Visions of an inclusive school – Preferred futures by special education teacher students

References

• Act 628/1998. Perusopetuslaki [Basic Education Act]. 1.8.1998/628.
   Google Scholar
• Act 642/2010. Laki perusopetuslain muuttamisesta [Act Amending the Basic Education Act]. 24.6.2010/642.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M., T. Booth, and A. Dyson. 2006. “Inclusion and the Standards Agenda: Negotiating Policy Pressures in England.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 10 (4–5): 295–308.
   Google Scholar
• Amara, R. 1981. “The Futures Field: Searching for Definitions and Boundaries.” The Futurist, XV(1): 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Azorín, C., and M. Ainscow. 2020. “Guiding Schools on Their Journey Towards Inclusion.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 24 (1): 58–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, D. 2012. “Transforming Teachers’ Temporalities: Futures in an Australian Classroom.” Futures 44 (1): 14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, H. S. 2002. “Why School Systems Resist Reform: A Psychoanalytic Perspective.” Human Relations 55 (2): 173–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, W., and J. A. Mau. 1971. “Images of the Future: Theory and Research Strategies.” In The Sociology of the Future: Theory, Cases and Annotated Bibliography, edited by W. Bell, 6–44. New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T. 2011. “The Name of the Rose: Inclusive Values Into Action in Teacher Education.” Prospects 41: 303–318.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T., and M. Ainscow. 2002. Index for Inclusion: Developing Learning and Participation in Schools. Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.
   Google Scholar
• CC. 2014. Opetussuunnitelman perusteet [The National Core Curriculum for Basic Education]. Helsinki: Finnish National Agency for Education. https://www.oph.fi/en/statistics-and-publications/publications/new-national-core-curriculum-basic-education-focus-school.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R. 2000. “Visions Of Alternative (Unpredictable) Futures and Their Use in Policy Analysis.” Conservation Ecology 4: 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Decree 986/1998. Asetus opetustoimen henkilöstön kelpoisuusvaatimuksista [Regulation on Teaching Staff]. 14.12.1998/986.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., and H. Kyngäs. 2008. “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1): 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Agency for the Development of Special Needs Education (EADSNE). 2012. Profile of Inclusive Teachers. Odense: EADSNE.
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L. 1998. “Inclusive Practice: What, Why and How?” In Promoting Inclusive Practice, edited by C. Tilstone, 13–26. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Foshay, A. W. 1991. “The Curriculum Matrix: Transcendence and Mathematics.” Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 6 (4): 277–293.
   Google Scholar
• Gidley, J. M. 1998. “Prospective Youth Visions Through Imaginative Education.” Futures 30 (5): 395–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, A. 2010. “Inclusive and Special Education in the English Educational System: Historical Perspectives, Recent Developments and Future Challenges.” British Journal of Special Education 37 (2): 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Jahnukainen, M. 2011. “Different Strategies, Different Outcomes? The History and Trends of the Inclusive and Special Education in Alberta (Canada) and in Finland.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 55 (5): 489–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., E. Schwartz, and D. McGhie-Richmond. 2009. “Preparing Teachers for Inclusive Classrooms.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25: 535–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungk, R., and N. Müllert. 1987. Future Workshops: How to Create Desirable Futures. London: Institute for Social Inventions.
   Google Scholar
• Ketovuori, H., and P. Pihlaja. 2016. “Inklusiivinen koulutuspolitiikka erityispedagogisin silmin [Inclusive Education Policy with the Eyes of Special Education].” In Koulutuksen tasa-arvon muuttuvat merkitykset [The Changing Meanings of Educational Equality], edited by H. Silvennoinen, M. Kalalahti, and J. Varjo, 159–182. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino, Kasvatussosiologian vuosikirjaI.
   Google Scholar
• Kivirauma, J. 2009. “Erityisopetuksen historialliset kehityslinjat [Historical Development Lines of Special Education].” In Erityispedagogiikan perusteet [Basics of Special Education], edited by S. Moberg, J. Hautamäki, J. Kivirauma, U. Lahtinen, H. Savolainen, and S. Vehmas, 25–45. Helsinki: WSOYpro Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Lintuvuori, M., J. Hautamäki, and M. Jahnukainen. 2017. “Perusopetuksen tuen tarjonnan muutokset 1970–2016 – erityisopetuksesta koulunkäynnin tukeen [Changes in the Provision of Support for Basic Education 1970–2016 – from Special Education to Support for Schooling].” Aika 11 (4): 4–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L., E. Gruffman-Cruse, B. Malmros, A.-C. Sundbaum, and Å Tieva. 2018. “Catching Sight of Students’ Learning: A Matter of Space?” In Core Meets E-LAW: Innovation in Higher Education. Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Magnússon, G. 2019. “An Amalgam of Ideals – Images of Inclusion in the Salamanca Statement.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (7–8): 677–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masini, E. 2006. “Rethinking Futures Studies.” Futures 38 (1): 1158–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Messiou, K. 2017. “Research in the Field of Inclusive Education: Time for a Rethink?” International Journal of Inclusive Education 21 (2): 146–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2007. “Erityisopetuksen strategia [Special Education Strategy].” Opetusministeriön Työryhmämuistioita ja Selvityksiä 2007: 47. [Reports of the Ministry of Education, Finland]. Helsinki University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Culture. 2019. Right to Learn Development Programmes. https://minedu.fi/en/qualityprogramme.
   Google Scholar
• Moberg, S. 2003. “Education for All in the North and the South: Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Inclusive Education in Finland and Zambia.” Education and Training in Development Disabilities 38 (4): 417–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikula, E., T. Järvinen, and A. Laiho. 2020. “The Contradictory Role of Technology in Finnish Young People’s Images of Future Schools.” Young 28 (5): 465–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygrén, N. 2019. “Scenario Workshops as a Tool for Participatory Planning in a Case of Lake Management.” Futures 107: 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihlaja, P., and H. Silvennoinen. 2020. “Inkluusio ja koulutuspolitiikka [Inclusion and Education Policy].” In Mahdoton inkluusio? Tunnista haasteet ja mahdollisuudet [Impossible Inclusion? Recognizing the Challenges and Possibilities], edited by M. Takala, A. Äikäs, and S. Lakkala, 45–71. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, J. W., A. N. Spiegel, and R. H. Bruininks. 1995. “Future Directions in Education and Inclusion of Students with Disabilities: A Delphi Investigation.” Exceptional Children 61 (6): 553–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raivio, H., and J. Karjalainen. 2013. “Osallisuus ei ole keino tai väline, palvelut ovat! [Involvement is Not a Means or an Instrument, Services Are!].” In Osallisuus – oikeutta vai pakkoa? [Involvement – Justice or Coercion?], edited by T. Era, 12–34. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 156. Jyväskylä: Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., and B. Lingard. 2010. Globalizing Education Policy. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. 2017. “Effective Inclusive Teacher Education for Special Educational Needs and Disabilities: Some More Thoughts on the Way Forward.” Teaching and Teacher Education 61: 164–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. 2013. “Hidden, Inconsistent, and Influential: Images of the Future in Changing Times.” Futures 45: S38–S44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., and H. Linturi. 2001. “Transition in Making: The Images of the Future in Education and Decision Making.” Futures 33 (3–4): 267–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomé Fernández, M. 2017. “Attitudes Toward Inclusive Education and Practical Consequences in Final Year Students of Education Degrees.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 237: 1184–1188.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1994. Salamanca Statement and Framework on Action for Special Needs Education. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2000. Dakar Framework for Action: Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2005. Guidelines for Inclusion: Ensuring Access to Education for All. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000140224. Retrieved 4.1.2020.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1994. Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities. General Assembly Resolution A/RES/48/96.
   Google Scholar
• Väyrynen, S. 2006. “Kuka kuuluu mukaan ja mitä arvostetaan? Esimerkki osallistavien ja ei-osallistavien käytänteiden suhteesta suomalaisessa ja eteläafrikkalaisessa koulussa [Who is Involved and What is Valued? An Example of the Relationship Between Inclusive and Non-Inclusive Practices in a Finnish and South African School].” Kasvatus 37 (4): 371–385.
   Google Scholar
• Väyrynen, S., and M. Paksuniemi. 2020. “Translating Inclusive Values Into Pedagogical Actions.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 24 (2): 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venäläinen, S., J. Saarinen, P. Johnson, H. Cantell, G. Jakobsson, P. Koivisto, M. Routti, et al. 2020. “Näkymiä OPS-matkan varrelta: Esi- ja perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelmien perusteiden 2014 toimeenpanon arviointi [Prospects from CC Journey: Evaluation of the Implementation of the 2014 Criteria for Pre-Primary and Basic Education Curricula].” Julkaisut 5: 2020. Helsinki: Kansallinen koulutuksen arviointikeskus.
   Google Scholar
• Werner-Putnam, R. 1979. “Special Education – Some Cross-National Comparisons.” Comparative Education 15 (1): 83–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiek, A., and D. Iwaniec. 2014. “Quality Criteria for Visions in Sustainability Science.” Sustainable Science 9: 497–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, S., and L. M. Woolfson. 2019. “Are Leaders Leading the Way with Inclusion? Teachers’ Perceptions of Systemic Support and Barriers Towards Inclusion.” International Journal of Educational Research 93: 232–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yada, A., A. Tolvanen, and H. Savolainen. 2018. “Teachers’ Attitudes and Self-Efficacy on Implementing Inclusive Education in Japan and Finland: A Comparative Study Using Multigroup Structural Equation Modelling.” Teaching and Teacher Education 75: 343–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YLE [Finnish National Broadcasting Company]. 2019. Suomi siirsi erityisoppilaat suuriin luokkiin, eivätkä kaikki opettajat pidä muutoksesta: “En ole koskaan ollut näin väsynyt” [Finland Transferred Students with Special Educational Needs to Big Classes, and Not All Teachers Like this Change: “I Have Never Been so Tired Before”]. YLE News. https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10644741.
   Google Scholar