study of Open-Ended Approach in Mathematics Teaching Using Jigsaw Method: A Case Study of the Water Beaker Problem.” Saitama University Bulletin 64 (2): 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2009. Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2011. Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2013. Japan – Country Note – Results from PISA 2012. Accessed January 17, 2017. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-results-japan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2015. Education Policy Outlook: Japan. Accessed October 31, 2017. www.oecd.org/education/policyoutlook.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ogura, Y. 2010. Science Education and Technology – APEC HRDWG Wiki. Accessed February 12, 2016. http://hrd.apec.org/index.php/Science_Education_and_Technology. Note: The publication year (2010) does not appear in the paper but was acquired from the author through personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Öystein, H. P. 2011. “What Characterizes High Achieving Students Mathematical Reasoning?” In The Elements of Creativity and Giftedness in Mathematics, edited by B. Sriraman and K. H. Lee, 193–216. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. 2016. “Engaging Gifted Students in a Heterogeneous Classroom.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis., Center for Faculty Excellence, Unites States Military Academy, West Point, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, F., J. Scaife, N. Yahya, and H. Halil. 2010. “Knowledge of Diverse Learners: Implications for the Practice of Teaching.” International Journal of Instruction 3 (2): 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Raufelder, D., W. Bukowski, and S. Mohr. 2013. “Thick Description of the Teacher-Student Relationship in the Educational Context of School: Results of an Ethnographic Field Study.” Journal of Education and Training Studies 1 (2), doi:10.11114/jets.v1i2.108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reed, C. F. 2004. “Mathematically Gifted in the Heterogeneously Grouped Mathematics Classroom: What is a Teacher to do?” Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 15 (3): 89–95. doi:10.4219/jsge-2004-453.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, E. 2015. “Development of Gifted Education and an Overview of Gifted Education in the USA, Canada, Equator, and Mexico.” Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal 4 (2): 241–247. doi:10.18355/pg.2015.4.2.241-247.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, E., and H. Boettger. 2015. “Gifted Education in Various Countries of Europe.” Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal 4 (2): 158–171. doi:10.18355/pg.2015.4.2.158-171.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. 1986. “The Three Ring Conception of Giftedness: A Developmental Model for Creative Productivity.” In Conceptions of Giftedness, edited by R. J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson, 51–92. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. 2002. “A Message from the Guest Editor: Looking at Giftedness Through a Wide-angle Lens.” Exceptionality 10 (2): 65–66. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1002_1.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, D., and L. Babinski. 2002. From Isolation to Conversation: Supporting New Teachers’ Development. Al-bany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. T. 2014. “Using the Blooms-Banks Matrix to Develop Multicultural Differentiated Lessons for Gifted Students.” Gifted Child Today 37 (3): 163–168. doi:10.1177/1076217514532275.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, J. D., and D. H. Layton. 2012. Study of Educational Politics. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Shani-Zinovich, I., and M. Zeidner. 2009. “On Being a Gifted Adolescent: Developmental, Affective, and Social Issues.” In Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students, edited by R. Leikin, A. Berman, and B. Koichu, 195–219. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield, L. 2003. Extending the Challenge in Mathematics: Developing Mathematical Promise in K-8 Students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Crown Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, E. A. 2013. “Problem-Posing Research in Mathematics Education: Looking Back, Looking Around, and Looking Ahead.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 83 (1): 157–162. doi: 10.1007/s10649-013-9477-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, F. M., L. J. Sheffield, V. Freiman, and M. Brandl. 2016. “Research on and Activities for Mathematically Gifted Students.” In Part of the Series ICME-13 Topical Surveys, edited by G. Kaiser, 1–14. Hamburg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39450-3_1.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, F. M., and C. Voica. 2012. “A Problem-Solving Conceptual Framework and its Implications in Designing Problem-Posing Tasks.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 83 (1): 9–26. doi: 10.1007/s10649-012-9422-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwick, D. 2012. Inquiry Into the Education of Gifted and Talented Students. East Melbourne: Govt. Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2010. Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. W., S. Lee, C. Chen, K. Kato, and W. Londo. 1994. “Education of Gifted and Talented Students in Mainland China, Taiwan, and Japan.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 17 (2): 104–130. doi:10.1177/016235329401700203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. W., and R. Nerison-Low. 2002. To Sum it up Case Studies of Education in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington, DC: National Institute on Student Achievement, Curriculum, and Assessment, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, J. W., and J. Hiebert. 1999. The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom, 0. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suriyon, A., M. Inprasitha, and K. Sangaroon. 2013. “Students’ Metacognitive Strategies in the Mathematics Classroom Using Open Approach.” Psychoanalytic Psychology 04 (07): 585–591. doi:10.4236/psych.2013.47084.
   Google Scholar
• Szabo, A. 2015. “Mathematical Problem-solving by High Achieving Students: Interaction of Mathematical Abilities and the Role of the Mathematical Memory.” In Proceedings of CERME9, edited by K. Krainer and N. Vondrová, 1087–1093. Prague: Charles University and ERME.
   Google Scholar
• Šimoník, O., and B. Bazalová. 2010. School and Talented Pupil. Brno: Masaryk University.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, R. K. 2015. “Nurturing Gifted and Talented Students to Become Future Leaders: The Innovative Curriculum for the Gifted and/or Talented at GT College in Hong Kong.” Gifted Education International. doi:10.1177/0261429415599274.
   Google Scholar
• Thijs, A., and J. Van den Akker, eds. 2009. Curriculum in Development. Enschede: SLO – Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Thrasher, T. 2008. “The Benefits of Mathematics Competitions.” Alabama Journal of Mathematics Spring/Fall 2008: 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Tolppanen, S., and K. Tirri. 2014. “How an Enrichment Summer Program is Meeting the Expectations of Gifted Science Students: A Case Study from Finland.” International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity 2 (1): 103–115.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, J. 2010. “Curriculum Perspectives: An Introduction.” In Curriculum Landscapes and Trends, edited by J. Van den Akker, W. Kuiper, and U. Hameyer, 1–10. London: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tassel-Baska, J. 2014. “Curriculum Issues: Back to the Future: Differentiated Curriculum in the Rear View Mirror.” Gifted Child Today 37 (3): 200–201. doi:10.1177/1076217514533278.
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, M. L., M. Agran, and C. Hughes. 2000. “A National Survey of Teachers’ Promotion of Self-Determination and Student-Directed Learning.” The Journal of Special Education 34 (2): 58–68. doi: 10.1177/002246690003400201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, M. M., J. L. Wilkins, and T. Oliver. 2006. Differentiating the Curriculum for Elementary Gifted Mathematics Students, 6–13. The National Council of Teachers in Mathematics. Accessed February 4, 2016. https://www.soe.vt.edu/tandl/pdf/Wilkins/Publications_Wilkins_Differentiating_curriculum_Elementary_Gifted_Mathematics_students.pdf.
   Google Scholar