Emergent school leader subjectivities in digitized practices: the case of VSware

References

• Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/ building society (pp. 259–264). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boudon, R. (1986). Theories of social change. A critical appraisal. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brøgger, K. (2018). The performative power of (non)human agency assemblages of soft governance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(5), 353–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2018.1449985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabitza, F., & Mattozzi, A. (2017). The semiotics of configurations for the immanent design of interactive computational systems. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 40 (1) , 65–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Cremonesi, L., Irrera, O., Lorenzini, D., & Tazzioli, M. (2016). Foucault and the making of subjects. Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2015). Relational sociology and culture: A preliminary framework. International Review of Sociology, 25(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.997965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M., Ceulemans, C., & Simons, M. (2014). Schools in the making: Mapping digital spaces of evidence. Journal of Educational Policy, 29(5), 617–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.865081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M. (2019a). Visual network analysis: A qualitative method for researching sociomaterial practice. Qualitative Research, 20(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118816613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M. (2019b). Researching educational apps: Ecologies, technologies, subjectivities and learning regimes. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(4), 414–429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1667824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills. (2015a). Digital strategy for schools 2015–2020: Enhancing teaching, learning and assessment (Dublin: Department of Education and Skills).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills. (2015b). Framework for junior cycle (Dublin: Department of Education and Skills).
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2012). Researching education through actor-network theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2010). (Un)doing standards in education with actor-network theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903314277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A. A. L. (2020). How to study the construction of subjectivity with ANT? In A. Blok, I. Farías, & C. Roberts (Eds.), The Routledge companion to actor-network theory (pp. 273–283). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goriunova, O. (2019). Face abstraction! Biometric identities and authentic subjectivities in the truth practices of data. Subjectivity, 12(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-018-00066-1
   Google Scholar
• Gunnulfsen, A. E. (2021). School leadership and micro-policymaking in schools time use and the collective care for the self. International Journal of Leadership in Education Advanced online publication , 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1854867
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, A. (2018). The accountability generation: Exploring an emerging leadership paradigm for beginning principals. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(4), 509–520 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1280001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højgaard, L., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology, 21(3), 338–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309359965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landri, P. (2021). Educational leadership, management, and administration through actor-network theory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Landri, P. (2019). Cartographies of the digital governance of education. In R. Gorur, G. Steiner-Khamsi, and S. Sellar (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2019: Comparative methodology in an era of big data and global networks. (chapter 8). Routledge 16 .
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mattozzi, A. (2010). A model for the semiotic analysis of objects. In S. Vihma (Ed.), Design semiotics in use (pp. 1–12). Aalto University, School of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, I. (2003). Road traffic accidents: The ordering of subjects, bodies and disability. Unipub Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nemorin, S. (2017). Affective capture in digital school spaces and the modulation of student subjectivities. Emotion, Space and Society, 24 (1) , 11–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2017.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work and organization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niesche, R., & Heffernan, A. (2020). Theorising identity and subjectivity in educational leadership research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Niesche, R. (2013). Foucault, counter-conduct and school leadership as a form of political subjectivity. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2013.768968
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, S., McNamara, G., O’Hara, J., & Brown, M. (2019). Irish teachers, starting on a journey of data use for school self-evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebughini, P. (2014). Subject, subjectivity, subjectivation. Sociopedia.isa 11 (1), 1–11 . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/20568460022
   Google Scholar
• Rezai-Rashti, M. G., & Segeren, A. (2020). The game of accountability: Perspectives of urban school leaders on standardized testing in Ontario and British Columbia, Canada. International Journal of Leadership in Education Advanced online publication , 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1808711
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2016). ‘There’s so much data’: Exploring the realities of data-based school governance. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115602909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugrue, C. (2015). Unmaking school leadership. A longitudinal life history of school leaders. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D., & McGimpsey, I. (2015). Assembling, disassembling and reassembling ‘youth services’ in Austerity Britain. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.975734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar