Managing senior management team boundaries and school improvement: an investigation of the school leader role

References

• Alge, B. J., Wiethoff, C., & Klein, H. J. (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 26–37.10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00524-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 33–52.10.1006/obhd.1998.2748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634–665.10.2307/2393475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue. Journal of Management, 17, 571–587.10.1177/014920639101700303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, K., & McCormick, J. (2012). Leadership and team dynamics in senior executive leadership teams. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 40, 653–671.10.1177/1741143212456909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Bradley, B. H., Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Colbert, A. E. (2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 544–557.10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.10.1111/peps.1991.44.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18, 359–372.10.1207/s15327043hup1804_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Gupta, R. (2003). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland’s occupational types. Personnel Psychology, 56, 45–74.10.1111/peps.2003.56.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascia, N., & Young, B. (2001). Women’s careers beyond the classroom: Changing roles in a changing world. Curriculum Inquiry, 31, 271–302.10.1111/curi.2001.31.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoliel, P., & Somech, A. (2010). Who benefits from participative management? Journal of Educational Administration, 48, 285–308.10.1108/09578231011041026
   Google Scholar
• Blau, P. (1977). Inequity and heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blickle, G., Meurs, J. A., Zettler, I., Solga, J., Noethen, D., & Kramer, J. (2008). Personality, political skill, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 377–387.10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/9781118619179
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2012). Distributed leadership in action: Leading high performing leadership teams in English schools. School Leadership and Management, 32, 21–36.10.1080/13632434.2011.642354
   Google Scholar
• Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429–452.10.1111/peps.1996.49.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardno, C. (2010). Focusing educational leadership on creating learning conditions that sustain productive relationships: The case of a New Zealand primary school. Leading and Managing, 16, 40–57.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 6.1–6.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio, W. F. (2003). Managing human resources, productivity, quality of work life, profits. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 956–974.10.2307/3069440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., & Rosen, B. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 331–346.10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (2001). How school leaders can promote teachers’ professional development: An account from the field. School Leadership and Management, 21, 43–57.10.1080/13632430120033036
   Google Scholar
• Cogliser, C. C., Gardner, W. L., Gavin, M., & Broberg, J. C. (2012). Big Five personality factors and leader emergence in virtual teams: Relationships with team trustworthiness, member performance contributions, and team performance. Group and Organization Management, 37, 752–784.10.1177/1059601112464266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO personality inventory-revised (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Cosner, S. (2009). Building organizational capacity through trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 248–291.10.1177/0013161X08330502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, J. L. (1993). Employee involvement: Methods for improving performance and work attitudes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cranston, N., & Ehrich, L. (2009). Senior management teams in schools: Understanding their dynamics, enhancing their effectiveness. Leading and Managing, 15, 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857–880.10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeChurch, L. A., Hiller, N. J., Murase, T., Doty, D., & Salas, E. (2010). Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1069–1085.10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 7–52.10.1111/peps.2011.64.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E., & Spangler, W. D. (2004). Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 177–193.10.1108/09534810410530601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPaola, M. F., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2005). Bridging or buffering: The impact of schools’ adaptive strategies on student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 43, 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2002). Team heterogeneity and its relationship with team support and team effectiveness. Journal of Educational Administration, 40, 44–66.10.1108/09578230210415643
   Google Scholar
• Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2010). From an intrateam to an interteam perspective of effectiveness: The role of interdependence and boundary activities. Small Group Research, 41, 143–174.10.1177/1046496409356479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druskat, V., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 435–457.10.2307/30040637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 40–57.10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1420–1452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erhard, R. (2000). Diagnostic kit for school violence [ in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, H. A. (1997). A passion for excellence: Feminine facets of leadership. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. M., Pratt, M. G., & O’Connor, E. J. (2009). Managing intractable identity conflicts. Academy of Management Review, 34, 32–55.10.5465/AMR.2009.35713276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Golden, B. (1992). Research notes. The past is the past--or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 848–860.10.2307/256318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E. B. (1995). School administrators as boundary spanners. In S. B. Bacharach & B. Mundell (Eds.), Images of schools (pp. 283–314). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Schwartz, B. (2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 61–76.10.1177/1745691610393523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2003). The new work of educational leaders: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Gullatt, D., & Lofton, B. (1996). The principal’s role in promoting academic gain. Natchitoches: Northwestern State University of Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2012). Distributed leadership: implications for the role of the principal. Journal of Management Development, 31, 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hoerr, T. (2005). The art of school leadership. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. J., & Frost, B. C. (2006). Multiple intelligences of transformational leaders: An empirical examination. International Journal of Manpower, 27, 37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100–112.10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493–504.10.1037/0003-066X.49.6.493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., Van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E. (2012). Intergroup leadership in organizations: Leading across group and organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 37, 232–255.10.5465/amr.2010.0221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, E., Klasik, D., & Loeb, S. (2010). Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116, 491–523.10.1086/653623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, L. M., & Ones, D. S. (2001).The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. Sinangil Kepir, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (pp. 233–277). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., & Sabo, D. J. (1998). Quality middle schools: Open and healthy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imants, J., & van Zoelen, A. (1995). Teachers sickness absence in primary schools, school climate and teachers’ sense of efficiency. School Organization, 15, 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E. (1992). Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. Advances in Strategic Management, 8, 345–382.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307–321.10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309.10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233–244.10.1177/1094428105285144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. L., Jr., & Fauske, J. R. (2000). Principals and the political economy of environmental enactment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 159–185.10.1177/0013161X00362002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W. (2003). Social interdependence: Interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 58, 934–945.10.1037/0003-066X.58.11.934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juvonen, J. (2001). School violence prevention testimony. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Health.10.1037/e447672006-001
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, E., & Gebert, D. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 77–89.10.1037/a0013077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233–265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• King, E. B, George, J. M, & Hebl, M. R. (2005). Linking personality to helping behaviors at work: An interactional perspective. Journal of Personality, 73, 585–608.10.1111/jopy.2005.73.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental models: Construct or metaphor. Journal of Management, 20, 402–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (1998). The new psychometrics: Science, psychology and measurement. Florence, KY: Taylor and Francis/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 47–52.10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2000). Conclusion: What we have learned about schools as intelligent systems. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems (pp. 315–330). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Leadership and student learning outcomes, interim report. London: DCSF.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 529–561.10.1177/0013161X08321221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6, 37–67.
   Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803–811.10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 326–336.10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, D. I., & D’Andrea Tyson, L. (1990). Participation, productivity, and the firm’s environment. In A. Blinder (Ed.), Compensation policies and productivity (pp. 183–244). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., Qing, L., & Xiaoyu, Y. (2013). Effects of top management team heterogeneous background and behavioural attributes on the performance of new ventures. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 30, 354–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, A., & Pointer Mace, D. (2008). Teacher learning: The key to educational reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 226–234.10.1177/0022487108317020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (2007). Teachers’ accounts of classroom experience as a resource for professional learning and instructional decision making. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making (pp. 217–240). Boston, MA: Blackwell Synergy.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–793.10.2307/3069415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Kruse, S., & Raywid, M. A. (1995). Putting teachers at the center of reform. NASSP Bulletin, 80, 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., & Jaeger, A. (2005). Getting to yes in China: Exploring personality effects in Chinese negotiation styles. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14, 415–437.10.1007/s10726-005-1403-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476.10.1177/0149206308316061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvoy, A., & Welker, R. (2000). Antisocial behavior, academic failure, and school climate: A critical review. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 130–140.10.1177/106342660000800301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misty, M. M. & DiPaola, M. F. (2011). Academic optimism and community engagement in urban schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 542–562.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound school improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P. (2005). The external leadership of self-managing teams: Intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 497–508.10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, S. A., & Ngu, S. (2006). The relationship between personality and leadership preferences. Current Research in Social Psychology, 11, 70–91.
   Google Scholar
• Moye, N., & Langfred, C. W. (2004). Information sharing and group conflict: Going beyond decision making to understand the effects of information sharing on group performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 381–410.10.1108/eb022919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Ilies, R. (2009). The development of leader-member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 256–266.10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, P. T. (2013). Developing Singapore school leaders to handle complexity in times of uncertainty. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14, 67–73.10.1007/s12564-013-9253-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (1994). Quality in teaching. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Paisley, P. O., & McMahon, H. G. (2001). School counseling for the twenty-first century: Challenges and opportunities. Professional School Counseling, 5, 106–115.
   Google Scholar
• Paisley, P. O., & Milsom, A. (2006). Group work as an essential contribution to transforming school counseling. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 32, 9–17.10.1080/01933920600977465
   Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 29, 89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P., & Organ, D. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, C. O. L. H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J., & Moon, H. (2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 391–403.10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, H. (2012). Principal-teacher interactions: How affective relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 39–85.10.1177/0013161X11417126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagans, R. E. W., Zuckerman, B., & McEvily, A. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks versus demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administration Science Quarterly, 49, 101–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674.10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61–72.10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219–227.10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira-Lishchinsky, O., & Rosenblatt, Z. (2008). Perceptions of organizational ethic as predictors of work absence: A test of alternative absence measures. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 717–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662–673.10.2307/256987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A. (2010). Participative decision making in schools: A mediating-moderating analytical framework for understanding school and teacher outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 174–209.10.1177/1094670510361745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2007). Schools as team-based organizations: A structure-process-outcomes approach. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 305–320.10.1037/1089-2699.11.4.305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggar, S., & Haines, V. Y., III. (2006). I need you, you need me: A model of initiated task interdependence. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 211–230.10.1108/02683940610659560
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 217–247.10.1177/0013161X08330501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591–620.10.1111/peps.1999.52.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tkach, C., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How do people pursue happiness?: Relating personality, happiness-increasing strategies, and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 183–225.10.1007/s10902-005-4754-1
   Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D., Tang, M., & West, M. A. (2004). Reflexivity for team innovation in China: The contribution of goal interdependence. Group and Organization Management, 29, 540–559.10.1177/1059601103254911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, G. S., Van de Vlient, E., & Oosterhof, A. (2003). Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 715–727.10.2307/30040663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. (2002). Modelling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: Primary school senior management teams in England and Wales. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 163–186.10.1076/sesi.13.2.163.3433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–30.10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51, 355–387.10.1111/apps.2002.51.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Wallace, M. (1991). Innovation in healthcare teams. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 303–315.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2002). The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration, 80, 103–124.10.1111/padm.2002.80.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in organizational behaviour, 20, 77–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, R. D., & Hudson, M. B. (2001). New rules for the game: How women leaders resist socialization to old norms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, L. A., Burke, L. A., Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2002). The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 164–169.10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 66–85.10.5465/amp.2012.0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S., Heinen, B., & Shuffler, M. (2009). Team leadership and team effectiveness. In E. Salas, G. Goodwin, & S. Burke (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 83–111). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar