The intelligent woman's guide to the urban question

References

• Arendt, H. [1958] 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2000. “The Urban Question as a Scale Question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of scale.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (2): 361–378. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2011. “The Urbanization Question, or, the Field Formerly Known as Urban Studies.” Inaugural lecture at Harvard, November.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2012. “Planetary Urbanization.” In Urban Constellations, edited by Matthew Gandy, 10–13. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2013. “The ‘Urban Age’ in Question.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2015. “Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban?” City 19 (2–3): 151–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2005. “Neoliberalism and the Urban Condition.” City 9 (1): 101–107. doi: 10.1080/13604810500092106
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, J., and R. Pekin. 2015. “Food Connect(s).” In Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene, 71–76. Brooklyn: Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. [1972] 1977. The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Catterall, B., and M. Wilson. 2014. “Introducing and Resituating a Debate About ‘Planetary Urbanisation.” City virtual special issue. Accessed August 2015. http://www.city-analysis.net/2014/08/18/introducing-and-resituating-a-debate-aboutplanetary-urbanisation/.
   Google Scholar
• Choike. 2004. “World Charter of Rights to the City.” Accessed October 2004. www.choike.org.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, M., and K. Iveson. 2015. “Beyond City Limits.” City 19 (5): 646–664. doi:10.1080/13604813.2015.1078603.
   Google Scholar
• De Tocqueville, A. 1971. Recollections. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsche, R. 1990. “Uneven Development: Public Art in New York City.” In Out There: Marginalization and Contemporary Cultures, edited by R. Ferguson, M. Gever, T. T. Minh-ha, and C. West, 107–132. New York: New Museum of Contemporary Art.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F. 1872. “ The Housing Question.” Accessed April 2012. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/housing-question/.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F. 1887. “The Housing Question, Preface to the Second German Edition.” Accessed April 2012. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/housing-question/preface.htm.
   Google Scholar
• European Social Forum. 2004. Accessed December 2004. http://www.fse-esf.org/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., and K. Iveson. 2008. Planning and Diversity in the City, Redistribution, Recognition and Encounter. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fogelsong, R. 1986. Planning the Capitalist City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K., D. B. Rose, and R. Fincher. 2015. Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene. Brooklyn: Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 1993. “Waiting for the Revolution, or How to Smash Capitalism While Working at Home in Your Spare Time.” Rethinking Marxism 6 (2): 10–24. doi: 10.1080/08935699308658052
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K., and E. Miller. 2015. “Economy as Ecological Livelihood.” In Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene. Brooklyn: Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. 2010. Lifeboat Cities. Sydney: UNSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. 2014. The Urban Condition. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1973. Social Justice and the City. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2000. Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, S. 2012. “The Return of the Housing Question.” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 12 (4): 423–444.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1985. Nicos Poulantzas: Marxist Theory and Political Strategy. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kipfer, S., and C. Schmid. 2004. “Right to the City / Bourgeois Urbanism.” Unpublished paper prepared for an INURA research workshop, Toronto, March 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Knabb, K., ed. and trans. 1981. Situationist International Anthology. Berkeley, CA: Bureau of Public Secrets.
   Google Scholar
• Kofman, E., and E. Lebas. 1996. “Lost in Transposition—Time, Space and the City.” In Writings on Cities, edited by H. Lefebvre, 3–60. UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kotanyi, A., and R. Vaneigem. 1961. “Programme élémentaire du bureau d'urbanisme unitaire.” Internationale Situationniste, no. 6 (August): 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1967. Position contre les technocrates. Paris: Gonthier.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1975. Les Temps des mépris. Paris: Stock. Interview with Lefebvre.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. [1973] 1976. The Survival of Capitalism. Translated by F. Bryant. London. Allison and Busby.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith, with an Afterword by David Harvey. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1996. Writings on Cities. Translated and edited by Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2003. The Urban Revolution. Translated and edited by Robert Bononno with a Foreword by Neil Smith. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. 1989. Lipstick Traces: A Secret History of the Twentieth Century. London: Martin Secker and Warburg Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1871. “The Civil War in France, March-May 1871.” Marx/Engels Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1871/civil-war-france/.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2013. “On Space, in conversation with Nigel Warburton.” Social Science Bites. http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2013/02/podcastdoreen-massey-on-space/.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, F. 2015. “Strategia: Thinking with or Accommodating the World.” In Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene, 37–42. Brooklyn: Punctum books.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. 2013. “First World Urban Activism.” City 17 (1): 5–19. doi:10.1080/13604813.2013.757417.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, S. M. 2015. “The Politics of Urban Knowledge.” City 19 (6): this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Merrifield, A. 2014. The New Urban Question. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 2003. The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinder, D. 2013. “Reconstituting the Possible: Lefebvre, Utopia and the Urban Question.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L., and J. Barry. 2015. “Bounded Recognition: Urban Planning and the Textual Mediation of Indigenous Rights in Canada and Australia.” Critical Policy Studies 9: 22–40.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2002. “Excavating Lefebvre: The Right to the City and its Urban Politics of the Inhabitant.” Geojournal 58: 99–108. doi:10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2011. “Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, S., C. Barnett, and A. Cochrane. 2014. “Where is Urban Politics?” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (5): 1551–1560. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelvink, G. 2015. “Learning to be Affected by Earth Others.” In Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene, 57–62. Brooklyn: Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2012. “Slumdog Cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism.” In Informalise! Essays on the Political Economy of Urban Form, edited by M. Angelil and R. Hehl, vol. 1, 107–142. ETH Zurich: Ruby Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, S. 1998. The Situationist City. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 1998. Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 2010. “Finding Our Way.” Documentary film with Giovanni Attili, 90 mins. Distributed by Moving Images.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 2011. “The Global Street: Making the Political.” Globalizations 8 (5): 573–579. doi:10.1080/14747731.2011.622458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, C. 1998. “The City as a Contested Terrain.” In Possible Urban Worlds: Urban Strategies at the End of the 20th Century, edited by INURA. Zurich: Birkhauser Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, G. B. 1949. The Intelligent Woman's Guide to Socialism, Capitalism, Sovietism and Fascism. London: Constable and Company Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. forthcoming 2015. “Planetary Urbanisation: What does it Matter for Politics or Practice?” Planning Theory and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, T. 2012. “Impacted Geographers: A Response to Pain, Kesby and Askins.” Area 44 (1): 117–119. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01067.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, T. 2013. “Expulsions from Public Housing: The Hidden Context of Concentrated Affluence.” Cities 35: 384–390. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2002. “New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy.” Antipode 34: 427–450. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F. 2012. “Informality and its Discontents.” In Informalise! Essays on the political economy of urban form, edited by M. Angelil and R. Hehl, vol. 1, 55–70. ETH Zurich: Ruby Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, T. 2015. “Vulture Stories: Narrative and Conservation.” In Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene, 51–56. Brooklyn: Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. 2015. “Building a Better Theory of the Urban: A Response to ‘Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban?’.” City 19 (2–3): 183–191. doi:10.1080/13604813.2015.1024073.
   Google Scholar