Comparison of inclusive and traditional science classrooms: middle school students’ attitudes towards science

References

• Armstrong, T. 2009. Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. 3rd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia USA.
   Google Scholar
• Artiles, A. J., and E. B. Kozleski. 2007. “Beyond Convictions: Interrogating Culture, History, and Power in Inclusive Education.” Language Arts 84 (4): 357–364.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J. A. 1999. An Introduction to Multicultural Education. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bellibas, M. S., and E. Gumus. 2016. “Teachers’ Perceptions of the Quantity and Quality of Professional Development Activities in Turkey.” Cogent Education 3 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1172950.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, S. 2012. “Making Science Labs Accessible to Students with Disabilities.” https://www.washington.edu/doit/making-science-labs-accessible-students-disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, S. E., and R. C. Cory. 2008. “Institutionalization of Universal Design in Higher Education.” In Universal Design in Higher Education: From Principles to Practice, edited by S. E. Burgstahler and R. C. Cory, 23–45. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capp, M. J. 2017. “The Effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning: a Meta-Analysis of Literature Between 2013 and 2016.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 21 (8): 791–807. doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caseau, D., and K. Norman. 1997. “Special Education Teachers use Science-Technology- Society (STS) Themes to Teach Science to Students with Learning Disabilities.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 8 (1): 55–68. doi:10.2307/43156083.
   Google Scholar
• CAST (Centre for Applied Special Technology). 2018. “Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2.” http://udlguidelines.cast.org.
   Google Scholar
• Causton-Theoharis, J., G. Theoharis, and B. Trezek. 2008. “Teaching pre-Service Teachers to Design Inclusive Instruction: A Lesson-Planning Template.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 12 (4): 381–399. doi:10.1080/13603110601156509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Universal Design. 1997. “The Principles of Universal Design.” https://projects.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Christidou, V. 2011. “Interest, Attitudes and Images Related to Science: Combining Students’ Voices with the Voices of School Science, Teachers, and Popular Science.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 6 (2): 141–159.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2007. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, B. C., M. L. Damiani, and B. O. Oswago. 2016. “From Attitudes to Practice: Utilising Inclusive Teaching Strategies in Kenyan Primary Schools.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 20 (4): 413–434. doi:10.1080/13603116.2015.1082648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, M. J. 2004. “The Connection Between Social-Emotional Learning and Learning Disabilities: Implications for Intervention.” Learning Disability Quarterly 27 (1): 53–63. doi:10.2307/1593632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finson, K. D., C. K. Ormsbee, M. Jensen, and D. T. Powers. 1997. “Science in the Mainstream: Retooling Science Activities.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 8 (3): 219–232. doi:10.1023/A:1009455903375.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., N. Frey, and J. Thousand. 2003. “What do Special Educators Need to Know and be Prepared to do for Inclusive Schooling to Work?” Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children 26 (1): 42–50. doi:10.1177/088840640302600105.
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L. 2009. “Preparing Teachers to Work in “Schools for All”.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (4): 533–534. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Campos, M.-D., C. Canabal, and C. Alba-Pastor. 2020. “Executive Functions in Universal Design for Learning: Moving Towards Inclusive Education.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 24 (6): 660–674. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1474955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. 1983. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. 1985. The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. 1993. Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. 1995. “Reflections on Multiple Intelligences: Myths and Messages.” Phi Delta Kappan 77 (3): 200–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodnough, K. 2001. “Multiple Intelligences Theory: A Framework for Personalizing Science Curricula.” School Science and Mathematics 101 (4): 180–193. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18021.x.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. 2015. “Implementing the Three Block Model of Universal Design for Learning: Effects on Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Stress, and job Satisfaction in Inclusive Classrooms K-12.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 19 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/13603116.2014.881569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J., and M. Porath. 2011. “Teaching to Diversity: Creating Compassionate Learning Communities for Diverse Elementary School Communities.” International Journal of Special Education 26 (2): 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, O.N. 2006. The Theory of Multiple Intelligences in Turkey. Multiple Intelligences in Global Perspectives: Howard Gardner (Harvard University) and Panel. SIG Multiple Intelligences: Theory and Practice. Invited panelist at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, O. N., R.E. Yager, and A. Doğan. 2009. “Changes in Attitudes towards Science-Technology-Society of Pre-service Science Teachers.” Research in Science Education 39 (2): 257–279. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9084-y
   Google Scholar
• Kilinc, S. 2019. “‘Who Will fit in with Whom?’ Inclusive Education Struggles for Students with dis/Abilities.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (12): 1296–1314. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1447612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King-Sears, M. E., T. M. Johnson, S. Berkeley, M. P. Weiss, E. E. Peters-Burton, A. S. Evmenova, A. Menditto, and J. C. Hush. 2015. “An Exploratory Study of Universal Design for Teaching Chemistry to Students with and Without Disabilities.” Learning Disability Quarterly 38 (2): 84–96. doi:10.1177/0731948714564575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirch, S. A., M. E. Bargerhuff, H. Turner, and M. Wheatly. 2005. “Inclusive Science Education: Classroom Teacher and Science Educator Experiences in CLASS Workshops.” School Science and Mathematics 105 (4): 175–196. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18157.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kolonich, A., G. Richmond, and J. Krajcik. 2018. “Reframing Inclusive Science Instruction to Support Teachers in Promoting Equitable Three-Dimensional Science Classrooms.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 29 (8): 693–711. doi:10.1080/1046560X.2018.1500418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, M. T., C. M. Gotch, M. Israel, E. Vasquez III, J. D. Basham, and K. Becht. 2013. “UDL in the Middle School Science Classroom: Can Video Games and Alternative Text Heighten Engagement and Learning for Students with Learning Disabilities?” Learning Disability Quarterly 37 (2): 87–99. doi:10.1177/0731948713503963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, C. B. 2005. “Effects of Thematic-Based, Hands-on Science Teaching Versus a Textbook Approach for Students with Disabilities.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (3): 245–263. doi:10.1002/tea.20057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F. 2014. “Inclusive Science Education”. In The Language of Science Education, edited by W. F. McComas, p. 48. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• MoNE (Ministry of National Education). 2012. Ozel Egitim Hizmetleri Yonetmeligi. https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2012_10/10111226_ozel_egitim_hizmetleri_yonetmeligi_son.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MoNE (Ministry of National Education). 2016. National Education Statistics: Formal Education, 2015–2016. http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2016_03/30044345_meb_istatistikleri_ orgun_egitim_2015_2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MoNE (Ministry of National Education). 2018. Kapsayıcı Eğitim Öğretmen Eğitimi Modülü Geliştirilmesi Programının Tanıtım Toplantısı. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/www/quotkapsayici-egitim-ogretmen-egitimi-modulu-gelistirilmesiquot-programinin-tanitim-toplantisi/icerik/703.
   Google Scholar
• Mutch-Jones, K., G. Puttick, and D. Minner. 2012. “Lesson Study for Accessible Science: Building Expertise to Improve Practice in Inclusive Science Classrooms.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (8): 1012–1034. doi:10.1002/tea.21034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003. “Attitudes Towards Science: a Review of the Literature and its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo. 1981. Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., and A. Hasni. 2014. “Interest, Motivation and Attitude Towards Science and Technology at K-12 Levels: a Systematic Review of 12 Years of Educational Research.” Studies in Science Education 50 (1): 85–129. doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.881626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser, S. 1995. Teaching the Majority. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saenz, L. M., and L. S. Fuchs. 2002. “Examining the Reading Difficulty of Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities: Expository Versus Narrative Text.” Remedial and Special Education 23 (1): 31–41. doi:10.1177/074193250202300105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., M. A. Mastropieri, and R. Boon. 1998. “Science Education for Students with Disabilities: a Review of Recent Research.” Studies in Science Education 32 (1): 21–44. doi:10.1080/03057269808560126.
   Google Scholar
• Shearer, C. B. 2006. The MIDAS: Professional Manual. Kent, OH: MI Research and Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, M. M. 2004. “Teaching Science to Students With Learning Problems in the Elementary Classroom.” Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 49 (1): 19–21. doi:10.3200/PSFL.49.1.19-21.
   Google Scholar
• Theoharis, G., and J. Causton-Theoharis. 2011. “Preparing pre-Service Teachers for Inclusive Classrooms: Revising Lesson-Planning Expectations.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 15 (7): 743–761. doi:10.1080/13603110903350321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trent, D. K. 1997. “Atomic Activities: Students with Different Learning Styles Experience Periodic Table Trends.” The Science Teacher 64 (3): 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Villanueva, M. G., J. Taylor, W. Therrien, and B. Hand. 2012. “Science Education for Students with Special Needs.” Studies in Science Education 48 (2): 187–215. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.737117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, S., and I. Hardy. 2017. “Beyond the Binary: Rethinking Teachers’ Understandings of and Engagement with Inclusion.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 21 (6): 667–686. doi:10.1080/13603116.2016.1251501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M., and L. Isenbarger. 2002. “Teaching Science to Students with Learning Disabilities: Subverting the Myths of Labeling Through Teachers’ Caring and Enthusiasm.” Research in Science Education 32 (1): 55–79. doi:10.1023/A:1015050706407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar