183
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

When the evil pops in: exploring the unheard voices of teachers working in private language schools in Iran concerning supervisory observation

ORCID Icon

References

  • Adamson, B. (2012). International comparative studies in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 641–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.003
  • Afzali, M., & Bazargani, M. (2011). An introduction to M-learning in Iranian universities. Electronic publishing conferences, Turkey. 150–157.
  • Akbari, R., Gaffar Samar, R., & Tajik, L. (2006). Developing a classroom observation model based on Iranian EFL teachers’ attitude. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 49 (198), 1–38. https://www.sid.ir/En/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=90104.
  • Akbari, R., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2012). EFL teachers’ recruitment and dynamic assessment in private language institutes of Iran. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(8), 29–51. https://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_612.html.
  • Avis, J. (2003). Re-thinking trust in a performative culture: The case of education. Journal of Education Policy, 18(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930305577
  • Avis, J. (2007). Further education: Policy hysteria, competitiveness and performativity. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(5), 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690903102286
  • Bailey, K. M. (2006). Language teacher supervision: A case-based approach. Cambridge University Press.
  • Banton, M. E. (1999). Teacher preferences for supervision practices: Traditional or collegial, both or neither (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Ohio University.
  • Barth, R. S. (2001). Teacher leader. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(6), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170108200607
  • Bates, A., Drits, D., & Ramirez, L. (2011). Self-awareness and enactment of supervisory stance: Influences on responsiveness toward student teacher learning. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 69–87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23479618.
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
  • Beck, А., & Emery, G. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.
  • Blase, J, & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 349–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X99353003
  • Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2002). The dark side of leadership: Teacher perspectives of principal mistreatment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 671–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X02239643
  • Boehe, D. M. (2014). Supervisory styles: A contingency framework. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927853.
  • Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003
  • Boles, K., & Troen, V. (1994). Teacher leadership in a professional development school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Brown, S., & Colling, C. (1993). Observing teaching: Issues and outcomes. In S. Brown, G. Jones, & S. Rawnsley (Eds.), Observing teaching (pp. 19–22). Staff and Educational Development Association.
  • Bullough, R. V., & Draper, R. J. (2004). Making sense of a failed triad. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(5), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487104269804
  • Chamberlin, C. R. (2000). TESL degree candidates’ perceptions of trust in supervisors. TESOL Quarterly, 34(4), 653‐673. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587780
  • Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools (2nd ed.). Christopher-Gordon.
  • Davys, A. M., & Beddoe, L. (2016). ‘Going live’: An exploration of models of peer, supervisor observation and observation for assessment. Practice, 28(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2015.1053857
  • Day, C., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership, reflective practice, and school improvement. In Leithwood, K. & Hallinger, P. (eds). Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 957–977). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
  • Edgington, U. (2013). Performativity and Affectivity: Lesson Observations in England’s FE Colleges. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent. UK. Accessed February 12, 2019. http://create.canterbury.ac.uk/13011/1/Edgington.pdf
  • Fischer, C. F. (n.d.). Supervision of instruction. http://www.stanswartz.com/adminbook/chap3.htm
  • Gebhard, J. G. (1984). Models of supervision: Choices. TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586717
  • Glanz, J. (1995). Exploring supervision history: An invitation and agenda. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 10(2), 95–113. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ499063.
  • Glanz, J. (1998). Histories, antecedents, and legacies of school supervision. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 39–79). Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
  • Glickman, C. (1995). Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach (2nd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  • Glickman, C., Gordon, S., & Ross-Gordon, J. (2009). The basic guide to supervision and instructional leadership (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  • Goldstein, J, & Noguera, P. A. (2006). A thoughtful approach to teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 63(6), 31–37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ745558
  • Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243032000112801
  • Hodgkinson, M. (1994). Peer observation of teaching performance by action enquiry. Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 2(2), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889410061132
  • Holland, P. (2005). The case for expanding standards for teacher evaluation to include an instructional supervision perspective. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-006-9009-0
  • Hoy, A. W. (2013). A reflection on the place of emotion in teaching and teacher education. In Newberry, M., Gallant, A. & Riley, P. (Ed.) Emotion and school: Understanding how the hidden curriculum influences relationships, leadership, teaching, and learning (Advances in Research on Teaching, Vol. 18, pp. 255-270). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3687(2013)0000018017
  • Ibrahim, A. S. (2013). Approaches to supervision of student teachers in one UAE teacher education program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.002
  • Jennett, H. K., Harris, S. L., & Mesibov, G. B. (2003). Commitment to philosophy, teacher efficacy, and burnout among teachers of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(6), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000005996.19417.57
  • Kahan, D. (2002). Development and evaluation of a screening instrument for cooperating teachers. The Teacher Educator, 38(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730209555307
  • Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awaking the sleeping giant. Corwin.
  • Kieschke, U., & Schaarschmidt, U. (2008). Professional commitment and health among teachers in Germany: A typological approach. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.005
  • Kim, T., & Danforth, S. (2012). Non-authoritative approach to supervision of student teachers: Cooperating teachers’ conceptual metaphors. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2012.643658
  • Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. F. (2016). Can principals promote teacher development as evaluators? A case study of principals’ views and experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(5), 711–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16653445
  • Lai, E., & Cheung, D. (2015). Enacting teacher leadership: The role of teachers in bringing about change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(5), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535742
  • Lam, S. (2001). Educators’ opinions on classroom observation as a practice of staff development and appraisal. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00049-4
  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321501
  • Levine, T. H. (2011). Features and strategies of supervisor professional community as a means of improving the supervision of preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.03.004
  • Li, W. S. (1999). Framing the future: Beyond teacher supervision. In Australian Curriculum Studies Association (Ed.), The ACSA 1999 collection: Conference papers: Framing the future (Vol.2, pp. 609–629). Deakin West, Australian Capital Territory:.
  • Little, J. W. (1995). Contested ground: The basis of teacher leadership in two restructuring high schools. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/461814
  • Lochmiller, C. R. (2016). Examining administrators’ instructional feedback to high school math and science teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616660
  • Mangin, M. M., & Stoelinga, S. R. (2008). Teacher leadership: What it is and why it matters. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership (pp. 1–9). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
  • Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Vasalos, A. (2009). Supporting presence in teacher education: The connection between the personal and professional aspects of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.013
  • Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership—Improvement through empowerment? An overview of the literature. Educational Management & Administration, 31(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X030314007
  • Na¨ring, G., Vlerick, P., & Van de Ven, B. (2012). Emotion work and emotional exhaustion in teachers: The job and individual perspective. Educational Studies, 38(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2011.567026
  • Ndebele, C. (2013). Prevalent supervisory styles in primary schools in a remote rural district in Zimbabwe: Strategies for reconciling them with teacher preferred supervisory styles. Studies of Tribes and Tribals, 11(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972639X.2013.11886666
  • Neumerski, C. M. (2012). Leading the improvement of instruction: Instructional leadership in high-poverty, urban schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan).
  • O’Leary, M., & Wood, P. (2017). Performance over professional learning and the complexity puzzle: Lesson observation in England’s further education sector. Professional Development in Education, 43(4), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1210665
  • O’Sullivan, M. C. (2004). The usefulness of lesson observation in a primary teachers’ INSET programme in Namibia. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747032000162280
  • Oliva, P. F., & Pawlas, G. E. (1999). Supervision for today’s schools. Wiley.
  • Oliva, P. F., & Pawlas, G. E. (2001). Supervision for today’s schools (6th ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
  • Ovando, M. N. (2003). Constructive feedback to enhance teaching and learning. Paper presented at the annual conference for the Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development, March 10, in San Francisco, CA.
  • Poglinco, S. M., & Bach, A. J. (2004). The heart of the matter: Coaching as a vehicle for professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(4), 398–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408500514
  • Pretorius, S. G., & Ngwenya, V. C. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards performance appraisal in Zimbabwean schools. Africa Education Review, 5(1), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146620802144859
  • Price, H. E. (2012). Principal–teacher interactions: How affective relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 39–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11417126
  • Rahmany, R., Hasani, M. T., & Parhoodeh, K. (2014). EFL teachers’ attitudes towards being supervised in an EFL context. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 348–359. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.348-359
  • Rashidi, N., & Forutan, A. (2015). On the Iranian in-service and pre-service language teachers’ perceptions of educational supervision concerning their professional development. Issues in Language Teaching, 4(2), 55–127. https://doi.org/10.22054/ILT.2015.7225.
  • Reavis, C. A. (1978). Research in review/clinical supervision: A review of the research. Educational Leadership, 35(7), 580–584. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Research-in-Review%2FClinical-Supervision%3A-A-Review-Reavis/ea8e025d0b833103762d97cd505fe5a55130c192
  • Richards, J. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers. Cambridge University press.
  • Richardson, P. W., Watt, H. M. G., & Devos, C. (2013). Types of professional and emotional coping among beginning teachers. In M. Newberry, A. Gallant, & P. Riley (Eds.), Emotion and school: Understanding how the hidden curriculum influences relationships, leadership, teaching, and learning (pp. 229–253). Emerald.
  • Rigby, J. G., Larbi-Cherif, A., Rosenquist, B. A., Sharpe, C. J., Cobb, P., & Smith, T. (2017). Administrator observation and feedback: Does it lead toward improvement in inquiry-oriented math instruction? Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 475–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16687006
  • Sadeghi, K., & Richards, J. C. (2015). Teaching spoken English in Iran’s private language schools: Issues and options. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 14(2), 210–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-03-2015-0019.
  • Scheeler, M. C., Ruhl, K. L., & McAfee, J. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4), 396–407. doi: 10.1177/088840640402700407
  • Sidhu, G. K., & Chan, Y. F. (2010). Formative supervision of teaching and learning: Issues and concerns for the school heads. European Journal of Scientific Research, 39(4):589–605. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Formative-supervision-of-teaching-and-learning%3A-and-Sidhu-Chan/ce258af3c708f0e6d2499f4c5bf0c7abe3d9ee96
  • Sivan, A., & Chan, D. W. (2009). The roles of supervised teaching practice and peer observation in teacher education in Hong Kong: Implications for partnership. Teacher Development, 13(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530903335590
  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001
  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001
  • Snow-Gerono, J. L. (2008). Locating supervision—A reflective framework for negotiating tensions within conceptual and procedural foci for teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(6), 1502–1515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.002
  • Somech, A. (2005). Directive versus participative leadership: Two complementary approaches to managing school effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(5), 777–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05279448
  • Soodmand Afshar, H., & Doosti, M. (2016). An investigation into factors contributing to Iranian secondary school English teachers’ job satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Research Papers in Education, 31(3), 274–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2015.1037335
  • Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236–246). Sage.
  • Starratt, R. J. (1997). Should supervision be abolished? Yes. In J. Glanz & R. F. Neville (Eds.), Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies (pp. 4–12). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
  • Stoeber, J., & Rennert, D. (2008). Perfectionism in school teachers: Relations with stress appraisals, coping styles, and burnout. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping. An International Journal, 21(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800701742461
  • Stones, E. (1984). Supervision in teacher education. METHUEN & CO. LTD.
  • Thies-Sprinthall, L., & Sprinthall, N. (1987). Preservice teachers as adult learners: A new framework for teacher education. In M. Haberman & J. Backus (Eds.), Advances in teacher education (Vol. 3, pp. 35–56). Ablex.
  • Thomas, G. (1993). Effective classroom teamwork: Support or intrusion? Routledge.
  • Thompson, C. A., & Wolstencroft, P. (2014). ‘Give ‘em the old razzle dazzle’–Surviving the lesson observation process in further education. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 19(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2014.920565
  • Tracy, S. J. (1998). Models and approaches. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 80-108). Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
  • Ubben, G. C., Hughes, L. W., & Norris, C. J. (2004). The principal: Creative leadership for excellence in schools (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  • Wajnryb, R. (1994). The pragmatics of feedback: A study of mitigation in the supervisory discourse of TESOL teacher educators (Unpublished PhD diss., Macquarie University).
  • Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge University Press.
  • Washer, P. (2006). Designing a system for observation of teaching. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(3), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880610678559
  • Whithall, J., & Wood, F. (1979). Taking the threat out of classroom observation and feedback. Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717903000120
  • York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255
  • Zahorik, J. (1988). The observing-conferencing role of university supervisors. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718803900203
  • Zepeda, S. J. (2007). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts (2nd ed.). Eye on Education.
  • Zepeda, S. J., & Ponticell, J. A. (1998). At cross-purposes: What do teachers need, want, and get from supervision?. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14(1), 68–87.‏ http://search.proquest.com/openview/d7381dcb78d6980b3427da664b0d36d3/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=35996

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.