Fifty ways to work with students’ diverse abilities? A video study on inclusive teaching practices in secondary mathematics classrooms

References

• Bass, H., and D. L. Ball. 2004. “A Practice-Based Theory of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: The Case of Mathematical Reasoning.” In Trends and Challenges in Mathematics Education, edited by W. Jianpan, and X. Binyan, 107–123. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R. 1992. Der Lehrer als Experte. Bern, Göttingen, Toronto: Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Corno, L. 2008. “On Teaching Adaptively.” Educational Psychologist 43 (3): 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselhorn, M., and A. Gold. 2013. Pädagogische Psychologie. Erfolgreiches Lernen und Lehren. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Höveler, K. 2019. “Learning Environments in Inclusive Mathematics Classrooms.” In Inclusive Mathematics Education, edited by D. Kollosche, R. Marcone, M. Knigge, M. G. Penteado, and O. Skovsmose, 87–106. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Janney, R. E., and M. E. Snell. 2006. “Modifying Schoolwork in Inclusive Classrooms.” Theory Into Practice 45 (3): 215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KMK. 2020. “Sonderpädagogische Förderung in Schulen 2009 bis 2018.” Statistische Veröffentlichungen der Kultusministerkonferenz Dokumentation Nr. 223, July 22. www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/pdf/Statistik/Dokumentationen/Aus_SoPae_Int_2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kollosche, D., R. Marcone, M. Knigge, M. Godoy Penteado, and O. Skovsmose, eds. 2019. Inclusive Mathematics Education. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Krähenmann, H., E. M. Opitz, S. Schnepel, and M. Stöckli. 2019. “Inclusive Mathematics Instruction: A Conceptual Framework and Selected Research Results of a Video Study.” In Inclusive Mathematics Education, edited by D. Kollosche, R. Marcone, M. Knigge, M. Godoy Penteado, and O. Skovsmose, 179–196. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl, J., T. Hecht, and N. Euker. 2016. “Grundprinzipien des Unterrichts und der Förderung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit intellektueller Beeinträchtigung.” In Evidenzbasierte Diagnostik und Förderung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit intellektueller Beeinträchtigung, edited by J. Kuhl, and N. Euker, 39–64. Bern: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl, J., S. Prediger, S. Schulze, C. Wittich, and I. Pulz. submitted. “Inklusiver Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe – Eine Interventionsstudie zur Prozentrechnung.” Unterrichtswissenschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Kurth, J., K. Lyon, and K. Shogren. 2015. “Supporting Students with Severe Disabilities in Inclusive Schools.” Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 40 (4): 261–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, R., and P. Tan. 2020. “Does Disability Matter in Mathematics Educational Research? A Critical Comparison of Research on Students with and Without Disabilities.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 32 (1): 5–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Brown, D. 2004. “Differentiated Instruction: Inclusive Strategies for Standard-Based Learning That Benefit the Whole Class.” American Secondary Education 32 (3): 34–62.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2015. “Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures.” In Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education, edited by A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, and N. Presmeg, 365–380. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mevarech, Z., S. Terkieltaub, T. Vinberger, and V. Nevet. 2010. “The Effects of Meta-Cognitive Instruction on Third and Sixth Graders Solving Word Problems.” ZDM – Mathematics Education 42 (2): 195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A., M. Vaughn, R. Q. Scales, M. A. Gallagher, A. W. Parsons, S. D. Davis, M. Pierczynski, and M. Allen. 2018. “Teachers’ Instructional Adaptations: A Research Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 88 (2): 205–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöhler, B., and S. Prediger. 2015. “Intertwining Lexical and Conceptual Learning Trajectories.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 11 (6): 1697–1722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöhler, B., S. Prediger, and J. Strucksberg. 2018. “Prozente verstehen – Fach- und sprachintegrierte, inklusive Unterrichtseinheit in Basis- und Regelfassung.” Open educational resource under sima.dzlm.de/um/7-001.
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., and S. Buró. 2021. “Selbstberichtete Praktiken von Lehrkräften zu Anforderungssituationen des inklusiven Mathematikunterrichts.” Journal für Mathematikdidaktik 42 (1): 187–217. doi:10.1007/s13138-020-00172-1.
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., and P. Neugebauer. in press. “Can Students with Different Language Backgrounds Equally Profit from a Language-Responsive Instructional Approach for Percentages? Differential Effectiveness in a Field Trial.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning. doi:10.1080/10986065.2021.1919817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., J. Strucksberg, C. Ademmer, B. Pöhler, S. Buró, J. Kuhl, C. Wittich, I. Pulz, and S. Schulze. 2019. Matilda-Handreichung zum inklusiven Prozente-Unterricht. Open Educational Ressource aus dem Projekt Mathematik inklusiv lehren lernen. Dortmund: Technische Universität/DZLM.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., J. G. Borkowski, and W. Schneider. 1989. “Good Information Processing: What it is and How Education Can Promote it.” Journal of Educational Research 2: 857–867.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. H., and A. Meyer. 2006. A Practical Reader in Universal Design for Learning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, P., K. Beswick, L. DeBlois, L. Healy, and E. Moser Opitz. 2016. “Assistance of Students with Mathematical Learning Difficulties: How Can Research Support Practice?.” ZDM – Mathematics Education 48 (5): 633–649.
   Google Scholar
• Strogilos, V., E. Avramidis, A. Voulagka, and E. Tragoulia. 2020. “Differentiated Instruction for Students with Disabilities in Early Childhood Co-Taught Classrooms: Types and Quality of Modifications.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 24 (4): 443–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2009. International Conference on Education, 48th Session. Inclusive Education. www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Policy_Dialogue/48th_ICE/ICE_FINAL_REPORT_eng.pdf. [July, 22, 2020].
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2006. Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. 2003. “The Didactical Use of Models in Realistic Mathematics Education.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 54 (1): 9–35.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem, A., K. Verschueren, K. Petry, and E. Struyf. 2020. “An Analysis of Research on Inclusive Education: A Systematic Search and Meta Review.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 24 (6): 675–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walqui, A., and G. C. Bunch, eds. 2019. Amplifying the Curriculum: Designing Quality Learning Opportunities for English Learners. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, M., P. Westwood, and G. Wong. 2005. “Meeting the Needs of Students with Specific Learning Difficulties in the Mainstream Education System.” International Journal of Special Education 20 (1): 67–76.
   Google Scholar