Publication Cover
City
Analysis of Urban Change, Theory, Action
Volume 23, 2019 - Issue 6
1,808
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Racialised postsocialist governance in Romania’s urban margins

Housing and local policymaking in Ferentari, Bucharest

References

  • Amann, Wolfgand, Ioan Bejan, and Alexis Mundt. 2013. “The National Housing Agency–A Key Stakeholder in Housing Policy.” In Social Housing in Transition Countries, edited by József Hegedüs, Nora Teller, and Martin Lux, 210–223. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Arpagian, Jasmine, and Stuart C. Aitken. 2018. “Without Space: The Politics of Precarity and Dispossession in Postsocialist Bucharest.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2): 445–453. doi:10.1080/24694452.2017.1368986.
  • Attoh, Kafui A. 2011. “What Kind of Right is the Right to the City?” Progress in Human Geography 35 (5): 669–685. doi:10.1177/0309132510394706.
  • Berescu, Cătălin, Mina Petrović, and Nora Teller. 2013. “Housing Exclusion of the Roma. Living on the Edge.” In Social Housing in Transition Countries, edited by József Hegedüs, Nora Teller, and Martin Lux, 98–116. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Calciu, Daniela. 2016. “Memories and the City, Heritage and Urbanity.” In Space and Time Visualisation, edited by Maria Boştenaru-Dan, and Cerasella Crăciun, 113–124. Cham: Springer.
  • Chelcea, Liviu, and Ioana Iancu. 2015. “An Anthropology of Parking: Infrastructures of Automobility, Work, and Circulation.” Anthropology of Work Review 36 (2): 62–73. doi:10.1111/awr.12068.
  • Chelcea, Liviu, Raluca Popescu, and Darie Cristea. 2015. “Who are the Gentrifiers and How Do They Change Central City Neighbourhoods? Privatization, Commodification, and Gentrification in Bucharest.” Geografie 120 (2): 113–133.
  • Chelcea, Liviu, and Gergő Pulay. 2015. “Networked Infrastructures and the ‘Local’: Flows and Connectivity in a Postsocialist City.” City 19 (2-3): 344–355. doi:10.1080/13604813.2015.1019231.
  • Clapp, Alexander. 2017. “Romania Redivivus.” New Left Review 108: 5–41.
  • Creţan, Remus, and Ryan Powell. 2018. “The Power of Group Stigmatization: Wealthy Roma, Urban Space and Strategies of Defence in Post-socialist Romania.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42 (3): 423–441. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12626.
  • Csepeli, György, and Dávid Simon. 2004. “Construction of Roma Identity in Eastern and Central Europe: Perception and Self-identification.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30 (1): 129–150. doi:10.1080/1369183032000170204.
  • Dobre, Ana M. 2010. “Romania: From Historical Regions to Local Decentralization via the Unitary State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe. https://search.crossref.org/?q=10.1093%2Foxfordhb%2F9780199562978.003.0030#.
  • Geddes, Mike. 2005. “Neoliberalism and Local Governance–Cross-National Perspectives and Speculations.” Policy Studies 26 (3-4): 359–377. doi:10.1080/01442870500198429.
  • Ghiţă, Alexandru F., Ciprian Ciucu, Alexandru Damian, Alexandra Toderiţă, Roxana Albişteanu, and Popescu. Ruxandra. 2016. Policy Paper Nr. 1 / Ianuarie 2016: Locuirea socială în Bucureşti. Între lege şi realitate. Accessed December 10, 2018 www.cdut.ro.
  • Goodwin, Mark, and Joe Painter. 1996. “Local Governance, the Crises of Fordism and the Changing Geographies of Regulation.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 21 (4): 635–648. doi:10.2307/622391.
  • INS (National Institute of Statistics). 2016. Dimensiuni ale incluziunii sociale în România. Bucharest: Institutul Naţional de Statistică. Accessed August 10, 2017. http://www.insse.ro/cms/sites/default/files/field/publicatii/dimensiuni_ale_incluziunii_sociale_in_romania_1.pdf.
  • Ion, Elena. 2014. “Public Funding and Urban Governance in Contemporary Romania: The Resurgence of State-led Urban Development in an Era of Crisis.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 7 (1): 171–187. doi:10.1093/cjres/rst036.
  • Jessop, Bob. 1999. “The Changing Governance of Welfare: Recent Trends in its Primary Functions, Scale, and Modes of Coordination.” Social Policy and Administration 33 (4): 348–359. doi:10.1111/1467-9515.00157.
  • Jessop, Bob. 2005. “The Political Economy of Scale and European Governance.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 96 (2): 225–230. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00453.x.
  • Jessop, Bob, Neill Brenner, and Martin Jones. 2008. “Theorizing Sociospatial Relations.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26 (3): 389–401. doi:10.1068/d9107.
  • Kóczé, Angéla. 2018. “Race, Migration and Neoliberalism: Distorted Notions of Romani Migration in European Public Discourses.” Social Identities 24 (4): 459–473. doi:10.1080/13504630.2017.1335827.
  • Lancione, Michele. 2017. “Revitalising the Uncanny: Challenging Inertia in the Struggle Against Forced Evictions.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (6): 1012–1032. doi:10.1177/0263775817701731.
  • Lancione, Michele. 2019. “The Politics of Embodied Urban Precarity: Roma People and the Fight for Housing in Bucharest, Romania.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 101: 182–191. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.008.
  • Light, Daniel, and Craig Young. 2015. “Public Space and the Material Legacies of Communism in Bucharest.” In Post-Communist Romania at 25, edited by Lavinia Stan, and Diane Vancea, 41–62. Lanham: Lexington.
  • Marcińczak, Szymon, Michael Gentile, Samuel Rufat, and Liviu Chelcea. 2014. “Urban Geographies of Hesitant Transition: Tracing Socioeconomic Segregation in Post-Ceauşescu Bucharest.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (4): 1399–1417. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12073.
  • Marin, Vera, and Liviu Chelcea. 2018. “The Many (Still) Functional Housing Estates of Bucharest, Romania: A Viable Housing Provider in Europe’s Densest Capital City.” In Housing Estates in Europe, edited by Daniel Baldwin Hess, Tiit Tammaru, and Maarten van Ham, 167–190. Cham: Springer.
  • Nae, Mariana, and David Turnock. 2011. “The New Bucharest: Two Decades of Restructuring.” Cities 28 (2): 206–219. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2010.04.004.
  • O’Neill, Bruce. 2010. “Down and Then Out in Bucharest: Urban Poverty, Governance, and the Politics of Place in the Postsocialist City.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (2): 254–269. doi:10.1068/d15408.
  • O’Neill, Bruce. 2014. “Cast Aside: Boredom, Downward Mobility, and Homelessness in Post-Communist Bucharest.” Cultural Anthropology 29 (1): 8–31. doi:10.14506/ca29.1.03.
  • O’Neill, Bruce. 2017. “The Ethnographic Negative: Capturing the Impress of Boredom and Inactivity.” Focaal 78: 23–37. doi:10.3167/fcl.2017.780103.
  • PMB (Primăria Municipiului Bucureşti). 2011. Conceptul Strategic Bucureşti. Bucharest: PMB.
  • Powell, Ryan, and John Lever. 2017. “Europe’s Perennial ‘Outsiders’: A Processual Approach to Roma Stigmatization and Ghettoization.” Current Sociology 65 (5): 680–699. doi:10.1177/0011392115594213.
  • Profiroiu, Constantin M., Alina G. Profiroiu, and Septimu R. Szabo. 2017. “The Decentralization Process in Romania.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Decentralisation in Europe, edited by José Ruano, and Marius Profiroiu, 353–387. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Pulay, Gergő. 2015. “The Street Economy in a Poor Neighbourhood of Bucharest.” Gypsy Economy: Romani Livelihoods and Notions of Worth in the 21st Century 3: 127–144.
  • Purcell, Mark. 2002. “Excavating Lefebvre: The Right to the City and its Urban Politics of the Inhabitant.” GeoJournal 58 (2-3): 99–108. doi:10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f.
  • Purcell, Mark. 2006. “Urban Democracy and the Local Trap.” Urban Studies 43 (11): 1921–1941. doi:10.1080/00420980600897826.
  • Purcell, Mark. 2013. “The Right to the City: the Struggle for Democracy in the Urban Public Realm.” Policy and Politics 41 (3): 311–327. doi:10.1332/030557312X655639.
  • Rughiniş, Cosima. 2010. “The Forest Behind the Bar Charts: Bridging Quantitative and Qualitative Research on Roma/Ţigani in Contemporary Romania.” Patterns of Prejudice 44 (4): 337–367. doi:10.1080/0031322X.2010.510716.
  • Sector 5. 2017. Regenerare Urbană Ferentari. Bucharest: Sector 5. Accessed August 10, 2017. http://www.sector5.ro/media/2763/ruf-cld.pdf.
  • Şoaită, Adriana M. 2017. “The Changing Nature of Outright Home Ownership in Romania: Housing Wealth and Housing Inequality.” In Housing Wealth and Welfare, edited by Caroline Dewilde, and Richard Ronald, 236–257. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • StudioBASAR. 2010. Evicting the Ghost: Architecture of Survival. Bucharest: Centrul de Introspecţie Vizuală.
  • Surubaru, Neculai-Cristian. 2017. “Administrative Capacity or Quality of Political Governance? EU Cohesion Policy in the New Europe, 2007–13.” Regional Studies 51 (6): 844–856. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1246798.
  • Teodorescu, Dominic. 2018. “The Modern Mahala: Making and Living in Romania’s Postsocialist Slum.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 59 (3-4): 436–461. doi:10.1080/15387216.2019.1574433.
  • Teodorescu, Dominic. 2019. “Dwelling on Substandard Housing: A Multi-site Contextualisation of Housing Deprivation among Romanian Roma.” PhD diss., Uppsala University.
  • Tosics, Ivan. 2016. “Integrated Territorial Investment: a Missed Opportunity?” In EU Cohesion Policy, edited by John Bachtler, Peter Berkowitz, Sally Hardy, and Tatjana Muravska, 284–296. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • van Baar, Huub. 2011. “Europe’s Romaphobia: Problematization, Securitization, Nomadization.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (2): 203–212. doi:10.1068/d2902ed1.
  • van Baar, Huub. 2018. “Contained Mobility and the Racialization of Poverty in Europe: The Roma at the Development–Security Nexus.” Social Identities 24 (4): 442–458. doi:10.1080/13504630.2017.1335826.
  • Vermeersch, Peter. 2011. “Europeanisering en de Roma: op zoek naar maatschappelijke inclusie in een nieuwe politieke en institutionele contekst.” Tijdschrift voor Sociologie 3 (4): 414–436.
  • Vermeersch, Peter. 2012. “Reframing the Roma: EU Initiatives and the Politics of Reinterpretation.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38 (8): 1195–1212. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2012.689175.
  • Vermeersch, Peter. 2017. “How Does the EU Matter for the Roma? Transnational Roma Activism and EU Social Policy Formation.” Problems of Post-Communism 64 (5): 219–227. doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1268925.
  • Vincze, Eniko. 2018. “Ghettoization: The Production of Marginal Spaces of Housing and the Reproduction of Racialized Labour.” In Racialized Labour in Romania: Spaces of Marginality at the Periphery of Global Capitalism, edited by Eniko Vincze, Norbert Petrovici, Cristina Raţ, and Giovanni Picker, 63–96. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Vincze, Eniko, and Cristina Rat. 2013. “Spatialization and Racialization of Social Exclusion. the Social and Cultural Formation of ‘Gypsy Ghettos’ in Romania in a European Context.” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai 58 (2): 5–21. doi: 10.5038/1937-8602.58.2.1
  • Vincze, Eniko, and George I. Zamfir. 2019. “Racialized Housing Unevenness in Cluj-Napoca Under Capitalist Redevelopment.” City 23 (4–5): 439–460. doi:10.1080/13604813.2019.1684078.
  • Zamfirescu, Irina M. 2015. “Housing Eviction, Displacement and the Missing Social Housing of Bucharest.” Calitatea vieţii 26 (2): 140–154.