Inclusive pedagogy through the lens of primary teachers and teaching assistants in England

References

• Ainscow, M., and A. Sandill. 2010. “Developing Inclusive Education Systems: The Role of Organisational Cultures and Leadership.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 14 (4): 401–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., D. William, and M. Brown. 2000. “Students’ Experiences of Ability Grouping – Disaffection, Polarisation and the Construction of Failure.” British Educational Research Journal 26 (5): 631–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosanquet, P., and J. Radford. 2019. “Teaching Assistant and Pupil Interactions: The Role of Repair and Topic Management in Scaffolding Learning.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 89 (1): 177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clark. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clark. 2013. “Teaching Thematic Analysis.” The Psychologist 26 (2): 120–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, A., F. King, and J. Travers. 2019. “Supporting the Enactment of Inclusive Pedagogy in a Primary School.” International Journal of Inclusive Education. Accessed 24th June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1625452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association (BERA). 2018. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, Fourth Edition. BERA. June 20. Accessed April 24, 2020. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2017. Research Methods in Education, Eighth Edition. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2017. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Third Edition. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Department of Health. 2015. Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice: 0 to 25 Years. London: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). 1997. Excellence for all Children: Meeting Special Educational Needs. London: DfEE.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills (DfES). 2001. Special Educational Needs Code of Practice. London: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). 2018. Statements of SEN and EHC Plans: England, 2018. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research, Fourth Edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L. 2009. “Preparing Teachers to Work in ‘Schools for All’.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (4): 533–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, L., and K. Black-Hawkins. 2011. “Exploring Inclusive Pedagogy.” British Educational Research Journal 37 (5): 813–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, L., and J. Spratt. 2013. “Enacting Inclusion: A Framework for Interrogating Inclusive Practice.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 28 (2): 119–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Great Britain. 2014. Children and Families Bill. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Groom, B., and R. Rose. 2005. “Supporting the Inclusion of Pupils with Social, Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties in the Primary School: The Role of Teaching Assistants.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 5 (1): 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1985. Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hosford, S., and S. O’Sullivan. 2016. “A Climate for Self-efficacy: The Relationship Between School Climate and Teacher Efficacy for Inclusion.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 20 (6): 604–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inclusive Quality Mark (IQM). 2020. IQM Inclusive School Award. Accessed April 23, 2020. https://iqmaward.com/iqm-inclusive-school/.
   Google Scholar
• Krefting, L. 1991. “Rigor in Qualitative Research: The Assessment of Trustworthiness.” American Journal of Occupational Therapy 45 (3): 214–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leatherman, J., and J. Niemeyer. 2005. “Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Inclusion: Factors Influencing Classroom Practice.” Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 26 (1): 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtman, M. 2013. Qualitative Research in Education: A User’s Guide, Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S., M. Proulx, H. Scott, and N. Thomson. 2014. “Exploring Teachers’ Strategies for Including Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mainstream Classrooms.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 18 (2): 101–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, W. E., S. A. Thompson, and V. Timmons. 2016. “‘We Are Inclusive. We Are a Team. Let’s Just Do It’: Commitment, Collective Efficacy, and Agency in Four Inclusive Schools.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 20 (8): 889–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciver, D., C. Hunter, A. Adamson, Z. Grayson, K. Forsyth, and I. McLeod. 2018. “Supporting Successful Inclusive Practices for Learners with Disabilities in High Schools: A Multisite, Mixed Method Collective Case Study.” Disability and Rehabilitation 40 (14): 1708–1717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molbaek, M. 2018. “Inclusive Teaching Strategies – Dimensions and Agendas.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22 (10): 1048–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2000. Evaluating Educational Inclusion: Guidance for Inspectors and Schools. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Punch, K. F., and A. Oancea. 2014. Introduction to Research Methods in Education, Second Edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. S. 2016. “The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review.” Journal of Education and Learning 6 (1): 102–112.
   Google Scholar
• Round, P. N., P. K. Subban, and U. Sharma. 2016. “‘I Don’t Have Time to be This Busy’. Exploring the Concerns of Secondary School Teachers Towards Inclusive Education.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 20 (2): 185–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., and I. S. Rubin. 2005. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sharples, J., R. Webster, and P. Blatchford. 2018. Making Best Use of Teaching Assistants, Guidance Report. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Sikes, P., H. Lawson, and M. Parker. 2007. “Voices on: Teachers and Teaching Assistants Talk About Inclusion.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 11 (3): 355–370.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. 1971. Attitude and Attitude Change. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Trussler, S., and D. Robinson. 2015. Inclusive Practice in the Primary School, A Guide for Teachers. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF United Kingdom. 2019. What is a Rights Respecting School? Accessed April 26, 2020. https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/the-rrsa/what-is-a-rights-respecting-school/.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 1994. The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Paper presented at the World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality, Salamanca, Spain, June 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2009. Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Great Britain, and M. Warnock. 1978. Special Educational Needs: Report of the Committee of Enquiry Into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, R., P. Blatchford, P. Bassett, P. Brown, C. Martin, and A. Russell. 2010. “Double Standards and First Principles: Framing Teaching Assistant Support for Pupils with Special Educational Needs.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 25 (4): 319–336.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde, A., and E. Avradmidis. 2011. “Mixed Feelings: Towards a Continuum of Inclusive Pedagogies.” Education 3-13 39 (1): 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, S., and L. M. Woolfson. 2019. “Are Leaders Leading the Way with Inclusion? Teachers’ Perceptions of Systemic Support and Barriers Towards Inclusion.” International Journal of Educational Research 93: 232–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar