Towards a new epistemology of the urban?

References

• Ajl, M. 2014. “The Hypertrophic City Versus the Planet of Fields.” In Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, edited by N. Brenner, 533–550. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J., A. Cochrane, and D. Massey. 1998. Rethinking the Region. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alton, C. 2014. Down North: The Lower Athabasca Regional Counter-Plan. Master of Design Studies (MDes) Thesis in Urbanism, Landscape, Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Graduate School of Design, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Angel, S. 2011. Making Room for a Planet of Cities. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, H. and D. Wachsmuth. 2014. “Urbanizing Urban Political Ecology: A Critique of Methodological Cityism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arboleda, M. 2015. “Spaces of Extraction, Metropolitan Explosions: Planetary Urbanization and the Commodity Boom in Latin America.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2007. Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arrighi, G. 1994. The Long Twentieth Century. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. 2007. “Cities After Oil 1: ‘Sustainable Development’ and Energy Futures.” City 11 (2): 201–213. doi: 10.1080/13604810701422896
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. 2009. “Cities After Oil—One More Time.” City 13 (4): 493–498. doi: 10.1080/13604810903298706
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2013. The New Science of Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bayat, A., and E. Denis. 2000. “Who is Afraid of Ashwaiyyat?. Urban Change and Politics in Egypt.” Environment and Urbanization 12 (2): 185–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L., and G. West. 2010. “A Unified Theory of Urban Living.” Nature 467: 912–913. doi: 10.1038/467912a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. 1984. The Perspective of the World. Translated by Siân Reynolds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2004. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2009. “What is Critical Urban Theory?” City 13 (2–3): 195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2013. “Theses on Urbanization.” Public Culture 25 (1): 85–114. doi: 10.1215/08992363-1890477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., ed. 2014a. Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2014b. “Introduction: Urban Theory Without an Outside.” In Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, edited by N. Brenner, 14–35. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2011. “Planetary Urbanization.” In Urban Constellations, edited by M. Gandy, 10–13. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2014. “The ‘Urban Age’ in Question.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (3): 731–755. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and N. Katsikis. 2014. “Is the Mediterranean Urban?” In Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, edited by N. Brenner, 428–459. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., D. Madden, and D. Wachsmuth. 2011. “Assemblage Urbanism and the Challenges of Critical Urban Theory.” City 15 (2): 225–240. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2011.568717
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., J. Peck, and N. Theodore. 2010. “Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways.” Global Networks 10 (2): 182–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugmann, J. 2010. Welcome to the Urban Revolution. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T., and A. Maringanti. 2010. “Practicing Urban Research Beyond Metrocentricity.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34 (2): 415–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00988.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett, R., and D. Sudjic. 2006. The Endless City. London: Phaidon.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, E. (1925) 1967. “The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project.” In The City, edited by R. Park and E. Burgess, 47–62. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1972) 1977. The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catterall, B. 2014. “Towards the Great Transformation: (11) Where/what is Culture in ‘Planetary Urbanisation’?. Towards a New Paradigm.” City 18 (3): 368–379. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2014.892773
   Google Scholar
• Catterall, B., and M. Wilson. 2014. “Introducing and Resituating a Debate About ‘Planetary Urbanisation’.” CITY. virtual special issue, “Reclaim the city and the planet.” Accessed December 20, 2014. http://www.city-analysis.net/2014/08/18/introducing-and-resituating-a-debate-about-planetary-urbanisation/
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35: 197–222. doi: 10.1086/596640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibber, V. 2013. Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cloke, P. 2006. “Conceptualizing Rurality.” In Handbook of Rural Studiesm, edited by P. Cloke, T. Marsden and P. Mooney, 18–28. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. 1991. Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J. 2002. “Geology of Mankind: The Anthropocene.” Nature 415: 23. doi: 10.1038/415023a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. 2006. Planet of Slums. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Diener, R., J. Herzog, M. Meili, P. de Meuron, and C. Schmid. 2006. Switzerland: An Urban Portrait, 1–4. Zürich: ETH Studio Basel, Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Elmqvist, T. 2014. “Why We Need an Urban Sustainable Development Goal.” blog entry at http://www.thenatureofcities.com/2014/03/02/why-we-need-an-urban-sustainable-development-goal/, accessed 9 January 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. 2014. “Resilience and Justice.” Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute Working Paper 2, http://www.sustainable.unimelb.edu.au/content/pages/mssi-research-paper-susan-s-fainstein-resilience-and-justice, accessed on 9 January 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. 2006. “City as Truth-Spot: Laboratories and Field-Sites in Urban Studies.” Social Studies of Science 36 (1): 5–38. doi: 10.1177/0306312705054526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girardet, H. 2004. Cities, People, Planet. New York: Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. 2011. Triumph of the City. New York: Tantor.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. 2014. The Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. 1978. “Capitalist Development and the History of American Cities.” In Marxism and the Metropolis, edited by W. Tabb and L. Sawyers, 25–63. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, A. 2013. Against the Smart City. E-book: amazon digital services.
   Google Scholar
• Gugger, H., N. Couling, and A. Blanchard. 2012. Barents Lessons. Lausanne: EPFL/Park Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. D., and E. L. Ullman. 1945. “The Nature of Cities.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 242: 7–17. doi: 10.1177/000271624524200103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, R., H. Hitz, C. Schmid, and R. Wolff. 1986. Theorien zur Stadtentwicklung. Oldenburg: Geographische Hochschulmanuskripte 12.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1985. “The Geopolitics of Capitalism.” In Social Relations and Spatial Structures, edited by D. Gregory and J. Urry, 128–163. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1989. The Urban Experience. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2010. The Enigma of Capital. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2012. Rebel Cities. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, C., ed. 2011. Port Cities: Dynamic Landscapes and Global Networks. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. 2013. “Cities and Flows: Re-Asserting a Relationship as Fundamental as it is Delicate.” Journal of Transport Geography 29: 33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., and S. Marvin. 2010. “Urbanism in the Anthropocene: Ecological Urbanism or Premium Ecological Enclaves.” City 14 (3): 298–313. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2010.482277
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. (1968) 1972. Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Continuum, 188–243.
   Google Scholar
• INURA. 1998. Possible Urban Worlds: Urban Strategies at the End of the 20th Century. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1970. The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. W. 1997. “The Thoroughgoing Urbanization of East and Southeast Asia.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 38 (3): 237–249. doi: 10.1111/1467-8373.00045
   Google Scholar
• Katsikis, N. 2015. From Hinterland to Hinterworld: Territorial Organization Beyond Agglomeration. Doctoral Dissertation, Doctor in Design Studies Program, Graduate School of Design, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Katznelson, I. 1992. Marxism and the City. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kipfer, S., and K. Goonewardena. 2013. “Urban Marxism and the Post-colonial Question: Henri Lefebvre and ‘Colonisation’.” Historical Materialism 21 (2): 76–116. doi: 10.1163/1569206X-12341297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krätke, S. 2014. “Cities in Contemporary Capitalism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (5): 1660–1677. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1974) 1991. The Production of Space. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1968) 1996. “The Right to the City.” In Writings on Cities by Henri Lefebvre, edited by E. Kofman and E. Lebas, 63–182. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1970) 2003. The Urban Revolution. Translated by R. Bonnono. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2009. State, Space, World: Selected Essays. edited by N. Brenner and S. Elden, Translated by G. Moore, N. Brenner and S. Elden. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, T. 2003. “Global Cities Versus ‘Global Cities’: Rethinking Contemporary Urbanism as Public Ecology.” Studies in Political Economy 70: 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mabin, A. 2014. “Grounding Southern Theory in Time and Place.” In The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South, edited by S. Parnell and S. Oldfield, 21–36. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, A., and A. Hornborg. 2014. “The Geology of Mankind? A Critique of the Anthropocene Narrative.” The Anthropocene Review 1 (1): 62–69. doi: 10.1177/2053019613516291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. 2012. “Whose Right to What City?” In Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, edited by N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, and M. Mayer, 24–41. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. 2012. “The ‘Right to the City’ in Urban Social Movements.” In Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, edited by N. Brenner, M. Mayer and P. Marcuse, 63–85. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, T. G. (1991) 2014. “The Emergence of Desakota Regions in Southeast Asia: Expanding a Hypothesis.” In Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, edited by N. Brenner, 121–139. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2013. “Land Grabbing as Security Mercantilism in International Relations.” Globalizations 10 (1): 47–64. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.760925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrifield, A. 2013. The Politics of the Encounter: Urban Theory and Protest Under Planetary Urbanization. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merrifield, A. 2014. The New Urban Question. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, W. 2013. The Environmental Advantages of Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monte-Mór, R. L. M. 2014a. “What is the Urban in the Contemporary World?” In Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, edited by N. Brenner, 260–267. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Monte-Mór, R. L. M. 2014b. “Extended Urbanization and Settlement Patterns: An Environmental Approach.” In Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, edited by N. Brenner, 109–120. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. 2008. “Ecological Crises and the Agrarian Question in World-Historical Perspective.” Monthly Review 60 (6): 54–63. doi: 10.14452/MR-060-06-2008-10_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. 2011. “Transcending the Metabolic Rift: A Theory of Crises in the Capitalist World-Ecology.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1): 1–46. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafavi, M., and G. Doherty, eds. 2011. Ecological Urbanism. Zürich: Lars Müller.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. E., and J. P. Rodrigue. 2005. “Port Regionalization: Towards a New Phase in Port Development.” Maritime Policy & Management 32 (3): 297–313. doi: 10.1080/03088830500139885
   Google Scholar
• Parnell, S., and Oldfield, eds. 2014. The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parnell, S., and J. Robinson. 2012. “(Re)theorizing Cities from the Global South: Looking Beyond Neoliberalism.” Urban Geography 33 (4): 593–617. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.33.4.593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2015a. “Uneven Regional Development.” In The International Encyclopedia of Geography, edited by D. Richardson, in press. Cambridge: Wiley-AAG.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2015b. “Cities Beyond Compare?” Regional Studies 49 (1): 160–182. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.980801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and N. Theodore. 2015. Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postone, M. 1993. Time, Labor and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Karl Marx's Critical Social Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prigge, W. 2008. “Reading the Urban Revolution: Space and Representation.” In Space, Difference, Everyday Life: Reading Henri Lefebvre, edited by K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom and C. Schmid, 46–61. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, W., and M. Wackernagel. 1996. “Urban Ecological Footprints: Why Cities Cannot be Sustainable—And Why they are a Key to Sustainability.” Environmental Impact Asssessment Review 16: 223–248. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00022-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2006. Ordinary Cities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2011. “Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (1): 1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2014. “New Geographies of Theorizing the Urban: Putting Comparison to Work for Global Urban Studies.” In The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South, edited by S. Parnell and S. Oldfield, 57–70. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2005. “Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (2): 147–158. doi: 10.1080/01944360508976689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2009. “The 21st Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory.” Regional Studies 43 (6): 819–830. doi: 10.1080/00343400701809665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2011. “Slumdog Cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (2): 223–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2014. “Worlding the South: Towards a Post-Colonial Urban Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South, edited by S. Parnell and S. Oldfield, 9–20. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A., and A. Ong, eds. 2012. Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, D., ed. 2004. The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Cities. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, D. 2010. “Urban Myths and the Mis-Use of Data That Underpin Them.” In Urbanization and Development, edited by J. Beall, B. Guha-Khasnobis and R. Kanbur, 83–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, P. 1986. Social Theory and the Urban Question. 2nd ed. New York: Holmes & Meier.
   Google Scholar
• Schaub, C., and K. dir Musale. 2014. Millons Can Walk. Documentary film. Zürich: RECK Filmproduction. http://schaubfilm.ch/en/filmography/dokumentarfilme/millions-can-walk/synopsis/
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, C. 2003. “Raum und Regulation. Henri Lefebvre und der Regulationsansatz.” In Fit für den Postfordismus?. Theoretisch-politische Perspektiven des Regulationsansatzes, edited by U. Brand and W. Raza, 217–242. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, C. 2005. Stadt, Raum und Gesellschaft: Henri Lefebvre und die Theorie der Produktion des Raumes. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, C. 2006. “Theory.” In Switzerland: an urban portrait, edited by R. Diener, J. Herzog, M. Meili, P. de Meuron and C. Schmid, 163–224. Vol. 1. Zürich: ETH Studio Basel/Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, C. 2008. “Henri Lefebvre's Theory of the Production of Space: Towards a Three-Dimensional Dialectic.” In Space, Difference, Everyday Life: Reading Henri Lefebvre, edited by K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom and C. Schmid, 27–45. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, C. 2012. “Henri Lefebvre, the Right to the City and the New Metropolitan Mainstream.” In Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, edited by N. Brenner, P. Marcuse and M. Mayer, 42–62. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, C. 2013. “Afterword: Urbanization as an Open Process.” In Torre David – Informal Vertical Communities, edited by Urban Think Tank, 384–387. Zürich: Lars Müller.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, C. (2012) 2014. “Patterns and Pathways of Global Urbanization: Towards Comparative Analysis.” In Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, edited by N. Brenner, 203–217. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, C. 2015a. “Specificity and Urbanization—A Theoretical Outlook.” In The Inevitable Specificity of Cities, edited by ETH Studio Basel, 287–307. Zürich: Lars Müller.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, C. 2015b. “The Trouble with Henri: Urban Research and the Theory of the Production of Space.” In Urban Revolution Now: Henri Lefebvre in Social Research and Architecture, edited by Ł. Stanek, C. Schmid and Á. Moravánszky, 27–48. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, C., Ł. Stanek, and A. Moravánszky. 2015. “Theory, not Method – Thinking with Lefebvre.” In Urban Revolution Now: Henri Lefebvre in Social Research and Architecture, edited by Ł. Stanek, C. Schmid and Á. Moravánszky, 1–24. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. 1988. New Industrial Spaces. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J., and M. Storper. 2014. “The Nature of Cities: The Limits and Scope of Urban Theory.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seekings, J. 2013. “Urban Theory: The Dream and its limits. Plenary lecture.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, annual conference of Research Committee 21 (RC21) of the International Sociological Association, Berlin, August.
   Google Scholar
• Sevilla-Buitrago, A. 2014. “Urbs in Rure: Historical Enclosure and Extended Urbanization in the Countryside.” In Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, edited by N. Brenner, 236–259. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. 2009. “The Spaces and Times of Globalization: Place, Scale, Networks and Positionality.” Economic Geography 78 (3): 307–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2002.tb00189.x
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E., H. Leitner, and A. Maringanti. 2013. “Provincializing Global Urbanism: A Manifesto.” Urban Geography 34 (7): 893–900. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2013.807977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone, A. M. 2009. City life from Jakarta to Dakar. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, T. 2014. “The Resilience of Neoliberal Urbanism.” Open Democracy, Accessed January 9, 2015. https://www.opendemocracy.net/opensecurity/tom-slater/resilience-of-neoliberal-urbanism
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. 2000. Postmetropolis. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E., and J. Kanai. (2006) 2014. “The Urbanization of the World.” In Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, edited by N. Brenner, 142–159. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. 1996. The Regional World. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., and R. Walker. 1989. The Capitalist Imperative: Territory, Technology and Industrial Growth. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sudjic, D. 1993. The 100-mile City. London: Mariner Books.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J., and R. E. Lang. 2004. “The Shock of the New: 100 Concepts Describing Recent Urban Change.” Environment and Planning A 36: 951–958. doi: 10.1068/a375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E., T. Bunnell, and D. Parthasarathy, eds. 2013. Cleavage, Connection and Conflict in Rural, Urban and Contemporary Asia. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Topalovic, M., M. Knüsel, and M. Jäggi. 2013. Architecture of Territory: Singapore, Johor, Riau. Zürich/Singapore: ETH Future Cities Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. 2013. Smart Cities. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlement Programme). (2007). The State of the World's Cities Report 2006/2007. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Theory Lab. 2015. Extreme Territories of Urbanization. Research report. Cambridge, MA: Urban Theory Lab, Graduate School of Design, Harvard University (urbantheorylab.net).
   Google Scholar
• Veltz, P. 1996. Mondialisation, villes et territoires: L’économie d'archipel. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Wachsmuth, D. 2014. “City as Ideology: Reconciling the Explosion of the City Form with the Tenacity of the City Concept.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (1): 75–90. doi: 10.1068/d21911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. 2014. “Plan Puebla Panama: The Violence of Abstract Space.” In Urban Revolution Now: Henri Lefebvre in Social Research and Architecture, edited by Ł. Stanek, C. Schmid and Á. Moravánszky, 113–130. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfrum, S., W. Nerdinger, and S. Schaubeck, eds. 2008. Multiple City: Urban Concepts, 1908–2008. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M. 2009. “Rural Geography: Blurring Boundaries and Making Connections.” Progress in Human Geography 33 (6): 849–858. doi: 10.1177/0309132508105001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar