2,208
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

Collaborative leadership development with ICT: experiences from three exemplary schools

References

  • Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 49–82.10.1177/0013161X04269517
  • Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., Samah, B., & Fooi, F. S. (2009). Technology and school leadership. Journal of Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18, 235–248.10.1080/14759390902992527
  • Arnseth, H. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2006). Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 167–185.10.1007/s11412-006-8874-3
  • Blackler, F., & Regan, S. (2009). Intentionality, agency, change: Practice theory and management. Management Learning, 40, 161–176.10.1177/1350507608101227
  • Blau, I., & Presser, O. (2013). e-Leadership of school principals: Increasing school effectiveness by a school data management system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 1000–1011.
  • Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement. Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Clark, W., Logan, K., Luckin, R., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Beyond Web 2.0: Mapping the technology landscapes of young learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 56–69.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00305.x
  • Cox, M. (2008). Researching IT in education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 965–981). London: Springer Science+Business Media.10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9
  • Cox, M. C. (2013). Formal to informal learning with IT: Research challenges and issues for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 85–105.10.1111/jcal.2013.29.issue-1
  • Crook, C. (2012). The ‘digital native’ in context: Tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 63–80.10.1080/03054985.2011.577946
  • Daniels, H., Edwards, E., Engeström, Y., Gallagher, T., & Ludvigsen, S. R. (Eds.). (2010). Activity theory in practice. Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies. London: Routledge.
  • Davies, P. M. (2010). On school educational technology leadership. Management in Education, 24, 55–61.10.1177/0892020610363089
  • Dexter, S. (2008). Leadership for IT in schools. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 543–554). London: Springer Science+Business Media.10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9
  • Dexter, S. (2011). School technology leadership: Artifacts in systems of practice. Journal of School Leadership, 21, 166–189.
  • Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out. Policy, practice and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812774
  • Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to work. The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363–382). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521831040
  • Erstad, O. (2004). PILOTER for skoleutvikling (PILOTS for school development). Report No. 28. ITU: University of Oslo.
  • Erstad, O. (2009). ‘Learning networks’—Capacity building for school development and ICT. In R. Krumsvik (Ed.), Learning in the network society and the digitized school (pp. 89–106). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
  • Erstad, O., & Hauge, T. E. (Eds.). (2011). Skoleutvikling og digitale medier. Kompleksitet, mangfold og ekspansiv læring [School development and digital media. Complexity, diversity and expansive learning]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
  • Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age. Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246–259.
  • Hatlevik, O., & Arnseth, H. C. (2012). ICT, teaching and leadership: How do teachers experience the importance of ICT-supportive school leaders? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1, 55–70.
  • Hauge, T. E., Norenes, S. O., & Vedøy, G. (2014). Team-based school leadership and educational change: Tools and practices in a secondary school. Journal of Educational Change, 15, 357–376.
  • Haughey, M. (2006). The impact of computers on the work of the principal: Changing discourses on talk, leadership and professionalism. School Leadership and Management, 26, 23–36.10.1080/13634230500492897
  • Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 137–154.10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y
  • Kruse, S., & Louis, K. S. (2009). Strong cultures. A principals’ guide to change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Laurillard, D., Oliver, M., Wasson, B., & Hoppe, U. (2009). Implementing technology-enhanced learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 289–306). London: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7
  • Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do Web 2.0 tools open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16-year-old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 87–104.10.1080/17439880902921949
  • Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • McBeath, J., & Cheng, Y. C. (Eds.). (2008). Leadership for learning. International perspectives. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
  • McGee, P., Carmean, C., & Jafari, A. (Eds.). (2005). Course management systems for learning: Beyond accidental pedagogy. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  • McLeod, S., & Richardson, J. W. (2011). The dearth of technology leadership coverage. Journal of School Leadership, 21, 216–240.
  • Olofsson, A. D., Lindberg, O. J., Fransson, G., & Hauge, T. E. (2011). Uptake and use of digital technologies in primary and secondary schools—A thematic review of research. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6, 208–226.
  • Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform. How school remakes mind in society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ottestad, G. (2013). School leadership for ICT and teachers’ use of digital tools. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2, 107–125.
  • Richardson, J. W., Bathon, J., Flora, K., & Lewis, W. (2012). NETS・Scholarship: A review of published literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45, 131–151.10.1080/15391523.2012.10782600
  • Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (Eds.). (2009). Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2013). Leadership for twenty-first-century schools and student achievement: Lessons learned from three exemplary cases. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16, 379–398.10.1080/13603124.2013.767380
  • Seashore, K. R. (2009). Leadership and change in schools: Personal reflections over the last 30 years. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 129–140.10.1007/s10833-009-9111-4
  • Selwyn, N. (2011). Schools and schooling in the digital age. A critical analysis. London: Routledge.
  • Seong, D. N. F., & Ho, J. M. (2012). How leadership for an ICT reform is distributed within a school. International Journal of Educational Management, 26, 529–549.
  • Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 53–64.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x
  • Somekh, B. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ pedagogical adoption of ICT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 449–460). London: Springer Science+Business Media.10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9
  • Spillane, J. P., & Diamond, J. B. (Eds.). (2006). Distributed leadership in practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of school leadership practice: Implications of a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 3–34.10.1080/0022027032000106726
  • Stuart, L. H., Mills, A. M., & Remus, U. (2009). School leaders, ICT competence and championing innovations. Computers & Education, 53, 733–741.
  • Tondeur, J., Devos, G., van Houtte, M., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2009). Understanding structural and cultural school characteristics in relation to educational change: The case of ICT integration. Educational Studies, 35, 223–235.10.1080/03055690902804349
  • Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., & Dexter, S. (2012). ICT policy planning in a context of curriculum reform: Disentanglement of ICT policy domains and artifacts. Computers and Education, 58, 1339–1350.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.007
  • Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Using an online tool to support school-based ICT policy planning in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 434–447.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00358.x
  • Voogt, J., & Knezek, G. (2008). International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. London: Springer Science+Business Media.10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9
  • Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, D., Knezek, D., & ten Brummelhuis, A. (2013). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A Call to Action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 4–14.10.1111/jcal.2013.29.issue-1
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., & Hoppe, U. (2003). Designing for change in networked learning environments. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2
  • Weng, C.-H., & Tang, Y. (2014). The relationship between technology leadership strategies and effectiveness of school administration: An empirical study. Computers and Education, 76, 91–107.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.010
  • Yuen, A. H. K., Law, N., & Wong, K. C. (2003). ICT implementation and school leadership. Case studies of ICT integration in teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 41, 158–170.10.1108/09578230310464666

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.