A review of empirical studies of co-principalship: antecedents, constellation-level outcomes and the issue of trust

References

• *Aravena, F., & Quiroga, M. (2019). Bicephalous leadership structure: An exploratory study in Chile. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(6), 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1492022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Beausaert, S., Froehlich, D. E., Riley, P., & Gallant, A. (2021). What about school principals’ well-being? The role of social capital. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(2), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143221991853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, A., Grönqvist, E., & Vlachos, J. (2012). The headmaster ritual: The importance of management for school outcomes ( Working paper 2012:16). The Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU).
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Rusell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• *Bunnell, T. (2008). The Yew Chung model of dual culture co-principalship: A unique form of distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120701721813
   Google Scholar
• *Court, M. R. (1998). Women challenging managerialism: Devolution dilemmas in the establishment of co-principalships in primary schools in Aotearoa/New Zealand. School Leadership & Management, 18(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632439869763
   Google Scholar
• *Court, M. R. (2002). “Here there is no boss”?: Alternatives to the lone(ly) principal. Set: Research Information for Teachers, (3), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0729
   Google Scholar
• *Court, M. R. (2003). Towards democratic leadership. Co-principal initiatives. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120304823
   Google Scholar
• *Court, M. R. (2004a). Talking back to new public management versions of accountability in education: A co-principalship’s practices of mutual responsibility. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143204041883
   Google Scholar
• *Court, M. R. (2004b). Using narrative and discourse analysis in researching co-principalships. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(5), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839042000253612
   Google Scholar
• *Court, M. R. (2007). Changing and/or reinscribing gendered discourses of team leadership in education?. Gender and Education, 19(5), 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250701535642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cunningham, C., Zhang, W., Streipe, M., & Rhodes, D. (2022). Dual leadership in Chinese schools challenges executive principalships as best fit for 21st century educational development. International Journal of Educational Development, 89(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102531
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, G., Den Hartog, D. N., & Sanders, K. (2006). Measuring trust inside organisations. Personnel Review, 35(5), 557–588. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480610682299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döös, M. (2007). Organizational learning. Competence-bearing relations and breakdowns of workplace relatonics. In L. Farell & T. Fenwick (Eds.), World year book of education 2007. Educating the global workforce. Knowledge, knowledge work and knowledge workers (pp. 141–153). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M. (2015). Together as one: Shared leadership between managers. International Journal of Business & Management, 10(8), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v10n8p46
   Google Scholar
• *Döös, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (2019). Att förändra organisatoriska förutsättningar: Erfarenheter av att införa funktionellt delat ledarskap i skola och förskola. Arbetsmarknad & arbetsliv, 25(2), 46–66. https://journals.lub.lu.se/aoa/article/view/20015/18046
   Google Scholar
• *Döös, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (2020). Changing organisational conditions: Experiences of introducing and putting function-shared leadership (FSL) into practice in schools and pre-schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 20(4), 672–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1734628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döös, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (2021). Fifty-five years of managerial shared leadership research: A review of an empirical field. Leadership, 17(6), 715–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211037809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döös, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (in press). Delat rektorskap: Om samarbete byggt på förtroende. In N. Rönnström & P. Skott (Eds.), Rektorers praktiska yrkeskunnande och vetenskapliga lärande (prel. title). Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• *Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., Madestam, J., & Örnberg, Å. (2017). Shared principalship: The perspective of close subordinate colleagues. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(4), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2017.1384503
   Google Scholar
• *Döös, M., Wilhelmson, J., Madestam, L., & Örnberg, Å. (2018a). The principle of singularity: A retrospective study of how and why the legislation process behind Sweden’s education act came to prohibit joint leadership for principals. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 2(2–3), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2757
   Google Scholar
• *Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., Madestam, J., & Örnberg, Å. (2018b). The shared principalship: Invitation at the top. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(3), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2017.1321785
   Google Scholar
• *Eckman, E. W. (2006). Co-principals: Characteristics of dual leadership teams. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760600549596
   Google Scholar
• *Eckman, E. W. (2007). The coprincipalship: It’s not lonely at the top. Journal of School Leadership, 17(3), 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460701700303
   Google Scholar
• *Eckman, E. W. (2018). A case study of the implementation of the co-principal leadership model. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1278243
   Google Scholar
• *Eckman, E. W., & Kelber, S. T. (2009). The co-principalship: An alternative to the traditional principalship. Planning and Changing Journal, 40(1/2), 86–102.
   Google Scholar
• *Eckman, E. W., & Kelber, S. T. (2010). Female traditional principals and co-principals: Experiences of role conflict and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Change, 11(3), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9116-z
   Google Scholar
• *Flessa, J. (2014). Learning from school leadership in Chile. Canadian and International Education, 43(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5206/cie-eci.v43i1.9237
   Google Scholar
• *Gronn, P. (1999). Substituting for leadership: The neglected role of the leadership couple. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)80008-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gronn, P., & Hamilton, A. (2004). “A bit more life in the leadership”: Co-principalship as distributed leadership practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1076/lpos.3.1.3.27842
   Google Scholar
• *Grubb, W. N., & Flessa, J. J. (2006). “A job too big for one”: Multiple principals and other nontraditional approaches to school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(4), 518–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X06290641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. V., Johnson, M., Saunders, C., & Thayer, A. L. (2019). Trust in virtual teams: A multidisciplinary review and integration. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v23i0.1757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244793
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasel, M. C., & Grover, S. L. (2017). An integrative model of trust and leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(6), 849–867. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2015-0293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heenan, D. A., & Bennis, W. (1999). Co-leaders. The power of great partnerships. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• *Hewitt, P. M., Denny, G. S., & Pijanowski, J. C. (2012). Teacher preferences for alternative school site administrative models. Administrative Issues Journal, 2(1), 74–82. https://dc.swosu.edu/aij/vol2/iss1/8
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, R. C., Levinson, D. J., & Zaleznik, A. (1965). The executive role constellation. An analysis of personality and role relations in management. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Holste, J. S., & Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ho, J., Shaari, I., & Kang, T. (2021). The distribution of leadership between vice-principals and principals in Singapore. International Journal of Leadership in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1849811
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S. G., & Muijs, D. (2010). School leadership effectiveness: The growing insight in the importance of school leadership for the quality and development of schools and their pupils. In S. G. Huber (Ed.), School leadership – international perspectives (Studies in Educational Leadership 10, pp. 57–77). Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• *Hughes, M., & James, C. (1999). The relationship between the head and the deputy head in primary schools. School Leadership & Management, 19(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632439969357
   Google Scholar
• Kosonen, P., & Ikonen, M. (2022). Trust building through discursive leadership: A communicative engagement perspective in higher education management. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(3), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1673903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1968). Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Ferdinand Enke Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust - a mechanism for the reduction of social complexity. (H. Davis, J. Raffan, & K. Rooney, Trans.). In T. Burns & G. Poggi (Eds.), Trust and power. Two works by Niklas Luhmann (pp. 1–103). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, R. B., Meyer, M. J., & Northfield, S. (2004). Trust and its role in principal succession: A preliminary examination of a continuum of trust. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(4), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760490901993
   Google Scholar
• *Madestam, J. (2017). En rektor när staten åter vill styra. Förändringar i skollagen som uttryck för metagovernance. Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift, 94(2), 37–58. https://www.djoef-forlag.dk/openaccess/nat/index.php
   Google Scholar
• *Marks, W. (2013). The transitional co-principalship model: A new way forward. Australian Educational Leader, 35(2), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.898541902934248
   Google Scholar
• *Masters, Y. (2013). Co-principalship: Are two heads better than one?. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 4(3), 1213–1221. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2013.0170
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/256727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.2307/259290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näslund, L. (2018). Förtroende och tillit – vad är det? Organisation & Samhälle-Svensk företagsekonomisk tidskrift, 2018(2), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Neumerski, C. (2012). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12456700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Notman, R. (2020). An evolution in distributed educational leadership: From sole leader to co-principalship. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 35(January), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.21307/jelpp-2020-005
   Google Scholar
• Öman, S. (2005). Juridiska aspekter på samledarskap - hinder och möjligheter för delat ledarskap. Arbetslivsinstitutet.
   Google Scholar
• *Örnberg, Å. (2016). Rättsliga förutsättningar att dela på rektorsuppgiften i grund- och gymnasieskola. Förvaltningsrättslig Tidskrift, 2016(1), 141–157.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). All those years ago. The historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership. Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 1–18). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. New Zealand Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger, S., Müller, B., & Güttel, W. H. (2020). Barriers to leadership development: Why is it so difficult to abandon the hero? Leadership, 16(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020935742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, K., Schoorman, F. D., & Ballinger, G. A. (2022). How can it be made right again? A review of trust repair research. Journal of Management, 49(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221089897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thomson, P., & Blackmore, J. (2006). Beyond the power of one: Redesigning the work of school principals. Journal of Educational Change, 7(3), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0003-6
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070004547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wadel, C. C. (2021). Samlederskap i barnehagen. Erfaringer med delt lederskap mellom likestilte pedagogiske ledere. Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 38(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-7989-2021-01-04
   Google Scholar
• West, E. L. (1978). The co-principalship: Administrative realism. The High School Journal, 61(5), 241–246. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40365795
   Google Scholar
• *Wilhelmson, L., & Döös, M. (2016). Joint principalship: A potential support for democratic practice in schools. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.31681
   Google Scholar
• *Wilhelmson, L., & Döös, M. (2017). Erfarenheter av delat ledarskap i den lokala skolan: Rektorers och arbetslagsledares röster. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 22(1–2), 101–123. https://open.lnu.se/index.php/PFS/article/view/1443/1287
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. A., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2022). The development and disruption of relationships between leaders and organizational members and the importance of trust. Leadership, 18(3), 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211056738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar