Pedagogical components in the inclusion of students with mathematical learning difficulties in mathematics classes

References

• Abed, M. G., and T. K. Shackelford. 2020. “Educational Support for Saudi Students with Learning Disabilities in Higher Education.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 35 (1): 36–44. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Atoum, N., F. Khalil, and Y. Al-Smadi. 2016. “The Impact of Cooperative Learning in the Performance of Students with Learning Disabilities in Mathematics.” Journal of Arab Studies in Education and Psychology 69: 169–184.
   Google Scholar
• Almoady, S., Y. Bokhary, M. Alhawas, S. Almayah, and S. Alabdullatif. 2013. The Guidebook for Teachers of Learning Disabilities. Riyadh: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Alnahdi, G. 2020. “Are we Ready for Inclusion? Teachers’ Perceived Self-Efficacy for Inclusive Education in Saudi Arabia.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 67 (2): 182–193. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2019.1634795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alnaim, F. 2016. Identification Strategies in the Saudi Learning Disabilities Programme: Primary Teachers’ Perspectives.” PhD Diss. University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T., and M. Ainscow. 2002. Index for Inclusion: Developing Learning and Participation in Schools. Bristol: CSIE.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brittle, B. 2020. “Coping Strategies and Burnout in Staff Working with Students with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities.” Teaching and Teacher Education 87: 102937. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. 2005. “Developmental Dyscalculia.” In In Handbook of Mathematical Cognition, edited by J. I. D. Campbell, 455–467. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and V. Braun. 2018. “Using Thematic Analysis in Counselling and Psychotherapy Research: A Critical Reflection.” Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 18 (2): 107–110. doi:10.1002/capr.12165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffield, F. 2004. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2017. “Teacher Education Around the World: What Can We Learn from International Practice?” European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (3): 291–309. doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deal, T. E., and K. D. Peterson. 2016. Shaping School Culture. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. 2012. Mindset: How You Can Fulfill Your Potential. New York, NY: Constable & Robinson.
   Google Scholar
• Firat, T. 2022. “The Change Over Time of the Perceptions of School Counsellor Candidates Related to Students with Learning Disabilities.” Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools 32 (2): 159–173. doi:10.1017/jgc.2021.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firat, T., and A. Bildiren. 2023. “Developmental Characteristics of Children with Learning Disabilities Aged 0–6 Based on Parental Observations.” Current Psychology, doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04526-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2007. Designing Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L. 2019. “On the Necessary co-Existence of Special and Inclusive Education.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (7-8): 691–704. doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1622801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, L., and M. Beaton. 2018. “Inclusive Pedagogy in Action: Getting it Right for Every Child.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22 (8): 870–884. doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1412513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., D. Fuchs, P. M. Seethaler, and N. Zhu. 2019. “Three Frameworks for Assessing Responsiveness to Instruction as a Means of Identifying Mathematical Learning Disabilities.” In International Handbook of Mathematical Learning Difficulties, edited by A. Fritz, V. Haase, and P. Räsänen, 669–681. Gewerbestrasse: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriely, R., R. Tarrasch, M. Velicki, and Z. Ovadia-Blechman. 2020. “The Influence of Mindfulness Meditation on Inattention and Physiological Markers of Stress on Students with Learning Disabilities and/or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.” Research in Developmental Disabilities 100: 103630. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, D. C. 2013. “Early Foundations for Mathematics Learning and Their Relations to Learning Disabilities.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 22 (1): 23–27. doi:10.1177/0963721412469398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., D. J. Chard, M. Jayanthi, S. K. Baker, P. Morphy, and J. Flojo. 2008. Mathematics Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities or Difficulty Learning Mathematics: A Synthesis of the Intervention Research. Portsmouth, NH: Center on Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Gervasoni, A., and A. Peter-Koop. 2020. “Inclusive Mathematics Education.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 32 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1007/s13394-020-00315-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, S., and F. Rockliffe. 2012. “Mathematics Difficulties: Does One Approach Fit All?.” Research in Mathematics Education 14 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/14794802.2012.657436.
   Google Scholar
• Gurganus, S. P. 2021. Math Instruction for Students with Learning Difficulties. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, S., M. Tan, A. Aljughaiman, and E. L. Grigorenko. 2015. “Gender Differences and School Influences with Respect to Three Indicators of General Intelligence: Evidence from Saudi Arabia.” Journal of Educational Psychology 107 (2): 486–501. doi:10.1037/a0037519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, C., A. Meyer, D. Rose, and R. Jackson. 2002. Technical Brief: Access, Participation, and Progress in the General Curriculum. Peabody, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. L., Y. F. Luo, S. C. Yang, C. M. Lu, and A. S. Chen. 2020. “Influence of Students’ Learning Style, Sense of Presence, and Cognitive Load on Learning Outcomes in An Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Environment.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 58 (3): 596–615. doi:10.1177/0735633119867422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, M., and M. B. Miles. 2002. The Qualitative Researcher's Companion. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., A. E. Lein, S. H. Im, A. A. Alghamdi, S. B. Hefte, and J. Mouanoutoua. 2018. “Mathematical Interventions for Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities and Mathematics Difficulties: A Meta-Analysis.” Exceptional Children 84 (2): 177–196. doi:10.1177/0014402917737467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordon, N. C., D. Kaplan, and L. B. Hanich. 2002. “Achievement Growth in Children with Learning Difficulties in Mathematics: Findings of a Two-Year Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (3): 586–597. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M., and G. Hornby. 2020. “Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality.” Education Sciences 10 (9): 258. doi:10.3390/educsci10090258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, M. 2017. “Implicit Assumptions in Special Education Policy: Promoting Full Inclusion for Students with Learning Disabilities.” Child & Youth Care Forum 46: 175–191. doi:10.1007/s10566-016-9382-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krischler, M., and I. M. Pit-ten Cate. 2019. “Pre- and In-Service Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Students with Learning Difficulties and Challenging Behavior.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 327. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krischler, M., J. J. Powell, and I. M. Pit-Ten Cate. 2019. “What is Meant by Inclusion? On the Effects of Different Definitions on Attitudes Toward Inclusive Education.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 34 (5): 632–648. doi:10.1080/08856257.2019.1580837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landerl, K., A. Bevan, and B. Butterworth. 2004. “Developmental Dyscalculia and Basic Numerical Capacities: A Study of 8–9-Year-old Students.” Cognition 93 (2): 99–125. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. 2013. Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., and L. A. Bierema. 2014. Adult Learning: Linking Theory and Practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelson, M. T. 2007. “An Overview of Dyscalculia: Methods for Ascertaining and Accommodating Dyscalculic Children in the Classroom.” Australian Mathematics Teacher 63 (3): 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimore, T. 2013. “Dyslexia in Higher Education: Creating a Fully Inclusive Institution.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 13 (1): 38–47. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2012.01231.x.
   Google Scholar
• Murayama, K., R. Pekrun, S. Lichtenfeld, and R. vom Hofe. 2013. “Predicting Long-Term Growth in Students' Mathematics Achievement: The Unique Contributions of Motivation and Cognitive Strategies.” Child Development 84 (4): 1475–1490. doi:10.1111/cdev.12036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., L. S. Fuchs, and D. Fuchs. 2013. “Reaching the Mountaintop: Addressing the Common Core Standards in Mathematics for Students with Mathematics Difficulties.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 28 (1): 38–48. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prast, E. J., E. Van de Weijer-Bergsma, E. H. Kroesbergen, and J. E. Van Luit. 2018. “Differentiated Instruction in Primary Mathematics: Effects of Teacher Professional Development on Student Achievement.” Learning and Instruction 54: 22–34. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rababah, A., and Y. Alghazo. 2016. “Diagnostic Assessment and Mathematical Difficulties: An Experimental Study of Dyscalculia.” Open Journal of Social Sciences 04 (6): 45–52. doi:10.4236/jss.2016.46005.
   Google Scholar
• Raja, B., and S. P. Kumar. 2012. “Findings of Studies on Dyscalculia: A Synthesis.” Journal on Educational Psychology 5 (3): 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, G., S. T. Shaw, and E. A. Maloney. 2018. “Math Anxiety: Past Research, Promising Interventions, and a New Interpretation Framework.” Educational Psychologist 53 (3): 145–164. doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1447384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, G. 2016. Dyslexia: A Practitioners Handbook. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sakiz, H. 2018. “Students with Learning Disabilities Within the Context of Inclusive Education: Issues of Identification and School Management.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22 (3): 285–305. doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1363302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakız, H. 2017. “Impact of An Inclusive Programme on Achievement, Attendance and Perceptions Towards the School Climate and Social-Emotional Adaptation Among Students With Disabilities.” Educational Psychology 37 (5): 611–631. doi:10.1080/01443410.2016.1225001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakız, H., A. Ekinci, and H. Sarıçam. 2020. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Their School Managers’ Skills and Their Own Self-Efficacy Levels.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 23 (5): 585–603. doi:10.1080/13603124.2018.1562094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergiovanni, T. 2006. The Principals: A Reflective Practice Perspective. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, M., and D. P. Bryant. 2017. “Improving the Fraction Word Problem Solving of Students With Mathematics Learning Disabilities.” Remedial and Special Education 38 (2): 76–86. doi:10.1177/0741932516669052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares, N., and D. R. Patel. 2015. “Dyscalculia.” International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health 8 (1): 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, G., and S. McKeown. 2006. Supporting Children with Dyslexia. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, P., R. Lambert, A. Padilla, and R. Wieman. 2019. “A Disability Studies in Mathematics Education Review of Intellectual Disabilities: Directions for Future Inquiry and Practice.” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 54: 100672. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. N., D. Van Garderen, A. Scheuermann, and E. J. Lee. 2015. “Applying a Universal Design for Learning Framework to Mediate the Language Demands of Mathematics.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 31 (3): 207–234. doi:10.1080/10573569.2015.1030988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trainor, A. A., and E. Graue. 2014. “Evaluating Rigor in Qualitative Methodology and Research Dissemination.” Remedial and Special Education 35 (5): 267–274. doi:10.1177/0741932514528100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2000. Education for All 2000 Assessment: Global Synthesis. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2015. EFA Global Monitoring Report: Education for all 2000–2015 Achievements and Challenges. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. 2013. “A Teacher's Perspective of Dyscalculia: Who Counts? An Interdisciplinary Overview.” Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties 18 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/19404158.2012.727840.
   Google Scholar