3,430
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Understanding sustainable professional learning communities by considering school leaders’ interpretations and educational beliefs

, , , &

References

  • Akiba, M., Murata, A., Howard, C., Wilkinson, B., & Fabrega, J. (2019). Race to the top and lesson study implementation in Florida: District policy and leadership for teacher professional development. In R. Huang, A. Takahashi, & J. P. da Ponte (Eds.), Theory and practice of lesson study in mathematics (pp. 731–754). Springer.
  • Anderson, G. L., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12–40. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028005012
  • Bartunek, J. M. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393029
  • Belo, N. A., Van Driel, J. H., Van Veen,K., & Verloop, N. (2014). Beyond the dichotomy of teacher- versus student-focused education: A survey study on physics teachers’ beliefs about the goals and pedagogy of physics education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.008
  • Borg, M. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs. ELT Journal, 55(2), 186–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.2.186
  • Brown, C., Poortman, C. L., Gray, H., Ophoff, J. G., & Wharf, M. M. (2020). Facilitating collaborative reflective inquiry amongst teachers: What do we currently know? International Journal of Educational Research, 105(1), 101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101695
  • Burch, P., & Spillane, J. P. (2003). Elementary school leadership strategies and subject matter: Reforming mathematics and literacy instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 103(5), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1086/499738
  • Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., & Hiebert, J. (2018). Reconceptualizing the roles of researchers and teachers to bring research closer to teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(5), 514–520. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.5.0514
  • Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
  • Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 817–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.002
  • Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
  • Cohen, D. K., & Mehta, J. D. (2017). Why reform sometimes succeeds: Understanding the conditions that produce reforms that last. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217700078
  • Creswell, J., & Clark, P. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage.
  • Davis, B., Sumara, D., & D’Amour, L. (2012). Understanding school districts as learning systems: Some lessons from three cases of complex transformation. Journal of Educational Change, 13(3), 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9183-4
  • De Vries, S., Roorda, G., & Van Veen, K. (2017). Lesson study: Effectief en bruikbaar in het Nederlandse onderwijs [Lesson study: Effective and useful in Dutch education]? Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
  • De Vries, S., Van De Grift, W. J., & Jansen, E. P. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs and continuing professional development. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311304715
  • Doğan, S., & Adams, A. (2018). Effect of professional learning communities on teachers and students: Reporting updated results and raising questions about research design. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(4), 634–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1500921
  • Dudley, P., Xu, H., Vermunt, J. D., & Lang, J. (2019). Empirical evidence of the impact of lesson study on students’ achievement, teachers’ professional learning and on institutional and system evolution. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12337
  • Dutton, J. E., & Jackson, S. E. (1987). Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306483
  • Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
  • Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604
  • Gummer, E., & Mandinach, E. (2015). Building a conceptual framework for data literacy. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–22.
  • Harris, A., & DeFlaminis, J. (2016). Distributed leadership in practice: Evidence, misconceptions and possibilities. Management in Education, 30(4), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616656734
  • Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2010). Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving Schools, 13(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480210376487
  • Hendriks, M. A., & Scheerens, J. (2013). School leadership effects revisited: A review of empirical studies guided by indirect-effect models. School Leadership & Management, 33(4), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.813458
  • Hodkinson, H., & Hodkinson, P. (2005). Improving schoolteachers’ workplace learning. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520500077921
  • Hubers, M. D. (2016). Capacity building by data team members to sustain schools’ data use (Doctoral dissertation). University of Twente.
  • Jackson, S. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1988). Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(3), 370–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392714
  • Joram, E. (2007). Clashing epistemologies: Aspiring teachers’, practicing teachers’, and professors’ beliefs about knowledge and research in education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.032
  • Kempe, U. R. (2019). Teachers and researchers in collaboration. A possibility to overcome the research‐practice gap? European Journal of Education, 54(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12336
  • Kennedy, M. (2010). Reviews/essays: Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10390804
  • Kippers, W. B., Poortman, C. L., Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. J. (2018). Data literacy: What do educators learn and struggle with during a data use intervention? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.001
  • Lai, M. K., & McNaughton, S. (2016). The impact of data use professional development on student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60(1), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.005
  • Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
  • Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
  • Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003003
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1989). Ethics: The failure of positivist science. The Review of Higher Education, 12(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1989.0017
  • Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.
  • Little, J. W. (2012). Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. In M. Kooy & K. van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters. International perspectives (pp. 22–44). Routledge.
  • Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement–a meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.550467
  • Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science Education, 11(2), 38–63.
  • Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.15993111
  • Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.873177
  • Malterud, K. (2012). Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40(8), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812465030
  • McNaughton, S. (2019, April). The conundrum of how to deal with variability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Toronto, Canada.
  • Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T. C. (2009). Understanding teacher learning in secondary education: The relations of teacher activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.003
  • OECD. (2008) . Education at a glance 2008: OECD indicators.
  • OECD. (2010) . Education at a glance 2010: OECD indicators.
  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
  • Pescosolido, A. T. (2001). Informal leaders and the development of group efficacy. Small Group Research, 32(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200104
  • Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002
  • Pitts, V. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2009). Using social network methods to study school leadership. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270902946660
  • Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2016). Solving student achievement problems with a data use intervention for teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60(1), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.010
  • Prenger, R., Tappel, A. P. M., Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2020). The sustainability of educational innovations: A review of empirical literature [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente.
  • Quinn, D. M., & Kim, J. S. (2017). Scaffolding fidelity and adaptation in educational program implementation: Experimental evidence from a literacy intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1187–1220. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217717692
  • Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
  • Rudolph, J. W., Morrison, J. B., & Carroll, J. S. (2009). The dynamics of action-oriented problem solving: Linking interpretation and choice. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 733–756. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.34.4.zok733
  • Saito, E. (2012). Key issues of lesson study in Japan and the United States: A literature review. Professional Development in Education, 38(5), 777–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.668857
  • Schildkamp, K., & Poortman, C. L. (2015). Factors influencing the functioning of data teams. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 3–10.
  • Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Data teams for school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(2), 228–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1056192
  • Schneider, S. C. (1997). Interpretation in organizations: Sensemaking and strategy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 6(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943297399321
  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004
  • Sleegers, P., Wassink, H., Van Veen, K., & Imants, J. (2009). School leaders’ problem framing: A sense-making approach to problem-solving processes of beginning school leaders. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(2), 152–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760902737162
  • Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey–Bass.
  • Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1086/663283
  • Spillane, J. P., & Callahan, K. A. (2000). Implementing state standards for science education: What district policy makers make of the hoopla. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<401::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-D
  • Stepanek, J., Appel, G., Leong, M., Turner Mangan, M., & Mitchell, M. (2007). Leading Lesson Study: A Practical Guide for Teachers and Facilitators. Sage.
  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
  • Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 89–134). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2018). Teacher evaluation policy as perceived by school principals: The case of Flanders (Belgium). Teachers and Teaching, 24(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1397508
  • Van den Boom-Muilenburg, S. N., Poortman, C. L., Daly, A. J., Schildkamp, K., De Vries, S., Rodway, J., & Van Veen, K. (2021). Key actors as leaders in knowledge brokering processes for sustainable school improvement with PLCs [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente.
  • Van den Boom-Muilenburg, S. N., Poortman, C. L., Schildkamp, K., De Vries, S., & Van Veen, K. (2020). ILeadership practice for sustained data use through professional learning communities[Manuscript submitted for publication]. Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente.
  • Van Driel, J. H., Meirink, J. A., Van Veen, K., & Zwart, R. C. (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.738020
  • Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., & Meirink, J. (2010). What makes professional development effective? A literature review. In M. Kooy & K. van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters. International perspectives (pp. 3–21). Routledge.
  • Vanderlinde, R., & Van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902919257
  • Vásquez, V. E. L. (2017). Teachers as researchers: Advantages, disadvantages and challenges for teachers intending to engage in research activities. Retrieved May 7, 2020, from https://www.academia.edu/719736/Teachers_as_Researchers_Advantages_Disadvantages_and_Challenges_for_Teachers_Intending_to_Engage_in_Research_Activities
  • Vermunt, J. D., Vrikki, M., Van Halem, N., Warwick, P., & Mercer, N. (2019). The impact of lesson study professional development on the quality of teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.02.009
  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
  • Willems, I., & Van den Bossche, P. (2019). Lesson study effectiveness for teachers’ professional learning: A best evidence synthesis. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 8(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-04-2019-0031
  • Wolthuis, F., Van Veen, K., De Vries, S., & Hubers, M. D. (2020). Between lethal and local adaptation: Lesson study as an organizational routine. International Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101534
  • Wood, P. (2017). Overcoming the problem of embedding change in educational organizations: A perspective from normalization process theory. Management in Education, 31(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616685286
  • Woods, P. A., & Roberts, A. (2016). Distributed leadership and social justice: Images and meanings from across the school landscape. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1034185