Whose leadership role is more substantial for teacher professional collaboration, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: a lens of distributed leadership

References

• Andersen, J. A. (2010). Public versus private managers: How public and private managers differ in leadership behavior. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2006). Multilevel modelling of complex survey data. In Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meeting in Seattle (pp. 2718-2726).
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. A., Camburn, E., Sanders, B. R., & Sebastian, J. (2010). Developing instructional leaders: Using mixed methods to explore the black box of planned change in principals’ professional practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(2), 241–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510361748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, C. (2017). The role of department chairs as instructional leaders in New Jersey secondary schools that practice distributed leadership. Seton Hall University.
   Google Scholar
• Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2018). The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1147608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P. A., & Harvey, J. (2003). Distributed leadership: A review of literature. National College for School Leadership. http://oro.open.ac.uk/8534/1/bennett-distributed-leadership-full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 349–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X99353003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, T. (2018). Leadership and context: Why one-size does not fit all. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217739543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2012). Distributed leadership in action: Leading high-performing leadership teams in English schools. School Leadership & Management, 32(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.642354
   Google Scholar
• Camburn, E. M., Rowan, B., & Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025004347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camburn, E. M., Spillane, J. P., & Sebastian, J. (2010). Assessing the utility of a daily log for measuring principal leadership practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 707–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10377345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C., & House, R. J. (2013). Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coomber, B., & Barriball, K. L. (2007). Impact of job satisfaction components on intent to leave and turnover for hospital-based nurses: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther, F., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2009). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2011). Successful school leadership: Linking with learning and achievement. McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Leithwood, K. A. (2007). Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective (Vol. 5). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Devos, G., & Hulpia, H. (2009). Exploring the link between distributed leadership and job satisfaction of school leaders. Educational Studies, 35(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802648739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). School leadership and management from a distributed perspective: A 2016 retrospective and prospective. Management in Education, 30(4), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616665938
   Google Scholar
• Dimmock, C. (2012). Leadership, capacity building and school Improvement: Concepts, themes and impact. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, A., & Eberlein, E. (2018). The role of heads of department in the professional development of educators: A distributed leadership perspective. Africa Education Review, 15(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1224583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & DuFour, R. (2010). On common ground: The power of professional learning communities. Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duyar, I., Gumus, S., & Bellibas, M. S. (2013). Multilevel analysis of teacher work attitudes: The influence of principal leadership and teacher collaboration. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(7), 700–719. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2012-0107
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Albert Shanker Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 1–38). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Goddard, Y. L., Sook Kim, E., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530. https://doi.org/10.1086/681925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hairon, S., & Goh, J. W. (2015). Pursuing the elusive construct of distributed leadership: Isthe search over? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(5), 693–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527–549. https://doi.org/10.1086/461843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/461445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1987). Organizational and social context and the instructional leadership role of the school principal [Paper presentation]. The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & DeFlaminis, J. (2016). Distributed leadership in practice: Evidence, misconceptions and possibilities. Management in Education, 30(4), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616656734
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2008). Distributed leadership: Democracy or delivery? Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863280
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Examining contextual differences in the development of instructional leadership and school achievement. The Urban Review, 22(4), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108463
   Google Scholar
• Heikka, J., Waniganayake, M., & Hujala, E. (2013). Contextualizing distributed leadership within early childhood education: Current understandings, research evidence and future challenges. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212462700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., Nielsen, A., & Saltmarsh, S. (2018). Prescribed distributed leadership in the era of accountability: The experiences of mentor teachers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 538–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216688469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2013). Multilevel regression and multilevel structural equation modeling. In T. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (pp. 281–294). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2010). How distributed leadership can make a difference in teachers’ organizational commitment? A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 565–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., Devos, G., Rosseel, Y., & Vlerick, P. (2012). Dimensions of distributed leadership and the impact on teachers’ organizational commitment: A study in secondary education. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(7), 1745–1784. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00917.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2009). The influence of distributed leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903231201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M., Sirinides, P., & Dougherty, P. (2018). Leadership matters: Teachers’ roles in school decision making and school performance. American Educator, 42(1), 13–17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1173452
   Google Scholar
• Lashway, L. (2006). Distributed leadership. In S. C. Smith & P. K. Philip (Eds.), School leadership: Handbook for excellence in student learning (pp. 245–265). Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. C.-K., Zhang, Z., & Yin, H. (2011). A multilevel analysis of the impact of a professional learning community, faculty trust in colleagues and collective efficacy on teacher commitment to students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 820–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., & Hallinger, P. (2012). National contexts influencing principals’ time use and allocation: Economic development, societal culture, and educational system. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.678862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. A., & Jantzi, D. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures [Paper presentation]. Paper presented at the the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Associaion for Curriculum Studies, British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. A., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320064
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. A., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. A., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. A., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760601091267
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. A., & Seashore-Louis, K. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. (2000). Putting students at the centre in education reform. International Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010024225888
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2016). How leadership is distributed and how it is associated with teaching quality? A cross-country study with the TALIS 2013. [Ph.D. Dissertation], Michigan State University, ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Printy, S. M. (2017). Distributed leadership and educator attitudes. In T. S. Ransaw & R. Majors (Eds.), Emerging issues and trends in education (pp. 143–180). Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2020). Focusing on the practice of distributed leadership: The international evidence from the 2013 TALIS. Educational Administration Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Bellibas, M. S., & Gumus, S. (2020). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 174114322091043. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Bellibas, M. S., & Printy, S. (2018). How school context and educator characteristics predict distributed leadership: A hierarchical structural equation model with 2013 TALIS data. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216665839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Werblow, J. (2019). The operation of distributed leadership and the relationship with organizational commitment and job satisfaction of principals and teachers: A multi-level model and meta-analysis using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, J., & Leithwood, K. A. (2017). Effects of distributed leadership on school academic press and student achievement. In K. Leithwood, J. Sun, & K. Pollock (Eds.), How school leaders contribute to student success (pp. 69–91). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03253412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascall, B., Leithwood, K. A., Straus, T., & Sacks, R. (2008). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863271
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
   Google Scholar
• Moos, L., Johansson, O., & Day, C. (2011). How school principals sustain success over time: International perspectives (Vol. 14). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. H., & Sherman, J. D. (1981). Generalizability of an organizational commitment model. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.5465/255572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. (1982). Organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior,14(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/271070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998-2012). Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide. Muthén & Muthén. https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/Mplus%20user%20guide%20Ver_7_r6_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). TALIS 2013 technical report. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS-technical-report-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. W., & McLaughlin, G. B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 559–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Printy, S. M., & Liu, Y. (2020). Distributed leadership globally: The interactive nature of principal and teacher leadership in 32 countries. Educational Administration Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y., Devos, G., & Hulpia, H. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450902909840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian, J., Camburn, E. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2018). Portraits of principal practice: Time allocation and school principal work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 47–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X17720978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. B., Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1992). Relationship between personal and contextual characteristics and principals’ administrative behaviors. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2012). Distributed leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., & Pareja, A. S. (2007). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal’s workday. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760601091200
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Diamond, J. B. (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Healey, K. (2010). Conceptualizing school leadership and management from a distributed perspective: An exploration of some study operations and measures. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 253–281. https://doi.org/10.1086/656300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Shirrell, M., & Hopkins, M. (2016). Designing and deploying a professional learning community (PLC) organizational routine: Bureaucratic and collegial arrangements in tandem. Les Dossiers des Sciences de l’éducation, (35), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.4000/dse.1283
   Google Scholar
• Sun, A., & Xia, J. (2018). Teacher-perceived distributed leadership, teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: A multilevel SEM approach using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. A. (1998). Distributed leadership: School improvement through collaboration. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(1), 94–95.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, R., Gold, J., & Lawler, J. (2011). Locating distributed leadership. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00303.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, D. G. (2019). Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in US schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, P. A., Bennett, N., Harvey, J. A., & Wise, C. (2004). Variabilities and dualities in distributed leadership: Findings from a systematic literature review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143204046497
   Google Scholar
• Woods, P. A., & Roberts, A. (2016). Distributed leadership and social justice: Images and meanings from across the school landscape. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1034185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar