Teaching writing by formula: empowerment or exclusion?

References

• AEU (Australian Education Union). 2020. NAPLAN Review. Australian Education Union.
   Google Scholar
• Albertson, Bonnie. 2007. “Organization and Developmental Features of Grade 8 & 10 Writers: A Descriptive Study of Delaware Student Testing Program Essays.” Research in the Teaching of English 41 (4): 435–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyrs, Richard. 2008. “One More Thing: Can we Teach Process Writing and Formulaic Response?” English Journal 97 (3): 97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Atwell, N. 1985. “Everyone Sits at a big Desk: Discovering Topics for Writing.” English Journal 74: 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Boechner, Victoria. 2018. “The Square Cucumber: Restoring Student Autonomy and Confidence.” English Journal 107 (3): 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Brannon, Lil, Courtney, Jennifer, Urbanski, Cynthia, Woodward, Shana, Reynolds, Jeanie, Iannone, Anthony, Haag, Karen et al. 2008. “‘EJ’ Extra: The Five Paragraph Essay and the Deficit Model of Education.” English Journal 98 (2): 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, Jory, and Holloway, Jessica. 2019. “Re-professionalizing Teaching: the new Professionalism in the United States.” Critical Studies in Education, 1–18. doi:10.1080/17508487.2019.1579743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, Bill, and Kalantzis, Mary. 1993. “Introduction: How a Genre Approach to Literacy Can Transform the Way Writing is Taught.” In The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing, edited by Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis, 1–21. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, Mike. 2007. “Whatever Happened to the Paragraph?” College English 69 (5): 470–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, Lani. 2014. “What Counts as Evidence of Inclusive Education?” European Journal of Special Needs Education 29 (3): 286–294. doi:10.1080/08856257.2014.933551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, Paul. 2018. “NAPLAN: The Writing is on the Wall But Who Can Actually Read it.” English in Australia 53 (1): 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, Simon. 2019. “‘Death by PEEL?’ The Teaching of Writing in the Secondary English Classroom in England.” English in Education 53 (1): 36–45. doi:10.1080/04250494.2019.1568832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, D. 1983. Writing: Teachers and Children at Work. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Anne, and Helks, Marie. 2018. “What, why and how: the Policy, Purpose and Practice of Grammatical Terminology.” English in Education 53 (3): 169–185.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, Emily. 2018. “Scaffolding Multimodality: Writing Process, Collaboration and Digital Tools.” English Teaching: Practice & Critique 17 (2): 132–147. doi:10.1108/ETPC-05-2017-0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kameen, Alex. 2017. “A Formula for Failure: The Problem With Formulaic Writing.” Teachers, Profs, Parents, Writers Who Care: A Blog Advocating for Authentic Writing Instruction, October 30. https://writerswhocare.wordpress.com/2017/03/13/a-formula-for-failure-the-problem-with-formulaic-writing/.
   Google Scholar
• Kerkham, Lyn, and Comber, Barbara. 2016. “Literacy Leadership and Accountability Practices.” In National Testing in Schools: An Australian Assessment, edited by Bob Lingard, Greg Thompson, and Sam Sellar, 86–97. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, Tamas, and Mizusawa, Ken. 2018. “Revisiting the Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Writing Instruction in a Multicultural Context.” Changing English 25 (1): 59–68. doi:10.1080/1358684X.2017.1403283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, Ken. 2018. “Review of ‘Strategic Writing: The Writing Process and Beyond in the Secondary Classroom’.’ English Journal 107 (6): 109–110.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, Pamela Neal. 2018. “The Pendulum of Standardization: An English Journal Retrospective.” English Journal 107 (5): 44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, Terry. 2015. Developing Writing Teachers: Practical Ways for Teacher-Writers to Transform Their Classroom Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw, B., Louden, W., and Wyatt-Smith, C. 2020. NAPLAN Review: Final Report. State of New South Wales, State of Victoria, State of Queensland and ACT.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, Iain. 2016. “Reconsidering Paragraphing Pedagogy: A Descriptivist Perspective.” English in Education 50 (3): 233–254. doi:10.1111/17548845.2016.11912577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, L. 2020. “Since Feeling is First: The Art of Teaching to Write Paragraphs.” English in Education, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, Lucinda, and Andy Morgan. 2019. “A Broken Paradigm? What Education Needs to Learn From Evidence-Based Medicine.” Journal of Education Policy 35 (5): 648–664. doi:10.1080/02680939.2019.1578902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuitty, Vicki. 2012. “Emerging Possibilities: A Complex Account of Learning to Teach Writing.” Research in the Teaching of English 46 (4): 358–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, D. 1982. Learning by Teaching: Selected Articles on Writing and Teaching. Montclair, NJ: Boynton Cook.
   Google Scholar
• NESA (NSW Education Standards Authority). 2018. Teaching Writing: Report of the Thematic Review of Writing. NSW Education Standards Authority, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Marnie. 1992. “An Editor Looks Back: Re-Reading and Re-Writing.” English in Australia (100):33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, Les. 2018. Towards a New NAPLAN: Testing to the Teaching. Surry Hills, NSW: New South Wales Teachers Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Muriel, and Ellis, Viv. 2000. “Writing in English and Responding to Writing.” In Evaluating Creativity: Making and Learning by Young People, 70–88. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Benjamin, and Schwartz, Jeffrey. 2018. “In Praise of the Unfinished.” English Journal 107 (5): 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, Roger. 2013. “How do We Make Inclusion Happen When Exclusion is a Political Disposition?” International Journal of Inclusive Education 17 (8): 895–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, F. 1984. “Demonstrations, Engagement and Sensitivity: The Choice Between People and Programs.” In English Teaching: An International Exchange, edited by James Britton, 57–66. London: Heinneman.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. 2018. “Exploring Survival: A Student-led Intervention in the 7th Grade English Classroom.” English Journal 107 (5): 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, Peter. 1984. Writing Your Way. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
   Google Scholar
• Tehan, D. 2019a. Bringing Phonics into Australian Schools. Canberra: Ministers for the Department of Education Media Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Tehan, D. 2019b. Focus on the Basics to Lift Student Performance, 1. Department of Education, Skills and Employment, Canberra, December 3. https://ministers.dese.gov.au/tehan/focus-basics-lift-student-performance.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Vaughn, and Bruno, Dan. 2018. “Building Literate Identities on What Already Exists.” English Journal 107 (5): 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wesley, Kimberley. 2000. “The Effects of the Five Paragraph Theme.” English Journal 90 (1): 57–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, Mark. 2000. “The Popularity of Formulaic Writing (And Why We Need to Resist).” The English Journal 90 (1): 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Yandell, John, Doecke, Brenton, and Abdi, Zamzam. forthcoming. “Who Me? Hailing Individuals as Subjects: Standardized Literacy Testing as an Instrument of Neoliberal Ideology.” In The Sociopolitics of English Language Testing, edited by Seyyed-Abdolhamid Mirhosseini and Peter de Costa, 3–22. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar