School autonomy and the surveillance of teachers

References

• Ball, S. J. (2000). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society? The Australian Educational Researcher, 27(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219719
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2017). The education debate. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2018). The tragedy of state education in England: Reluctance, compromise and muddle–a system in disarray. Journal of the British Academy, 6, 207–238. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/006.207
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How Schools do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J., & Hult, A. (2017). Different Systems, Different Identities: The Work of Inspectors in Sweden and England. In J. Baxter (Ed.), School Inspectors: Policy Implementers, Policy Shapers in National Policy Contexts (pp. 45–69). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. (2017). School Inspectors as Policy Implementers: Influences and Activities. In J. Baxter (Ed.), School Inspectors: Policy Implementers, Policy Shapers in National Policy Contexts (pp. 1–23). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, A. (2017). Education Policy and the Intensification of Teachers’ Work: The Changing Professional Culture of Teaching in England and Implications for Social Justice. In S. Parker, K. N. Gulson, & T. Gale (Eds.), Policy and Inequality in Education (pp. 169–185). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, A., & Maguire, M. (2018). Doing without believing–enacting policy in the English primary school. Critical Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1500384
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., McNamara, G., O’Brien, S., Skerritt, C., O’Hara, J., Faddar, J., Cinqir, S., Vanhoof, J., Figueiredo, M., & Kurum, G. (2020). Parent and student voice in evaluation and planning in schools. Improving Schools, 23(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480219895167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M., McNamara, G., O’Hara, J., & O’Brien, S. (2016). Exploring the changing face of school inspections. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(66), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.66.1
   Google Scholar
• Cardellino, P., & Woolner, P. (2019). Designing for transformation – A case study of open learning spaces and educational change. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1649297
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, A. (2018). School Surveillance, Control, and Resistance in the United Kingdom. In J. Deakin, E. Taylor, & A. Kupchik (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of School Discipline, Surveillance, and Social Control (pp. 17–42). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. (2016). Leading autonomous schools: Academies, leadership and the self-improving school system in England. In S. Clarke & T. O’Donoghue (Eds.), School Leadership in Diverse Contexts (pp. 133–152). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2019a). Student voice in learning: Instrumentalism and tokenism or opportunity for altering the status and positioning of students? Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 27(2), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2018.1489887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2019b). Democratic contribution or information for reform? Prevailing and emerging discourses of student voice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(6), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2019c). The politics of student voice: Unravelling the multiple discourses articulated in schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1444144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney, S. J. (2015). Mapping school types in England. Oxford Review of Education, 41(6), 799–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1121141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney, S. J. (2016). Post-panopticism and school inspection in England. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(4), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.965806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney, S. J., & Gunter, H. M. (2015). Get off my bus! School leaders, vision work and the elimination of teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(4), 395–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, M., Maxwell, B., Coldron, J., & Simkins, T. (2020). Local authorities as actors in the emerging “school-led” system in England. Educational Review, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1739625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy-Spicer, D., Bubb, S., Earley, P., Crawford, M., & James, C. (2019). Headteacher performance management in England: Balancing internal and external accountability through performance leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217739361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyles, A., Machin, S., & McNally, S. (2017). Unexpected school reform: Academisation of primary schools in England. Journal of Public Economics, 155, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, M., & Bragg, S. (2003). Students as Researchers: Making a Difference. Pearson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans). Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, K. (2019). “That would be my red line”: An analysis of headteachers’ resistance of neoliberal education reforms. Educational Review, 71(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1522042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, A., Truscott, J., Simmons, C., Anderson, D., & Thomas, N. (2018). Exploring student participation across different arenas of school life. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S. W. (2018). School-based teacher hiring and achievement inequality: A comparative perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 61, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton, J. (2004). Reworking Qualitative Data. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P. S., Vogel, R. J., & Clarke-Steffen, L. (1997). The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research, 7(3), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239700700306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2019a). Risky teachers: Mitigating risk through high-stakes teacher evaluation in the USA. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(3), 399–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2019b). Teacher evaluation as an onto-epistemic framework. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 40(2), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1514291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., & Brass, J. (2018). Making accountable teachers: The terrors and pleasures of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1372636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honingh, M., Ruiter, M., & Thiel, S. V. (2020). Are school boards and educational quality related? Results of an international literature review. Educational Review, 72(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1487387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, A. (2009). Seductions of risk, social control, and resistance to school surveillance. In In T. Monahan & R.D. Torres (Eds.), Schools Under Surveillance: Cultures of Control in Public Education (pp.230-245). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, A. (2015). Governmentality and the ‘selling’of school surveillance devices. The Sociological Review, 63(4), 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. C. (2020). Investigating the realist networks of the Chief Executive Officer of a multi-academy trust. Educational Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1721436
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. C., Courtney, S. J., & Gunter, H. M. (2020). Researching professional biographies of educational professionals in new dark times. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(3), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1673879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings, M., & Francis, B. (2018). Chain Effects 2018: The Impact of Academy Chains on Low-Income Pupils. The Sutton Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, M., Francis, B., & De Vries, R. (2014). Chain Effects: The Impact of Academy Chains on Low Income Students. London. In The Sutton Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. L., Tymms, P., Kemethofer, D., O’Hara, J., McNamara, G., Huber, S., Myrberg, E., Skedsmo, G., & Greger, D. (2017). The unintended consequences of school inspection: The prevalence of inspection side-effects in Austria, the Czech Republic, England, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. Oxford Review of Education, 43(6), 805–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1352499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2012). Matters of autonomy and accountability in the English schooling policy context: Constraints and possibilities. Queensland: University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2014). ‘It’s like Spiderman … with great power comes great responsibility’: School autonomy, school context and the audit culture. School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.938040
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2015). New modalities of state power: Neoliberal responsibilisation and the work of academy chains. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(11), 1190–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1044205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2017). School autonomy reform and public education in Australia: Implications for social justice. The Australian Educational Researcher, 44(4–5), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0243-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A., & Mills, M. (2019). Autonomy, Accountability and Social Justice: Stories of English Schooling. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, E. D. (2017). Autonomy and accountability in schools serving disadvantaged communities. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(5), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2016-0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulz, C. (2017). Heroic heads, mobility mythologies and the power of ambiguity. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(2), 85–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. (2009). Politics by Other Means: Education Accountability and the Surveillance State. In T. Monahan & R. D. Torres (Eds.), Schools Under Surveillance: Cultures of Control in Public Education (pp. 159–174). Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance, Power and Everyday Life. In R. Mansell, C. Avgerou, D. Quah, & R. Silverstone (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies (pp. 449–472). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ruairc, G. (2009). Language, socio-economic class and educational underachievement. In S. Drudy (Ed.), Education in Ireland: Challenge and Change (pp. 118–135). Gill and Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ruairc, G. (2019). School evaluation: Trends and directions. In E. Ottesen & F. Stephens (Eds.), School Evaluation with a Purpose (pp. 8–27). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2019). Headship as policy narration: Generating metaphors of leading in the English primary school. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 51(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2018.1563531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Ball, S. (2018). Discomforts, opposition and resistance in schools: The perspectives of union representatives. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(7), 1060–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1443431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, N. (2019). Does outsourcing school systems degrade education workforces? Evidence from 18,000 English state schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 40(8), 1015–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1647092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messiou, K., & Ainscow, M. (2020). Inclusive Inquiry: Student–teacher dialogue as a means of promoting inclusion in schools. British Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 670–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3602
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. (2018). Student voice in secondary schools: The possibility for deeper change. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(5), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2018-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A., George, R., & Halpin, D. (2002). The developing role of the headteacher in English schools: Management, leadership and pragmatism. Educational Management & Administration, 30(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/02611X02030002508
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E., & Charteris, J. (2020). Student voice research as a technology of reform in neoliberal times. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1713867
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, S., & Skerritt, C. (2020). Exploring teacher identity using poststructural tools. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2020.1753691
   Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2015). The visibility and invisibility of performance management in schools. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2016). Understanding performance management in schools: A dialectical approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(2), 166–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2017a). The surveillance of teachers and the simulation of teaching. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1209566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2017b). Conceptualising the surveillance of teachers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(7), 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1218752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2018). Conspicuous practice: Self-surveillance and commodification in English education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 27(4), 375–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, N. (2017a). How does scale mean? A critical approach to scale in the study of policy. Critical Policy Studies, 11(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1119052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, N. (2017b). Practices of boundary-work in the collaboration between principals and private sponsors in England’s academy schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1230785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, N. (2019). Revealing Market Hegemony through a Critical Logics Approach: The Case of England’s Academy Schools Policy. In A. Wilkins & A. Olmedo (Eds.), Education Governance and Social Theory: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Research (pp. 123–138). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500500138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. (2007). Inspection and emotion. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640701372418
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. (2009). Inspection and the fabrication of professional and performative processes. Journal of Education Policy, 24(5), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903125129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., Ball, S. J., Braun, A., & Maguire, M. (2017). Translating policy: Governmentality and the reflective teacher. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6), 745–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1309072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., & Calvert, G. (2020). What motivates people to teach, and why do they leave? Accountability, performativity and teacher retention. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Ball, S. (2018). Surveillance, Governmentality and moving the goalposts: The influence of Ofsted on the work of schools in a post-panoptic era. British Journal of Educational Studies, 66(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1372560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, D., & Santesso, A. (2018). School Surveillance and Privacy. In J. Deakin, E. Taylor, & A. Kupchik (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of School Discipline, Surveillance, and Social Control (pp. 491–507). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Salokangas, M., & Ainscow, M. (2018). Inside the Autonomous School: Making Sense of a Global Educational Trend. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skerritt, C. (2019a). Irish migrant teachers’ experiences and perceptions of autonomy and accountability in the English education system. Research Papers in Education, 34(5), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1493741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skerritt, C. (2019b). ‘I think Irish schools need to keep doing what they’re doing’: Irish teachers’ views on school autonomy after working in English academies. Improving Schools, 22(3), 267–287. DOI is : https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480219853457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skerritt, C. (2019c). Discourse and teacher identity in business-like education. Policy Futures in Education, 17(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318774682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skerritt, C. (2019d). Privatization and ‘destatization’: School autonomy as the ‘Anglo neoliberalization’ of Irish education policy. Irish Educational Studies, 38(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2019.1595085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B., Leavey, G., & Rothi, D. (2019). Managerialism and teacher professional identity: Impact on well-being among teachers in the UK. Educational Review, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1556205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. C. (2017). Democratic Agency and Neo-Liberal Responsibilisation: Leadership in Academy Schools (doctoral dissertation). Gloucestershire: University of Gloucestershire.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. (2019). Transformation and Control: What Role for Leadership and Management in a 'School-led System'?. In A. Wilkins & A. Olmedo (Eds.), Education Governance and Social Theory: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Research (pp.209–226). London: Bloomsbury
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. (2012). The rise of the surveillance school. In K. Ball, K. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies (pp. 225–231). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. (2013). Surveillance Schools: Security, Discipline and Control in Contemporary Education. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E., & Kearney, A. (2018). School Discipline and Surveillance: Developments in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. In J. Deakin, E. Taylor, & A. Kupchik (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of School Discipline, Surveillance, and Social Control (pp. 87–104). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thome, S. (1998). Ethical and representational issues in qualitative secondary analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 8(4), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, C.-Y. (2015). Changing headship, changing schools: How management discourse gives rise to the performative professionalism in England (1980s–2010s). Journal of Education Policy, 30(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.972988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verger, A., & Parcerisa, L. (2017). A Difficult Relationship: Accountability Policies and. In L. Tendre (Ed.), International Handbook of Teacher Quality and Policy (pp. 241–254). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verger, A., & Parcerisa, L. (2019). Test-Based Accountability and the Rise of Regulatory Governance in Education: A Review of Global Drivers. In A. Wilkins & A. Olmedo (Eds.), Education Governance and Social Theory: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Research (pp. 139–158). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C. (2011). Professionalism and the post-performative teacher: New teachers reflect on autonomy and accountability in the English school system. Professional Development in Education, 37(3), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2010.514204
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C. (2015). Education reform in England: Quality and equity in the performative school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(11), 1143–1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1044202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigley, T. (2018). Book review: Inside the Autonomous School: Making Sense of a Global Educational Trend. Improving Schools, 21(2), 201–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480218778207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar