Multi-Dimensional Trust: how beginning principals build trust with their staff during leader succession

References

• Alvy, H., & Robbins, P. (2005). Growing into leadership. Educational Leadership, 62, 50–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley, P. (2001). In pursuit of authentic school leadership practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 353–365.
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. G. (1999). The leadership advantage. Leader to Leader, 12, 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. G. (2003). On becoming a leader. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, M., & MacNeil, A. (1998). Trust: A quality required for successful management. In Y. Cano, F. H. Wood, & J. C. Smith (Eds.), Creating high functioning schools: Practice and research (pp. 29–37). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Bottery, M. (2003). The management and mismanagement of trust. Educational Management & Administration, 31, 245–261.
   Google Scholar
• Bottery, M. (2005). Trust: Its importance for educators. Management in Education, 18, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Brinberg, D., & McGrath, J. (1982). A network of validity concepts within the research process. In D. Brinberg, & L. Kidder (Eds.), New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in research (pp. 5–21). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Covey, S. (1992). Principle-centered leadership. New York, NY: Fireside.
   Google Scholar
• Covey, S. (2004). The 8th habit: From effectiveness to greatness. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, G. (2006). Complexity and the beginning principal in the United States: Perspectives on socialization. Journal of Educational Administration, 44, 310–325.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, G. (2007). The professional organizational socialization of new English headteachers in school reform contexts. Educational Management Administration Leadership, 35, 51–71.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals. Palo Alto, CA: The Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2009). Building and sustaining successful principalship in England: The importance of trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 47, 719–730.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolly, H., & Beresford, J. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fahy, P., Wu, H. C., & Hoy, W. K. (2010). Individual optimism of secondary teachers: A new concept and its measure. In W. Hoy, & M. Dipaola (Eds.), Analyzing school contexts: Influences of principals and teachers in the service of students (pp. 209–227). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, P. (2008). The empirical consequences of school trust. In W. Hoy, & M. Dipaola (Eds.), Improving schools: Studies in leadership and culture (pp. 1–27). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, P., Adams, C., & Hoy, W. K. (2011). Collective trust: Why schools can’t improve without it. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabarro, J. (1987). The dynamics of taking charge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative trust relations (pp. 213–238). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York, NY: Paulist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. (1998). Distinguishing trust and power in interorganizational relationships. In C. Lane, & R. Bachmann (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations (pp. 64–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, A. (1991). Leader succession and socialization: A synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 61, 451–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, A. (1993). Principal succession. Albany, NY: SUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, A., Brown, E., Ashby, P., Keys, W., Sharp, C., & Benefield, P. (2003). Issues for early headship—problems and support strategies. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1998). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 135–157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., Smith, P. A., & Sweetland, S. R. (2002). The development of the organizational climate index for high schools: Its measure and relationship to faculty trust. High School Journal, 86, 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Witkowski, L. (1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26, 38–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical conformation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184–208.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. L. (2010). Exploring and explicating the distinctive features of educational organizations: Theories and theorizing. In W. Hoy, & M. Dipaola (Eds.), Analyzing school contexts: Influences of principals and teachers in the service of students (pp. 1–38). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, E., & Winston, B. (2005). A correlation of servant leadership, leader trust, and organizational trust. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 26, 6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (2004). Confidence. New York, NY: Corwin Business.
   Google Scholar
• Kee, H. W., & Knox, R. E. (1970). Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14, 357–365.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. B., & Hanna, B. A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 357–389). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kutsyuruba, B., Walker, K., & Noonan, B. (2010). The ecology of trust in the principalship. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations, 21, 23–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 438–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. (1997). Self, subject, audience text: Living at the edge, writing in the margins. In W. Tierney, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Representation and the text (pp. 37–56). Albany, NY: SUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Denzin, N. (1994). The fifth moment. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 575–586). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, R., Meyer, M., & Northfield, S. (2004). Trust and its role in principal succession: A preliminary examination of a continuum of trust. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3, 275–294.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, R., Meyer, M., & Northfield, S. (2005). Principal succession and the continuum of trust in schools. In H. Armstrong (Ed.), Examining the practice of school administration Canada (pp. 85–102). Calgary: Detselig Enterprises.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J., & Crow, G. (2003). Being and becoming a principal: Role conceptions for contemporary principals and assistant principals. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, M. J. (2001). Self-efficacy and leadership effectiveness: Applying social cognitive theory to leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organization, 8, 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., Macmillan, R., & Northfield, S. (2009). Principal succession and its impact on teacher morale. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12, 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 261–287). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2002). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 176–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, S., de la Colina, M., & Boone, M. (2008). Lifeworld or systemsworld: What guides novice principals? Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 690–701.
   Google Scholar
• Normore, A. (2004). Leadership success in schools: Planning, recruitment, and socialization. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Northfield, S. (2011). Learning to lead: An investigation into the preparation, induction, roles and practices of beginning principals—a Canadian study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Northfield, S. (2013). Three dimensional trust: How beginning principals build trust with their staff during leader succession. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Northfield, S., Macmillan, R., & Meyer, M. (2006). Trust during transition: How vice-principals influence trust development with new principals during principal succession. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Northfield, S., Macmillan, R., & Meyer, M. (2008). Succession and trust development. The CAP Journal, 16, 15–18. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Principals.
   Google Scholar
• Northfield, S., Macmillan, R., & Meyer, M. (2010). Trust in transition: How career vice-principals influence the development of trust with new principals during principal succession. In K. Anderson (Ed.), The leadership compendium: Emergent scholars of Canadian educational leadership (pp. 73–91). Fredericton: The Atlantic Centre for Educational Administration and Leadership (ACEAL).
   Google Scholar
• Northfield, S., Macmillan, R., & Meyer, M. (2011). Trust during transition: Strategic leadership and trust development during principal succession. In R. White & K. Cooper (Eds.), Principals in succession: Transfer and rotation in educational administration (pp. 109–137). In K. Leithwood (Series Ed.), Studies in educational leadership. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parkay, F. W., & Rhodes, J. (1992). Stress and the beginning principalship. In F. W. Parkay, & G. E. Hall (Eds.), Becoming a principal: The challenges of beginning leadership (pp. 103–122). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergiovanni, T. (2004). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community, and personal meaning in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. A., Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2001). Organizational health of high schools and dimensions of faculty trust. Journal of School Leadership, 12, 135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, R. C., & Flores, F. (2001). Building trust in business, politics, relationships, and life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarter, C. J., Sabo, D., & Hoy, W. K. (1995). Middle school climate, faculty trust and effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., & Hall, C. (2011). Sense-making as a lens on everyday change leadership practice: The case of Holly Tree Primary. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 14, 385–403.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 217–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. (2004). Principals’ sense of efficacy and trust. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70, 547–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weindling, D., & Dimmock, C. (2006). Sitting in the ‘hot seat’: New headteachers in the UK. Journal of Educational Administration, 44, 326–340.
   Google Scholar
• Wildy, H., & Clarke, S. (2008). Principals on L-plates: Rear view mirror reflections. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 727–738.
   Google Scholar
• Zand, D. E. (1997). The leadership triad: Knowledge, trust, and power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar